Jump to content


Photo

***OFFICIAL GUN CONTROL DEBATE***


  • Please log in to reply
9401 replies to this topic

#1 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:12 AM

Let's use this thread for the debate, so we can keep the argument out of the individual incident threads for those who want to see updates.



#2 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:24 AM

Armed classrooms For years, some areas in the US have allowed "armed classrooms" to deter (or truncate) future attacks, presumably by changing helpless victims into armed defenders. In 2008, Harrold Independent School District in Texas became the first public school district in the U.S. to allow teachers with state-issued firearm-carry permits to carry their arms in the classroom; special additional training and ricochet-resistant ammunition were required for participating teachers.[106] Students at the University of Utah have been allowed to carry concealed pistols (so long as they possess the appropriate state license) since a State Supreme Court decision in 2006.[107][108] In addition to Utah, Wisconsin and Mississippi each have legislation that allow students, faculty and employees with the proper permit, to carry concealed weapons on their public university's campuses.[109][110] Colorado and Oregon state courts have ruled in favor of Campus Carry laws by denying University's proposals to ban guns on campus. Ruling that the UC Board of Regents and the Oregon University System did not have the authority to ban weapons on campus.[111][112] A selective ban was then re-instated, wherein Oregon state universities enacted a ban on guns in school building and sporting events or by anyone contracted with the university in question.[113] Michigan State University as of June 2009, allows students to carry firearms on campus,the university still prohibits knives and other non-firearm weapons however. A commentary in the conservative National Review Online argues that the armed school approach for preventing school attacks, while new in the US, has been used successfully for many years in Israel and Thailand.[114] Teachers and school officials in Israel are allowed and encouraged to carry firearms if they have former military experience in the IDF, which almost all do. However, statistics on what percentage of teachers are actually armed are unavailable.

http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms Big supporter.

#3 timschochet

timschochet

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 72,899 posts
  • Joined 17-September 07

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:27 AM

We'll get to it. I...just can't right now. Too emotional. This is ####ed up.
Unless otherwise stated, any comment or statement I make is strictly MY OPINION, and should not be taken as an implication of fact, no matter how definitive it sounds. I speak for no one but myself.

#4 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:29 AM

We'll get to it. I...just can't right now. Too emotional. This is ####ed up.

Understand, but there will be people that bring it up. Trying to get it out the other threads.

#5 Henry Ford

Henry Ford

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7,837 posts
  • Joined 31-October 11
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:31 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shooting#Armed_classrooms Big supporter.

I could probably be convinced, but I'd honestly be just as concerned about most teachers losing it and using that gun improperly as I would about someone breaking in and starting a shooting. I hear about a lot more "workplace" shootings than school shootings.

In this specific case I agree with Hitler.

 


#6 culdeus

culdeus

    Have good

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 36,019 posts
  • Joined 21-August 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas
  • Interests:Bottom

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:32 AM

Serious question, why are non lethal weapons not available to people in schools? Are they simply not effective? I mean a taser or rubber bullet gun is going to slow somebody down a bit at least. I just don't think through rules and lockdown this type of event is preventable.

#7 Rayderr

Rayderr

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 35,570 posts
  • Joined 30-July 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:THE Columbus, Ohio

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:33 AM

We'll get to it. I...just can't right now. Too emotional. This is ####ed up.

Understand, but there will be people that bring it up. Trying to get it out the other threads.

will?

Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again? Uh... okay, well, the button on the side, is it glowing? Yeah, you need to turn it on... uh, the button turns it on... yeah, you do know how a button works don't you?  No, not on clothes.  No, no, there you go, no, there you go. I just heard it come on... no, no, that's the music you heard when it comes on... no, that's the music you hear when... I'm sorry, are you from the past?


#8 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:35 AM


http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms

Big supporter.

I could probably be convinced, but I'd honestly be just as concerned about most teachers losing it and using that gun improperly as I would about someone breaking in and starting a shooting. I hear about a lot more "workplace" shootings than school shootings.

Really? I guess mass shootings are more school related. They get more victims because there is no other threat. Movie theaters, some malls, government buildings and schools are gun free zones.

Now, I will agree with being concerned about teachers being able to use the gun. I am all having regular training mandatory for those who want to conceal carry.

#9 Henry Ford

Henry Ford

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7,837 posts
  • Joined 31-October 11
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:37 AM



http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms

Big supporter.

I could probably be convinced, but I'd honestly be just as concerned about most teachers losing it and using that gun improperly as I would about someone breaking in and starting a shooting. I hear about a lot more "workplace" shootings than school shootings.

