Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Maurile Tremblay

Admin
  • Content Count

    41,705
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Maurile Tremblay last won the day on July 30

Maurile Tremblay had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

13,459 Excellent

About Maurile Tremblay

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    San Diego Chargers

Recent Profile Visitors

43,857 profile views
  1. Maurile Tremblay

    FanDuel Week 7

    Thanks. The Bengals-Chiefs were flexed into Primetime, displacing the Rams-49ers. I need to adjust the schedule ... will be reflected in the next update.
  2. Maurile Tremblay

    Week 6 injury thread

    The following players are questionable or doubtful heading into Sunday: Sun 1:00 pm - Adrian Peterson [Q] - RB, WAS - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Caleb Sturgis [Q] - PK, LAC - OUT Sun 1:00 pm - Chase Edmonds [Q] - RB, ARI - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Chris Thompson [Q] - RB, WAS - OUT Sun 1:00 pm - Dalvin Cook [Q] - RB, MIN - OUT Sun 1:00 pm - Deshaun Watson [Q] - QB, HOU - Active Sun 1:00 pm - DeVante Parker [Q] - WR, MIA - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Eric Ebron [Q] - TE, IND - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Greg Olsen [Q] - TE, CAR - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Isaiah Crowell [Q] - RB, NYJ - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Jamison Crowder [Q] - WR, WAS - OUT Sun 1:00 pm - John Ross [Q] - WR, CIN - OUT Sun 1:00 pm - Josh Doctson [Q] - WR, WAS - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Nick Vannett [Q] - TE, SEA - OUT Sun 1:00 pm - O.J. Howard [Q] - TE, TB - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Paul Richardson Jr [Q] - WR, WA - Active Sun 1:00 pm - Ryan Tannehill [Q] - QB, MIA - OUT Sun 4:25 pm - Deonte Thompson [Q] - WR, DAL- Active Sun 8:20 pm - Chris Hogan [Q] - WR, NE Sun 8:20 pm - Josh Gordon [Q] - WR, NE Sun 8:20 pm - Rob Gronkowski [Q] - TE, NE Sun 8:20 pm - Sony Michel [Q] - RB, NE MNF - George Kittle [Q] - TE, SF MNF - Geronimo Allison [Q] - WR, GB MNF - Matt Breida [Q] - RB, SF MNF - Pierre Garcon [Q] - WR, SF MNF - Randall Cobb [Q] - WR, GB MNF - Trent Taylor [D] - WR, SF
  3. Maurile Tremblay

    2018 Elections Thread

    Joe, you don't understand the current politics in American. This is why you shouldn't be our nominee in 2020. On a serious note, this is true. I like Presidents who are good at estimating probabilities. It's kind of important when making decisions with large geopolitical implications. I'd be comfortable voting for Nate Silver over Joe Biden if that were the choice.
  4. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    It's theoretically possible for people to do something horrid without being hypocritical about it. But I think it's rare in practice since most people publicly claim to abhor things that are horrid.
  5. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    Will The New York Times do? That article's not about Garland specifically, but I think the Garland arguments can revert back to it. That's possible.
  6. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    What did McConnell say? Did he say "We're just going to be arbitrarily evil?" Or did he have some kind of superficially plausible reason, good enough to satisfy his own party, that sounded kind of like his party was doing something justified in response to the other party doing something unjustified? I'm sure it wasn't a good reason. It was actually a pretext for "I want more power for my party." Just as, I'm sure, the Democrats will have some kind of reason for packing the court, if that's what they do. It won't be a good reason, either. It will also be a pretext for "I want more power for my party." And onward we will go ... each side making things progressively worse, as a justified response to the other side's unjustified instigation, step by step to hell.
  7. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    Is The Politics Forum not reputable enough for you?
  8. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    Every provocation by the other party is unjustified, and every response by our party is justified. Just ask us. According to Republicans, what they did with Garland was simply justified force in response to the unjustified force against Bork. (Or maybe Thomas.) And so on back in time... If a person wants everything to keep getting worse and worse, he's entitled to that preference, but he should be consistent about it. He shouldn't complain about the previous step while encouraging the next one.
  9. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    It depends on what rules of war we tell others to follow, if any. If we say "one country shouldn't drop nukes on another country even in response to a huge surprise attack" and then we do exactly that, I'd say that makes us hypocrites. If we say "one party shouldn't escalate violations of the intended constitutional framework relating to Supreme Court nominations (by, for example, refusing to confirm a nominee for partisan political reasons)" and then do exactly that (by, for example, packing the court) ... same deal.
  10. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    You can complain, but if you escalate the violence, you complain hypocritically.
  11. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    Wrong Strictly speaking, people are entitled to complain about anything they want, what with this being America and all. What I think Ivan meant was that people can't make that complaint without hypocrisy.
  12. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    They are states, too. Congress's power to regulate commerce among the states includes Virginia. The Full Faith and Credit Clause includes Pennsylvania. The Privileges and Immunities Clause includes Kentucky.
  13. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    D.C. has a larger population than Wyoming and Vermont (not including cows).
  14. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    Of course not. BTW 4 Senators and 8 House members would be 12 electoral votes. It would be 9 by my count (since DC already has three).
  15. Maurile Tremblay

    🏛️ Official Supreme Court nomination thread

    Do you consider that to be okay? (I don't.)