Mr Anonymous
Footballguy
Go Pack!
Last edited by a moderator:
Have to agree. Only hope is that the new pack D mixes it up and Farve does one of his patented 4 int games. Otherwise I dont see the pack overcoming a bad o lineUnfortunately if I wasn't such a diehard fan and thereby dead against betting against my team I'd be all over Minnesota -3.5. I feel dirty even saying that. I just have no confidence in the Packers crappy O-Line.
Pack will make Farve (and those crappy receivers) beat them. Better odds than letting Peterson run all over them.Never this excited about a regular season game. Hope they win but it's usually where the Vikings like to rip our hearts out and stomp on them.GO VIKINGS !!I'm predicting an absolutely unbelievable game by Peterson.. 185 and three tds
I hear you brother, but this year is different. #4 is on our side, we lose that game last week without him.GO VIKES!!!Never this excited about a regular season game. Hope they win but it's usually where the Vikings like to rip our hearts out and stomp on them.
GO VIKINGS !!
I'm predicting an absolutely unbelievable game by Peterson.. 185 and three tds
Yep. It really is a shame though. The Packers ooze talent up and down the roster. But the O-Line is so poor that I'm afraid much of it will go to waste. They don't pass protect which hampers the play-calling and eliminates much of the playbook. They don't run block which hurts the backs. And the aren't good enough to sustain long drives thus putting the defense on the field more and leading to their breakdown as the game goes on. Just an average O-Line and I believe this team could be truely special. It's a waste of talent.Have to agree. Only hope is that the new pack D mixes it up and Farve does one of his patented 4 int games. Otherwise I dont see the pack overcoming a bad o lineUnfortunately if I wasn't such a diehard fan and thereby dead against betting against my team I'd be all over Minnesota -3.5. I feel dirty even saying that. I just have no confidence in the Packers crappy O-Line.
Ugh, don't remind me.....I like Vikes tonight too.I hear you brother, but this year is different. #4 is on our side, we lose that game last week without him.GO VIKES!!!Never this excited about a regular season game. Hope they win but it's usually where the Vikings like to rip our hearts out and stomp on them.
GO VIKINGS !!
I'm predicting an absolutely unbelievable game by Peterson.. 185 and three tds
Not Tom Jackson, I think he hates Favre.Man this pregame is painful....the whole Monday Night Countdown crew should just go down to the field and take turns giving Favre oral.
Only if Favre does a couple of chuck and ducks early because of pressure, with woodson int's to TD's.Not counting on it.AP, 140 yards, 2tdremember last year when people thought ADP was going to run all over the Saints on MNF? i think he gets shut down tonight again. 42 yards on 17 carries.
ESPN knows what theyre doing. The fans who want the steak are going to the table no matter who is serving it. The sizzle is for the casual fans and your girlfriend.ESPN, more than any other news/network, knows how to sell the sizzle, not the steak. I'm not sure I even know what the 'steak' is at this point.
Yes. Possibly.Awesome break down of AD abilities there.Browns didnt have bad defense on that play really either.. AD is is just something else.did Jaws just say ADP one of greatest backs in NFL history??
Fair - and I think they know they are doing it. I don't think it's coincidental that the last bit before the game was a breakdown on AD. As much as they would love this to be a Farve game, it's going to come down to Rodgers or AD.ESPN, more than any other news/network, knows how to sell the sizzle, not the steak. I'm not sure I even know what the 'steak' is at this point.
Two guys in the division alone come to mind first. Payton and Sanders down? Check that...three. Gale Sayers. Just more ridiculous hyperbole from ESPN. Maybe one day for ADP, but surely not yet.did Jaws just say ADP one of greatest backs in NFL history??
jumping the gun a bit. sure, if he does it another 5 years, but way too early for that kind of talk imoYes. Possibly.Awesome break down of AD abilities there.Browns didnt have bad defense on that play really either.. AD is is just something else.did Jaws just say ADP one of greatest backs in NFL history??
I think he's the best running back to play since Eric Dickerson.did Jaws just say ADP one of greatest backs in NFL history??
Only thing I've predicted right all year, I'll retire now.They need to utilize screens and short passes to get the line feeling good and, more importantly, giving Rodgers time to throw. We'll see what happens, but the Vikes should win on paper. But that's why they play the games.
I think what you say is correct, but I don't think it has much significance. How many teams want to give up a young QB drafted in the first round to acquire a QB who's going to turn 40 this week, no matter how talented and storied? Very few teams would make that swap even if their QB hadn't had a very impressive first year as a starter simply due to the age difference and extremely narrow window of opportunity to win with the 40-year old at QB. Even the Raiders would not really benefit from making such a trade (if they could) as they are not close to competing for a championship in the next year or two.there isn't a single GM in the league who would trade Rodgers for Favre straight up.
Pretty sure the answer would be "no"I wonder if R Grant ever says to himself "just once I'm going to try to make this defender miss"
Could end up being true.did Jaws just say ADP one of greatest backs in NFL history??
Been saying this for a while - only way to help out a bad line.EDIT: Looked good on that pass protection. Jennings with nice sticky hands there.screens are big so far for the pack
I'll take over.Pack OL is terribleover / under sacks on Rodgers tonight? 4?
typical crap call for the vikings at home