QUOTE (Jene Bramel @ May 28 2008, 08:34 AM)

QUOTE (MAC_32 @ May 28 2008, 09:08 AM)

I do not believe Dunn is in their long term plans, which is a mistake.
Jocketty said on the broadcast last night that Dunn's production would be extremely difficult (and pricey) to replace. He also said it was his usual policy to not negotiate during the season. Castellini loves the big guy. Dunn has apparently been a similar mentor to Bruce as Griffey was to Dunn and Kearns once upon a time -- though it's clearly debatable whether that's a good thing or not.
I think there's better than a 50% chance Dunn stays.
Add Harang, Volquez, Cueto and some combination of Arroyo, Thompson, Bailey, Maloney and 2010 looks pretty bright. It'd be even more interesting if one of the other hopefuls (Frazier, Stubbs, Mesoraco, Valaika) forces himself into the picture by then too. With any luck, Baker and the front office won't foul it up.
I'm kind of torn about the Bruce thing. It was painfully clear from the beginning that Patterson wouldn't be the answer, but I'm not sure how much good the extra two months in the minors did for him. Maybe it was good for his confidence, but Votto has been a big contributor after his 2-3 week adjustment at the start of the season. Hard to believe Bruce couldn't have done the same.
All this should probably go in whatever Reds thread we're posting in these days, but I'm getting a little nervous about Volquez, too. Bunch of pitches in nearly every start, then a 40 pitch relief appearance after a "breather" type start in terms of pitch count. Let's keep these kids healthy for 2009-2010 please.
Good info on the Dunn negotiations, didn't know the new regime wanted to keep Dunn around; guess that eliminates the thought of Dunn being moved to the AL at the deadline.
I'm probably one of the only non-Reds homers who thought this team's prospects were bright in the short term. I thought they'd be better than this now and competing for the division next season - maybe I'm a year ahead. There's a lot of good,young talent.
As for Volquez, that's Dusty Baker. He is too hard on young batters (and limits their AB's until proven otherwise accordingly - he needed to be told that Corey Patterson was marred in a 1-for-27 slump earlier this season, he hadn't even noticed!) and over uses young pitchers, just ask poor Kerry Wood. Why he's sending out his rookies in the 7th inning of games that are not close and they've already tallied 100+ pitches is mind numbing dumb, and Dusty's already done it twice (once to Volquez, once to Cueto). The relief appearance was more need than anything else, I understand that, but more self control needs to be exerted going forward - it probably won't though.
I was more excited this offseason than I'd been in years. I thought this team, even with Patterson and Hatteberg starting this season in significant roles, had 85-87 win potential. Realistically, though, 2009 is the beginning of the window -- assuming the young pitchers are handled properly while they grow.
Agreed on all the Dusty stuff. I'm a little less fussy than I was when he was hired, but still a little fearful of what may be in store for Volquez and Cueto (and Arroyo) through the summer. It's not even worth discussing the Patterson thing -- horrifically stupid. You can argue the merits of letting a 21 year old phenom have a 2 month mental health break in AAA, but it's really hard to take when the guy holding him there has no useful skill other than his defensive range.