Really? I guess mass shootings are more school related. They get more victims because there is no other threat. Movie theaters, some malls, government buildings and schools are gun free zones.

Now, I will agree with being concerned about teachers being able to use the gun. I am all having regular training mandatory for those who want to conceal carry.

Oh, I don't mean the teacher being unable to use it. I mean I'd be concerned that a disgruntled teacher would carry out a workplace shooting and not set off any alarms beforehand because he/she was allowed to carry weapons into the school.

In this specific case I agree with Hitler.

 


#10 Mr.Pack

Mr.Pack

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,207 posts
  • Joined 14-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:37 AM

It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on. The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

There is nothing worse than not enjoying life.--prefontaine


The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi


#11 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:37 AM

Serious question, why are non lethal weapons not available to people in schools? Are they simply not effective? I mean a taser or rubber bullet gun is going to slow somebody down a bit at least. I just don't think through rules and lockdown this type of event is preventable.

hmm not sure on tasers. It would be difficult to conceal from the children.

#12 culdeus

culdeus

    Have good

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 36,019 posts
  • Joined 21-August 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas
  • Interests:Bottom

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:39 AM

Serious question, why are non lethal weapons not available to people in schools? Are they simply not effective? I mean a taser or rubber bullet gun is going to slow somebody down a bit at least. I just don't think through rules and lockdown this type of event is preventable.

hmm not sure on tasers. It would be difficult to conceal from the children.

Maybe, but so would a firearm. At least with a taser if a kid gets a hold of it you aren't looking at a body count in the teens you are looking at a bunch of soiled pants.

#13 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:39 AM




http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms

Big supporter.

I could probably be convinced, but I'd honestly be just as concerned about most teachers losing it and using that gun improperly as I would about someone breaking in and starting a shooting. I hear about a lot more "workplace" shootings than school shootings.

Really? I guess mass shootings are more school related. They get more victims because there is no other threat. Movie theaters, some malls, government buildings and schools are gun free zones.

Now, I will agree with being concerned about teachers being able to use the gun. I am all having regular training mandatory for those who want to conceal carry.

Oh, I don't mean the teacher being unable to use it. I mean I'd be concerned that a disgruntled teacher would carry out a workplace shooting and not set off any alarms beforehand because he/she was allowed to carry weapons into the school.

In order to have a concealed carry permit, you can not have a record of any type of violent or drug related crime or even a DWI in LA. Don't know the numbers, but I don't think the people with the permits to carry are the ones who are the shooters in the workplace.

#14 Officer Pete Malloy

Officer Pete Malloy

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 18,362 posts
  • Joined 02-January 08

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:39 AM

Armed classrooms For years, some areas in the US have allowed "armed classrooms" to deter (or truncate) future attacks, presumably by changing helpless victims into armed defenders. In 2008, Harrold Independent School District in Texas became the first public school district in the U.S. to allow teachers with state-issued firearm-carry permits to carry their arms in the classroom; special additional training and ricochet-resistant ammunition were required for participating teachers.[106] Students at the University of Utah have been allowed to carry concealed pistols (so long as they possess the appropriate state license) since a State Supreme Court decision in 2006.[107][108] In addition to Utah, Wisconsin and Mississippi each have legislation that allow students, faculty and employees with the proper permit, to carry concealed weapons on their public university's campuses.[109][110] Colorado and Oregon state courts have ruled in favor of Campus Carry laws by denying University's proposals to ban guns on campus. Ruling that the UC Board of Regents and the Oregon University System did not have the authority to ban weapons on campus.[111][112] A selective ban was then re-instated, wherein Oregon state universities enacted a ban on guns in school building and sporting events or by anyone contracted with the university in question.[113] Michigan State University as of June 2009, allows students to carry firearms on campus,the university still prohibits knives and other non-firearm weapons however. A commentary in the conservative National Review Online argues that the armed school approach for preventing school attacks, while new in the US, has been used successfully for many years in Israel and Thailand.[114] Teachers and school officials in Israel are allowed and encouraged to carry firearms if they have former military experience in the IDF, which almost all do. However, statistics on what percentage of teachers are actually armed are unavailable.

http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms Big supporter.

Where do you teach?

