what type of value did you get for him? In a similar position. I have Forte, D. Lewis, Vereen and Lynch/Rawls. Trying to get WR1/2 value for the Seattle backfield, but not sure that is realistic.I had this bad feeling so I traded him. I got no where near the better end of it but now I dont have to worry about whether to play him or not and that gives me peace of mind.Anybody else not real excited to just throw Lynch back in the lineup?
I know he has to start in fantasy if he plays, but two ####ty weeks followed by a 22 YO going bonkers in his stead doesn't inspire much confidence. You can't bet against Lynch, but man, a 29 YO with a ton of beast mode miles on him? Ugh. Plus, he got the "crap, we know this won't end well giving an older RB his money but the fans will freak out if we don't" extension.
Anyway, I was scrambling 3 weeks ago to find starting RB's (covered my eyes rolling out the Devonta/Chris Johnson duo that first time) in Lynch's absence. Now, I have a bad feeling throwing him back in the lineup. If he sucks this week, we've got some problems.
I offered Landry for Lynch last week and was rejected. I thought about offering DT for him but I am hesitant.what type of value did you get for him? In a similar position. I have Forte, D. Lewis, Vereen and Lynch/Rawls. Trying to get WR1/2 value for the Seattle backfield, but not sure that is realistic.I had this bad feeling so I traded him. I got no where near the better end of it but now I dont have to worry about whether to play him or not and that gives me peace of mind.Anybody else not real excited to just throw Lynch back in the lineup?
I know he has to start in fantasy if he plays, but two ####ty weeks followed by a 22 YO going bonkers in his stead doesn't inspire much confidence. You can't bet against Lynch, but man, a 29 YO with a ton of beast mode miles on him? Ugh. Plus, he got the "crap, we know this won't end well giving an older RB his money but the fans will freak out if we don't" extension.
Anyway, I was scrambling 3 weeks ago to find starting RB's (covered my eyes rolling out the Devonta/Chris Johnson duo that first time) in Lynch's absence. Now, I have a bad feeling throwing him back in the lineup. If he sucks this week, we've got some problems.
I traded Lynch and M Wallace (I have Freeman, Lewis, West, C Mike and Foster) for David Johnson (keeper eligible) and John Brown (I have Landry, Hopkins, A Robinson, Randle ). I was trying hard to land a really solid WR2 and Brown is a guy I like and was really all I could get.tcook81 said:what type of value did you get for him? In a similar position. I have Forte, D. Lewis, Vereen and Lynch/Rawls. Trying to get WR1/2 value for the Seattle backfield, but not sure that is realistic.AcerFC said:I had this bad feeling so I traded him. I got no where near the better end of it but now I dont have to worry about whether to play him or not and that gives me peace of mind.pollardsvision said:Anybody else not real excited to just throw Lynch back in the lineup?
I know he has to start in fantasy if he plays, but two ####ty weeks followed by a 22 YO going bonkers in his stead doesn't inspire much confidence. You can't bet against Lynch, but man, a 29 YO with a ton of beast mode miles on him? Ugh. Plus, he got the "crap, we know this won't end well giving an older RB his money but the fans will freak out if we don't" extension.
Anyway, I was scrambling 3 weeks ago to find starting RB's (covered my eyes rolling out the Devonta/Chris Johnson duo that first time) in Lynch's absence. Now, I have a bad feeling throwing him back in the lineup. If he sucks this week, we've got some problems.
That's a very Oakland homer article because it isn't really portraying what is actually happening on the O-line or why Marshawn has been "injured". This is simply wishful thinking that Seattle has cap issues without real research on the matter. It's typical because most fans believe we can't afford to pay everyone what we're paying but the truth is we have a ton of dead money in 2015 for Harvin and Unger. Once that clears Lynch's salary is a non-issue.Faust said:
You're never going to get it. There's numerous articles stating the exact opposite and that you don't know what you're talking about, such as this one:I think it's a combination of the league catching up the the Hawks, Lynch's skills diminishing, and the terrible Graham trade.
Ha, I read it this morning and almost made a similar comment. There's like 6 obvious grammatical errors even with just my breezing through it.Also, the editor of that publication should be fired.
