What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Seahawks prime time games purposely scheduled as away games (1 Viewer)

Seahawks hosting the first game is an educated guess by the NFL that they don't conflict with the MLB postseason. Remember last year's nightmare scenario where a playoff baseball game was going on the same night as MNF? Nobody figures the Mariners will be in the postseason.

 
The theory by PFT is pretty ridiculous.

The Saints get plenty prime time home games and they blow teams out all the time.

You can pretty much chalk up a prime-time game in the Superdome as a victory for the Saints. They've won 13 consecutive home night games, and 16 of their last 17, by an average score of nearly 20 points per game dating back to 2008.
They get two this year. And when they do it's a big party, the networks love the raucous fans, show plenty crowd shots and then the tv and league crews all enjoy coming down here for the the local culture. NO used to get prime time games even when they were lousy.

Another theory is the league manipulates results using the schedule more than people think. Seattle has to have that first season opener night game but after that they get nothing. Reality is that makes it that much harder for the Seahawks to repeat. Not only that:

The Seahawks have a nightmarish stretch with six games over only 35 days during games 10 to 15.
http://espn.go.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/5641/seattle-seahawks-schedule-analysis

And they get road prime time games at their two main division opponents and also go cross country vs WAS. I think the league is making it tough on Seattle and they're not the only ones. Teams like Buffalo (and maybe one other) have a ridiculous stretch of facing teams that have an advantage over them in terms of rest vs what the Bills get. The Saints are looking at a third straight season of having a division road game on TNF. Lots of complaints out there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seattle homer reporting in.

If it were to continue to happen year after year you might have something to talk about, but it still probably wouldn't pass a hypothesis test for the difference in two means using a t-test.

Nothing to see here.

 
Seattle homer reporting in.

If it were to continue to happen year after year you might have something to talk about, but it still probably wouldn't pass a hypothesis test for the difference in two means using a t-test.

Nothing to see here.
Id hate to have the nightmare of making these schedules for any of the major pro sports leagues.

 
Seattle homer reporting in.

If it were to continue to happen year after year you might have something to talk about, but it still probably wouldn't pass a hypothesis test for the difference in two means using a t-test.

Nothing to see here.
Id hate to have the nightmare of making these schedules for any of the major pro sports leagues.
Thats why computers do it with minor tweaks from humans.

 
Seahawks hosting the first game is an educated guess by the NFL that they don't conflict with the MLB postseason. Remember last year's nightmare scenario where a playoff baseball game was going on the same night as MNF? Nobody figures the Mariners will be in the postseason.
The first NFL game is early September. It's still the regular season for baseball then - there just happened to be an Orioles homestand during football's opening week and the stadiums were too close to one another (shared a parking lot I beleive). Apparently the Mariners are away on September 4th or the Stadiums are far enough apart.

 
Seahawks hosting the first game is an educated guess by the NFL that they don't conflict with the MLB postseason. Remember last year's nightmare scenario where a playoff baseball game was going on the same night as MNF? Nobody figures the Mariners will be in the postseason.
The first NFL game is early September. It's still the regular season for baseball then - there just happened to be an Orioles homestand during football's opening week and the stadiums were too close to one another (shared a parking lot I beleive). Apparently the Mariners are away on September 4th or the Stadiums are far enough apart.
The stadiums are across the street from each other.

I think it's more a show of mercy than anything else. If the Mariners/Seahawks played at home on the same day Mariner attendance would go down from 10,000 to about 10

 
Did Seahawks' home field cost them in prime time?By Marc Sessler

Around the League Writer

Has Seattle's march of dominance at CenturyLink Field cost the Seahawks home games on prime-time TV?

ProFootballTalk was told by a league source that the NFL was wary of putting the Super Bowl champions at home in nationally televised games due to the team's recent history of blowing opponents out.

Seattle's only prime-time game at home this season comes against the Green Bay Packers in the regular-season opener. Their remaining three nationally televised tilts will force the Seahawks to visit the Washington Redskins in Week 5, the San Francisco 49ers on Thanksgiving night in Week 13 and the Arizona Cardinals in Week 16.

Last season, Pete Carroll's crew blasted San Francisco 29-3 in a Week 2 showdown on Sunday night before scattering the New Orleans Saints 34-7 in a Monday Night Football affair in Week 13. In 2012, Seattle whipped the 49ers 42-13 in a Sunday night massacre.

The Seahawks of late have been nearly perfect in the Pacific Northwest, winning 17 of their last 18 at home, including the playoffs. Since Carroll became coach in 2010, the team is an outrageous 18-0 at home (including the postseason) when Seattle wins the time of possession battle.

Meanwhile, young Russell Wilson has compiled a 17-1 mark at CenturyLink, but he's just 10-8 in away games, where his passer rating dips from 110.3 to 92.1.

With that in mind, forcing Seattle onto the road might drum up more competitive fare on national television. But if that's the goal, can someone explain why the Super Bowl champions have four prime-time dates while the New York Giants -- a dead-on-arrival operation last season -- have five?

The "Around The League Podcast" NFL Schedule Extravaganza will change the way you look at everything.
 
Quote

ProFootballTalk was told by a league source that ...
Whenever I see this I think that whatever follows is bound to be worthless. Its like a license to pass wild speculation off as somehow believable. One might think that if PFT was to repeatedly do this that eventually they would lose credibility. Quite the opposite. They've hit paydirt just enough that people seem to ignore the wild speculation when its off base.

 
The theory by PFT is pretty ridiculous.

