QUOTE (Steve in Minneapolis @ Jun 7 2005, 11:05 PM)
I am okay with you having your opinion about why RT sports (or any other site) is better, or that CBS is 'over priced'. But you then say that people who use it 'deserve a good bash on the back of the head.'

This goes back a few years, when mfl.com was just an infant. CBSSportsline made an overt bait-and-switch attempt to drive mfl.com out of business by offering its service for free, with the hope that the greater majority orf mfl.com's customers would jump to CBS. Quite a few did, but many, like my leagues did not, because of all the diverse set-up, scoring, & scheduling options mfl.com offered that CBS did not.
Those of us that stayed with mfl.com @ $40 a league then got a tremendous laugh when the entire CBS network went down for days at a time due to the flood of usage that they had not been prepared to accept. People literally could not run waivers for weeks at a time in some leagues. In the meantime, if we had the slightest problem with anything at mfl.com, an e-mail to support got a response within 1/2 hour.
The year after this happened, CBS pulled the rug out from under their owners, changing from a free league to charging $130/league, while mfl.com stayed at $50/league & improved its options, growing in its versatility - that was the bait-and-switch part. mfl.com survived, offering diverse options at a really good price, while CBS obviously had no intention of sending a reasonable amount of their profits into the product, and a lot of leagues there got the same problems with overloaded servers during the first few weeks of the season, creating huge problems for leagues with late drafts & creating waivers havoc in many leagues. Don't even get me started about CBS's attempted switch to the java draft system - an unqualified disaster that screwed a lot of drafts up badly.
Yet for some reason, people would come to this board, pimping CBS as being so superior, while the mfl.com owners quitely got a little lower quality product, but had superior service & superior reliability by a couple of orders of magnitude. Since that time, CBS has made their product sexier, but have kept the price extremely high, relatively speaking, while mfl.com has raised its prices marginally while improving its product immensely and keeping the same reliable service.
It comes down to people remembering how CBS tried to eliminate its competition through a patently unfair business practice, then screwed its own owners by creating such an absurd price level while offering extremely poor service, but hooking unknowledgable and/or uncaring FF owners.
Mfl.com has always been a reliable, reasonably priced product that has constantly thrown a good amount of its profits to upgrade its product while offering consistently great service. CBS in the meantime got exposed as the wolf in sheep's clothing that it was, and to this day still has tremendous bugs in its service - as evidenced by the waves of posts in the last 2 weeks of preseason through the first 2-3 weeks of regular season where people here are asking if anyone else is having trouble with their CBS league.
We remember mfl.com being steady & dedicated to its leagues while CBS tried to drive them out of business, and we appreciate the way mfl.com runs their ship while holding a reasonable line on their pricing. Hence the animosity to CBS and the spill over to owners who will come to the board crowing about how great CBS's product is.
That animosity is well deserved.