QUOTE (BassNBrew @ Aug 12 2008, 12:58 PM)

QUOTE (David Yudkin @ Aug 12 2008, 11:01 AM)

QUOTE (BassNBrew @ Aug 12 2008, 02:13 PM)

David, care to explain the Miller pick to me? As a flexible pick, I think you left some serious points on the board by not going WR or RB at that spot.
Miller should again clock in at 200-225 points and I can use him as a flex. Teams that will end up not using a TE at a flex will most likely not come close to that out of the flex spot.
A RB5 or WR 6 will probably only score 50 points. IMO, I am more confident in getting some decent WR in the next few rounds vs letting more TE go off the board.
In essence, I see only a few TE left in as decent scoring options. I still see a couple dozzen decent WR options. IMO, I will lose out a a few points at WR but will make up a bigger chunk in the FLEX spot.
IMO, we are almost at a point where RBs are not worth much unless you hit on the right ones.
Once you've filled your starting requirement it comes down to a raw point issue so looking at what will be available later in the draft is a non-issue. For Miller to be the right pick there he had to be projected higher than every other WR on your board. Of course that excludes the delta expected from leaving everyone else one less TE.
I am going to have to disagree with Anarchy's assessment and reasoning for taking Health Miller 4.05 as his flex player being a wise decision when there were many other starters available.
I do not see taking Miller as the 10th TE off the board hedging the other owners out from being able to re-coup value from the position. TE's drafted after this such as Scheffler, Vernon Davis ect. are not losing much ground if any to Miller imho.
I also do not see how locking up your flex position so early will give you a benifit in total points. You seem to be saying that by scoring X points from the flex position it will give you an advantage over every other team because you drafted the flex so highly. That is debatable although the logic suggests you are comparing a player you drafted in the 4th round to players other owners will draft in round 18. You SHOULD ouscore those players from the flex position but I fail to see how that gives you any strategic advantage.
When you drafted Miller only 18 WR were off the board. You could have drafted Megatron, Marshall, Driver, Cotch ect. you did come back and get Driver in round 5.. imagine if you had gotten Cotch and Driver.. you would be in a lot better shape imo.. 3 WR and only 2 more needed to fill..
Or you could have drafted RB Edge, Grahm, McFadden, Turner, FWP, Tom Jones.. these guys are starters and I am certain the ones who do not get injured will outscore Miller in total points while your opponents get a weaker flex..maybe.. you have ZERO RB and need 4.
The only way I see this working in Anarchy's favor is if he pulls some comatose bargain starters at RB/WR in rounds 17 to compete with what he has lost at those starting positions.