What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

What QB pricepoint do you like (according to current ADP) ? (1 Viewer)

BigSteelThrill

Footballguy
12 team -- (Not that it matters, but the adp set up is... non-ppr, 1 QB, 2rb + 3wr + te, 6pts per td.)

If you have to overpay just a little to acquire him, whats your preference?

AUGUST 19

1 2.02 Andrew Luck
2 2.06 Aaron Rodgers
3 4.04 Peyton Manning
4 5.03 Russell Wilson
5 5.06 Ben Roethlisberger
6 5.12 Drew Brees
7 6.12 Matt Ryan
8 7.05 Cam Newton
9 7.06 Tony Romo
10 8.01 Tom Brady
11 8.07 Matthew Stafford
12 8.12 Eli Manning
13 9.05 Ryan Tannehill
14 9.12 Philip Rivers
15 10.05 Sam Bradford
16 11.04 Teddy Bridgewater
17 11.09 Carson Palmer
18 12.05 Colin Kaepernick
19 12.10 Joe Flacco
20 13.10 Jameis Winston
21 13.11 Jay Cutler
22 14.01 Andy Dalton
23 14.03 Derek Carr
24 14.08 Nick Foles
25 14.08 Robert Griffin III

JULY 26

1 2.02 Andrew Luck
2 2.07 Aaron Rodgers
3 4.02 Peyton Manning
4 4.12 Russell Wilson
5 5.04 Drew Brees
6 5.12 Ben Roethlisberger
7 6.10 Cam Newton
8 7.02 Matt Ryan
9 7.05 Tony Romo
10 7.09 Tom Brady
11 8.05 Matthew Stafford
12 9.02 Eli Manning
13 9.08 Ryan Tannehill
14 10.03 Philip Rivers
15 11.04 Teddy Bridgewater
16 11.07 Sam Bradford
17 11.11 Carson Palmer
18 12.09 Colin Kaepernick
19 12.10 Joe Flacco
20 13.10 Jameis Winston
21 13.12 Jay Cutler
22 14.04 Marcus Mariota
23 14.05 Nick Foles
24 14.08 Derek Carr
25 14.10 Andy Dalton

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ben, Ryan, Romo, Stafford, Tannehill, and I especially like Dalton that late, and he can be had usually even later than that.

 
I like Brady Stafford and Rivers at or just ahead of the price. Depedning on exact scoring (yardage?), Luck seems appropriate but I'd have trouble pulling the trigger on QB that early. Wilson at the 4/5 turn is tempting too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
QB2 has to be Cutler.

He's falling too far, IMO. Crappy, implosion year, for sure, but on a PPG basis he still finished QB12 in most leagues.

He's almost certainly gotta be somewhat better than last year and you're paying QB21 price for someone who is borderline startable, and who has upside for 30 points on any given game.

 
Absolutely Brady at 7.9. Sure, he will likely be suspended for 2-4 games, but you can grab another option with a good early schedule to cover. Brady IMO is going to have a chip on his shoulder after Deflategate, and will likely be a top 5 QB for the remaining 12-14 games.

I also like Big Ben, Tannehill and Bridgewater at their respective prices as well.

Dalton is also really cheap but I don't see the upside in him, much rather gamble with Cutler or Derek Carr at Dalton's price point.

 
I probably wouldnt even look at QBs until one of the other teams takes their 2nd QB. Then I would look at guys like Rivers, Tannehill, And Eli.

edit.............wait a sec, just noticed NON-ppr with 6 points per passing TD. CHanges things quite a bit for me. Is there even a TE spot?

Either way, that setup makes QB a ton more valuable than a 12 team PPR with 4 point TDs that I am used to. In that case, I think Ryan, Romo, and Brady look the most appealing to me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless that ADP is specific to a 6 pt PaTD leavue, you should assume that their true ADP will be some where between a half and full round higher than that.

 
Given that particular set of data, give me Luck or Rodgers every time.

I recommend Luck #1 overall in virtually all formats this year.

 
Absolutely Brady at 7.9. Sure, he will likely be suspended for 2-4 games, but you can grab another option with a good early schedule to cover. Brady IMO is going to have a chip on his shoulder after Deflategate, and will likely be a top 5 QB for the remaining 12-14 games.
That would be surprising. In his last 32 regular season games, Brady has thrown 1 or 0 TDs in 14 of them. He is not a statistical monster anymore, and they run it a lot once they get inside the 5 now. I do agree that he will have a chip on his shoulder, but he doesn't have the WRs to stick it to everyone on a weekly basis like he did back in '07 when he had Moss and Welker. I think he'll still be a top 10 QB on a PPG basis, but top 5? Not sure I see that.

