Search results

A sincere and heartfelt thank you to everyone who purchased a ticket to support Chance for Hope. The drawing was at our Miami Nights gala this evening and the winner was present at the event. Sorry we didn’t have a Footballguy winner but so appreciate all your support! You all are the best!

Wordle 1,042 3/6* 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜arise 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜plain 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Daily Rescue Octordle #823 🕛9️⃣ 🕚6️⃣ 7️⃣🔟 5️⃣8️⃣ Score: 9 Connections Puzzle #320 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟪🟪🟪🟪 .

Yes, that is precisely what they did. Traveled a long way to play for 25 minutes on a week with Monday - Thursday - Sunday matches. But it was a great ending!!!

Today, Roma had to travel to Udin to play the last 20 minutes of the 1-1 match that was suspended due to Ndicka’s injury. Still 1-1 as they headed into extra time. Then this happens in ninety-fifth minute: https://youtu.be/Pui93L9FejA?si=4ZCa0E_u2IfEpIhm&t=10m Edit to add: keeps Roma in fifth...

So did you sign the non-compete in connection with selling your stock, or in connection with accepting employment with the acquiring company? If the latter, there aren’t many jurisdictions that would uphold a five year restriction, even without the FTC rule.

Wordle 1,041 3/6* ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜arise 🟩🟩⬜⬜🟨incur 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Missed plied vs blind Daily Rescue Octordle #822 6️⃣5️⃣ 🕛🕚 8️⃣9️⃣ 🔟🕐 Score: 8 Connections Puzzle #319 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟪🟪🟪🟪 .

Wordle 1,040 3/6* ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨arise 🟨🟨⬜🟨🟨toner 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Missed goofy vs goody Daily Rescue Octordle #821 8️⃣5️⃣ 9️⃣🕐 🕛🔟 6️⃣🕚 Score: 8 Connections Puzzle #318 🟦🟦🟩🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟪🟪🟪🟪 .

If I only had one hour to live, I’d want to spend it watching a WNBA game. Because it would be the longest hour of my life. I kid, I kid!!!

Given that his non-compete was written in a way to allow him to do independent consulting, it sounds like he no longer works there. But you could be right!

Does the two-year presumptive limit apply to sale of business noncompetes?

Yes, this used to be about 50% of my practice until 7 years ago when I switched careers.

Sounds like a sale of business non-compete, which are exempted from this rule provided it’s a bona fide sale.

Yes, this is the anti-competitive issue that the FTC is largely hanging its hat on I believe.

At least in the jurisdiction where I practiced law, for jobs where it didn’t make sense, I was generally able to bust the non-compete in court (if not before). But where there is a truly legitimate interest, I was able to enforce them on the regular.

Well, they may not hire them to begin with (particularly if they can now poach employees from other companies that have already paid for that investment). But assuming they do, sure they will train them. But will that investment be reduced? Will companies be more selective on which employees...

That’s because you’re a seasoned professional with an advanced skill set. But what about entry level engineers entering the workforce today? And what ripple effect will a reduction in investment have on that population over the next 10+ years? Again, I concede that increased employee mobility...

The concerns I raised in my overly lengthy post are (or should be) concerns of employees, not employers.

There was talk of a 25% substantial ownership threshold, but perhaps that got removed from the final rule. I hope so! In hindsight, I’m guessing that is precisely what Krista was talking about.

I am certainly not saying that the rule isn’t a net benefit for individual employees, or even businesses for that matter. But I also don’t think it’s the slam dunk some people think it is. It’s not as simple as just saying “well companies need to just focus on retaining employees.” This rule, if...

That is awesome! We’ll know Friday night!!