What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

My Projections - Things I Discovered (1 Viewer)

Instinctive

Footballguy
As with RB/WR, these are things I discovered with my projections that I didn't necessarily expect. When I go in, I know that I'm high on a guy, or I "think Matt Ryan is undervalued." But sometimes I find actually working out numbers in context and such without bias leads me to conclusions I had not thought of, like perhaps I like Matt Ryan, but the guy I really like is Tony Romo, and I hadn't realized it. When I call a guy out as my "QB4 or QB7" or the like, please know that my DD has a scoring system with -.25 for inc passes, =.25 for completions, 1/30 yards, 6 pt TDs, and -3 for INTs.

RB Thread

Here we go!

1. The big three QBs are REALLY big – I have them at more than double the VBD of any other QB.

I’m not even sure why. Brees is the only one I have projected at a ton of yardage, Brady is the only one with a ton of TDs (41), and Rodgers is better than all the other QBs, but not dramatically so, until you add in the 300 or so rush yards he gets on a yearly basis…

Anyway, I was not considering a QB in the first (1.09) but after all of my projections are done, I traded up to 1.06 to make sure I get one of the big 3, Calvin, Foster, or Rice. I know this isn’t earth shattering, but I didn’t see the gap as being THAT huge between these three guys and all the others. Apparently, I think it is.

2. The biggest value plays appear, to me, to be Matt Ryan, Tony Romo, and Philip Rivers. A lot of people are down on Rivers, but I’m just not sure why. His yardage and TDs weren’t bad last season, he just had a ton of picks. It appears as though many of them were flukey, and I would not at all be surprised to see him as QB5, and not that far behind the top 3.

I do love Matt Ryan. I knew that going in, and it was interesting to find that he’s actually my QB4, not just a guy I see as undervalued. I think that his ypa improvement remains (so his ypa is about the same as last season, but a little bit better) and his TDs go up. A couple of little factors, and the numbers I end up with put him in the top 5.

Romo also ended up in my top 5. Pretty much everything I projected is at his career rates as a healthy player. I also see resurgence for Miles Austin and have Dez in the top 15, so this one makes a lot of sense. I suppose I’m just high on the Cowboys passing offense.

Result: All three 5th round ADP “R” QBs look like good 4th round picks to me. If I don’t have one of the big 3 QBs, I’m hoping I can go Calvin/TE/WR/one of these guys and then hit RB hard with some of the value plays I found, detailed in my RB thread of this same name.

3. Eli Manning appears to be the safe pickProjection: 327/528, 4171 yards, 28/16

Those numbers actually seem a bit low to me when I look back at them, but I also don’t see much at Eli’s disposal after Nicks and Cruz (who I think comes back down a bit this year). I think this projection (what I think will happen) is closer to his floor than his ceiling, especially given his near 5k last season. If I get stuck without a Big 3 and then somehow miss out on the three “R” guys above, I want to make sure I get Eli.

Result: QB10 – but very very close to my QBs 8 and 9 (Newton and Vick)

4. Joe Flacco appears to be getting overlookedProjection: 304/510, 3652 yards, 23/12

These aren’t world beater numbers, but they place Flacco as one of the best backup QBs to get, and give him potential for those who like to try QBBC. He’s right with Carson Palmer in my projections, and if I get an “R” QB or even Vick, I want Flacco or Palmer as my backup. Flacco has Torrey Smith at his disposal deep and throws a good deep ball. Boldin is losing steps, but can still be useful. Dickson and Pitta are talented, and Rice is always there as well.

Result: QB16, and I may be adjusting Roeth, which would push Flacco up another spot to QB15.

I don't want this to turn into a QB strategy thread, but I really want to get one of those big 3. Massive VBD difference over the other guys, and outdoing the top RBs as well. TE thread might be up tomorrow, but I also travel and draft, so you all may have to wait for the weekend. TE thread will have less substance anyway.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good post. If last night's gameplan was any indication of the Raven's regular season strategy, Flacco could be the steal of the draft this year! He went 27/36, and looked pretty damn good. I wonder if people will be moving him up their draft boards, or just writing off last night as a pre-season flook-type thing.

