Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Family Matters

Members
  • Content Count

    3,413
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Family Matters

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. I was just reviewing how terribly you were owned in some of those old Charger threads. Hilarious!

  2. Hats off to the Chargers. They totally earned this game. They may have paid too dearly unfortunately. But I have to give AJ, Norv the Charger team all the credit in the world. In fact, the depth of this team showed and paid off today. All the back ups that were called upon played critical roles and made signoficant contributions to this win. The depth I'm referring to is mostly because of AJ. He did a terrific job assembling this team. I don't always agree with his actions or the manner he conducts his business but you cannot argue with his ability to identify talent and assemble a quality team. Also, Norv should get his share of credit. He overcame tremendous adversity and stayed the course. I have a new level of respect for him after the way he handled this season. Congrats Charger fans. Good luck next week!
  3. I see the same thing that I described earlier. I must be as blind as Family Matters.PS FM reason number 64 why AJ Smith's job is nowhere near to being in jeopardy. Stat of the Week So you want to know how active your team will be with a good free-agency market coming up in three months? Here's a chart of how much cap space each team was due to have next spring as of Saturday, along with how many players each team has under contract: Team Signed Players 2008 cap room 1. Tennessee 39 $40.85 million 2. San Diego 44 $33.03 million 3. Jacksonville 43 $32.69 million 4. Buffalo 49 $32.05 million 5. New Orleans 39 $31.69 million 6. Cincinnati 48 $31.45 million 7. San Francisco 48 $30.91 million 8. Cleveland 42 $30.31 million 9. Arizona 34 $30.27 million 10.N.Y. Jets 45 $27.72 million 11.Oakland 40 $25.98 million 12.Tampa Bay 48 $25.90 million 13.Miami 48 $25.56 million 14.N.Y. Giants 49 $24.47 million 15.Detroit 42 $23.50 million 16.Houston 43 $22.91 million 17.Dallas 40 $20.61 million 18.Kansas City 44 $20.27 million 19.Chicago 52 $19.80 million 20.Pittsburgh 43 $18.61 million 21.Green Bay 48 $18.37 million 22.Philadelphia 49 $17.17 million 23.Denver 49 $16.77 million 24.Minnesota 49 $14.88 million 25.New England 41 $10.93 million 26.St. Louis 45 $9.61 million 27.Seattle 44 $9.55 million 28.Indianapolis 48 $8.49 million 29.Carolina 35 $6.05 million 30.Atlanta 52 $5.79 million* 31.Baltimore 42 $5.00 million 32.Washington 45 -$20.72 million * Not including unspecified potential rebate from contested return of Michael Vick's pro-rated signing bonus. And yes, you read it right. The Washington Redskins are $20 million over the projected '08 cap, a number that will be reduced once the 'Skins convert some bonuses assigned to the '08 cap (including a hefty one paid to tight end Chris Cooley) to signing bonuses, which can be pro-rated over the life of the contract. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writ...9/week14/4.html So the savings from Brees was that much? So does this contridict the point that Walter Slovotsky kept making about SD spending near their Cap limit each year? Am I missing something?Apparently you're missing the entire point of the post. This is the Chargers cap space for 2008, not for 2007. As far as I know, the Chargers are right at the cap limit for 2007.In the offseason, I'm sure AJ will try to lock up Cromartie and a couple other young Bolts to long term extensions. Then he'll make a couple moves via free agency, getting the Bolts close to the cap. By week 7, if the Bolts haven't had to use the remaining cap space, AJ will accelerate a couple of bonuses so that the Chargers are maxed out against the cap, and have more room in the following offseason. Happens every year. You may be right, I might be missing something. But comparing to where they are versus others, they seem on the low end of things. That usually means they are spending less. Guess it would be helpful to know where they are right now, for this season compared to the rest of the NFL. That would paint a better picture I guess. Anyone know?