I'm pretty horny most of the time


#15 BeaverCleaver

BeaverCleaver

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,939 posts
  • Joined 18-May 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mayfield

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:40 AM

It appears the school shooting was planned with two shooters involved. I am not sure stricter gun control laws would have prevented this from happening.
"There's also a side of me that's kind of snotty."-LHUCKS October 2007

#16 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:41 AM

Serious question, why are non lethal weapons not available to people in schools? Are they simply not effective? I mean a taser or rubber bullet gun is going to slow somebody down a bit at least. I just don't think through rules and lockdown this type of event is preventable.

hmm not sure on tasers. It would be difficult to conceal from the children.

Maybe, but so would a firearm. At least with a taser if a kid gets a hold of it you aren't looking at a body count in the teens you are looking at a bunch of soiled pants.

If you see me anywhere out of a gun zone, I'm probably carrying, but you would never know.

#17 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:42 AM

Armed classrooms For years, some areas in the US have allowed "armed classrooms" to deter (or truncate) future attacks, presumably by changing helpless victims into armed defenders. In 2008, Harrold Independent School District in Texas became the first public school district in the U.S. to allow teachers with state-issued firearm-carry permits to carry their arms in the classroom; special additional training and ricochet-resistant ammunition were required for participating teachers.[106] Students at the University of Utah have been allowed to carry concealed pistols (so long as they possess the appropriate state license) since a State Supreme Court decision in 2006.[107][108] In addition to Utah, Wisconsin and Mississippi each have legislation that allow students, faculty and employees with the proper permit, to carry concealed weapons on their public university's campuses.[109][110] Colorado and Oregon state courts have ruled in favor of Campus Carry laws by denying University's proposals to ban guns on campus. Ruling that the UC Board of Regents and the Oregon University System did not have the authority to ban weapons on campus.[111][112] A selective ban was then re-instated, wherein Oregon state universities enacted a ban on guns in school building and sporting events or by anyone contracted with the university in question.[113] Michigan State University as of June 2009, allows students to carry firearms on campus,the university still prohibits knives and other non-firearm weapons however. A commentary in the conservative National Review Online argues that the armed school approach for preventing school attacks, while new in the US, has been used successfully for many years in Israel and Thailand.[114] Teachers and school officials in Israel are allowed and encouraged to carry firearms if they have former military experience in the IDF, which almost all do. However, statistics on what percentage of teachers are actually armed are unavailable.

http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms Big supporter.

Where do you teach?

I don't. My job has me off and on university campus.

Edited by ATC1, 14 December 2012 - 10:42 AM.


#18 Rayderr

Rayderr

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 35,570 posts
  • Joined 30-July 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:THE Columbus, Ohio

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:43 AM

In most of the mass shooting cases, the shooter gave off signs that he was unhinged and possibly going to do something bad. Hell, Loughner was making threats against Giffords well before he actually shot her. The best way to stop this stuff from happening isn't to ban all guns, or a certain type of gun, it's to be observant of those around you, recognize when someone is mentally unstable.

Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again? Uh... okay, well, the button on the side, is it glowing? Yeah, you need to turn it on... uh, the button turns it on... yeah, you do know how a button works don't you?  No, not on clothes.  No, no, there you go, no, there you go. I just heard it come on... no, no, that's the music you heard when it comes on... no, that's the music you hear when... I'm sorry, are you from the past?


#19 Officer Pete Malloy

Officer Pete Malloy

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 18,362 posts
  • Joined 02-January 08

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:43 AM

Armed classrooms For years, some areas in the US have allowed "armed classrooms" to deter (or truncate) future attacks, presumably by changing helpless victims into armed defenders. In 2008, Harrold Independent School District in Texas became the first public school district in the U.S. to allow teachers with state-issued firearm-carry permits to carry their arms in the classroom; special additional training and ricochet-resistant ammunition were required for participating teachers.[106] Students at the University of Utah have been allowed to carry concealed pistols (so long as they possess the appropriate state license) since a State Supreme Court decision in 2006.[107][108] In addition to Utah, Wisconsin and Mississippi each have legislation that allow students, faculty and employees with the proper permit, to carry concealed weapons on their public university's campuses.[109][110] Colorado and Oregon state courts have ruled in favor of Campus Carry laws by denying University's proposals to ban guns on campus. Ruling that the UC Board of Regents and the Oregon University System did not have the authority to ban weapons on campus.[111][112] A selective ban was then re-instated, wherein Oregon state universities enacted a ban on guns in school building and sporting events or by anyone contracted with the university in question.[113] Michigan State University as of June 2009, allows students to carry firearms on campus,the university still prohibits knives and other non-firearm weapons however. A commentary in the conservative National Review Online argues that the armed school approach for preventing school attacks, while new in the US, has been used successfully for many years in Israel and Thailand.[114] Teachers and school officials in Israel are allowed and encouraged to carry firearms if they have former military experience in the IDF, which almost all do. However, statistics on what percentage of teachers are actually armed are unavailable.

http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms Big supporter.