 
Easy choice here here for me.

Carson Palmer at 13.12 in PPR leagues since July 15. Was #14 in PPG (#10 in full games played) last year. Indoors, 2 pass catching backs that cant run in the tackles, one of the best WR trios in the league, Year 3 same offense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brady was the #2 fantasy QB from week 5 on last year. There are reasons why he did not do as well the season prior to that. Like losing his Top 5 receiving targets from the season before, having his replacement receivers banged up, his OL banged up, and an injured Gronk.

This year NE returns everyone except Vereen and added Chandler. Not many things layers on offense have health injuries at the moment. And I think Brady will play all 16 games unless he takes a one game suspension. Pass on him and you will regret it.

 
Absolutely Brady at 7.9. Sure, he will likely be suspended for 2-4 games, but you can grab another option with a good early schedule to cover. Brady IMO is going to have a chip on his shoulder after Deflategate, and will likely be a top 5 QB for the remaining 12-14 games.
That would be surprising. In his last 32 regular season games, Brady has thrown 1 or 0 TDs in 14 of them. He is not a statistical monster anymore, and they run it a lot once they get inside the 5 now. I do agree that he will have a chip on his shoulder, but he doesn't have the WRs to stick it to everyone on a weekly basis like he did back in '07 when he had Moss and Welker. I think he'll still be a top 10 QB on a PPG basis, but top 5? Not sure I see that.
Look at the games where he had a healthy Gronk.

If you call that weeks 5-16 in 2014 plus weeks 7-13 in 2013 (17 games over 2 years), he was on pace for 4729/38 per 16 games.

 
I'm not touching a QB until at least round 7. Romo, Stafford and Rivers are clear targets for me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Dalton could be an every week starter. In 2013 he got OK performance from Gresham, but he didn't have gio starting right away and sanu was hurt for the season. Dalton was a top 5 qb. Last year, he lost Marvin Jones, eifert, and aj green and gio got hurt, and people act like his drop off is entirely his own fault. I understand that people think the run game will be substantial but he should flirt with qb1 numbers.

Truth is that most of these guys are going to end up having good seasons, and variance will have more to do with who finishes where at the end of season.

I say take almost any two late and you'll be fine. Eli and a first will probably outscore luck and a 9th in most leagues.

Palmer (just because of the injury), Flacco (who will need some time to learn a system and receivers), Winston and Mariotta are getting drafted higher than they should be, but the rest are all starter quality.

 
Andy Dalton could be an every week starter. In 2013 he got OK performance from Gresham, but he didn't have gio starting right away and sanu was hurt for the season. Dalton was a top 5 qb. Last year, he lost Marvin Jones, eifert, and aj green and gio got hurt, and people act like his drop off is entirely his own fault. I understand that people think the run game will be substantial but he should flirt with qb1 numbers.

Truth is that most of these guys are going to end up having good seasons, and variance will have more to do with who finishes where at the end of season.

I say take almost any two late and you'll be fine. Eli and a first will probably outscore luck and a 9th in most leagues.

Palmer (just because of the injury), Flacco (who will need some time to learn a system and receivers), Winston and Mariotta are getting drafted higher than they should be, but the rest are all starter quality.
I'd imagine Dalton will be on nearly all my redraft teams this year. I agree, at that price the potential reward is way too high.
 
Absolutely Brady at 7.9. Sure, he will likely be suspended for 2-4 games, but you can grab another option with a good early schedule to cover. Brady IMO is going to have a chip on his shoulder after Deflategate, and will likely be a top 5 QB for the remaining 12-14 games.
That would be surprising. In his last 32 regular season games, Brady has thrown 1 or 0 TDs in 14 of them. He is not a statistical monster anymore, and they run it a lot once they get inside the 5 now. I do agree that he will have a chip on his shoulder, but he doesn't have the WRs to stick it to everyone on a weekly basis like he did back in '07 when he had Moss and Welker. I think he'll still be a top 10 QB on a PPG basis, but top 5? Not sure I see that.
Look at the games where he had a healthy Gronk.

If you call that weeks 5-16 in 2014 plus weeks 7-13 in 2013 (17 games over 2 years), he was on pace for 4729/38 per 16 games.
Cherry picking weeks to make your point, eh? Gronk was healthy all last season, so ignoring weeks 1-4 is comical.

