You posted right above this post. You’re welcome.AAABatteries said:Stupid question but how can you find posts you made in a thread? I don't even remember posting in here but obviously did.
You posted right above this post. You’re welcome.AAABatteries said:Stupid question but how can you find posts you made in a thread? I don't even remember posting in here but obviously did.
I don't care what Targaryen backstory they tell, it cannot possibly redeem what they did to Danny.Sinn Fein said:So, what exactly is the point of this show going to be? We know what the history holds for this world. This sort of feels like it could be a redemption arc for Daenerys and the prior show-runners - where we learn that all the Targaryens were capable of madness.... so it wasn't really her fault...
I don't care what Targaryen backstory they tell, it cannot possibly redeem what they did to Danny.
I still haven't watched a single minute of Thrones since that last season. And I probably rewatched it more than any other drama (other than the Wire, possibly). I just can't. they butchered it. it would be one thing, if like the wire, you could go back and rewatch to see how this crazy narrative arc was hiding in the shadows and you just missed it. But there is no such thing for Danny. Going back to watch her scenes would only be more infuriating.
I honestly don't remember 100% the last couple seasons, so admit I could be pulling a little out of my ### but I think those examples are mostly people who wronged her, not a whole city. Also I think people were expecting a bit of a gradual ramp up to that person, not what we got.I think they did telegraph Daenerys' future going all the way back to season 1 - when she burned the woman for cursing Drogo, or when she nonchalant;y watched her brother get melted, or when she first uttered the word: "Dracarys" in the House fo the Undying. Or when she killed the Khals, or when she killed teh slave trader that sold her the unsullied, or the guy from Mereen sent to negotiate, or the Tarleys, or Varys, etc.
Whenever Daenerys did not get her way, or felt disrespected, she burned #### down. We, as an audience, tended to overlook it, because we were rooting for her to win.
I’m hoping for boobsSinn Fein said:So, what exactly is the point of this show going to be? We know what the history holds for this world. This sort of feels like it could be a redemption arc for Daenerys and the prior show-runners - where we learn that all the Targaryens were capable of madness.... so it wasn't really her fault...
Nah. It’s a quantum leap from those examples mostly of her, rightly or wrongly, torching people that she felt were evil or, I’ll even grant, standing in her way, to genocide. Especially given her growth as the show progressed. The torching of innocents, including children, was never remotely close to earned.I think they did telegraph Daenerys' future going all the way back to season 1 - when she burned the woman for cursing Drogo, or when she nonchalant;y watched her brother get melted, or when she first uttered the word: "Dracarys" in the House fo the Undying. Or when she killed the Khals, or when she killed teh slave trader that sold her the unsullied, or the guy from Mereen sent to negotiate, or the Tarleys, or Varys, etc.
Whenever Daenerys did not get her way, or felt disrespected, she burned #### down. We, as an audience, tended to overlook it, because we were rooting for her to win.
Especially torching non-combatants and completely ignoring the very obvious red keep where Cersei actually was. The problem was that if she doesn’t go full moron then Tyrion doesn’t find his brother and sister (dude’s a hell of a bloodhound) and decide she’s got to die. That’s The Walking Dead level story telling not GOT early years.Nah. It’s a quantum leap from those examples mostly of her, rightly or wrongly, torching people that she felt were evil or, I’ll even grant, standing in her way, to genocide. Especially given her growth as the show progressed. The torching of innocents, including children, was never remotely close to earned.
No doubt the writing in later seasons was terrible, but Danarys becoming the Mad Queen was telegraphed from the beginning. She had an actual vision of herself in a burned out Kings Landing throne room with ashes floating through the air in season 2. By the time she arrived in Westeros, she was a ruthless tyrant.Agree. The real massacre was the writing. So bad. Which was a shame, because the artistic team did their best work when they finally had a budget. But you can never outrun bad writing or storytelling.
True. However, she had already won. There was no believable reason for Dany to torch the city and regular people. At all. Made zero sense within the story they told. Paranoid, angry, crazy etc., it still didn’t work the way they did it.I think they did telegraph Daenerys' future going all the way back to season 1 - when she burned the woman for cursing Drogo, or when she nonchalant;y watched her brother get melted, or when she first uttered the word: "Dracarys" in the House fo the Undying. Or when she killed the Khals, or when she killed teh slave trader that sold her the unsullied, or the guy from Mereen sent to negotiate, or the Tarleys, or Varys, etc.
Whenever Daenerys did not get her way, or felt disrespected, she burned #### down. We, as an audience, tended to overlook it, because we were rooting for her to win.
Sure. If you’re into ridiculously lazy writing. Frodo had several similar visions on the way to Modor. Still doesn’t pay the till.No doubt the writing in later seasons was terrible, but Danarys becoming the Mad Queen was telegraphed from the beginning. She had an actual vision of herself in a burned out Kings Landing throne room with ashes floating through the air in season 2. By the time she arrived in Westeros, she was a ruthless tyrant.
