Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
What is the owner and his coaches thinking right now? The Pro Bowl is most stress-free environment there is for these guys and he still couldn't keep his composure.
... including Indy who went 2-16 in 2011 prior to Luck's arrival and 11-5 his rookie season with essentially the same team. Also, how does your argument explain Indy getting to the divisional round the last 2 seasons?
Bottomline, Luck's poor play in the playoffs is understandable considering...
Is anyone really implying that the Packers should fire McCarthy after the NFC Champ game? If so, that's a bit extreme.
With that said, I think the team would be best served if he gave up play calling duties. To me it's clear that he's got too much on his plate which is effecting his ability to...
McCarthy obviously didn't run the ball every play in the 2nd half, but I don't think anyone can honestly debate that he didn't get conservative with his playcalling. Straight from the horses mouth from a previous post:
I don't believe this is the reason why GB ultimately lost considering the...
This is my take on the rule and play. It's the fact that others make it their mission to defend the rule with absolute statements is what I have an issue with. That and the fact that anyone who is interested in breaking down the rule and play are labeled emotional Dallas fan.
Pereira:
He agrees with the result of the play, but his interpretation of the rule is not the same as yours.
As I have mentioned already, I think the it's simple and clean to require all falling players to complete the process. The rule just need to be cleared up. Not sure why it's so hard to...
There's a camp that believes you can make a football move while falling to the ground. The language of the rule is not "crystal clear" about this and leaves room for interpretation. Only a few minor updates would be needed to make the rule crystal clear.
On the other front, the NFL is...
100% clear because you say so. 100% crystal clear because those who are charged with interpreting the rules are not interpreting the rule consistently.
Got it.
The bolded statement may indeed be true, but the rule is not clear cut nor is the NFL explaining it that way. The NFL could be explaining the rule differently because they stupid as you inply, but the easier explanation is that they simply don't interpret the rule as you do. If they feel the...
I think one thing is clear. Everyone has a different interpretation of the rule due to the ambiguity of the language. Also, the NFL is at the forefront of explaining the rule in a way that opens it up to interpretation when they could clarify the rule in a single sentence.
I'm pretty much in...
Thankfully, we no longer live in the stone age and have technology to lift us above the idea that "ignorance is bliss". Sorry to break it to you, but it's only going to get worse for you. Yes, even in baseball.
If you use jon_mx's logic as a baseline, there is no room for interpretation at least in the case of Dez's play.
The refs and execs have implied that the play could've been considered a catch if Dez made a clear football move. If they are using the same logic, they would flat out state that all...
I mentioned this before, I think in response to a similar post of yours, but I totally get this logic and it's one of the simplest and cleanest explanations.
My problem is the powers that be don't seem to be interpreting it this way. At the very least they aren't explaining it this way since...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.