 
Going off the list, the ones that jump out to me are: Roethlisberger, Ryan, Romo and Eli

Really think Eli has the potential for a top 5 season this year. Full season with Beckham, Cruz, Randle, Vereen and Donell. He's going to win a bunch of teams their league this year.

 
Any from 9-14

in most leagues I find myself taking cam, but not with 6 pts for all TD
Agreed. Missed out on all these in a QB run, and settled for Bradford at his ADP. But very surprised Dalton fell to me in the 16th round. I have Dalton as my starter till Bradford proves himself. Between these two, I think I have a safe floor.

 
I don't really understand waiting on QB too long. A guy like Newton or Ben R could be better than a guy you can get around 9-12 ranked QB. The RB/WR/TE guys you are getting in rounds 5-8 may not make up that difference from Ben R to a Brady or Eli. There is a premium to having a better QB because you generally cannot get a better one later on in the year but you have a better chance of getting a WR or RB that booms.

You may have one of the worst QBs in your league. I can see the strategy working but taking guys like Romo and Stafford are kind of risky. Yeah if you get Bradford and he has a great year and you loaded up on your WR 3, Flex and TE then it works. There are many potential Flex, RB 2 and WR 3 players that go drafted a lot later or free agency. There will hardly be any QB you can just find.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Going off the list, the ones that jump out to me are: Roethlisberger, Ryan, Romo and Eli

Really think Eli has the potential for a top 5 season this year. Full season with Beckham, Cruz, Randle, Vereen and Donell. He's going to win a bunch of teams their league this year.
I was able to grab Eli and Brady at 11.12 and 13.7 in a recent dynasty draft. Eli, Brady and Rivers are the guys I target since they can be had so late.

 
From your list, I like Tannehill/Eli/Rivers/Bridgewater at those ADPs, knowing that I would need to take a 2nd QB in the next few rounds. But I've been ending up with Manning in the 5th quite a bit in MFL10s and cheap ESPN draft leagues. I generally like to wait on QB, but the combo of Manning falling too far IMO and that being kind of a gray area in terms of RB/WR talent led to me breaking from my normal strategy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team -- (Not that it matters, but the adp set up is... non-ppr, 1 QB, 2rb + 3wr + te, 6pts per td.)

If you have to overpay just a little to acquire him, whats your preference?
Full price for Rodgers or Luck and watch the competition crumble.
3 of the 4 leagues I play in are 6pt passing TD leagues. I never take a QB early and do just fine.
Who did you have last year in those leagues?

 
I think with the new extra point rules, Cam will be a 2 point machine. He's already pretty good otherwise anyhow. I am thinking he finishes around QB3 and I'm targeting him pretty heavily.

 
If full price, I'm waiting. Eli. Bradford. Bridgewater.

If the studs fall to rd3, I'm interested

 
I don't really understand waiting on QB too long. A guy like Newton or Ben R could be better than a guy you can get around 9-12 ranked QB. The RB/WR/TE guys you are getting in rounds 5-8 may not make up that difference from Ben R to a Brady or Eli. There is a premium to having a better QB because you generally cannot get a better one later on in the year but you have a better chance of getting a WR or RB that booms.

You may have one of the worst QBs in your league. I can see the strategy working but taking guys like Romo and Stafford are kind of risky. Yeah if you get Bradford and he has a great year and you loaded up on your WR 3, Flex and TE then it works. There are many potential Flex, RB 2 and WR 3 players that go drafted a lot later or free agency. There will hardly be any QB you can just find.
I'm not confident that Roethlisberger will outscore Brady or eli. If all three were on the board I'm not even sure I'd take Ben first, so taking him a round or more earlier would require a confidence I simply don't have. I'm not even that confident he'll outscore Dalton. Dalton has outscored Roethlisberger in two of his four years in the league. Roethlisberger led during Dalton's rookie year, and last year, when Ben set or matched records in yards, touchdowns and td/int while Dalton's whole receiving corps was hurt.

 
12 team -- (Not that it matters, but the adp set up is... non-ppr, 1 QB, 2rb + 3wr + te, 6pts per td.)

If you have to overpay just a little to acquire him, whats your preference?
Full price for Rodgers or Luck and watch the competition crumble.
3 of the 4 leagues I play in are 6pt passing TD leagues. I never take a QB early and do just fine.
Who did you have last year in those leagues?
1. Drafted RG3, traded for Wilson

2. Drafted Romo and Roethlisberger

3. Drafted Brady and Wilson

4. Drafted Wilson

The earliest I took a QB was the 7th round when I took Brady.

