Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Eliminate homework?
Footballguys Forums > Our Forums > Footballguys Free For All
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
fatguyinalittlecoat
QUOTE (TinHat @ Oct 10 2006, 04:28 PM) *
Gym class at least 3 times per week should be required. Healthy bodies help build healthy minds


Does gym class really keep kids in shape, though? I don't remember it ever being very rigorous.
belljr
I didn't know not having gym was an option in high school.

Not sure if it's state law here but we had to have gym every year for 3 marking periods all the way through HS.

The one marking period was for health.
Pipes
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *
QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
fatguyinalittlecoat
QUOTE (belljr @ Oct 10 2006, 04:31 PM) *
I didn't know not having gym was an option in high school.

Not sure if it's state law here but we had to have gym every year for 3 marking periods all the way through HS.

The one marking period was for health.

I think I only had gym through 9th grade. I'm pretty sure it wasn't required in 10th-12th.
The_Hunchback
I didn't read the thread. I have 4 kids, 3 of which are in school. Them getting homework in my eyes is a good thing, the days they don't have any homework they are required to have reading time. Sometimes they must still read even with homework. Them having certain things to do for school at home teaches time management and prioritizing things. If they didn't have homework they would just get that much more around the house to do.

I have a nephew who doesn't do hardly any homework, his parents don't make him. It is starting to reflect in his daily work at school because he doesn't have to do as much and figures hell I don't have to do anything at home why should I do much at school. He has poor time management and skills to figure out what is important and what isn't.
The Tick
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *
QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


NO.

hmmm where do I start:
1) you can't just learn stuff by watching a teacher do it on the blackboard. They show you concepts, then you learn by trying out these concepts in different situations on your own.
2) this can't all be done in class as different students will be able to do it at different paces. If teacher just says try it yourself for 10 minutes, half the class may actually get done and "learn" what they were doing, but the other half will be sitting there struggling through it for a while.
3) reading/analyzing/writing, has no place in class because it takes time and thought to actually do a well written essay or even paragraph when your younger, not something that should be taken up by school time.
Chaka
QUOTE (Snotbubbles @ Oct 10 2006, 11:09 PM) *
QUOTE
Failing the kids might have an effect.

Yeesh! Lazy parents. You need a license to go fishing but anyone can have children, there is something wrong with that.


What if the child brings home geometry, algebra, chemistry? I took high level calculus and had to take the GMAT and couldn't remember how to do the basic mathematics in it (i think geometry and algebra). What about parents that don't have higher level educations. To effectively help a child do the homework you would have to re-learn (or in some instances learn) the material first. That in itself could take a couple of hours a night before you could even help your child.
I wasn't suggesting the parents help the kids do their homework, that kind of defeats the purpose doesn't it? But it doesn't take much education to crack the whip and make sure the child does their homework.

Parents can also contribute even if they don't know the subject by asking the child to teach them what they are doing. If the child has the opportunity to explain the work then it will certainly increase their comprehension of the material.
Chaka
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 11:15 PM) *
QUOTE (Serenity Now @ Oct 10 2006, 02:12 PM) *

As a parent, I'd have to say I'm pretty mixed on the homework issue. From the parent standpoint, most of the work I see assigned is crap busy work. If that's what my kids will be assigned, I'd just as soon have them out playing. If there's a purpose to the work, such as what Tanner outlined, then I can see the value of it. If it's a project for students to complete over time, etc, that's fine. Spare me the fill in the blanks worksheets, please.

The rule of thumb in our district is 10 minutes per grade level of the student. I'm fine with that. I have two children, one of whom is very, very bright but struggles mightily with fine motor skills and moving information from brain to pencil. Homework can be excruciating for him even though the work isn't that hard. What takes many kids 20 minutes might take him more than an hour. I fought the suggestion to stop him at the allotted time because I didn't want to teach him to stop without finishing. This year, however, I'm going to have to do that as he's being assigned over 2 hours of homework a night in 6th grade. It's ridiculous.


pigskinp.gif

Most HW is crap and mindless and a complete waste of time. Going out to play > mindless dribble teacher's assign to their students to waste their time. I think getting outside and playing is something that is greatly lost in this country and can't believe how many kids now stay indoors practically all day.


