[quote name='Chaka' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:32 PM' post='5697397']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697356' date='Oct 11 2006, 12:26 AM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697334' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:23 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697298' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:16 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697281' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:12 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697226' date='Oct 10 2006, 04:05 PM']
[quote name='The Tick' post='5697210' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:03 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5697157' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:55 PM']
[quote name='Pipes' post='5697018' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:35 PM']
[quote name='RKMoney' post='5696956' date='Oct 10 2006, 03:29 PM']
[quote name='BGP' post='5696899' date='Oct 10 2006, 02:24 PM']
I disagree with getting rid of homework. Among the homework I had in elementary school:
+ math: memorizing times tables, etc, using flash cards.
+ math: worksheets of problems to solve like long division.
+ book reports: We had a book report due every two weeks - we had to pick a book from the school library to read and report on.
+ spelling: memorizing words
+ history: reading texts, taking notes
+ english: learning the formalities of the language like subjects and predicates, verbs, objects, pronouns, tenses, etc. Having homework assigned to identify these things in a given text.
I don't see the harm in any of this. A little less TV and more studies is a good thing.
[/quote]
Shouldn't that all be done IN CLASS, not OUT OF CLASS though?
Edit: if the answer is "NO" then why have teachers?
[/quote]
You can't become proficient with complex subjects like calculus by just sitting in class and following a teacher as he/she goes through problems. If you can then you're smarter than most of us.
[/quote]
Long division is complex? I am going by the list above.
[/quote]
When I was in third grade it was for me... I guess i'm not as smart as the average FFAer... Makes me wonder how I managed to graduate college as an engineer...
[/quote]
Ok so the more important question is should the teacher teach you how to do long division or simply show you once and have your parent's help you at home?
[/quote]
The teacher should teach it to you, but there is a limit to how much teaching the teacher can do before they have to move on for the rest of the class. If in that time you are not able to grasp the concept, and can't figure out the homework you have 4 options, fail, your parents can help if they can, off hours with the teacher, or a tutor.
[/quote]
I understand all of this but if you master a particular subject or something you are doing at the time, why should you waste an hour of busy work at home when you may need help in other subjects?
Example: You are grandmaster at long division but you stink in Spanish translation. So your math teacher assigns you about an hour of doing long division problems while you have Spanish HW on top of that. This doesn't even cover your Physics and English homework. So, why waste time on your long division HW when you are the master at it when you need to spend your time in Spanish, Physics, and English? How does this help you one bit?
[/quote]
That gets into the amount of homework assigned per class, which as I have stated in this thread earlier can be an issue also.
I would say spending an hour on something you are the master of is exactly a waste of time, and an unreasonable amount of homework. This isn't a metric that teachers can necessarily use, but for a student that is a master of a certain subject, I would think on average an assignment that takes more then 20 minutes would be busywork and a waste of their time. As for people that say even 20 minutes is a waste, live with it, it's school, just like work, sometimes you have to do pointless stuff, in this case, the reason would be because it would take a teacher too much time to tailor their class perfectly for each student, such is life.
[/quote]
If school's had HW voluntary then it would be left up to the student's and their parents. And for the people who rolleyes on this think about it, there's a lot of bad student's who simply DON'T do HW at all and get bad grades as a result. Forcing student's to do HW
I don't think makes them any better students.[/quote]This is the operative phrase in this paragraph.
By making it voluntary you guarantee the underachievers will continue to underachieve (a process that typically begins in the home), by making it mandatory and establishing consequences for their actions (failing grades) you teach them about accountability and responsibility and maybe you reach a few of the underachievers and get them to change their habits. Some children will always underachieve, or achieve at a lower level if you prefer, but some simply haven't been taught any other way.
[/quote]
I disagree but even if I agreed, so the people who know it already should be punished? People who underachieve still do so with HW assigned. They either skip it or cheat and copy off someone else.
I just remember getting some bad grades in HW assignments not because I didn't know how to do it but because I had not only practice (sports) after class and then focused on HW in classes where I needed help. So my choice at a certain point later at night was to get decent amount of sleep or simply skip it. When I skiped it I got a bad mark on the HW which is lame.