Where do you teach?

I don't. My job has me off and on university campus.

Can you be more specific? I'd like to be able to determine whether or not you should be armed.

I'm pretty horny most of the time


#20 Sweet Feet

Sweet Feet

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 740 posts
  • Joined 30-November 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gotham City

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:45 AM

It appears the school shooting was planned with two shooters involved. I am not sure stricter gun control laws would have prevented this from happening.

Sad thing is IMO.. nothing. If someone wants a gun they're not hard to get legally or illegally. People want to think gun control will stop a killer or persons that want to do harm. I'm not one of those people.

#21 hook014

hook014

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,754 posts
  • Joined 01-December 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Myrtle Beach

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:46 AM

In most of the mass shooting cases, the shooter gave off signs that he was unhinged and possibly going to do something bad. Hell, Loughner was making threats against Giffords well before he actually shot her. The best way to stop this stuff from happening isn't to ban all guns, or a certain type of gun, it's to be observant of those around you, recognize when someone is mentally unstable.

And then??

#22 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:47 AM

Armed classrooms For years, some areas in the US have allowed "armed classrooms" to deter (or truncate) future attacks, presumably by changing helpless victims into armed defenders. In 2008, Harrold Independent School District in Texas became the first public school district in the U.S. to allow teachers with state-issued firearm-carry permits to carry their arms in the classroom; special additional training and ricochet-resistant ammunition were required for participating teachers.[106] Students at the University of Utah have been allowed to carry concealed pistols (so long as they possess the appropriate state license) since a State Supreme Court decision in 2006.[107][108] In addition to Utah, Wisconsin and Mississippi each have legislation that allow students, faculty and employees with the proper permit, to carry concealed weapons on their public university's campuses.[109][110] Colorado and Oregon state courts have ruled in favor of Campus Carry laws by denying University's proposals to ban guns on campus. Ruling that the UC Board of Regents and the Oregon University System did not have the authority to ban weapons on campus.[111][112] A selective ban was then re-instated, wherein Oregon state universities enacted a ban on guns in school building and sporting events or by anyone contracted with the university in question.[113] Michigan State University as of June 2009, allows students to carry firearms on campus,the university still prohibits knives and other non-firearm weapons however. A commentary in the conservative National Review Online argues that the armed school approach for preventing school attacks, while new in the US, has been used successfully for many years in Israel and Thailand.[114] Teachers and school officials in Israel are allowed and encouraged to carry firearms if they have former military experience in the IDF, which almost all do. However, statistics on what percentage of teachers are actually armed are unavailable.

http://en.wikipedia....rmed_classrooms Big supporter.

Where do you teach?

I don't. My job has me off and on university campus.

Can you be more specific? I'd like to be able to determine whether or not you should be armed.

That is part of my point. Why does it matter? If I have gone through training much like a police officer to learn how to use a weapon and have no prior record. What should it matter?

Edited by ATC1, 14 December 2012 - 10:48 AM.


#23 culdeus

culdeus

    Have good

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 36,019 posts
  • Joined 21-August 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas
  • Interests:Bottom

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:47 AM

Serious question, why are non lethal weapons not available to people in schools? Are they simply not effective? I mean a taser or rubber bullet gun is going to slow somebody down a bit at least. I just don't think through rules and lockdown this type of event is preventable.

hmm not sure on tasers. It would be difficult to conceal from the children.

Maybe, but so would a firearm. At least with a taser if a kid gets a hold of it you aren't looking at a body count in the teens you are looking at a bunch of soiled pants.

If you see me anywhere out of a gun zone, I'm probably carrying, but you would never know.

This is part of the problem with these discussions. You have people that are very comfortable with firearms and don't want them out of their hands, but they represent such a small subset of the population such as to make such an approach untenable. In a school setting you would want 1-2 people out of 40-50 or on up to 200 staff to have such a predilection for gun use I would argue that this rate is perhaps as high as 1000x the national average. (I looked this up later in Texas CCL is 0.16% of population) So then you look at highly trained PD members and the cost is too high for such a thing based on the cost of life risk equation. So training people to have less lethal options available seems like a reasonable compromise however it is not discussed as an option openly.

#24 Cliff Clavin

Cliff Clavin

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 11,784 posts
  • Joined 08-December 09

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:48 AM

Might want to look at WHY people do these things and not HOW. Hint: It isn't a gun problem.

