Maybe I am completely missing the boat, however, I finally did a mock draft in my udated DD (using most current projections) and found some discrepancies that I can't figure out.
If I look at my cheetsheet it does reconcile to the latest projections for Performance leagues (as of 8/25). However, these do not reconcile to the Top 200 Performance article posted by Dodd today (8/26). So I tried a mock draft and selected the recomended best value pick for a few rounds and found that the DD best value pick defult did not make sence in cetain instances. For example, it recommends taking A. Green with the #3 pick instead of Duece M, who is listed ahead of Green - and the projections have Duece scoring 21 more total points than Green.
I could image this could be due to "value" drafting, however would have expected that to occur later in the draft, not at the #3 pick. Especially, when Dodds article has the FBG rank for Dues at #3 and ADP at #4. Effectively, looks like DD defaults to ADP, not "value" drafting. Isn't DD supposed to indicate the best value for us vs. merely ADP.
Totally confused - do I use DD best value recommendation or Dodds article (which makes more sense) as my guide?
Help! draft is tomorrow night !!