Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Politician Spock

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4,922 Excellent

About Politician Spock

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Room NCC-1701, Capitol Building, DC

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team

Recent Profile Visitors

8,350 profile views
  1. Many homeless people can't keep a job because of mental issues. I fully support tax dollars being spent to help with homelessness, but simply giving the tax money to lay people to take them in is a really bad idea, and your story is a good example of why. And it's really a #### move for someone to use this topic as a form of sarcasm. In my opinion, our country's lack of willingness to do something in this area is a serious black eye we suffer from.
  3. Yes, yes.... I was being sarcastic, obviously. Hopefully I wasn't been so sarcastic that the point that anyone who feels they need so much control over a thread they create, as to need to put certain posters on ignore so that their replies don't show to anyone, needs to go to a psychiatrist, if only so that they can report back to us what psychological condition they suffer from.
  4. Exactly. Messiah is the Hebrew word that means "anointed one" and is literally used in Hebrew texts to mean "anointed King". It means the Messiah is anointed by god to be the next King of Israel. The Greek word for "anointed" is Christos. Given the NT books were written in Greek, this is where the name Jesus Christ comes from. Jesus is the Greek translation of his Hebrew name "Yeshua" and it literally means "Jesus anointed", meaning Jesus is anointed by god to be the next King of Israel. Actually his name was Iesus until the letter J was invented around 500 years ago. Prior to the invention of the letter J, the letter I was like Y, in that sometimes it's a vowel and sometimes it's a consonant. J was invented to become the consonant use of the letter I. So yes, everything you say about the 1st century, Jesus is political is 100% true. His followers followed him because they believed he was anointed to the be the next King of Israel. They also believed he would return Israel to the correct observance of the Torah, reunite the 10 lost tribes, and rid the holy land of its current foreign occupation (Rome). That last bit is why Rome killed anyone who people believed to be the Messiah. And there were many of them that popped up around that time, because the book of Daniel had a prophecy that around that time the messiah would arrive. So messiah claims were popping up everywhere, and a lot of them were named "Jesus" because another OT prophecy claimed the messiah would be named Yeshua. The specific Jesus we know of today popped up from the Essenes. The Essenes were a sect of Jews that were both pacifists and opposed to wealth, and were vastly opposed to other Jewish sects like the Pharisees and Sadducees who they believed had taken the nation of Israel so off course with their wrong religious beliefs. Their Yeshua Messiah (Jesus Christ) came from Nazareth, and thus their new sect of Judiasm coined the phrase Nazarenes (Nazarth + Essenes). While this Nazareth Essene Jesus Messiah and his followers are the one we are most familiar with today, back when they existed, again they were just one of many sects of Jews who were making claims that someone was the Messiah (Christos.... i.e. anointed). And again, because this Messiah (Christos... i.e. anointed) was to rid the holy land of Roman occupation, these Messiah (Christos... anointed) believers were rebels and traitors in the eyes of Rome. They were called "Christians" and were persecuted because they wanted the holy land rid of Roman occupation. This is where Christian persecution came from. And it wasn't just Rome that did it. It was Jews as well. It was Jews that didn't believe that a messiah was present and didn't want to change the status quo. They may not like Roman occupation, but they saw that being better than what would come from war. Eventually these rebellious Christians cause enough damage that Rome did go in and level Jerusalem, and either enslaved or scattered all Jews (not just the ones that believed in a Messiah). Years later this even happened to all of Judea. Israel as a nation existed no more. And all of these messiah believing sects exited no more either, because without a country, what good is an anointed king of it? So why do we have christianity today? The one, and only one answer.... Paul. Paul was one of the persecutors of christians. He was killing them... even the pacifist nazarene sect. He saw no difference between different sects of messiah believing Jews. If they believed a messiah was present, then they were rebels and were executed. Hence why Paul was there where Steven the nazarene was executed. But something in Paul changed in regards to the nazarene sect. Were not exactly sure what and how, because even Paul's letters and the book of Acts disagree about how that process unfolded (his letters say he went to Arabia for three years and had visions of Jesus where Jesus taught him "his gospel" and even allowed him to ascend into Heaven for more visions and instruction. In Galatians he is adamant that "no man" taught him the gospel that he preaches, and it's 100% sourced directly from his visions