Agreed. The ending wasn't great, but it wasn't terrible like some think it was, but you know how it is once a little negativity catches on with folks on the internet. People love a bandwagon. I work with a guy who thought it was all okay and then months after the finale decided that it was the worst thing ever, and it was obvious that reading all of the negativity got in his head.Capella said:Kind of odd, to me, that folks could have thoroughly enjoyed the show for 6 years or whatever and be so totally repulsed by it now because of how it ended. It wasn’t a great ending, probably was bad, but didn’t ruin the rest of the show for me and certainly won’t stop me from watching another series.
Exactly. I was like, were people not paying attention? Danny always had that "My dragons will burn anyone who gets in my way" mentality, and once her two closest friends (Jorah and Missandei) were dead and she had lost all faith in the one other person who could check her worst impulses (Tyrion), there was no one left to get in her ear, and it was scorched earth time.I think they did telegraph Daenerys' future going all the way back to season 1 - when she burned the woman for cursing Drogo, or when she nonchalant;y watched her brother get melted, or when she first uttered the word: "Dracarys" in the House fo the Undying. Or when she killed the Khals, or when she killed teh slave trader that sold her the unsullied, or the guy from Mereen sent to negotiate, or the Tarleys, or Varys, etc.
Whenever Daenerys did not get her way, or felt disrespected, she burned #### down. We, as an audience, tended to overlook it, because we were rooting for her to win.
Sure. If you’re into ridiculously lazy writing. Frodo had several similar visions on the way to Modor. Still doesn’t pay the till.
And, to address the Westeros point, she really wasn’t. She had moral justification for everything she did. Which was consistent with her growth up until that point. “Ruthless tyrant”, respectfully, is a gross overstatement of what she was leaving across the sea.
The show tried to save the sloppy narrative they were about to inflict on us when she got there, but it was so obvious as to be insulting while we watched it.
It was irredeemably bad writing and plot narrative. The worst part was how lazy it was. And I say that as someone who adored the franchise.
Agreed. The ending wasn't great, but it wasn't terrible like some think it was, but you know how it is once a little negativity catches on with folks on the internet. People love a bandwagon. I work with a guy who thought it was all okay and then months after the finale decided that it was the worst thing ever, and it was obvious that reading all of the negativity got in his head.
Exactly. I was like, were people not paying attention? Danny always had that "My dragons will burn anyone who gets in my way" mentality, and once her two closest friends (Jorah and Missandei) were dead and she had lost all faith in the one other person who could check her worst impulses (Tyrion), there was no one left to get in her ear, and it was scorched earth time.
The people of king’s landing, including the women and children, were not standing in her way though. The breaker of chains started slaughtering innocents, for no reason. They surrendered.
Ive just said the writing was “terrible” so your comment that I’m “into ridiculously lazy writing” seems misplaced. I didn’t like the last few season, entirely because of the weak writing. I don’t think it’s wise to defend the morality of this character. Maybe her story was lazy and stupid, but the writers could not have telegraphed their terrible lazy character arc any more clearly - she was going to take what she viewed as hers and rain hellfire down on anything that stood in her way. The scene everyone loves so much when she stole the unsullied army is ridiculous. In the world they created, it wouldn’t make sense for her to become a benevolent, kind leader.
AAABatteries said:It appears I posted in this thread sometime but had mostly avoided it for years as I didn't watch much of the TV show. Loved the books and was just hoping and praying Martin would do something but I've given up. I have HBO now and I'm going to go back and watch the whole thing. It appears there's a lot of complaints about the final season(s) but that won't sway me - I'm still happy I watched Lost through the end. Wish me luck.
I think they did telegraph Daenerys' future going all the way back to season 1 - when she burned the woman for cursing Drogo, or when she nonchalant;y watched her brother get melted, or when she first uttered the word: "Dracarys" in the House fo the Undying. Or when she killed the Khals, or when she killed teh slave trader that sold her the unsullied, or the guy from Mereen sent to negotiate, or the Tarleys, or Varys, etc.
Whenever Daenerys did not get her way, or felt disrespected, she burned #### down. We, as an audience, tended to overlook it, because we were rooting for her to win.
thecatch said:CletiusMaximus said:Does Martin have any role in this? I think some parts of this story is addressed in ASOIF. There's a backstory there.
He wrote a book on the backstory for the Targ dynasty, but it was more like an encyclopedia than a novel. A lot of the dialog people loved and got hooked on from the first few seasons of the show was lifted almost verbatim out of his books. So this show won't have the benefit of that detailed, prewritten material to draw from.
That's a different prequel than the one coming out about the Targarians. The one they canceled took place thousands of years ago. Would love to see the failed pilot out of curiosity.
Need to see a trailer or something. I have 0 interest right now, and I was obsessed with GOT.August 21st House of the Dragon
Need to see a trailer or something. I have 0 interest right now, and I was obsessed with GOT.