I invented a crude Sybian around '91 using a hairbrush handle and record player. The chick would always say 33 was fine but the thing would get cranked to 78 within a minute or so.


Never listen to me. I don't know what I'm talking about.


#25 Rayderr

Rayderr

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 35,570 posts
  • Joined 30-July 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:THE Columbus, Ohio

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:49 AM

In most of the mass shooting cases, the shooter gave off signs that he was unhinged and possibly going to do something bad. Hell, Loughner was making threats against Giffords well before he actually shot her. The best way to stop this stuff from happening isn't to ban all guns, or a certain type of gun, it's to be observant of those around you, recognize when someone is mentally unstable.

And then??

Notify authorities. Of course, that would require the authorities to do something (as in Giffords, the police thought Loughner was harmless. Whoops.) Now it won't stop everything. Nothing will.

Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again? Uh... okay, well, the button on the side, is it glowing? Yeah, you need to turn it on... uh, the button turns it on... yeah, you do know how a button works don't you?  No, not on clothes.  No, no, there you go, no, there you go. I just heard it come on... no, no, that's the music you heard when it comes on... no, that's the music you hear when... I'm sorry, are you from the past?


#26 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:50 AM

Serious question, why are non lethal weapons not available to people in schools? Are they simply not effective? I mean a taser or rubber bullet gun is going to slow somebody down a bit at least. I just don't think through rules and lockdown this type of event is preventable.

hmm not sure on tasers. It would be difficult to conceal from the children.

Maybe, but so would a firearm. At least with a taser if a kid gets a hold of it you aren't looking at a body count in the teens you are looking at a bunch of soiled pants.

If you see me anywhere out of a gun zone, I'm probably carrying, but you would never know.

This is part of the problem with these discussions. You have people that are very comfortable with firearms and don't want them out of their hands, but they represent such a small subset of the population such as to make such an approach untenable. In a school setting you would want 1-2 people out of 40-50 or on up to 200 staff to have such a predilection for gun use I would argue that this rate is perhaps as high as 1000x the national average. (I looked this up later in Texas CCL is 0.16% of population) So then you look at highly trained PD members and the cost is too high for such a thing based on the cost of life risk equation. So training people to have less lethal options available seems like a reasonable compromise however it is not discussed as an option openly.

Sad but true. And you bring up a good point on the ability to carry a taser. I have not gone through the proper training for a taser, so I can not comment of the possible effectiveness it may have. ETA: If more people familiarize themselves with proper use and saftey, those numbers should improve.

Edited by ATC1, 14 December 2012 - 10:52 AM.


#27 Don Quixote

Don Quixote

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,578 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Alexandria, VA

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:52 AM

Just throwing this in here. Picture of the type of gun used .223 caliber rifle

#28 ATC1

ATC1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,910 posts
  • Joined 03-May 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:53 AM

Just throwing this in here. Picture of the type of gun used .223 caliber rifle

This is the Oregon shooting. Correct?

#29 Rayderr

Rayderr

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 35,570 posts
  • Joined 30-July 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:THE Columbus, Ohio

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:53 AM

Just throwing this in here. Picture of the type of gun used .223 caliber rifle

:confused:

Police have recovered two weapons from the suspect, a Glock and a Sig Sauer, the source said. It's unclear if police killed the suspect.

both of those are handguns.

Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again? Uh... okay, well, the button on the side, is it glowing? Yeah, you need to turn it on... uh, the button turns it on... yeah, you do know how a button works don't you?  No, not on clothes.  No, no, there you go, no, there you go. I just heard it come on... no, no, that's the music you heard when it comes on... no, that's the music you hear when... I'm sorry, are you from the past?


#30 Mr.Pack

Mr.Pack

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,207 posts
  • Joined 14-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:56 AM

Might want to look at WHY people do these things and not HOW. Hint: It isn't a gun problem.

:goodposting:

There is nothing worse than not enjoying life.--prefontaine


The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi


#31 lakerstan

lakerstan

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 721 posts
  • Joined 01-September 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vegas, Baby

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:57 AM

It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on. The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

#32 Sammy3469

Sammy3469

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,013 posts
  • Joined 05-May 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York, NY

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:58 AM

I must have my .223 caliber military rifle for home protection!!!!

We look for the required level of pugnacity, truculence, belligerence, hostility, and testosterone


#33 Don Quixote

Don Quixote

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,578 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Alexandria, VA

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:59 AM


Just throwing this in here. Picture of the type of gun used .223 caliber rifle

:confused:

Police have recovered two weapons from the suspect, a Glock and a Sig Sauer, the source said. It's unclear if police killed the suspect.

both of those are handguns.