If there is a specific purpose though then I have no problem with it but for the most part, most HW is pretty useless.
Homework is NOT the reason children are spending to much time inside and it is silly to suggest it is. How about cutting into their television time or their X-Box time or their on-line time to get them outside? Makes more sense than cutting into their intellectual time.
The_Hunchback
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:46 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 11:15 PM) *

QUOTE (Serenity Now @ Oct 10 2006, 02:12 PM) *

As a parent, I'd have to say I'm pretty mixed on the homework issue. From the parent standpoint, most of the work I see assigned is crap busy work. If that's what my kids will be assigned, I'd just as soon have them out playing. If there's a purpose to the work, such as what Tanner outlined, then I can see the value of it. If it's a project for students to complete over time, etc, that's fine. Spare me the fill in the blanks worksheets, please.

The rule of thumb in our district is 10 minutes per grade level of the student. I'm fine with that. I have two children, one of whom is very, very bright but struggles mightily with fine motor skills and moving information from brain to pencil. Homework can be excruciating for him even though the work isn't that hard. What takes many kids 20 minutes might take him more than an hour. I fought the suggestion to stop him at the allotted time because I didn't want to teach him to stop without finishing. This year, however, I'm going to have to do that as he's being assigned over 2 hours of homework a night in 6th grade. It's ridiculous.


pigskinp.gif

Most HW is crap and mindless and a complete waste of time. Going out to play > mindless dribble teacher's assign to their students to waste their time. I think getting outside and playing is something that is greatly lost in this country and can't believe how many kids now stay indoors practically all day.


If there is a specific purpose though then I have no problem with it but for the most part, most HW is pretty useless.
Homework is NOT the reason children are spending to much time inside and it is silly to suggest it is. How about cutting into their television time or their X-Box time or their on-line time to get them outside? Makes more sense than cutting into their intellectual time.



My son is horrible about playing the game cube, horrible, he could spend all day on that damn thing. He is also the worst about getting his homework done. We won't allow him to watch tv, play the game cube or anything inside unless his homework is done but even then we force him to play outside prior to allowing tv or gamecube. I have taken the thing away and actually taken him outside against his will, if for no other reason than making him sit outside instead of staying inside and staring at the tv.

For him homework isn't worthless, it is an absolute necessity. For my daughter it isn't as big a thing, she understands and can get things done much better but even for her I still think she needs homework, which can include just reading a book. They need down time after being at school and working their brains all day but at the same time they need to know intellectual stimulation doesn't stop once you leave school.
Disco Stu
QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 03:35 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.
RKMoney
QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.


Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
RKMoney
QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 02:54 PM) *
QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 03:35 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


pigskinp.gif

You could make an argument that regardless of how easy/difficult a class is, you NEED a teacher there and it's much more helpful than doing it on your own. You don't know how to do something, you shouldn't have your parents teach it to you because the teacher didn't have enough time to.
Chaka
QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 11:54 PM) *
QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 03:35 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.
Calculus primer for dads. Bikini Calculus
Chaka
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 11:55 PM) *
QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.


Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
For a child it can be. Heck I know plenty of adults who can't make change without a calculator.
RKMoney
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:01 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 11:55 PM) *

QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.


Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
For a child it can be. Heck I know plenty of adults who can't make change without a calculator.


And that's the parents job, not the teacher's job?
The Tick
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM) *
QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.


Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.


