@ben_quinones: @MikeReiss: Photo: Rob Gronkowski says he has green light to play in the regular-season opener. http://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/506468887601631232/photo/1 YES GRONK IS READY
Didn't appear Wright needed much motivation in that last preseason game...just a ploy to motivate Tim Wright
@ben_quinones: @MikeReiss: Photo: Rob Gronkowski says he has green light to play in the regular-season opener. http://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/506468887601631232/photo/1 YES GRONK IS READY
Link isn't working properly, what does it say?
To paraphrase it says CHAMPIONSHIP!!!Link isn't working properly, what does it say?
It's only slightly concerning that the 2/27/0 line was vs. MIA last year. Only slightly.In the four games on "limited" snaps when he came back last year:
8-114-0
2-27-0
9-143-1
5-59-1
Good for almost 18ppg in PPR leagues.
Some reports at the end of training camp noted that Gronk was noticeably under conditioned when he was back to taking eleven on eleven reps. Of course, you'd think to expect that, but combine a not 100% conditioned Gronk, stifling heat in Miami, and a team that usually gives the Pats offense fits, if you weren't going to play Gronk for one game this season, this certainly might be that game. I'm certainly not advocating for it, though.He clearly doesn't need a full compliment of snaps to do work. I'm very excited to roll him out their vs. MIA.
Over 20 in TE premium.In the four games on "limited" snaps when he came back last year:
8-114-0
2-27-0
9-143-1
5-59-1
Good for almost 18ppg in PPR leagues.
I remember that game, and Gronk had a 30+ yard TD called back via penalty that had nothing to do with the play.It's only slightly concerning that the 2/27/0 line was vs. MIA last year. Only slightly.In the four games on "limited" snaps when he came back last year:
8-114-0
2-27-0
9-143-1
5-59-1
Good for almost 18ppg in PPR leagues.
He was on fire those 4 weeks. The offense's improvement was palpable.I remember that game, and Gronk had a 30+ yard TD called back via penalty that had nothing to do with the play.It's only slightly concerning that the 2/27/0 line was vs. MIA last year. Only slightly.In the four games on "limited" snaps when he came back last year:
8-114-0
2-27-0
9-143-1
5-59-1
Good for almost 18ppg in PPR leagues.
Sooo... even more of a first round pick now?Bump, with Brady playing the full slate his value is even higher than where he's been drafted all pre-season.
Even more justified first round pick.Sooo... even more of a first round pick now?Bump, with Brady playing the full slate his value is even higher than where he's been drafted all pre-season.
I don't think it's completely unreasonable to put him in the Top 5-6 of the WR's. He's the best WR (playing at TE) in a Brady offense by a large margin. Will get volume between the 20's and in the red zone, and makes his own TD's outside of the redzone. From a scarcity at the position perspective, I'd rather take him early and gamble at WR than take a top WR at the price point and have to gamble at TE.Where do you rank him with all the top WRs in a no TE required, non-ppr situation?
Right after the no doubt elite guys like Antonio brown, dez, Julio but ahead of cobb and maybe even ahead of aj green and demaryius.Where do you rank him with all the top WRs in a no TE required, non-ppr situation?