Jump to content


daveR

Member Since 19 Apr 2003
Offline Last Active May 15 2013 12:46 PM
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: *** CLEVELAND BROWNS THREAD ***

12 May 2013 - 04:29 AM

Gotta go with RevDawg, here.  Maybe they're just new at this, but the secrecy looks like it's being overdone.


In Topic: *** CLEVELAND BROWNS THREAD ***

28 April 2013 - 12:06 PM

Davonne Bess is the biggest player addition to a poor offense.  He's a decent slot / possession receiver, which we already had in Little.  Net = 0.

This might be your dumbest one yet. Which is saying something.

 

Your commentary is worthless without reasoning. 


In Topic: *** CLEVELAND BROWNS THREAD ***

28 April 2013 - 03:09 AM

So they changed the scheme's.  We're back to Mangini style.  Sure hope it works this time.

 

They added pass rushers.  I'm cool with that.  Can't see how a good pass rush can be a bad thing.

 

Davonne Bess is the biggest player addition to a poor offense.  He's a decent slot / possession receiver, which we already had in Little.  Net = 0.

 

.

 

Like all Browns fans, I am hoping everything works out well.  :thumbup:   But, as you can see, I'm not sold.


In Topic: *** CLEVELAND BROWNS THREAD ***

27 April 2013 - 12:37 PM

 

 

 




Good posts guys. I didn't like some of the moves, but when you look at the offseason as a whole I do think the Browns are better off than they were in 2012.

 
The weaknesses remain weaknesses.  QB - same guy.  OG - same guys.  TE - lesser guy.  PK - New hole.  DL - was a strength.  LB - were good as 4-3, added guys to fill holes created by going 3-4.  CB - not improved.  S - not improved.
QB same guy better coaching and system.
OG pinks ton back not a primary need
TE fair point we will see about Jordan
DL all main guys still there plus Bryant
LB were ok added guys who can rush the qb
Cb have added 3 guys
S agree
K just stop
Switch to 3-4 it happened get over it
So a five win team didn't get much better while others did.

Wha? I was just addressing his mostly horrible points. You may resume the fetal position.

 

My "horrible" point is that they have not improved any weaknesses.  The OGs were weak and still are.  Do you disagree?  The QB was weak, and we hope he gets better, but nobody knows for sure.  The DL was already good, so adding to it didn't make the team better overall.  "Get over it" is an irrational statement.  If you think we're not worse at PK, you're just wrong.  And, do you really think the defensive backfield is significantly improved?  Anybody with any sense would have to say, "We can only hope", because taking the eighth best CB in the draft is crossing your fingers at best!


In Topic: *** CLEVELAND BROWNS THREAD ***

27 April 2013 - 10:52 AM

Good posts guys. I didn't like some of the moves, but when you look at the offseason as a whole I do think the Browns are better off than they were in 2012.

 

The weaknesses remain weaknesses.  QB - same guy.  OG - same guys.  TE - lesser guy.  PK - New hole.  DL - was a strength.  LB - were good as 4-3, added guys to fill holes created by going 3-4.  CB - not improved.  S - not improved.