When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
RKMoney
So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
Chaka
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 11:57 PM) *
QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 02:54 PM) *

QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 03:35 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


pigskinp.gif

You could make an argument that regardless of how easy/difficult a class is, you NEED a teacher there and it's much more helpful than doing it on your own. You don't know how to do something, you shouldn't have your parents teach it to you because the teacher didn't have enough time to.
Either you don't get the concept of homework and independent study, you need someone to spoonfeed you every piece of new information in your life or RK gets my vote for Deep Sea Fisherman of the year.
RKMoney
QUOTE (The Tick @ Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM) *

QUOTE (Pipes @ Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM) *

QUOTE (BGP @ Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM) *

I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.


Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?


You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.


Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.


When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...


lol.gif

Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
IvanKaramazov
QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM) *
Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.
RKMoney
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697215' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM'][quote name='RKMoney' post='5697168' date='Oct 10 2006, 11:57 PM']
[quote name='Disco Stu' post='5697145' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:54 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.[/quote]

Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]

You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]
Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.
[/quote]

pigskinp.gif

You could make an argument that regardless of how easy/difficult a class is, you NEED a teacher there and it's much more helpful than doing it on your own. You don't know how to do something, you shouldn't have your parents teach it to you because the teacher didn't have enough time to.
[/quote]Either you don't get the concept of homework and independent study, you need someone to spoonfeed you every piece of new information in your life or RK gets my vote for Deep Sea Fisherman of the year.
[/quote]

Homework can mean many different things.
Chaka
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:03 AM) *
So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
It's supplemental education bro (I know how much you love to be called bro), it teaches them independent problem solving skills and/or reinforces information covered in class. The parent doesn't need to teach them the subject, even if they are capable which most are not, just make sure they actually do their work.

Don't act like it's a foreign concept.
RKMoney
QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM) *
QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM) *

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.


But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
IvanKaramazov
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:57 PM) *
You could make an argument that regardless of how easy/difficult a class is, you NEED a teacher there and it's much more helpful than doing it on your own. You don't know how to do something, you shouldn't have your parents teach it to you because the teacher didn't have enough time to.


I don't think it's asking too much from a kid for him to read the textbook if he runs into a jam. It's good for students to work through things on their own without having a teacher/prof standing over their shoulder all the time.
RKMoney
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:06 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:03 AM) *

So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
It's supplemental education bro (I know how much you love to be called bro), it teaches them independent problem solving skills and/or reinforces information covered in class. The parent doesn't need to teach them the subject, even if they are capable which most are not, just make sure they actually do their work.

Don't act like it's a foreign concept.


Why force a student though to do it if they already know it?
Chaka
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:06 AM) *
QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM) *

QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM) *

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.


But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
It is difficult to set different standards for each students in a class. Would you rather other students receive less education because others are superior in a subject?
RKMoney
QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 03:07 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 03:57 PM) *

You could make an argument that regardless of how easy/difficult a class is, you NEED a teacher there and it's much more helpful than doing it on your own. You don't know how to do something, you shouldn't have your parents teach it to you because the teacher didn't have enough time to.


I don't think it's asking too much from a kid for him to read the textbook if he runs into a jam. It's good for students to work through things on their own without having a teacher/prof standing over their shoulder all the time.



Sure but why force a student to do homework though? Problem is that you have 6 teacher's and each one wants you to do homework you can spend many hours racing through stuff you may already know. What's the point?
IvanKaramazov
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 04:06 PM) *
QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM) *

QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM) *

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.


But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?


If they're a math whiz, then doing a little homework shouldn't be a big deal.
Chaka
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:08 AM) *
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:06 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:03 AM) *

So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
It's supplemental education bro (I know how much you love to be called bro), it teaches them independent problem solving skills and/or reinforces information covered in class. The parent doesn't need to teach them the subject, even if they are capable which most are not, just make sure they actually do their work.

Don't act like it's a foreign concept.


Why force a student though to do it if they already know it?
So all students know the subject completely? Why have schools then?
RKMoney
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:09 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:06 AM) *

QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM) *

QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM) *

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.