Great link. Lol. Marshawn is running into the age wall. The team is going to erode further as the Wilson deal sucks up their cap space and they need some NFL caliber recoevers, especially if they aren't going to use Graham.You're never going to get it. There's numerous articles stating the exact opposite and that you don't know what you're talking about, such as this one:I think it's a combination of the league catching up the the Hawks, Lynch's skills diminishing, and the terrible Graham trade.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14175748/ten-teams-crash-nfl-playoffs-nfl
Is the thinking in Seattle that lynch is back next year and starting? Does he have anything left in the tank? With his injuries I'm afraid Seattle will shut him down early this year if they keep losing. Is there any talk of this in Seattle?That's a very Oakland homer article because it isn't really portraying what is actually happening on the O-line or why Marshawn has been "injured". This is simply wishful thinking that Seattle has cap issues without real research on the matter. It's typical because most fans believe we can't afford to pay everyone what we're paying but the truth is we have a ton of dead money in 2015 for Harvin and Unger. Once that clears Lynch's salary is a non-issue.Faust said:
None about shutting him down. Hell, we're not out of the playoff race by any means. The Arizona game was a pretty bad loss. Actually, all of the losses have been bad because we've been in the lead in all of them.Is the thinking in Seattle that lynch is back next year and starting? Does he have anything left in the tank?With his injuries I'm afraid Seattle will shut him down early this year if they keep losing. Is there any talk of this in Seattle?That's a very Oakland homer article because it isn't really portraying what is actually happening on the O-line or why Marshawn has been "injured". This is simply wishful thinking that Seattle has cap issues without real research on the matter. It's typical because most fans believe we can't afford to pay everyone what we're paying but the truth is we have a ton of dead money in 2015 for Harvin and Unger. Once that clears Lynch's salary is a non-issue.Faust said:
Great link. Lol. Marshawn is running into the age wall. The team is going to erode further as the Wilson deal sucks up their cap space and they need some NFL caliber recoevers, especially if they aren't going to use Graham.You're never going to get it. There's numerous articles stating the exact opposite and that you don't know what you're talking about, such as this one:I think it's a combination of the league catching up the the Hawks, Lynch's skills diminishing, and the terrible Graham trade.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14175748/ten-teams-crash-nfl-playoffs-nfl
Laugh if you want, but your big dynasty is a shambles. One Superbowl since 1974. See you in 2050.Great link. Lol. Marshawn is running into the age wall. The team is going to erode further as the Wilson deal sucks up their cap space and they need some NFL caliber recoevers, especially if they aren't going to use Graham.You're never going to get it. There's numerous articles stating the exact opposite and that you don't know what you're talking about, such as this one:I think it's a combination of the league catching up the the Hawks, Lynch's skills diminishing, and the terrible Graham trade.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14175748/ten-teams-crash-nfl-playoffs-nfl
Laugh if you want, but your big dynasty is a shambles. One Superbowl since 1974. See you in 2050.Great link. Lol. Marshawn is running into the age wall. The team is going to erode further as the Wilson deal sucks up their cap space and they need some NFL caliber recoevers, especially if they aren't going to use Graham.You're never going to get it. There's numerous articles stating the exact opposite and that you don't know what you're talking about, such as this one:I think it's a combination of the league catching up the the Hawks, Lynch's skills diminishing, and the terrible Graham trade.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14175748/ten-teams-crash-nfl-playoffs-nfl
Should they have kept throwing balls to graham last game after he batted about three of them down? He should have had 90 and a td but couldn't catch a cold.Great link. Lol. Marshawn is running into the age wall. The team is going to erode further as the Wilson deal sucks up their cap space and they need some NFL caliber recoevers, especially if they aren't going to use Graham.You're never going to get it. There's numerous articles stating the exact opposite and that you don't know what you're talking about, such as this one:I think it's a combination of the league catching up the the Hawks, Lynch's skills diminishing, and the terrible Graham trade.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14175748/ten-teams-crash-nfl-playoffs-nfl
Neither the Seahawks or Packers look very good right now. As far as Lynch goes, it looks like the end is near. If I were Pete Carroll, I'd play Rauls against SF and let Marshawn get a little better for the stretch run. Rauls looks like he has more burst although, obviously, he can't do some of the things that Beastmode can. However, I'm not sure the abdominal thing is a thing that heals in a short time frame.Laugh if you want, but your big dynasty is a shambles. One Superbowl since 1974. See you in 2050.Great link. Lol. Marshawn is running into the age wall. The team is going to erode further as the Wilson deal sucks up their cap space and they need some NFL caliber recoevers, especially if they aren't going to use Graham.You're never going to get it. There's numerous articles stating the exact opposite and that you don't know what you're talking about, such as this one:I think it's a combination of the league catching up the the Hawks, Lynch's skills diminishing, and the terrible Graham trade.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14175748/ten-teams-crash-nfl-playoffs-nfl
Marshawn Lynch - RB - Seahawks
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports Marshawn Lynch (abdomen) "needs a couple weeks" to see if he can recover and play again before resorting to surgery.