  4. I see the same thing that I described earlier. I must be as blind as Family Matters.PS FM reason number 64 why AJ Smith's job is nowhere near to being in jeopardy. Stat of the Week So you want to know how active your team will be with a good free-agency market coming up in three months? Here's a chart of how much cap space each team was due to have next spring as of Saturday, along with how many players each team has under contract: Team Signed Players 2008 cap room 1. Tennessee 39 $40.85 million 2. San Diego 44 $33.03 million 3. Jacksonville 43 $32.69 million 4. Buffalo 49 $32.05 million 5. New Orleans 39 $31.69 million 6. Cincinnati 48 $31.45 million 7. San Francisco 48 $30.91 million 8. Cleveland 42 $30.31 million 9. Arizona 34 $30.27 million 10.N.Y. Jets 45 $27.72 million 11.Oakland 40 $25.98 million 12.Tampa Bay 48 $25.90 million 13.Miami 48 $25.56 million 14.N.Y. Giants 49 $24.47 million 15.Detroit 42 $23.50 million 16.Houston 43 $22.91 million 17.Dallas 40 $20.61 million 18.Kansas City 44 $20.27 million 19.Chicago 52 $19.80 million 20.Pittsburgh 43 $18.61 million 21.Green Bay 48 $18.37 million 22.Philadelphia 49 $17.17 million 23.Denver 49 $16.77 million 24.Minnesota 49 $14.88 million 25.New England 41 $10.93 million 26.St. Louis 45 $9.61 million 27.Seattle 44 $9.55 million 28.Indianapolis 48 $8.49 million 29.Carolina 35 $6.05 million 30.Atlanta 52 $5.79 million* 31.Baltimore 42 $5.00 million 32.Washington 45 -$20.72 million * Not including unspecified potential rebate from contested return of Michael Vick's pro-rated signing bonus. And yes, you read it right. The Washington Redskins are $20 million over the projected '08 cap, a number that will be reduced once the 'Skins convert some bonuses assigned to the '08 cap (including a hefty one paid to tight end Chris Cooley) to signing bonuses, which can be pro-rated over the life of the contract. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writ...9/week14/4.html So the savings from Brees was that much? So does this contridict the point that Walter Slovotsky kept making about SD spending near their Cap limit each year? Am I missing something?
  5. He did look pretty good. But my god, that's alot of holding not getting called.
  6. If it's so stupid, then why did you suggest that the only reason that the Chargers would be holding on to a coach that has won 6 of his last 8 and could wrap up his division this weekend was to keep from paying for an ex-coach?Not adding value is better than detracting value, FM.Wow thisis really difficult for you isn't it. I'm not the one suggesting it. Read the news. I'm just repsonding to what's been reported by the Charger local media. I didn't make this up. It's really helpful to read all that I post rather pick bits and pieces. Maybe then we can have a meaningful debate instead of this idiotic nonsense. You said "Now there are reports that they are so cheap that they don't want to fire Norv because they don't want to pay 2 x-coaches. lol" Can you link me to even one source that says that this is the only reason, or even the primary reason, that they won't fire Norv?The link was already posted earlier. Feel free to look it up yourself. Sounds like your beef is with the guy reprting this, not me. But I have to say based on AJ's past handling of some player contracts that it's very believable. At the very least, he's left some believeing it's the case. Maybe it's not true but very believable.
  7. Well at least you believe whatever they're selling and that's something if not blind homerism. The belief that Rivers is as good as Brees and that Marty needing to be fired after losing a playoff game is the premise of your beliefs today. It's really difficult to debate with someone that's locked into a belief that reasonable outside of blind homerism can easily see. I can understand you're being behind your team and all and that's great, I won't criticize a fan for believeing. But outside of of that noone that is being realistic is going to believe that these moves were what's best for the team. Sure, it may yet work out, over time, but at what cost? You have to think they would be better off if these moves were not made.