of Jesus. He's even negative towards James, Peter and John in his letters, even insinuating that Jesus knew they were too stupid to understand the great mystery and that's why he didn't teach them it while he walked with them and had to wait to teach it to Paul after he died. The great mystey being that Jesus is not just a Jewish messiah, but a savior of the entire world. The Books of Acts takes a much different view of Paul, one that shows him respectful of the Jerusalem "pillars", and one that shows them working together. Given it was written well after Paul died, and by one of Paul's associates, it's pretty obvious that this view of Paul and his relationship with the original nazarenes is apologetic in nature, and must be taken with many grains of salt. Paul's opposition and pleading that he is telling the truth is far more likely to be closer to the truth, even despite him likely being very one sided, and the truth being closer to the middle. While the NT books do provide some history of this nazarene sect, most, if not all, of the NT was written by Greek speaking gentiles, and not by Aramaic speaking Jews. And it's a fair assumption that most, of the books including the synoptic gospels were written by gentile believers of Paul's great mystery gospel, which is that Jesus is a savior of all for those that believe that he is god. The jews didn't believe that. Not even the messiah believing Jews. Not even the nazarene sect of Jews. Again, like you said, they believed their messiah was the next king of Israel. And when Jerusalem and Judea were no longer Israel, their beliefs all died off too. All that remained was the gentile version that Paul created from his great mystery reveled gospel. It's those that believe Pauline christianity is what the followers of Jesus believed, that think Christianity isn't political. As Paul's great mystery essentially says there are no political boundries for his gospel. To the messiah beliving Jews, it was entirely political, and Jesus had nothing at all to do with Gentiles. Giving his message to them was like "feeding the dogs".
  5. Did Edward Snowden's 2013 revelations about a huge secret data center collecting everything everyone is doing online mean that Alex Jones was right? No, it did not. It just shows that even a broken clock is right twice a day. These conspiracy extremists do not get to claim they're right when one of the many things they claim turns out to be true. It's all the stuff they claim that is wrong that defines whether or not they are right or wrong. That said, the conspiracy extremists being wrong does not mean we aren't living in a plutocracy. Of course we are. It's just a chaotic plutocracy where the rich disagree on a ton of stuff. What matters is that the opinions of the non-rich masses don't matter. These conspiracy extremists actually make that situation worse as most people can't tell the difference, so when they write off the extremists, they write off those who recognize we live in a plutocracy, and thus live in the fiction of a their non-rich opinion actually has a voice in their democracy.
  6. This is my thread. There are many like it, but this one is mine. My thread is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my thread is useless. Without my thread, I am useless. I must post my thread true. I must post straighter than my enemy who is trying to kill me. I must post him before he posts me. I will ... My thread and I know that what counts in war is not the posts we fire, the noise of our burst, nor the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count. We will hit ... My thread is human, even as I, because it is my life. Thus, I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weaknesses, its strength, its parts, its accessories, its sights and its barrel. I will keep my thread clean and ready, even as I am clean and ready. We will become part of each other. We will ... Before God, I swear this creed. My thread and I are the defenders of my country. We are the masters of our enemy. We are the saviors of my life. So be it, until victory is America's and there is no enemy, but peace!
  7. The purpose of deterrents and laws and rules is to influence those decisions.
  8. They're "happy" in the same way someone who has joined an MLM is "happy" with the MLM despite their costs obviously outweighing their benefits so far. It's hope that they have, and that hope is more than enough to blind them from a disappointing reality.
  9. The rest of my post, that you cut out, is the point. If a person can't see that their line of thinking results in insanity, then their opinion should be ignored.
  10. I don't understand why the Indy 500 thinks it's supreme.
  11. Given the prosecutor hasn't chosen to prosecute (yet), maybe the prosecutor knows how f'ing dumb this case is, which would be a small glimmer of hope that there is some intelligence in Alabama.
  12. My understanding of what she is charged with, is that it wouldn't change the situation at all, as she is charged with being at fault for the incident, and therefor at fault for the death of the fetus.
  13. EXACTLY!!!! Someone's child kills themselves with the parents gun, and the worst reaction from the gun nuts is "how sad" followed by "thoughts and prayers". But let's send pregnant woman to prison for GETTING SHOT!!!!