It'll all depend on who they got to write this stuff. I don't think it was Martin. Hopefully it's not whoever they got to fill in the blanks for seasons 6 and 7.HBO shows (assuming its a genre/premise that looks somewhat interesting to me) get the benefit of the doubt.
So I'll give this a shot, but no elevated expectations. At least d &d aren't involved
Isn't it based off of Martin's book "Fire and Blood"?It'll all depend on who they got to write this stuff. I don't think it was Martin. Hopefully it's not whoever they got to fill in the blanks for seasons 6 and 7.
I guess so. Thanks for pointing that out. I haven't read that, guess I'll have to give it a look.Isn't it based off of Martin's book "Fire and Blood"?
Bro.... Books don't exist...... Says so right in the titleIsn't it based off of Martin's book "Fire and Blood"?
I don’t know if it’s the way GOT ended but I don’t feel as psyched when I watch that teaser. I hope it’s amazing.
You mean the Rings of Power series coming out?I don’t know if it’s the way GOT ended but I don’t feel as psyched when I watch that teaser. I hope it’s amazing.
One other thought, this makes me think of a series on just Elves in LOTR. While they are cool as part of the fellowship or as lovers of human kings, a show on all elves would be boring as hell. The Targaryens makes me think of Elves. We barely saw any in GOTs. Again, hope it’s amazing and some or most of the actors turn out amazing jobs like GOT did before the debacle.
Lol, but no. I meant a show with only Elves and no one else, period. I picked Elves too because they aren’t “fun” people so to speak.You mean the Rings of Power series coming out?
It sure does. Really going to be interesting to see how it goes with Dragons on both sides.
You don't think it would be interesting to see the fall of the Targaryens? How the chess board is played with Dragons on both sides? To me it could be an incredible story to watch.Lol, but no. I meant a show with only Elves and no one else, period. I picked Elves too because they aren’t “fun” people so to speak.
I guess even the new trailer above looks interesting but seems a little limiting. Here’s another analogy. Would GOT have been as good of a show if the whole thing was basically just Kings Landing?
After watching GOT, I’m worried. I hope they prove me wrong. Rings of Power even in the previews sure doesn’t seem limited in scope. Super hot take, HotD almost seems like Big Brother where they setup cameras app over Kings Landing and that’s all we’ll see.
RoP is elf centric but it brings in all the other races as they are developed in the timeline. In the beginning it was just the elves then people started making other races. Elves were the dominate race until the LoTR's story line when they finally gave over to man.Lol, but no. I meant a show with only Elves and no one else, period. I picked Elves too because they aren’t “fun” people so to speak.
I guess even the new trailer above looks interesting but seems a little limiting. Here’s another analogy. Would GOT have been as good of a show if the whole thing was basically just Kings Landing?
After watching GOT, I’m worried. I hope they prove me wrong. Rings of Power even in the previews sure doesn’t seem limited in scope. Super hot take, HotD almost seems like Big Brother where they setup cameras app over Kings Landing and that’s all we’ll see.
I hope so. I just don’t get a super excited vibe. It doesn’t have the full realm feel.You don't think it would be interesting to see the fall of the Targaryens? How the chess board is played with Dragons on both sides? To me it could be an incredible story to watch.
I am too and I’ll be watching for sure. Hopefully, the uneasy feeling I have from the previews is just that. RoP looks great and I hope it proves to be as well. I’m a sucker for Galadriel and the previews look great in that respect.RoP is elf centric but it brings in all the other races as they are developed in the timeline. In the beginning it was just the elves then people started making other races. Elves were the dominate race until the LoTR's story line when they finally gave over to man.
As for HoTD, from what I understand, it shouldn't be as you describe in your last paragraph. Before the Targaryen's came on the scene, all the houses just constantly fought with one another. One would rise to power then eventually get knocked off by another and another and so on. The Targaryen's mastered dragons and forced all the other houses to unite to fight them so it should be interesting to see some of the backstory and the fights between the other houses.
I'm a geek for all this stuff so I'm in no matter what.
Well it's the story of their house, so I wouldn't expect the entirety of the realm to really be involved.I hope so. I just don’t get a super excited vibe. It doesn’t have the full realm feel.
stbugs said:I hope so. I just don’t get a super excited vibe. It doesn’t have the full realm feel.
Trailer was alright. Enough to get me to watch.
Its a universe that I like and the 2 idiots who ruined the first show aren't involved...so I'll give it a shot. If it has good characters and good stories, (and decent effects/production values, which I'm sure will be the case) I'll be in.
I do worry that they're just gonna go all in on trying to make the girl the hero like they did with Daenerys (before they screwed it up) and that the "girl power, down with the patriarchy" message will be a bit much. We shall see.
Yes yes, we definitely need more of the “man runs everything” storylines we’ve seen from Hollywood for the past 75 years.and that the "girl power, down with the patriarchy" message will be a bit much.