It's what the AP is reporting now.

#34 Mr.Pack

Mr.Pack

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,207 posts
  • Joined 14-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:00 AM


It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

My link

There is nothing worse than not enjoying life.--prefontaine


The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi


#35 Henry Ford

Henry Ford

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7,837 posts
  • Joined 31-October 11
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:03 AM



It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

My link

I think the "Injures" part of the headline is kind of relevant to this debate. It's a very different headline than "Kills."

In this specific case I agree with Hitler.

 


#36 lakerstan

lakerstan

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 721 posts
  • Joined 01-September 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vegas, Baby

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:07 AM




It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

My link

I think the "Injures" part of the headline is kind of relevant to this debate. It's a very different headline than "Kills."

Yes - at least those 22 kids had the chance to grow up.

#37 David Dodds

David Dodds

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • Pip
  • 12,130 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Foresthill, CA

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:07 AM

I think we all can agree no citizens should be able to have pipe bombs, grenades, bazookas, rocket launchers, or Claymore Mines. Why is that? I mean what's more effective than Claymore mines to protect your house. Post a sign out front that says this house is protected by Claymore Mines...proceed at your own risk. Or using a few grenades to do some sport fishing. Dead fish float up and you scoop them up and eat for weeks. I state crazy talk like this, because some guns have no place in society. Assault Rifles, Rapid shooting guns, etc. What's the point of allowing citizens to own these except to be used for killing lots of people. Make the penalty for owning this type of gun severe and they will go away. Just like normal people don't own pipe bombs. Let's at least start down a path that says we are trying to fix this problem. Just ignoring it with stupid phrases like guns don't kill people, people kill people make no sense. Because if that was true, we should all be able to go buy our grenades. I have never seen a grenade injure someone that was not tossed by a person.

#38 Blick

Blick

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 479 posts
  • Joined 30-September 04
  • Location:Pittsburgh

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:07 AM

I'm an ardent supporter of gun rights and own quite a few shotguns, handgun, rifles, etc. I'd give up all of them in an instance if I thought for one second it would do any good.

Edited by Blick, 14 December 2012 - 11:08 AM.

Here We Go, Steelers...

#39 Mr.Pack

Mr.Pack

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,207 posts
  • Joined 14-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:08 AM




It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

My link

I think the "Injures" part of the headline is kind of relevant to this debate. It's a very different headline than "Kills."

So then, you're part of the crowd that believes if all guns are banned, these problems will go away?

Again, I wish my world was as simple as yours.

There is nothing worse than not enjoying life.--prefontaine


The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi


#40 Clifford

Clifford

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,167 posts
  • Joined 30-July 10

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:08 AM

It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on. The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

What percent of criminal acts are stopped or somehow prevented by armed citizens? I know you don't have a percentage and can't because it would be something around .0001% So the argument of loose gun control laws stopping crime is bull####. After Aurora I proposed that anyone who wants to acquire a gun have to go through a psychological check as well as a background check. The first should be a call to the person's medical insurance to see if they covered any psychological drugs or counselling. If either is found the person would have to wait while the seller talked to the counselor or dr. who prescribed the drugs. If either felt that the person posed any sort of risks to other or himself, he/she would not be able to purchase a gun and be put on a police watch-list for attempting to purchase a gun. I was laughed off this board because of concerns around what it would take to build the infrastructure to execute and the invasion of privacy. I wonder how people feel about those concerns now.

Like most things I don't understand I wanted to punch its face.
-Binky the Doormat

Your constant hyperbole is ridiculous. You're to the FFA what Hitler was to Europe.
-Dr. Awesome

Some people learn by words, some people learn by consequences, some people can’t learn.
-Nick Saban

 

No one here seems to get its okay to be racist against white people

-johnjohn


#41 Mr.Pack

Mr.Pack

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,207 posts
  • Joined 14-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:10 AM

I think we all can agree no citizens should be able to have pipe bombs, grenades, bazookas, rocket launchers, or Claymore Mines. Why is that? I mean what's more effective than Claymore mines to protect your house. Post a sign out front that says this house is protected by Claymore Mines...proceed at your own risk. Or using a few grenades to do some sport fishing. Dead fish float up and you scoop them up and eat for weeks.

I state crazy talk like this, because some guns have no place in society. Assault Rifles, Rapid shooting guns, etc. What's the point of allowing citizens to own these except to be used for killing lots of people. Make the penalty for owning this type of gun severe and they will go away. Just like normal people don't own pipe bombs.