  8. And that is why I've been critical of AJ on these decisions. If he would of checked himself (ego) on these issues they would likely be a better TEAM today and going forward. He's the one that decided they needed to draft another QB. He's the one that allowed a Pro Bowl QB leave and start over at that position. (BTW-it's interesting to observe that the Browns are handling their similar QB issues better by at least allowing Anderson the time to prove or disprove he's their guy). He's the one that chose not to get along with his head coach. So the way I see it, he could of prevented these problems by doing what's best for the team rather than force his will. That's all I've been saying all along.
  9. If it's so stupid, then why did you suggest that the only reason that the Chargers would be holding on to a coach that has won 6 of his last 8 and could wrap up his division this weekend was to keep from paying for an ex-coach?Not adding value is better than detracting value, FM.Wow thisis really difficult for you isn't it. I'm not the one suggesting it. Read the news. I'm just repsonding to what's been reported by the Charger local media. I didn't make this up. It's really helpful to read all that I post rather pick bits and pieces. Maybe then we can have a meaningful debate instead of this idiotic nonsense.
  10. And this is why people take your opinions on the Chargers with a grain of salt. AJ's interests are directly tied to the interests of the Chargers winning games. To suggest otherwise is laughable.Sure the Bolts would love to have kept Drew Brees AND their coordinators and Marty. Unfortunately, keeping Drew Brees meant paying ~ $10M to an injured QB while you have a high first round pick on the bench who can replace Brees and allow you to spend the $10M elsewhere to improve the team.And AJ didn't decide to give the Dolphin and Cowboy head coaching gigs to his coordinators. To suggest that AJ decided to make those changes is ridiculous.I know I've had my share of mis-reading a post but I didn't say or suggest he decided to get rid of the coordinators. I said he decided (or he and Spanos) to fire Marty and get rid of Brees. As for the money, not sure where the cap number is but they aren't they under? If so then your point is off a bit. Besides, teams pay injured players every year. They heal and play again. It happens all the time. And if they were that concerned about his health, then why offer him any money at all? They just wanted him if they could get him cheap. IOW-they weren't interested in paying him fair market money. AJ tried the saame thing with Gates. That was a costly mistake as well. Now there are reports that they are so cheap that they don't want to fire Norv because they don't want to pay 2 x-coaches. lolBTW-where did they spend all that money they saved on Brees?But if you think those decisions were in the best interest of the Chargers winning then I guess you're happy with the results. Because outside of the changes I mentioned, this is the same team.What I find interesting about this thread is that some want to pin the problems on Rivers. Some on the line. Some on the D. Isn't it interesting that it seems it's everyone's fault but AJ's. When they were winning with Marty and Brees, it was because of AJ. Now that they having troubled times, it's everyones fault but AJ's. Simply amazing the way some Charger fans see things.All I know is that when I moved to Cali in 2003 the organization was in shambles and that the team, at least on paper, has improved every year. AJ didn't exactly have the easiest job in the world but he's helped make it so the Chargers aren't the laughingstock of the NFL. Can't argue with that thinking. From a high level view it sounds right. But when you think about some of the moves you realize things could be better. BSS-this is not directed at you but to anyone that wants to answer:1. Did AJ do the right thing in letting Brees go? 2. Was letting Brees go and putting in a first year starter the best move to help the Chargers win and continue their upward development?3. Was letting Marty go the best thing for the Chargers?4. Did allowing Marty to go help the Chargers continue their upward development and winning ways? Especially considering they lost both coordinators? And they have a new QB that is still learning?5. Do you feel the Chargers are a better team today without Brees and Marty with the Chargers?If you feel AJ has made the best moves for the organization by letting Brees and Marty go then you have low expectations for them this year and therefore have no room to complain about Rivers or Norv. No reasonable person should expect a new QB and numerous coaching changes to move on without set backs. They need more time to make their impact. Perhaps 1-3 years more depending on wht other changes AJ has in store for them.These questions define what is happening to this team this year. Personally, I feel they would be in better position today if Brees was still their QB and/or Marty was their coach. Or if they still had some continuity in their coaching staff. Some of that was entirely out of their control but some of it was avoidable.
