Tick
Dec 21 2005, 03:13 PM
Please comment on your vote, and list any player that should be nominated for the next round. If you must assume a scoring system, go with 0.5 points per half-tackle, 3 points per sack / INT / FF / FR.
Final Results:
Ray Lewis [ 1 ] ** [6.25%]
Jonathan Vilma [ 12 ] ** [75.00%]
Mike Peterson [ 2 ] ** [12.50%]
Lofa Tatupu [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Demorrio Williams [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Nick Barnett [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Other [ 1 ] ** [6.25%]
Vilma by the mercy rule.
inbreeder
Dec 21 2005, 03:37 PM
QUOTE (Tick @ Dec 21 2005, 04:13 PM)
Please comment on your vote, and list any player that should be nominated for the next round. If you must assume a scoring system, go with 0.5 points per half-tackle, 3 points per sack / INT / FF / FR.
Vilma. Already a top 5 guy in his second year and still has the potential to improve in a good situation. Although I'm a huge Mike Peterson guy.
Might consider adding Donnie Edwards, Brian Urlacher, Keith Bulluck or Antonio Pierce. Those guys are probably on par with Tatupu or Williams.
stevec
Dec 21 2005, 03:44 PM
I know he's old, but I think you need to have the #1 guy on the poll until he's not the #1 guy. Hence I request that Zach Thomas be added.
On 2 related notes for Tick:
1. This forum gets a lot less activity than the Shark Pool, so we may not be able to do more than 1 player a day per position. I will vote in every thread I see, and I think alot of the IDP guys will do likewise. I'm intereted to see how many total votes there are in this forum for IDP's, I'd expect a fair number of close votes due to less people voting.
2. Do we want to break out DT/DE & CB/S? I'd say no, but others may differ.
Tick
Dec 21 2005, 03:44 PM
I also voted Vilma. He's young and dominant.
Tick
Dec 21 2005, 03:45 PM
QUOTE (stevec @ Dec 21 2005, 05:44 PM)
I know he's old, but I think you need to have the #1 guy on the poll until he's not the #1 guy. Hence I request that Zach Thomas be added.
On 2 related notes for Tick:
1. This forum gets a lot less activity than the Shark Pool, so we may not be able to do more than 1 player a day per position. I will vote in every thread I see, and I think alot of the IDP guys will do likewise. I'm intereted to see how many total votes there are in this forum for IDP's, I'd expect a fair number of close votes due to less people voting.
2. Do we want to break out DT/DE & CB/S? I'd say no, but others may differ.
Yeah, I don't know what to expect, but figured I'd give it a shot and see what the response is. I'll add Zach Thomas to the next poll.
stevec
Dec 21 2005, 03:52 PM
I'll throw out a poll on the breakdown thing - it might help a little.
Renegades of Funk
Dec 21 2005, 05:27 PM
Vilma is the clear #1.
Weiner Dog
Dec 21 2005, 05:41 PM
QUOTE (Renegades of Funk @ Dec 21 2005, 06:27 PM)
Qtip Callahan
Dec 21 2005, 07:08 PM
Ditto that Vilma is the man..
Tick
Dec 21 2005, 07:34 PM
This is enough of a landslide that I'm going to move on to #2.
Herc
Dec 21 2005, 07:43 PM
I voted other just to stir the pot
I like O. Thurman in Lewis' system as one of the top dogs going forward.
I think him and Vilma will both be top 5 for years to come..... just a different perspective
Just because I like Thurman does not mean I would take him first I really like his situation going forward
HitMen05
Dec 22 2005, 06:39 AM
I agree Vilma all the way.
Keith Bulluck should have been in the vote, he would be my 2nd or 3rd choice in a dynasty league
mike303
Dec 22 2005, 06:59 AM
I voted Vilma, but would add Urlacher & Bullock to the next vote.
msommer
Dec 22 2005, 07:27 AM
QUOTE (HitMen05 @ Dec 22 2005, 07:39 AM)
I agree Vilma all the way.
Keith Bulluck should have been in the vote, he would be my 2nd or 3rd choice in a dynasty league
SkyRattlers
Dec 22 2005, 12:26 PM
I realize this is closed now but I voted other for Bulluck
yetiknight
Dec 22 2005, 05:55 PM
I voted Vilma. Leads the league in tackles most of the year and doesn't have a bad situation. It most certainly could get better though.
I would mark Antonio Pierce down as a close second. He is becoming a clear defensive MVP for any team.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.