Lynch visited sports-hernia specialist Dr. William Meyers in Philadelphia on Tuesday. It appears they'll bypass surgery for the time being and see if rest and rehab will do the trick. (It probably won't.) Thomas Rawls is locked in as the Seahawks' lead back for the foreseeable future and has high-end RB1 upside.
Source: Adam Schefter on Twitter
Nov 24 - 10:50 PM
Top 10 running backs entering Week 13With the season entering the final quarter of the year, we break down the top 10 running backs RBs as ranked by PFF’s grading system. A running back’s ability to positively impact a game depends on numerous factors, some of which are out of the player’s control (e.g. offensive line play).
2. Marshawn Lynch (90.1), Seattle SeahawksLynch has endured a season full of injuries (he’s likely to miss a few more weeks following surgery to mend a lingering groin injury) and poor offensive line play, but he’s posted the second-best elusive rating among qualifying RBs (79.0), forcing 37 missed tackles on 124 total touches. He is currently in his third-straight year as a top-three NFL RB.
Marshawn Lynch (abdomen) is active for Sunday's Divisional Round game against the Panthers.
Lynch is playing for the first time since November 15. He's been practicing the last two weeks and should get his usual workload against Carolina's fourth-ranked run defense. Christine Michael will be the change-of-pace back with Fred Jackson occupying a limited role on passing downs. If reports are true that Seattle is likely to move on from Lynch this offseason, this might be Beast Mode's final game in a Seahawks uniform.
Source: Albert Breer on Twitter
Jan 17 - 11:34 AM
Not sure, but I know I posted in one thread that I honestly wasn't worried about him being active against us. He hadn't looked great this year and honestly with so much time off, he had to be a bit rusty/out of game shape. The game flow obviously made him a non-factor in terms of touches, but even when he got some early he wasn't effective. That said, I think the DL was ready and played well in the first half, so maybe next year he has something left in the tank when he isn't hurt. Hard to tell, but with his beast mode style, he's in that camp of RBs that hits a wall quickly. Throw in playoffs and before 2015, he'd been averaging 350 touches a year for 4 years. That takes a toll, especially now that he'll be 30 before next season. Maybe he can make a bit of an impact on the right team, but I think he's going to soon be in the SJax land of ineffectiveness. Too bad, he was a lot of fun to watch (even as a Panthers fan) when he was "on" in games.End of the line for Lynch? I think he's done in SEA, but do people think he's played his last snap in the NFL? I feel like the only reason Lynch played this year was because SEA threw money at him, and if SEA cuts him this off-season he's going to be very displeased at the amount of money teams will be willing to give him.
Marshawn has never done much against the Panthers. He averages 60 yds on 16 touches and has 1 touchdown in six games. And that average is lower after yesterday.Not sure, but I know I posted in one thread that I honestly wasn't worried about him being active against us. He hadn't looked great this year and honestly with so much time off, he had to be a bit rusty/out of game shape. The game flow obviously made him a non-factor in terms of touches, but even when he got some early he wasn't effective. That said, I think the DL was ready and played well in the first half, so maybe next year he has something left in the tank when he isn't hurt. Hard to tell, but with his beast mode style, he's in that camp of RBs that hits a wall quickly. Throw in playoffs and before 2015, he'd been averaging 350 touches a year for 4 years. That takes a toll, especially now that he'll be 30 before next season. Maybe he can make a bit of an impact on the right team, but I think he's going to soon be in the SJax land of ineffectiveness. Too bad, he was a lot of fun to watch (even as a Panthers fan) when he was "on" in games.End of the line for Lynch? I think he's done in SEA, but do people think he's played his last snap in the NFL? I feel like the only reason Lynch played this year was because SEA threw money at him, and if SEA cuts him this off-season he's going to be very displeased at the amount of money teams will be willing to give him.