But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
It is difficult to set different standards for each students in a class. Would you rather other students receive less education because others are superior in a subject?


That's why you should make it voluntary. If you need additonal help then it's there, if not then no need to waste your time. Teach student's to be responsible and accountability.
IvanKaramazov
I think this thread currently rates a 4 on the RKMonkey Trolling Scale™, but early indications are that that rating could rise.
The Tick
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697226' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM'][quote name='The Tick' post='5697210' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697157' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.[/quote]

Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]

You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]

Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
[/quote]

When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
[/quote]

lol.gif

Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
[/quote]

The teacher should teach it to you, but there is a limit to how much teaching the teacher can do before they have to move on for the rest of the class. If in that time you are not able to grasp the concept, and can't figure out the homework you have 4 options, fail, your parents can help if they can, off hours with the teacher, or a tutor.
RKMoney
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:10 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:08 AM) *

QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:06 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:03 AM) *

So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
It's supplemental education bro (I know how much you love to be called bro), it teaches them independent problem solving skills and/or reinforces information covered in class. The parent doesn't need to teach them the subject, even if they are capable which most are not, just make sure they actually do their work.

Don't act like it's a foreign concept.


Why force a student though to do it if they already know it?
So all students know the subject completely? Why have schools then?

Some will breeze by it so they shouldn't do any time wasting homework
Some will understand it but need additional work so home work is there

Again, most student's have 6 classes so while you may not need ANY homework for Math, you may need some for Science or English, etc.
Chaka
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:11 AM) *
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:09 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:06 AM) *

QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM) *

QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM) *

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.


But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
It is difficult to set different standards for each students in a class. Would you rather other students receive less education because others are superior in a subject?


That's why you should make it voluntary. If you need additonal help then it's there, if not then no need to waste your time. Teach student's to be responsible and accountability.
rolleyes1.gif

That's a brilliant plan. I guess it's a good way to weed out the self-starters from the future ditch diggers. Heaven forbid we wouldn't want someone to learn they can achieve more if they actually work hard.
RKMoney
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697281' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:12 PM'][quote name='RKMoney' post='5697226' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697210' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697157' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.[/quote]

Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]

You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]

Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
[/quote]

When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
[/quote]

lol.gif

Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
[/quote]

The teacher should teach it to you, but there is a limit to how much teaching the teacher can do before they have to move on for the rest of the class. If in that time you are not able to grasp the concept, and can't figure out the homework you have 4 options, fail, your parents can help if they can, off hours with the teacher, or a tutor.
[/quote]

I understand all of this but if you master a particular subject or something you are doing at the time, why should you waste an hour of busy work at home when you may need help in other subjects?

Example: You are grandmaster at long division but you stink in Spanish translation. So your math teacher assigns you about an hour of doing long division problems while you have Spanish HW on top of that. This doesn't even cover your Physics and English homework. So, why waste time on your long division HW when you are the master at it when you need to spend your time in Spanish, Physics, and English? How does this help you one bit?
RKMoney
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697285' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:13 PM'][quote name='RKMoney' post='5697269' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:11 AM']
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697255' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:09 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697236' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:06 AM']
[quote name='IvanKaramazov' post='5697230' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM']
[quote name='Disco Stu' post='5697145' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM']
Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.[/quote]

I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.
[/quote]

But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
[/quote]It is difficult to set different standards for each students in a class. Would you rather other students receive less education because others are superior in a subject?
[/quote]

That's why you should make it voluntary. If you need additonal help then it's there, if not then no need to waste your time. Teach student's to be responsible and accountability.
[/quote] rolleyes1.gif