I know the big 3 at QB have been getting a lot of attention this offseason (and deservedly so), but I don't think it can be stated enough just how much of an advantage that having one of them gives you in most leagues. In my drafts this weekend, if I find myself having to flip a coin between CJ2K/Mcfadden in the first round, and one of the big 3 QB's is sitting there, I will be going QB without a doubt.

 
I don't agree with all of it but this is a very solid post. I'm also thinking that Flacco could be a guy who see's a nice bump in his numbers this year as well. I'm not nearly as high on the Cowboys passing game as you are and think the offensive line problems they've been having portend a very rough year both literally and numbers wise for Romo. I don't think Romo can last a full season getting hit as much as I'm thinking he'll be getting hit this year.

 
As with RB/WR, these are things I discovered with my projections that I didn't necessarily expect. When I go in, I know that I'm high on a guy, or I "think Matt Ryan is undervalued." But sometimes I find actually working out numbers in context and such without bias leads me to conclusions I had not thought of, like perhaps I like Matt Ryan, but the guy I really like is Tony Romo, and I hadn't realized it. When I call a guy out as my "QB4 or QB7" or the like, please know that my DD has a scoring system with -.25 for inc passes, =.25 for completions, 1/30 yards, 6 pt TDs, and -3 for INTs.

Here we go!

1. The big three QBs are REALLY big – I have them at more than double the VBD of any other QB.

I’m not even sure why. Brees is the only one I have projected at a ton of yardage, Brady is the only one with a ton of TDs (41), and Rodgers is better than all the other QBs, but not dramatically so, until you add in the 300 or so rush yards he gets on a yearly basis…

Anyway, I was not considering a QB in the first (1.09) but after all of my projections are done, I traded up to 1.06 to make sure I get one of the big 3, Calvin, Foster, or Rice. I know this isn’t earth shattering, but I didn’t see the gap as being THAT huge between these three guys and all the others. Apparently, I think it is.

2. The biggest value plays appear, to me, to be Matt Ryan, Tony Romo, and Philip Rivers. A lot of people are down on Rivers, but I’m just not sure why. His yardage and TDs weren’t bad last season, he just had a ton of picks. It appears as though many of them were flukey, and I would not at all be surprised to see him as QB5, and not that far behind the top 3.

I do love Matt Ryan. I knew that going in, and it was interesting to find that he’s actually my QB4, not just a guy I see as undervalued. I think that his ypa improvement remains (so his ypa is about the same as last season, but a little bit better) and his TDs go up. A couple of little factors, and the numbers I end up with put him in the top 5.

Romo also ended up in my top 5. Pretty much everything I projected is at his career rates as a healthy player. I also see resurgence for Miles Austin and have Dez in the top 15, so this one makes a lot of sense. I suppose I’m just high on the Cowboys passing offense.

Result: All three 5th round ADP “R” QBs look like good 4th round picks to me. If I don’t have one of the big 3 QBs, I’m hoping I can go Calvin/TE/WR/one of these guys and then hit RB hard with some of the value plays I found, detailed in my RB thread of this same name.

3. Eli Manning appears to be the safe pickProjection: 327/528, 4171 yards, 28/16

Those numbers actually seem a bit low to me when I look back at them, but I also don’t see much at Eli’s disposal after Nicks and Cruz (who I think comes back down a bit this year). I think this projection (what I think will happen) is closer to his floor than his ceiling, especially given his near 5k last season. If I get stuck without a Big 3 and then somehow miss out on the three “R” guys above, I want to make sure I get Eli.

