What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Michigan Senate Passes Bill Making Oral and Anal Sex Punishable (1 Viewer)

All of you are heathens! The Bible says these two acts are sinful. The Michigan government is trying to save you. Can't you see that? REPENT!!!!!!

 
Why are you reading frontiers? Something to tell the group?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
People are getting sick in Flint and this is what they're doing?
Yes Tim, the government is just a single branch, only capable of working on one thing and nothing else. They chose this.
Whatever. It looks very bad for them to be working on stuff like this while Flint is still suffering.
See, I think it would look bad to completely neglect all other issues while they throw more resources than needed to fix this problem. It would be wasteful, costly, irresponsible and foolish.

Then again, it was your idea.

 
People are getting sick in Flint and this is what they're doing?
Yes Tim, the government is just a single branch, only capable of working on one thing and nothing else. They chose this.
Whatever. It looks very bad for them to be working on stuff like this while Flint is still suffering.
See, I think it would look bad to completely neglect all other issues while they throw more resources than needed to fix this problem. It would be wasteful, costly, irresponsible and foolish.

Then again, it was your idea.
I agree, but why is this even an issue?

 
People are getting sick in Flint and this is what they're doing?
Yes Tim, the government is just a single branch, only capable of working on one thing and nothing else. They chose this.
Whatever. It looks very bad for them to be working on stuff like this while Flint is still suffering.
See, I think it would look bad to completely neglect all other issues while they throw more resources than needed to fix this problem. It would be wasteful, costly, irresponsible and foolish.

Then again, it was your idea.
I agree, but why is this even an issue?
Someone summarized it well.

It's purely to protect animals. The people stuff was already ruled unconstitutional and unenforceable, they just kept it in because trying to remove it/change the language would have made the entire process longer/harder (heh heh heh).

 
Not quite as idiotic as it reads at first. The way I understood it

  • Existing law applies both to sex between people and bestiality
  • Existing law was already declared unconstitutional w/r/t consensual human secks in 2003, so only the bestiality portions are actually enforceable
  • They're trying to strengthen the law to prevent animal abusers from having pets
  • If they try to modify the law to remove the unconstitutional parts, they expect a big fight from conservatives who can't be seen as voting for teh homoes (despite the law already being found unconstitutional)
  • In order to get the animal-protection parts into effect with the least delay, they're leaving the rest of the wording in there and will continue to ignore/not enforce it.
I'm getting errors trying to open the link, so this may already be covered there.
Is bestiality a huge problem in Michigan?
The state is the shape of a big paw. Doesn't get much bigger than that.

 
People are getting sick in Flint and this is what they're doing?
Yes Tim, the government is just a single branch, only capable of working on one thing and nothing else. They chose this.
Whatever. It looks very bad for them to be working on stuff like this while Flint is still suffering.
See, I think it would look bad to completely neglect all other issues while they throw more resources than needed to fix this problem. It would be wasteful, costly, irresponsible and foolish.

Then again, it was your idea.
I agree, but why is this even an issue?
Someone summarized it well.

It's purely to protect animals. The people stuff was already ruled unconstitutional and unenforceable, they just kept it in because trying to remove it/change the language would have made the entire process longer/harder (heh heh heh).
You say it like its perfectly normal. We really have to pass ridiculous bills and promise not to enforce parts of them because a party is so completely intractable it can't be reasoned with?

 
People are getting sick in Flint and this is what they're doing?
Yes Tim, the government is just a single branch, only capable of working on one thing and nothing else. They chose this.
Whatever. It looks very bad for them to be working on stuff like this while Flint is still suffering.
See, I think it would look bad to completely neglect all other issues while they throw more resources than needed to fix this problem. It would be wasteful, costly, irresponsible and foolish.

Then again, it was your idea.
I agree, but why is this even an issue?
Someone summarized it well.

It's purely to protect animals. The people stuff was already ruled unconstitutional and unenforceable, they just kept it in because trying to remove it/change the language would have made the entire process longer/harder (heh heh heh).
You say it like its perfectly normal. We really have to pass ridiculous bills and promise not to enforce parts of them because a party is so completely intractable it can't be reasoned with?
Those are the righties for ya.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top