That's a brilliant plan. I guess it's a good way to weed out the self-starters from the future ditch diggers. Heaven forbid we wouldn't want someone to learn they can achieve more if they actually work hard.
[/quote]
Chaka
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697302' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:17 AM'][quote name='Chaka' post='5697285' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:13 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697269' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:11 AM']
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697255' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:09 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697236' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:06 AM']
[quote name='IvanKaramazov' post='5697230' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM']
[quote name='Disco Stu' post='5697145' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM']
Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.[/quote]

I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.
[/quote]

But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
[/quote]It is difficult to set different standards for each students in a class. Would you rather other students receive less education because others are superior in a subject?
[/quote]

That's why you should make it voluntary. If you need additonal help then it's there, if not then no need to waste your time. Teach student's to be responsible and accountability.
[/quote] rolleyes1.gif

That's a brilliant plan. I guess it's a good way to weed out the self-starters from the future ditch diggers. Heaven forbid we wouldn't want someone to learn they can achieve more if they actually work hard.
[/quote]
[/quote]How exactly? By making homework voluntary? Why not make X-Box an elective while we're at it?
The Tick
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697298' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:16 PM'][quote name='The Tick' post='5697281' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:12 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697226' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697210' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697157' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.[/quote]

Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]

You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]

Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
[/quote]

When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
[/quote]

lol.gif

Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
[/quote]

The teacher should teach it to you, but there is a limit to how much teaching the teacher can do before they have to move on for the rest of the class. If in that time you are not able to grasp the concept, and can't figure out the homework you have 4 options, fail, your parents can help if they can, off hours with the teacher, or a tutor.
[/quote]

I understand all of this but if you master a particular subject or something you are doing at the time, why should you waste an hour of busy work at home when you may need help in other subjects?

Example: You are grandmaster at long division but you stink in Spanish translation. So your math teacher assigns you about an hour of doing long division problems while you have Spanish HW on top of that. This doesn't even cover your Physics and English homework. So, why waste time on your long division HW when you are the master at it when you need to spend your time in Spanish, Physics, and English? How does this help you one bit?
[/quote]

That gets into the amount of homework assigned per class, which as I have stated in this thread earlier can be an issue also.

I would say spending an hour on something you are the master of is exactly a waste of time, and an unreasonable amount of homework. This isn't a metric that teachers can necessarily use, but for a student that is a master of a certain subject, I would think on average an assignment that takes more then 20 minutes would be busywork and a waste of their time. As for people that say even 20 minutes is a waste, live with it, it's school, just like work, sometimes you have to do pointless stuff, in this case, the reason would be because it would take a teacher too much time to tailor their class perfectly for each student, such is life.
RKMoney
QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 03:12 PM) *
I think this thread currently rates a 4 on the RKMonkey Trolling Scale™, but early indications are that that rating could rise.


This is a message board, correct?
RKMoney
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697334' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:23 PM'][quote name='RKMoney' post='5697298' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:16 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697281' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:12 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697226' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697210' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697157' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.[/quote]

Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]

You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]

Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
[/quote]

When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
[/quote]

lol.gif

Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
[/quote]

The teacher should teach it to you, but there is a limit to how much teaching the teacher can do before they have to move on for the rest of the class. If in that time you are not able to grasp the concept, and can't figure out the homework you have 4 options, fail, your parents can help if they can, off hours with the teacher, or a tutor.
[/quote]

I understand all of this but if you master a particular subject or something you are doing at the time, why should you waste an hour of busy work at home when you may need help in other subjects?

Example: You are grandmaster at long division but you stink in Spanish translation. So your math teacher assigns you about an hour of doing long division problems while you have Spanish HW on top of that. This doesn't even cover your Physics and English homework. So, why waste time on your long division HW when you are the master at it when you need to spend your time in Spanish, Physics, and English? How does this help you one bit?
[/quote]

That gets into the amount of homework assigned per class, which as I have stated in this thread earlier can be an issue also.