Result: QB10 – but very very close to my QBs 8 and 9 (Newton and Vick)

4. Joe Flacco appears to be getting overlookedProjection: 304/510, 3652 yards, 23/12

These aren’t world beater numbers, but they place Flacco as one of the best backup QBs to get, and give him potential for those who like to try QBBC. He’s right with Carson Palmer in my projections, and if I get an “R” QB or even Vick, I want Flacco or Palmer as my backup. Flacco has Torrey Smith at his disposal deep and throws a good deep ball. Boldin is losing steps, but can still be useful. Dickson and Pitta are talented, and Rice is always there as well.

Result: QB16, and I may be adjusting Roeth, which would push Flacco up another spot to QB15.

I don't want this to turn into a QB strategy thread, but I really want to get one of those big 3. Massive VBD difference over the other guys, and outdoing the top RBs as well. TE thread might be up tomorrow, but I also travel and draft, so you all may have to wait for the weekend. TE thread will have less substance anyway.
shhhh. Flacco is flying with stealth. Lets keep it that way.

 
Great post. This is the type of stuff that makes FBG the website that it is.

Question, where do you see Newton and Stafford?

 
Great post. This is the type of stuff that makes FBG the website that it is.

Question, where do you see Newton and Stafford?
Both are guys I want no part of until the 4th round purely because I see a lot of regression risk, but here are my projections for them and where they ended up in my rankings (I'll just bold them with my top 10).Stafford: 372/605, 4384, 34/20 - And I am not at all confident in the TDs. I think that could be high if Leshoure comes out and is strong. Too many variables for me to feel confident at all in projecting Stafford with accuracy - I'm avoiding him.

Newton: 288/480, 3600, 24/15 - And I wouldn't be surprised if that is closer to 22/19 or something on TDs, but I liked what I saw of his decision making last year. I have him with 633 rush yards and 5 TDs - and I think that TD number could be high, but really have no idea how Tolbert will be used, if at all, down there.

Tom Brady

Aaron Rodgers

Drew Brees

Matt Ryan

Tony Romo

Matthew Stafford - QB6

Philip Rivers

Cam Newton - QB8

Michael Vick

Eli Manning

And I see upside for Eli, risk on Stafford, Newton, Romo. That back half of the top 10 is relatively close with my end numbers.

 
Wow you have Ryan and Romo ahead of Stafford? Why no love on Stafford last year was his first full year and he absolutely killed it. Now Titus Young is good. Saying this as a Brady Owner btw

 
1. The big three QBs are REALLY big – I have them at more than double the VBD of any other QB.

I’m not even sure why. Brees is the only one I have projected at a ton of yardage, Brady is the only one with a ton of TDs (41), and Rodgers is better than all the other QBs, but not dramatically so, until you add in the 300 or so rush yards he gets on a yearly basis…

Anyway, I was not considering a QB in the first (1.09) but after all of my projections are done, I traded up to 1.06 to make sure I get one of the big 3, Calvin, Foster, or Rice. I know this isn’t earth shattering, but I didn’t see the gap as being THAT huge between these three guys and all the others. Apparently, I think it is.
Couple questions:Does it worry you any that you're predicting the "big 3" to essentially repeat what happened last year (i.e. stand head and shoulders above the rest of the QB crowd)? I'm not saying it can't happen, or even suggesting that you shouldn't trust your projections (I like your process, by the way), I'm just wondering if it worries you at all that normally players in the top tier shuffle in and out from year to year. Does that tempt you to re-assess your projections?

Sort of related to the first question, which QB (or QBs) outside the top 3 do you think has the best chance to exceed your expectations and potentially end up in that top tier?