Let's at least start down a path that says we are trying to fix this problem. Just ignoring it with stupid phrases like guns don't kill people, people kill people make no sense. Because if that was true, we should all be able to go buy our grenades. I have never seen a grenade injure someone that was not tossed by a person.

Exactly.

I have never seen a gun kill someone without a person pulling the trigger.

You kind of made the point of "......people kill people"

That said, I agree with your post that we need to fix this problem. Rapid unemployment and lack of direction growing up all contribute to people going bat#### crazy with no morals or regard for human life.

Edited by Mr.Pack, 14 December 2012 - 11:11 AM.

There is nothing worse than not enjoying life.--prefontaine


The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi


#42 Clifford

Clifford

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,167 posts
  • Joined 30-July 10

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:10 AM





It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

My link

I think the "Injures" part of the headline is kind of relevant to this debate. It's a very different headline than "Kills."

So then, you're part of the crowd that believes if all guns are banned, these problems will go away?

Again, I wish my world was as simple as yours.

JFC If I hear this nonsensical tripe trotted out one more time I am going to ####### explode.

NO PREVENTATIVE MEASURE HAS A 100% SUCCESS RATE. Not our laws, not prisons, not seatbelts, not bike helmets, not parachutes.

The point of introducing measures are to REDUCE a problem, not eliminate it completely. If this is the best you can come up with do us all a favor and keep quiet.

Like most things I don't understand I wanted to punch its face.
-Binky the Doormat

Your constant hyperbole is ridiculous. You're to the FFA what Hitler was to Europe.
-Dr. Awesome

Some people learn by words, some people learn by consequences, some people can’t learn.
-Nick Saban

 

No one here seems to get its okay to be racist against white people

-johnjohn


#43 Henry Ford

Henry Ford

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7,837 posts
  • Joined 31-October 11
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:11 AM





It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

My link

I think the "Injures" part of the headline is kind of relevant to this debate. It's a very different headline than "Kills."

So then, you're part of the crowd that believes if all guns are banned, these problems will go away?

Again, I wish my world was as simple as yours.

No, I'm not part of that crowd. But if you're putting up a stabbing of 22 elementary school kids as a correlary to what happened today, I'd say it's also relevant that those kids aren't dead.

In this specific case I agree with Hitler.

 


#44 Mr.Pack

Mr.Pack

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,207 posts
  • Joined 14-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:12 AM


It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

What percent of criminal acts are stopped or somehow prevented by armed citizens? I know you don't have a percentage and can't because it would be something around .0001%

So the argument of loose gun control laws stopping crime is bull####.

After Aurora I proposed that anyone who wants to acquire a gun have to go through a psychological check as well as a background check. The first should be a call to the person's medical insurance to see if they covered any psychological drugs or counselling. If either is found the person would have to wait while the seller talked to the counselor or dr. who prescribed the drugs. If either felt that the person posed any sort of risks to other or himself, he/she would not be able to purchase a gun and be put on a police watch-list for attempting to purchase a gun.

I was laughed off this board because of concerns around what it would take to build the infrastructure to execute and the invasion of privacy.

I wonder how people feel about those concerns now.

Hello, Mr. Criminal, you need to go through a background check before you buy the gun I'm selling on the street.

:rolleyes:

There is nothing worse than not enjoying life.--prefontaine


The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi


#45 David Dodds

David Dodds

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • Pip
  • 12,130 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Foresthill, CA

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:13 AM


I think we all can agree no citizens should be able to have pipe bombs, grenades, bazookas, rocket launchers, or Claymore Mines. Why is that? I mean what's more effective than Claymore mines to protect your house. Post a sign out front that says this house is protected by Claymore Mines...proceed at your own risk. Or using a few grenades to do some sport fishing. Dead fish float up and you scoop them up and eat for weeks.

I state crazy talk like this, because some guns have no place in society. Assault Rifles, Rapid shooting guns, etc. What's the point of allowing citizens to own these except to be used for killing lots of people. Make the penalty for owning this type of gun severe and they will go away. Just like normal people don't own pipe bombs.

Let's at least start down a path that says we are trying to fix this problem. Just ignoring it with stupid phrases like guns don't kill people, people kill people make no sense. Because if that was true, we should all be able to go buy our grenades. I have never seen a grenade injure someone that was not tossed by a person.

Exactly.

I have never seen a gun kill someone without a person pulling the trigger.