I would say spending an hour on something you are the master of is exactly a waste of time, and an unreasonable amount of homework. This isn't a metric that teachers can necessarily use, but for a student that is a master of a certain subject, I would think on average an assignment that takes more then 20 minutes would be busywork and a waste of their time. As for people that say even 20 minutes is a waste, live with it, it's school, just like work, sometimes you have to do pointless stuff, in this case, the reason would be because it would take a teacher too much time to tailor their class perfectly for each student, such is life.
[/quote]

If school's had HW voluntary then it would be left up to the student's and their parents. And for the people who rolleyes on this think about it, there's a lot of bad student's who simply DON'T do HW at all and get bad grades as a result. Forcing student's to do HW I don't think makes them any better students.
RKMoney
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697313' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:20 PM'][quote name='RKMoney' post='5697302' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:17 AM']
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697285' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:13 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697269' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:11 AM']
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697255' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:09 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697236' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:06 AM']
[quote name='IvanKaramazov' post='5697230' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM']
[quote name='Disco Stu' post='5697145' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM']
Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.[/quote]

I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.
[/quote]

But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
[/quote]It is difficult to set different standards for each students in a class. Would you rather other students receive less education because others are superior in a subject?
[/quote]

That's why you should make it voluntary. If you need additonal help then it's there, if not then no need to waste your time. Teach student's to be responsible and accountability.
[/quote] rolleyes1.gif

That's a brilliant plan. I guess it's a good way to weed out the self-starters from the future ditch diggers. Heaven forbid we wouldn't want someone to learn they can achieve more if they actually work hard.
[/quote]
[/quote]How exactly? By making homework voluntary? Why not make X-Box an elective while we're at it?
[/quote]

Responsibility --> Student's who need HW will ask for it and then take it home and do it themselves. It's up to them if they need more work on a particular subject. Someone can drop out and go to war but not responsible enough to know if they need more HW or not?

Accountability ---> need more help in a subject but skipped getting HW and as a result got a bad grade on the test? You should be held accountable for your actions, just like in life.
Zalf
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 04:08 PM) *
QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:06 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:03 AM) *

So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
It's supplemental education bro (I know how much you love to be called bro), it teaches them independent problem solving skills and/or reinforces information covered in class. The parent doesn't need to teach them the subject, even if they are capable which most are not, just make sure they actually do their work.

Don't act like it's a foreign concept.


Why force a student though to do it if they already know it?


Work ethic. I spend most of my day doing things I already know how to do. I learned the patience to do this by doing it in school.
RKMoney
QUOTE (Zalf @ Oct 10 2006, 03:30 PM) *
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 04:08 PM) *

QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:06 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:03 AM) *

So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
It's supplemental education bro (I know how much you love to be called bro), it teaches them independent problem solving skills and/or reinforces information covered in class. The parent doesn't need to teach them the subject, even if they are capable which most are not, just make sure they actually do their work.

Don't act like it's a foreign concept.


Why force a student though to do it if they already know it?


Work ethic. I spend most of my day doing things I already know how to do. I learned the patience to do this by doing it in school.


That's not work ethic though.
Chaka
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697356' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:26 AM'][quote name='The Tick' post='5697334' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:23 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697298' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:16 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697281' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:12 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697226' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697210' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697157' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.[/quote]

Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]

You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]

Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
[/quote]

When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
[/quote]

lol.gif

Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
[/quote]

The teacher should teach it to you, but there is a limit to how much teaching the teacher can do before they have to move on for the rest of the class. If in that time you are not able to grasp the concept, and can't figure out the homework you have 4 options, fail, your parents can help if they can, off hours with the teacher, or a tutor.
[/quote]

I understand all of this but if you master a particular subject or something you are doing at the time, why should you waste an hour of busy work at home when you may need help in other subjects?

Example: You are grandmaster at long division but you stink in Spanish translation. So your math teacher assigns you about an hour of doing long division problems while you have Spanish HW on top of that. This doesn't even cover your Physics and English homework. So, why waste time on your long division HW when you are the master at it when you need to spend your time in Spanish, Physics, and English? How does this help you one bit?
[/quote]

That gets into the amount of homework assigned per class, which as I have stated in this thread earlier can be an issue also.