 
Newton: 288/480, 3600, 24/15 - And I wouldn't be surprised if that is closer to 22/19 or something on TDs, but I liked what I saw of his decision making last year. I have him with 633 rush yards and 5 TDs - and I think that TD number could be high, but really have no idea how Tolbert will be used, if at all, down there.
How can 5 be high? That is a 66% reduction from last year. You would have to remove every goal line TD from last season to get that number, and Tom Brady at least had 3 GL TDs. This forum is more worried about Cam getting hurt at the goal line than the Panthers are. They used him the same way the entire season - the same play even, at the goal line. Even after the playoffs were long gone, they still had Cam running the goal line zone read. He was clearly the face of the franchise and their most important player by a large margin - potentially the franchise's most important ever. Why weren't they scared? Because there is minimal risk. More often than not, he simply falls into the backs of his offensive line. When he is stopped short, it is a close range, low impact tackle. And looking at Cam, he can handle 10 such tackles over a 17 week season. Newton is by far the best value in most formats, based on this forum. In his rookie season, he outscored the career averages of Brees, Brady, Manning, and Rodgers. The scary part?--the massive room for improvment. The reports from camp is that he is more accurate on his underneath throws and that the Panthers trust him 100%. The training wheels are coming off and the Panthers will be a race for the playoffs.He will throw for 4,000 yards again, 25+ passing TDs, fewer Ints than last season, 700 rushing yards and 10 + TDs on the ground. If Brees, Brady, and Rodgers come back down to earth - you're looking at the #1 VBD producing QB for the 2013 season. To answer your questions and concerns before hand:-Tolbert wasn't brought in to replace Cam in the GL Zone Option formation - the most successful goal line play in the NFL last season. Stewart? Maybe. But, most likely, he was brought in to play FB. They don't need GL help. At all. -No. Cam is not at major risk operating as the goal line back. -No. Cam's numbers did not decrease because they ran him less; they were simply at the goal line less.-No. NFL teams did not slow Cam Newton down over the 2nd half of the season; the Panthers did. They won more games and Newton was a better football player because of it.Draft Cam. Smile. Enjoy life.
 
Good post. If last night's gameplan was any indication of the Raven's regular season strategy, Flacco could be the steal of the draft this year! He went 27/36, and looked pretty damn good. I wonder if people will be moving him up their draft boards, or just writing off last night as a pre-season flook-type thing.
Don't get too excited, that was against Jacksonville in the preseason.
 
Great thread instinctive, we need more of these in the SP. I agree with most of what you said, though as you'll see in the other threads Ryan isn't a value anymore. Makes Romo, Rivers, Eli and probably Vick even more of values potentially if he goes ahead of them-and ADP is indicating that he'll be the 6th QB taken now after the Big Three and the Next Two.

I'd say the QB outside of the Big Five most likely to break into the top 3 would probably be Vick-if he stays healthy (I know, I know) I say he finishes in the top 4.

 
Wow you have Ryan and Romo ahead of Stafford? Why no love on Stafford last year was his first full year and he absolutely killed it. Now Titus Young is good. Saying this as a Brady Owner btw
I suppose that when it comes down to it, Stafford wasn't super efficient with the third most attempts in league history, and I don't think he'll have that many attempts again. There are some other things - I expect a few more INTs, and less TDs, and I could be wrong (believe it or not, I have been before), but mainly I think his super lofty status was a result of a MASSIVE amount of opportunity which is unlikely to occur again. It would be practically impossible for Detroit to have a worse run game, in my mind, which means less passing. This leads me into my point for Sidewinder here:

1. The big three QBs are REALLY big – I have them at more than double the VBD of any other QB.

I’m not even sure why. Brees is the only one I have projected at a ton of yardage, Brady is the only one with a ton of TDs (41), and Rodgers is better than all the other QBs, but not dramatically so, until you add in the 300 or so rush yards he gets on a yearly basis…

Anyway, I was not considering a QB in the first (1.09) but after all of my projections are done, I traded up to 1.06 to make sure I get one of the big 3, Calvin, Foster, or Rice. I know this isn’t earth shattering, but I didn’t see the gap as being THAT huge between these three guys and all the others. Apparently, I think it is.
Couple questions:Does it worry you any that you're predicting the "big 3" to essentially repeat what happened last year (i.e. stand head and shoulders above the rest of the QB crowd)? I'm not saying it can't happen, or even suggesting that you shouldn't trust your projections (I like your process, by the way), I'm just wondering if it worries you at all that normally players in the top tier shuffle in and out from year to year. Does that tempt you to re-assess your projections?

