Edited by mjr, 08 May 2012 - 06:37 AM.
Rebuild mode with the 1.04 pick
Posted 08 May 2012 - 06:27 AM
Posted 08 May 2012 - 10:30 AM
12 team dynasty PPR, start 1 QB 2-3 RB 3-4 WR 1-2 TE 1K 1D/ST
Doug Martin, Trent Richardson, Dunbar, Helu, CJ Anderson, Stephan Taylor
Marshall, Fitz, Cobb, Mike Evans, Josh Gordon, Nicks, Kenny Stills
Graham, Dwayne Allen
Posted 08 May 2012 - 12:18 PM
Posted 09 May 2012 - 03:27 PM
Based on scoring and lineup requirements, WRs appear to be very valuable, and your WRs are crap. I'd go for Thomas or Blackmon with 1.04.
QB: Roetlisberger, Bradford, Bortles, S. Hill
RB: LeVeon, D. Robinson, CJ2K, MJD, J. Rodgers, L. James, Rice, Ridley, Andre Williams, Seastrunk, De'Anthony Thomas, Rajion Neal
WR: J. Gordon, Julio, Andre Johnson, Golden Tate, Britt, A. Robinson, Jennings, Hartline, M. Austin, J. Blackmon
TE: Julius Thomas, Jordan Cameron, Coby Fleener
Posted 09 May 2012 - 03:54 PM
Edited by squistion, 09 May 2012 - 03:54 PM.
QUOTE (Marvin @ Apr 25, 2012 12:45 AM)
squistion is going to come in here and start reporting people. Then you'll really be sorry.
QUOTE (JerseyToughGuys @ Apr 20, 2012 03:45 PM)
No one expects the spanish squistion!~@@
Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:23 AM
Edited by mjr, 10 May 2012 - 09:30 AM.
Posted 10 May 2012 - 01:24 PM
Kickbacks 3: 5-2
Ashes of 27: 4-3
Fantasy Champs: 3-4
Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:10 AM
I think that ranking may have more to do with Thomas' knee and Manning's neck than Blackmon/Thomas' playing situations, though I certainly could be wrong. I don't question that Blackmon is the better WR either, but he's already sitting out because of a foot issue (albeit minor) and Gabbert only threw for 2200 yds and 12 TDs all last season. I understand Gabbert didnt have the tools and that Blackmon and Robinson are there to improve all of that, but Gabbert would have to better than double his numbers to give Blackmon the stats worth the 4th overall pick to me. Even if I though Gabbert will improve, I don't think it'll be by enough to make that happen. I certainly could be dead wrong, but Im willing to take my chances. Anyway... The guy drafting 1st has Freeman at QB and pretty much only Danial Thomas at RB, so my guess is he most likely goes Richardson. Long shot he goes Luck. No way he goes WR. Team 2 has Eli/Locker at QB, Julio and J.Nelson at WR and only Blount worth mentioning at RB. Richardson will go here if team 1 goes Luck, but otherwise I think Martin could be drafted here. There's a shot he goes BPA and can't resist passing on Luck, but RB is his greatest need. Going WR is least likely scenario. Team 3 has Schuab/Romo/A.Smith at QB, Gore/Hunter and S.Jackson at RB and guys like Austin, Holmes, Maclin, J.Baldwin and Meachem at WR. This one is throwing me off. I don't know how he's going to draft. He might be easy to pusuade swapping picks with, so Im going to give that a shot. Otherwise Im thinking RG3 may be the guy.
Just wondering why Thomas outweighs Blackmon in your thinking. FBG consensus dynasty ranking have Blackmon at 17 with a horrid QB, and have Thomas at 24 with Manning at QB - I'd be asking myself why do they feel that way. Personally, I don't see how you pass on Luck this year - and if neither QB is availabe at 1.04 it means that Martin is and I'd draft him in spite of greater need elsewhere
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:56 PM
Definitely going QB if Luck or RG3 are there. I've decided that much.
...I think you are just a player or so away from being decent in a 12 team league. Long term I would go QB, with the pick.
Please see mine
If Manning can be at least better than Fitzpatrick, Donald Brown puts up respectable RB2 numbers, Olsen can get back to playing more than blocking and Boldin can hang on for another year or two, I think I can get this team to .500 or a little better this season. A lot of "ifs" though. Team only had 1 win before I took it. Got 5 wins last year with with Lynch, Johnson, Manning and Olsen being added only a couple of weeks before the playoffs. Crossing my fingers...
Responded to your thread.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users