I would say spending an hour on something you are the master of is exactly a waste of time, and an unreasonable amount of homework. This isn't a metric that teachers can necessarily use, but for a student that is a master of a certain subject, I would think on average an assignment that takes more then 20 minutes would be busywork and a waste of their time. As for people that say even 20 minutes is a waste, live with it, it's school, just like work, sometimes you have to do pointless stuff, in this case, the reason would be because it would take a teacher too much time to tailor their class perfectly for each student, such is life.
[/quote]

If school's had HW voluntary then it would be left up to the student's and their parents. And for the people who rolleyes on this think about it, there's a lot of bad student's who simply DON'T do HW at all and get bad grades as a result. Forcing student's to do HW I don't think makes them any better students.
[/quote]This is the operative phrase in this paragraph.

By making it voluntary you guarantee the underachievers will continue to underachieve (a process that typically begins in the home), by making it mandatory and establishing consequences for their actions (failing grades) you teach them about accountability and responsibility and maybe you reach a few of the underachievers and get them to change their habits. Some children will always underachieve, or achieve at a lower level if you prefer, but some simply haven't been taught any other way.
Zalf
QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 04:31 PM) *
QUOTE (Zalf @ Oct 10 2006, 03:30 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 10 2006, 04:08 PM) *

QUOTE (Chaka @ Oct 10 2006, 03:06 PM) *

QUOTE (RKMoney @ Oct 11 2006, 12:03 AM) *

So complex and easy subjects it's the parent's job to teach their children, not the teacher's job?
It's supplemental education bro (I know how much you love to be called bro), it teaches them independent problem solving skills and/or reinforces information covered in class. The parent doesn't need to teach them the subject, even if they are capable which most are not, just make sure they actually do their work.

Don't act like it's a foreign concept.


Why force a student though to do it if they already know it?


Work ethic. I spend most of my day doing things I already know how to do. I learned the patience to do this by doing it in school.


That's not work ethic though.


Sure it is. And its a real life skill learned via school that I use everyday. A skill I use alot more often then the "new" things I learned during Advanced Trig class time.
shining path
The major skill that I think homework, or at least work out of class, is necessary to build is writing. Term papers, short compositions etc.
RKMoney
[quote name='Chaka' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:32 PM' post='5697397']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697356' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:26 AM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697334' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:23 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697298' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:16 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697281' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:12 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697226' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697210' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697157' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:

+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.

I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.
[/quote]

Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?

Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]

You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]

Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
[/quote]

When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
[/quote]

lol.gif

Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
[/quote]

The teacher should teach it to you, but there is a limit to how much teaching the teacher can do before they have to move on for the rest of the class. If in that time you are not able to grasp the concept, and can't figure out the homework you have 4 options, fail, your parents can help if they can, off hours with the teacher, or a tutor.
[/quote]

I understand all of this but if you master a particular subject or something you are doing at the time, why should you waste an hour of busy work at home when you may need help in other subjects?

Example: You are grandmaster at long division but you stink in Spanish translation. So your math teacher assigns you about an hour of doing long division problems while you have Spanish HW on top of that. This doesn't even cover your Physics and English homework. So, why waste time on your long division HW when you are the master at it when you need to spend your time in Spanish, Physics, and English? How does this help you one bit?
[/quote]

That gets into the amount of homework assigned per class, which as I have stated in this thread earlier can be an issue also.