 
I don't really understand waiting on QB too long. A guy like Newton or Ben R could be better than a guy you can get around 9-12 ranked QB. The RB/WR/TE guys you are getting in rounds 5-8 may not make up that difference from Ben R to a Brady or Eli. There is a premium to having a better QB because you generally cannot get a better one later on in the year but you have a better chance of getting a WR or RB that booms.

You may have one of the worst QBs in your league. I can see the strategy working but taking guys like Romo and Stafford are kind of risky. Yeah if you get Bradford and he has a great year and you loaded up on your WR 3, Flex and TE then it works. There are many potential Flex, RB 2 and WR 3 players that go drafted a lot later or free agency. There will hardly be any QB you can just find.
I'm not confident that Roethlisberger will outscore Brady or eli. If all three were on the board I'm not even sure I'd take Ben first, so taking him a round or more earlier would require a confidence I simply don't have.I'm not even that confident he'll outscore Dalton. Dalton has outscored Roethlisberger in two of his four years in the league. Roethlisberger led during Dalton's rookie year, and last year, when Ben set or matched records in yards, touchdowns and td/int while Dalton's whole receiving corps was hurt.
Ben should outscore Brady if Brady misses games. I don't really like having to draft another QB shortly after taking Brady. I admit the strategy can work really well especially if you can get a Rivers or another solid QB several rounds later and at the same time get an extra RB or WR. I am pretty sure Ben outdoes Eli. I am not sure about Dalton but I know he can't win playoff games. Banking your season on Dalton or Eli especially in high buy ins is tough.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't really understand waiting on QB too long. A guy like Newton or Ben R could be better than a guy you can get around 9-12 ranked QB. The RB/WR/TE guys you are getting in rounds 5-8 may not make up that difference from Ben R to a Brady or Eli. There is a premium to having a better QB because you generally cannot get a better one later on in the year but you have a better chance of getting a WR or RB that booms.

You may have one of the worst QBs in your league. I can see the strategy working but taking guys like Romo and Stafford are kind of risky. Yeah if you get Bradford and he has a great year and you loaded up on your WR 3, Flex and TE then it works. There are many potential Flex, RB 2 and WR 3 players that go drafted a lot later or free agency. There will hardly be any QB you can just find.
I'm not confident that Roethlisberger will outscore Brady or eli. If all three were on the board I'm not even sure I'd take Ben first, so taking him a round or more earlier would require a confidence I simply don't have.I'm not even that confident he'll outscore Dalton. Dalton has outscored Roethlisberger in two of his four years in the league. Roethlisberger led during Dalton's rookie year, and last year, when Ben set or matched records in yards, touchdowns and td/int while Dalton's whole receiving corps was hurt.
Ben should outscore Brady if Brady misses games. I don't really like having to draft another QB shortly after taking Brady. I admit the strategy can work really well especially if you can get a Rivers or another solid QB several rounds later and at the same time get an extra RB or WR. I am pretty sure Ben outdoes Eli. I am not sure about Dalton but I know he can't win playoff games. Banking your season on Dalton or Eli especially in high buy ins is tough.
Eli was QB10 in one of my leagues last year. He finished 31 points behind Russell Wilson, who was QB6. 31 points over a full season is not even 2 points a week difference. Wilson is usually going off the board in the 4th/5th in most mocks I've done. Eli is going in about the 9th/10th. It's easy to make up 2ppg with your RB/WR picks.

Once you get past Luck/Rodgers, most of the other QBs are pretty even. The difference between Ben and Eli last year was 2.7ppg. Again, if you are able to snag better WR/RBs in the mid rounds, you can make up that difference pretty easily.

 
Going off the list, the ones that jump out to me are: Roethlisberger, Ryan, Romo and Eli

Really think Eli has the potential for a top 5 season this year. Full season with Beckham, Cruz, Randle, Vereen and Donell. He's going to win a bunch of teams their league this year.
I was able to grab Eli and Brady at 11.12 and 13.7 in a recent dynasty draft. Eli, Brady and Rivers are the guys I target since they can be had so late.
That's huge. The older QBs can be great values for a couple of years but then you'll be looking for a new QB. Which could be fine, but the biggest advantage of taking a guy like Luck, Rodgers, Cam or Wilson is locking down the position for the foreseeable future.

