Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Moe.

Members
  • Content Count

    9,200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,478 Excellent

About Moe.

  • Rank
    Footballguy
  • Birthday 03/15/1985

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

12,749 profile views
  1. He’s definitely one of the 15 best guys on the Sixers
  2. Am I crazy or are they better than they were this time last year?
  3. The study I linked addresses the impact of increased demand specifically in one of the summary bullet points at the beginning. I can't pull it up at work (FBGs is not blocked but educational institutions are, lol) but it's in there. I absolutely agree re: the bolded. I don't really know what to think but I definitely would prefer something different than what we are doing now (outright prohibition), that much is for sure. Maybe legalization would make it easier to go after the traffickers or those who would continue to operate illegally.
  4. That's not true but whatever. I think the issue is that these streaming services are basically the same product. The overall customer experience is miles better imo, but it's just a package of channels that are dictated to you with little to no a la carte options. Bill creep is another thing people hated about cable and these services appear to be not much different in that regard. They aren't much of a game changer anymore, just a step in the right direction. It's an interesting time to be alive. The internet feels like it's been around forever but in the grand scheme of things it's brand new. We still have a lot to figure out. Would it be impossible for someone to offer a reverse-Philo service? If they could get all of the sports channels together, I'd rather pay 35-40 bucks/month for that instead of $50 for YTTV or whatever. I have zero use for the rest of the channels. Maybe the sports channels are so expensive that once you get them all together you're looking at $50ish anyhow.
  5. I don’t think this is what you meant but to make sure I understand - where Aguero was standing when Eriksen hit the ball doesn’t matter. If you are in an offside position but the other team plays the ball to you it’s fine. So does the video ref first have to determine if there was a deliberate attempt to play the ball - and then they look to see where Aguero was standing? Seems like a difficult way to do it imo.
  6. I don’t think his intent matters, just whether or not he touched it
  7. That might be true, there are pros and cons to each approach. I don’t think the impact on sex trafficking is a pro for legalization, unfortunately.
  8. If Bernardo had whiffed but the ball somehow still found Aguero it would have stood.
  9. Old but relevant https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/lids/2014/06/12/does-legalized-prostitution-increase-human-trafficking/
  10. I really don’t think it’s that simple on this one. The net effect would likely be more trafficked individuals in total but the percentage of sex workers who were trafficked would go down. Is that a win? I’m normally on the other side of this but on this particular issue I don’t think we can legalize it and assume that will be a cure-all.
  11. Didn’t want to quote it but good post @jvdesigns2002. Although I’m not sure coaching can be faulted with respect to shot selection. I think we have enough evidence at this point that RWB is going to pretty much do whatever whenever. At one point in time Russ killed teams with that pull-up jumper from the elbow - he seems to have completely abandoned that as he’s lost confidence in his shot, but for some reason that doesn’t stop him from bombing those threes. He’s also got to get over trying to make the game a 1v1 battle against whoever pissed him off that night. He simply can’t go shot for shot with a guy like Lillard and it’s idiotic to even try. Some of it is on Presti - they just don’t have enough shooting on the roster period. Hopefully they can make it a series.
  12. A friend of mine just suggested the Thunder fire Billy D and hire Mark Jackson. Am I allowed to continue being friends with this person?