Sort of related to the first question, which QB (or QBs) outside the top 3 do you think has the best chance to exceed your expectations and potentially end up in that top tier?
I think that Stafford, Rivers, and Ryan could do it. Ryan's YPA jumped a lot last year, but there's also fluke issues. Stafford was there last year, and I don't think he has that opportunity again, but he could certainly be more efficient and accurate and do more with his attempts. It tempts me not at all. Especially when you look at where those three guys have been finishing. Rodgers has never (repeat: NEVER) finished below 2nd as a starter. Brady I have projected for pretty high yardage - I wouldn't be surprised with him having even 400+ less yards than the 4700 I have him at as well as 5+ TDs less. And he'd STILL be in the top there.

Brees - I'm really not projecting all that different from what he's had. I brought his TD and INT numbers WAY back from last year. His yardage is still high - but it's always been high for him. He's always been a near 70% or more passer in NO. He's a 600+ attempt guy on that team at this point.

I see your point about re-assessment. I just think I've assessed it enough times at this point to be confident in my conclusions.

 
Great thread instinctive, we need more of these in the SP. I agree with most of what you said, though as you'll see in the other threads Ryan isn't a value anymore. Makes Romo, Rivers, Eli and probably Vick even more of values potentially if he goes ahead of them-and ADP is indicating that he'll be the 6th QB taken now after the Big Three and the Next Two.

I'd say the QB outside of the Big Five most likely to break into the top 3 would probably be Vick-if he stays healthy (I know, I know) I say he finishes in the top 4.
First off, thanks.Yes he is. I thought exactly what you just posted before i sat down. But my projections slot Ryan as a value anywhere after the end of the 2nd round. I may have to take him at 4.04, and that's pretty darn early...but my projections tell me that he's a value pick there. That would be something I learned from this exercise.

If you look a couple posts above, I don't actually find Vick a value. QB9 is where he ended up with me.

 
Newton: 288/480, 3600, 24/15 - And I wouldn't be surprised if that is closer to 22/19 or something on TDs, but I liked what I saw of his decision making last year. I have him with 633 rush yards and 5 TDs - and I think that TD number could be high, but really have no idea how Tolbert will be used, if at all, down there.
How can 5 be high? That is a 66% reduction from last year. You would have to remove every goal line TD from last season to get that number, and Tom Brady at least had 3 GL TDs. This forum is more worried about Cam getting hurt at the goal line than the Panthers are. They used him the same way the entire season - the same play even, at the goal line. Even after the playoffs were long gone, they still had Cam running the goal line zone read. He was clearly the face of the franchise and their most important player by a large margin - potentially the franchise's most important ever. Why weren't they scared? Because there is minimal risk. More often than not, he simply falls into the backs of his offensive line. When he is stopped short, it is a close range, low impact tackle. And looking at Cam, he can handle 10 such tackles over a 17 week season. Newton is by far the best value in most formats, based on this forum. In his rookie season, he outscored the career averages of Brees, Brady, Manning, and Rodgers. The scary part?--the massive room for improvment. The reports from camp is that he is more accurate on his underneath throws and that the Panthers trust him 100%. The training wheels are coming off and the Panthers will be a race for the playoffs.He will throw for 4,000 yards again, 25+ passing TDs, fewer Ints than last season, 700 rushing yards and 10 + TDs on the ground. If Brees, Brady, and Rodgers come back down to earth - you're looking at the #1 VBD producing QB for the 2013 season. To answer your questions and concerns before hand:-Tolbert wasn't brought in to replace Cam in the GL Zone Option formation - the most successful goal line play in the NFL last season. Stewart? Maybe. But, most likely, he was brought in to play FB. They don't need GL help. At all. -No. Cam is not at major risk operating as the goal line back. -No. Cam's numbers did not decrease because they ran him less; they were simply at the goal line less.-No. NFL teams did not slow Cam Newton down over the 2nd half of the season; the Panthers did. They won more games and Newton was a better football player because of it.Draft Cam. Smile. Enjoy life.
That's certainly one way to look at things with the rushing part. I just don't like to project things that have never, EVER, happened before. Which I'm doing with Newton's rushing TDs anyway. I would rather miss the bus on him this year and remain safe than take him and have history line up. You make a lot of factual statements there Coop - I know you've got a hard on for Newton like nobody's business (that's not an insult, in case you wonder, I've got my share - e.g. Colston), but at least try and act like you aren't just making #### up.He will have 25+ pass TDs.He will have 700+ rush yards. He will have less INTs.He will throw for 4000+ yards.Wow. I'll put money down with you (side bet) that at least one of those doesn't come true. Should be an easy bet, right? Just $20, nothing too big.I can totally see everything you mention happening, by the way. It just isn't what I think is most likely, and that's not how I draft. You're assuming EVERYTHING goes right for Newton. All the big QBs regress, he improves in EVERY SINGLE CATEGORY...I mean, it is possible. And it's a nice risk/reward play. But that's not how I draft :shrug:
 