 
I like these, but i'm a big matchup/stream guy.

12 9.02 Eli Manning
13 9.08 Ryan Tannehill
14 10.03 Philip Rivers
15 11.04 Teddy Bridgewater

19 12.10 Joe Flacco

21 13.12 Jay Cutler

-undrafted-

Alex Smith
Geno Smith
Palmer

I Dont like these guys at their ADP, i think they are all a round or 2 early. mid to late 3rd is where i consider luck/rodgers. 5-7 is where i'm looking at the other 3

1 2.02 Andrew Luck
2 2.07 Aaron Rodgers
3 4.02 Peyton Manning
4 4.12 Russell Wilson
5 5.04 Drew Brees

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't really understand waiting on QB too long. A guy like Newton or Ben R could be better than a guy you can get around 9-12 ranked QB. The RB/WR/TE guys you are getting in rounds 5-8 may not make up that difference from Ben R to a Brady or Eli. There is a premium to having a better QB because you generally cannot get a better one later on in the year but you have a better chance of getting a WR or RB that booms.

You may have one of the worst QBs in your league. I can see the strategy working but taking guys like Romo and Stafford are kind of risky. Yeah if you get Bradford and he has a great year and you loaded up on your WR 3, Flex and TE then it works. There are many potential Flex, RB 2 and WR 3 players that go drafted a lot later or free agency. There will hardly be any QB you can just find.
I'm not confident that Roethlisberger will outscore Brady or eli. If all three were on the board I'm not even sure I'd take Ben first, so taking him a round or more earlier would require a confidence I simply don't have.I'm not even that confident he'll outscore Dalton. Dalton has outscored Roethlisberger in two of his four years in the league. Roethlisberger led during Dalton's rookie year, and last year, when Ben set or matched records in yards, touchdowns and td/int while Dalton's whole receiving corps was hurt.
Ben should outscore Brady if Brady misses games. I don't really like having to draft another QB shortly after taking Brady. I admit the strategy can work really well especially if you can get a Rivers or another solid QB several rounds later and at the same time get an extra RB or WR. I am pretty sure Ben outdoes Eli. I am not sure about Dalton but I know he can't win playoff games. Banking your season on Dalton or Eli especially in high buy ins is tough.
Eli was QB10 in one of my leagues last year. He finished 31 points behind Russell Wilson, who was QB6. 31 points over a full season is not even 2 points a week difference. Wilson is usually going off the board in the 4th/5th in most mocks I've done. Eli is going in about the 9th/10th. It's easy to make up 2ppg with your RB/WR picks.

Once you get past Luck/Rodgers, most of the other QBs are pretty even. The difference between Ben and Eli last year was 2.7ppg. Again, if you are able to snag better WR/RBs in the mid rounds, you can make up that difference pretty easily.
A lot will depend on each individual league and scoring systems. Based on the FBG default scoring system, the scoring difference between QB1 and QB12 has typically been a pretty big number (108, 177, 107, 173, 71, 113, 116, 193, 120, and 57 each of the past 10 years).

The question becomes, how close can you get to drafting a QB closer to the top of the VBD bandwidth and at what point in the draft does it take to get that player. I've had years where I won plucking QBs off the waiver wire from week to week and won going away. I wouldn't recommend it, but it is possible. That's the only thing I think is atypical about QBs vs. other positions. You can normally find a starting NFL QB on the waiver wire. You might find an NFL injury fill in RB or WR on occasion, but those positions will be picked over by mid season if you run into injury issues.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't really understand waiting on QB too long. A guy like Newton or Ben R could be better than a guy you can get around 9-12 ranked QB. The RB/WR/TE guys you are getting in rounds 5-8 may not make up that difference from Ben R to a Brady or Eli. There is a premium to having a better QB because you generally cannot get a better one later on in the year but you have a better chance of getting a WR or RB that booms.