I would say spending an hour on something you are the master of is exactly a waste of time, and an unreasonable amount of homework. This isn't a metric that teachers can necessarily use, but for a student that is a master of a certain subject, I would think on average an assignment that takes more then 20 minutes would be busywork and a waste of their time. As for people that say even 20 minutes is a waste, live with it, it's school, just like work, sometimes you have to do pointless stuff, in this case, the reason would be because it would take a teacher too much time to tailor their class perfectly for each student, such is life.
[/quote]

If school's had HW voluntary then it would be left up to the student's and their parents. And for the people who rolleyes on this think about it, there's a lot of bad student's who simply DON'T do HW at all and get bad grades as a result. Forcing student's to do HW I don't think makes them any better students.
[/quote]This is the operative phrase in this paragraph.

By making it voluntary you guarantee the underachievers will continue to underachieve (a process that typically begins in the home), by making it mandatory and establishing consequences for their actions (failing grades) you teach them about accountability and responsibility and maybe you reach a few of the underachievers and get them to change their habits. Some children will always underachieve, or achieve at a lower level if you prefer, but some simply haven't been taught any other way.
[/quote]

I disagree but even if I agreed, so the people who know it already should be punished? People who underachieve still do so with HW assigned. They either skip it or cheat and copy off someone else.


I just remember getting some bad grades in HW assignments not because I didn't know how to do it but because I had not only practice (sports) after class and then focused on HW in classes where I needed help. So my choice at a certain point later at night was to get decent amount of sleep or simply skip it. When I skiped it I got a bad mark on the HW which is lame.
The Tick
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697369' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:29 PM'][quote name='Chaka' post='5697313' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:20 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697302' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:17 AM']
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697285' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:13 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697269' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:11 AM']
[quote name='Chaka' post='5697255' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:09 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697236' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:06 AM']
[quote name='IvanKaramazov' post='5697230' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:05 PM']
[quote name='Disco Stu' post='5697145' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM']
Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.[/quote]

I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.
[/quote]

But why make student's do homework? What if someone was an ace at calculus? Does that mean they need to waste their time doing it?
[/quote]It is difficult to set different standards for each students in a class. Would you rather other students receive less education because others are superior in a subject?
[/quote]

That's why you should make it voluntary. If you need additonal help then it's there, if not then no need to waste your time. Teach student's to be responsible and accountability.
[/quote] rolleyes1.gif

That's a brilliant plan. I guess it's a good way to weed out the self-starters from the future ditch diggers. Heaven forbid we wouldn't want someone to learn they can achieve more if they actually work hard.
[/quote]
[/quote]How exactly? By making homework voluntary? Why not make X-Box an elective while we're at it?
[/quote]

Responsibility --> Student's who need HW will ask for it and then take it home and do it themselves. It's up to them if they need more work on a particular subject. Someone can drop out and go to war but not responsible enough to know if they need more HW or not?

Accountability ---> need more help in a subject but skipped getting HW and as a result got a bad grade on the test? You should be held accountable for your actions, just like in life.
[/quote]

I really disagree with your argument, but those are two of my favortie words in the english language. There is not enough of either taught to childeren, but I don't think homework as optional is the way to do it.
RKMoney
QUOTE (shining path @ Oct 10 2006, 03:38 PM) *
The major skill that I think homework, or at least work out of class, is necessary to build is writing. Term papers, short compositions etc.


pigskinp.gif

I agree that HW is important but it totally depends on what it is.
Pipes
QUOTE (IvanKaramazov @ Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM) *
QUOTE (Disco Stu @ Oct 10 2006, 03:54 PM) *

Calculus is a good example of something that shouldn't be brought home. We did most/all of our calculus work in class, helping each other, with the teacher closely supervising and helping when needed.

Bring calculus home and the vast majority of students are on their own. Most parents simply aren't capable of helping.


I disagree 100% with this. Math (and particularly higher math) is definitely an area where I think homework would be quite helpful. Students learn from wrestling with problems on their own and/or drilling on basic mechanics.

That's how I learned calculus, and I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Profs are great for explaining the theory/intuition behind mathematical concepts, but its really up to the student to get the mechanics down on their own.

pigskinp.gif

This guy get's it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.