The Saints get plenty prime time home games and they blow teams out all the time.

You can pretty much chalk up a prime-time game in the Superdome as a victory for the Saints. They've won 13 consecutive home night games, and 16 of their last 17, by an average score of nearly 20 points per game dating back to 2008.
They get two this year. And when they do it's a big party, the networks love the raucous fans, show plenty crowd shots and then the tv and league crews all enjoy coming down here for the the local culture. NO used to get prime time games even when they were lousy.

Another theory is the league manipulates results using the schedule more than people think. Seattle has to have that first season opener night game but after that they get nothing. Reality is that makes it that much harder for the Seahawks to repeat. Not only that:

The Seahawks have a nightmarish stretch with six games over only 35 days during games 10 to 15.
http://espn.go.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/5641/seattle-seahawks-schedule-analysis

And they get road prime time games at their two main division opponents and also go cross country vs WAS. I think the league is making it tough on Seattle and they're not the only ones. Teams like Buffalo (and maybe one other) have a ridiculous stretch of facing teams that have an advantage over them in terms of rest vs what the Bills get. The Saints are looking at a third straight season of having a division road game on TNF. Lots of complaints out there.
The 6 games in 35 days is deceiving. If a team plays 6 straight Sundays, which every team does every season, that's 6 games in 40 days .So week 10, they play Mon. Weeks 11-14 are all Sundays, and week 15 is a Thurs. Wah.

 
Seattle homer reporting in.

If it were to continue to happen year after year you might have something to talk about, but it still probably wouldn't pass a hypothesis test for the difference in two means using a t-test.

Nothing to see here.
Id hate to have the nightmare of making these schedules for any of the major pro sports leagues.
Here is a good article on how they do it:

http://mmqb.si.com/2014/04/24/making-of-2014-nfl-schedule/

Interesting stuff:

That’s what happens when four men and 40 computers work for 70 days to invent what they hope will be a 256-game masterpiece—but which they know will bring charges of favoritism and cronyism from teams, TV networks and stadium operators.

 
LarryAllen said:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
The theory by PFT is pretty ridiculous.

The Saints get plenty prime time home games and they blow teams out all the time.

You can pretty much chalk up a prime-time game in the Superdome as a victory for the Saints. They've won 13 consecutive home night games, and 16 of their last 17, by an average score of nearly 20 points per game dating back to 2008.
They get two this year. And when they do it's a big party, the networks love the raucous fans, show plenty crowd shots and then the tv and league crews all enjoy coming down here for the the local culture. NO used to get prime time games even when they were lousy.

Another theory is the league manipulates results using the schedule more than people think. Seattle has to have that first season opener night game but after that they get nothing. Reality is that makes it that much harder for the Seahawks to repeat. Not only that:

The Seahawks have a nightmarish stretch with six games over only 35 days during games 10 to 15.
http://espn.go.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/5641/seattle-seahawks-schedule-analysis

And they get road prime time games at their two main division opponents and also go cross country vs WAS. I think the league is making it tough on Seattle and they're not the only ones. Teams like Buffalo (and maybe one other) have a ridiculous stretch of facing teams that have an advantage over them in terms of rest vs what the Bills get. The Saints are looking at a third straight season of having a division road game on TNF. Lots of complaints out there.
The 6 games in 35 days is deceiving. If a team plays 6 straight Sundays, which every team does every season, that's 6 games in 40 days .So week 10, they play Mon. Weeks 11-14 are all Sundays, and week 15 is a Thurs. Wah.
I see what you mean, maybe it doesn't amount to much with a bunch of Sunday games with a road TNF @SF game squeezed in. I don't think I'd say "nightmarish" but it poses some challenges considering the average win totals for these opponents last year must be around the 11 win range:

Week 11: Sunday, Nov. 16, at Kansas City, 1 p.m.

Week 12: Sunday, Nov. 23, Arizona, 4:05 p.m.

Week 13: Thursday, Nov. 27, at San Francisco, 8:30 p.m.

Week 14: Sunday, Dec. 7, at Philadelphia, 4:25 p.m.

Week 15: Sunday, Dec. 14, San Francisco, 4:25 p.m.

Week 16: Sunday, Dec. 21, at Arizona, 8:30 p.m.

Five good defenses in there too, just a note for FF reference during the playoff runup.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm all for a good conspiracy theory......but this isn't one of them.
I agree, that this likely wasn't done "on purpose" for sinister reasons.

But even if it was true, so what?

SEA has to play 8 road games, what difference does it make what time those games start to Seattle. If the NFL wants competitive and interesting games in prime time is that a bad thing?

 
SEA has to play 8 road games, what difference does it make what time those games start to Seattle.
Seattle playing their prime time games on the road is a good thing in some cases. During the Holmgren years the running narrative was that they struggled playing early games on the east coast. The prime time slot for a road game means it won't be occurring at what we perceive to be 10AM here on the west coast. Their game at Washington on Oct. 6th falls into this category, but because its been moved to prime time they will get to avoid that early morning slot.

 
SEA has to play 8 road games, what difference does it make what time those games start to Seattle.
Seattle playing their prime time games on the road is a good thing in some cases. During the Holmgren years the running narrative was that they struggled playing early games on the east coast. The prime time slot for a road game means it won't be occurring at what we perceive to be 10AM here on the west coast. Their game at Washington on Oct. 6th falls into this category, but because its been moved to prime time they will get to avoid that early morning slot.
:goodposting:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top