You may have one of the worst QBs in your league. I can see the strategy working but taking guys like Romo and Stafford are kind of risky. Yeah if you get Bradford and he has a great year and you loaded up on your WR 3, Flex and TE then it works. There are many potential Flex, RB 2 and WR 3 players that go drafted a lot later or free agency. There will hardly be any QB you can just find.
I'm not confident that Roethlisberger will outscore Brady or eli. If all three were on the board I'm not even sure I'd take Ben first, so taking him a round or more earlier would require a confidence I simply don't have.I'm not even that confident he'll outscore Dalton. Dalton has outscored Roethlisberger in two of his four years in the league. Roethlisberger led during Dalton's rookie year, and last year, when Ben set or matched records in yards, touchdowns and td/int while Dalton's whole receiving corps was hurt.
Ben should outscore Brady if Brady misses games. I don't really like having to draft another QB shortly after taking Brady. I admit the strategy can work really well especially if you can get a Rivers or another solid QB several rounds later and at the same time get an extra RB or WR. I am pretty sure Ben outdoes Eli. I am not sure about Dalton but I know he can't win playoff games. Banking your season on Dalton or Eli especially in high buy ins is tough.
Eli was QB10 in one of my leagues last year. He finished 31 points behind Russell Wilson, who was QB6. 31 points over a full season is not even 2 points a week difference. Wilson is usually going off the board in the 4th/5th in most mocks I've done. Eli is going in about the 9th/10th. It's easy to make up 2ppg with your RB/WR picks.

Once you get past Luck/Rodgers, most of the other QBs are pretty even. The difference between Ben and Eli last year was 2.7ppg. Again, if you are able to snag better WR/RBs in the mid rounds, you can make up that difference pretty easily.
A lot will depend on each individual league and scoring systems. Based on the FBG default scoring system, the scoring difference between QB1 and QB12 has typically been a pretty big number (108, 177, 107, 173, 71, 113, 116, 193, 120, and 57 each of the past 10 years).

The question becomes, how close can you get to drafting a QB closer to the top of the VBD bandwidth and at what point in the draft does it take to get that player. I've had years where I won plucking QBs off the waiver wire from week to week and won going away. I wouldn't recommend it, but it is possible. That's the only thing I think is atypical about QBs vs. other positions. You can normally find a starting NFL QB on the waiver wire. You might find an NFL injury fill in RB or WR on occasion, but those positions will be picked over by mid season if you run into injury issues.

136, 226, 93, 132, 143, 257, 146, and 88).
There's definitely a difference if you can get one of the top 2 or 3 QBs most seasons. But once you get past them, there isn't really a huge difference between the rest. If you want a QB early, then make sure you grab Luck or Rodgers. But if you wait, you're probably not going to see a huge difference between say Wilson and Eli this season.

 
in a 12 team league I like a guy who is matchup proof so I don't mind over paying or drafting a stud early.....not a big fan of trying to play the matchup game with a QBBC approach (not my strength) so I give the stud plug and play guys a little more value....I like to be above average to well above average at QB and in some ways TE and then rely on what drafting skills I do have to round out the roster at RB/WR....in a 12 team H2H league a top QB can win you some games by themselves and get you to that number that gets you in the playoffs....a decent draft at RB/WR and roster management/WW work during the season could have you entering the post season in pretty good shape with a stud QB pulling the trigger for you....

to answer the question here.....I obviously like Brady but not sure you'll be able to get him at that price as the season approaches....I don't think he misses any time.....

if I didn't spend an early pick on QB, I would be looking at Ryan, Palmer, and even Cutler

 
I think Wilson could be big this year as Silva said. Newton can have a top 3 year if he can run and make more passes with the best corps he has in his career. Ben could have a big year with more support. I agree that there likely won't be a big difference between Matt Ryan and Eli/Rivers. etc. If the QB you take has a down year you could be in trouble.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Brady, Tannehil, Rivers, and Kaepernick.

Kaep still threw for over 3,300 yards with 19 TD and ran for over 600 yards. He should run for more yards if the 49ers OC opens up the playbook to let Kaep play to his strengths so he's a very sneaky low risk/high reward option for me at that ADP.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not interested in palmer or any of the AZ receivers. Remember how good palmer looked before his first acl? He cratered hard after that.

 
Not interested in palmer or any of the AZ receivers. Remember how good palmer looked before his first acl? He cratered hard after that.
Might want to revisit Palmer's numbers before he got hurt last season.

He was on pace for over 4300yds and 29TDs.

And before last season, he had back to back 4,000+yds seasons.

 
12 team -- (Not that it matters, but the adp set up is... non-ppr, 1 QB, 2rb + 3wr + te, 6pts per td.)

If you have to overpay just a little to acquire him, whats your preference?

14 10.03 Philip Rivers

18 12.09 Colin Kaepernick

19 12.10 Joe Flacco

21 13.12 Jay Cutler

25 14.10 Andy Dalton
these jump out to me...

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top