I agree that the top 3 are in a level all their own and people are making a mistake.

Last night, 10 team league...starting at the #3 pick it went Rodgers, Brady, Brees, Stafford, Newton all 5 in a row.

 
That's certainly one way to look at things with the rushing part. I just don't like to project things that have never, EVER, happened before. Which I'm doing with Newton's rushing TDs anyway. I would rather miss the bus on him this year and remain safe than take him and have history line up. You make a lot of factual statements there Coop - I know you've got a hard on for Newton like nobody's business (that's not an insult, in case you wonder, I've got my share - e.g. Colston), but at least try and act like you aren't just making #### up.He will have 25+ pass TDs.He will have 700+ rush yards. He will have less INTs.He will throw for 4000+ yards.Wow. I'll put money down with you (side bet) that at least one of those doesn't come true. Should be an easy bet, right? Just $20, nothing too big.I can totally see everything you mention happening, by the way. It just isn't what I think is most likely, and that's not how I draft. You're assuming EVERYTHING goes right for Newton. All the big QBs regress, he improves in EVERY SINGLE CATEGORY...I mean, it is possible. And it's a nice risk/reward play. But that's not how I draft :shrug:
I'd bet you $20, in a fair bet. I'll let you pick any one of those numbers, and put $20 on it(Which actually isn't fair. We should pick a stat and meet in the middle of our numbers, but I'll use mine).4,000 passing is less than last year. 10 rushing TDs is less than last year. 700 rushing yards is less than last year. Essentially, I am projecting that his passing TDs go up, Ints down, and that's it. Also, not all big QBs regress. It is not uncommon for a QB to improve on their rookie numbers. I won't say I have a hard on - but I am a huge believer in Newton. I am big Florida Gator fan, so I wanted to hate Newton. I really did. But I think he will be a great NFL QB and continue to do special things fantasy wise. I have him as my #1 dynasty player, in most settings. So, it is not logical for me to expect that other's are as high on him as me. But I think he is very undervalued.And I am not sure what you think I "just made up". He did it last year. It happened. I don't know why people are so intimidated by the concept that MAYBE--just MAYBE!--it can happen again. Maybe it wasn't a fluke. Maybe his 14 rushing TDs weren't an accident. Maybe he didn't peak during his rookie year, following a lockout shortened off season. Maybe the guy coming off arguably the best college football season ever, followed by the best rookie season ever, is a special player? Maybe?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top