You kind of made the point of "......people kill people"

That said, I agree with your post that we need to fix this problem. Rapid unemployment and lack of direction growing up all contribute to people going bat#### crazy with no morals or regard for human life.

Except citizens can't own grenades. See the irony. You don't have the right to own a grenade. It's the law. That's the same logic a lot of guns should be banned. They have no place in society.

#46 Mr.Pack

Mr.Pack

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,207 posts
  • Joined 14-August 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:14 AM






It's actually pretty simple, the old saying "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is spot on.

The hand wringers think that once all guns are banned the criminals will hand over their guns because it's illegal. Ridiculous.

Then why don't we see more mass stabbings?

My link

I think the "Injures" part of the headline is kind of relevant to this debate. It's a very different headline than "Kills."

So then, you're part of the crowd that believes if all guns are banned, these problems will go away?

Again, I wish my world was as simple as yours.

No, I'm not part of that crowd. But if you're putting up a stabbing of 22 elementary school kids as a correlary to what happened today, I'd say it's also relevant that those kids aren't dead.

I'm not comparing the two at all. I just read about it and it was fresh in my mind. Both are sad though and signs this world is coming a part.

Maybe the world should end next Friday. This #### makes me sick.

There is nothing worse than not enjoying life.--prefontaine


The difference between a successful person and others is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather in a lack of will. - Vince Lombardi


#47 Clifford

Clifford

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,167 posts
  • Joined 30-July 10

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:14 AM

Might want to look at WHY people do these things and not HOW. Hint: It isn't a gun problem.

The Why is a longer term societal fix. Doesn't mean you shouldn't make it harder for people to get the means to execute schoolchildren even if you can't fix everyone's thoughts.

Like most things I don't understand I wanted to punch its face.
-Binky the Doormat

Your constant hyperbole is ridiculous. You're to the FFA what Hitler was to Europe.
-Dr. Awesome

Some people learn by words, some people learn by consequences, some people can’t learn.
-Nick Saban

 

No one here seems to get its okay to be racist against white people

-johnjohn


#48 Snotbubbles

Snotbubbles

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,478 posts
  • Joined 15-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia, PA

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:14 AM

In most of the mass shooting cases, the shooter gave off signs that he was unhinged and possibly going to do something bad. Hell, Loughner was making threats against Giffords well before he actually shot her. The best way to stop this stuff from happening isn't to ban all guns, or a certain type of gun, it's to be observant of those around you, recognize when someone is mentally unstable.

And once you recognize, what are you supposed to do? How do you stop someone? Institutionalize someone for life for making threatening comments? How do you seperate a threat from a serious threat?
2008 World F'n Champions!

#49 Sammy3469

Sammy3469

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,013 posts
  • Joined 05-May 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York, NY

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:15 AM


I think we all can agree no citizens should be able to have pipe bombs, grenades, bazookas, rocket launchers, or Claymore Mines. Why is that? I mean what's more effective than Claymore mines to protect your house. Post a sign out front that says this house is protected by Claymore Mines...proceed at your own risk. Or using a few grenades to do some sport fishing. Dead fish float up and you scoop them up and eat for weeks.

I state crazy talk like this, because some guns have no place in society. Assault Rifles, Rapid shooting guns, etc. What's the point of allowing citizens to own these except to be used for killing lots of people. Make the penalty for owning this type of gun severe and they will go away. Just like normal people don't own pipe bombs.

Let's at least start down a path that says we are trying to fix this problem. Just ignoring it with stupid phrases like guns don't kill people, people kill people make no sense. Because if that was true, we should all be able to go buy our grenades. I have never seen a grenade injure someone that was not tossed by a person.

Exactly.

I have never seen a gun kill someone without a person pulling the trigger.

You kind of made the point of "......people kill people"

That said, I agree with your post that we need to fix this problem. Rapid unemployment and lack of direction growing up all contribute to people going bat#### crazy with no morals or regard for human life.

What BS. You can't shoot up a school classroom in seconds without a semi-automatic weapon. These weapons directly let these events happen.

We look for the required level of pugnacity, truculence, belligerence, hostility, and testosterone


#50 Sweet Feet

Sweet Feet

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 740 posts
  • Joined 30-November 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gotham City

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:15 AM

Except citizens can't own grenades. See the irony. You don't have the right to own a grenade. It's the law. That's the same logic a lot of guns should be banned. They have no place in society.

like I wrote before.. just because something is illegal doesnt mean you cant obtain it. A person who wants to kill unsuspecting people will most likely succeed by any means.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users