  11. Quick, give me the name of one NFL franchise that is hoping to pay for ex-coaches.FM = Not smart but I consider the source. Typical well thought posts. Once again you have demonstarted your superior intellect.Funny how when I refer to articles or national media pundits about the Chargers I hear comments like they don't what they're talking about. I also here from some of you that Acee is the local expert and is "in the know" so to speak. In fact it was Maurile that has stated Acee is the Charger expert. I know some have hold him in high regard. Now you want to dismiss his reports about the Chargers not wanting to fire Norv to avoid paying ex-coaches. Sounds about right. I notice that you didn't answer the question. If your nonsensical rantings and refusal to take into consideration what almost every other person says on a subject weren't so hilarious, I think I'd have to put you on ignore.I don't answer stoopid questions and it's a stoopid question and you looked silly for even asking it. Now you look even more silly for bringing it up again. So I'll leave it to you to answer seeing as you are the only one concerned about it.Oh, and please put me on ignore. You usually don't add any value to this discussion so maybe that would be the best thing you could do for all of us. Please.
  12. Quick, give me the name of one NFL franchise that is hoping to pay for ex-coaches.FM = Not smart but I consider the source. Typical well thought posts. Once again you have demonstarted your superior intellect.Funny how when I refer to articles or national media pundits about the Chargers I hear comments like they don't what they're talking about. I also here from some of you that Acee is the local expert and is "in the know" so to speak. In fact it was Maurile that has stated Acee is the Charger expert. I know some have hold him in high regard. Now you want to dismiss his reports about the Chargers not wanting to fire Norv to avoid paying ex-coaches. Sounds about right. Actually, it was Trotter who said that, not Acee. But Trotter is a Charger expert as well.I thought Acee made the comments as well. But in any case, it's becoming clear that Acee has his own concerns as expressed here:http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/charg...25chargers.html But hey, if other's said it it must be true. Right?
  13. The Chargers have pretty consistently spent up to the cap number for quite some time. However, they do a pretty good job managing their future cap, so each year they start out significantly below the cap. The Chargers as an organization have shown that they are willing pay players based on performance on the field (see LT). And you are wrong about Antonio Gates. The Chargers (and AJ) had no problem paying him big time money (which they are), they just wanted him to sign the tender and get into camp while they negotiated his new contract.1. The Chargers are no where near their cap from what I've seen. They are about middle of the road on payroll. 2. You are not accurate about Gates. They did not want to deal in a fair way and he held out for a fair market deal. Aj played hardball when he realized he couldn't bully Gates and in doinf so he cost the team, again. Of course in the end he paid Gates. Gates gave a little and AJ gave a little. But that could of been done before AJ put the Chargers in abd situation. Clearly his actions were not in the Chargers best interest. As far as Brees goes, what did he win while he was a Charger? One division title. No playoff wins. I don't think losing Brees has hurt this team nearly as much as you suggest. In fact, the Chargers have a pretty decent chance to finish this year at 11-5. That would match the team's best record under Brees. Your point on Brees is skewed to make it appear their decision was warrented. I'm surprised you said that. Didn't think I would have to make this point to you. With any QB there is a development process. Brees had just turned the corner and was proving himself. The talent on this team was not fully assembled while Brees was developing. Parts were being added along the way. In some cases (Gates for example) parts were missing at times due to AJ's hardball tatics. I'm sure that missing Gates for training and gametime didn't help the Chargers in their efforts to improve and improve. But Brees did continue to improve, didn't he? River OTOH-had the benefit of a fully loaded team to step into. This is hardly a similar situation. And if you are seriously suggesting that this year's team is asgood as it was last year then you must be smoking something. Have you seen them play? Have you read the comments in this thread questioning what's wrong? I really do not expect they will go far in the playoffs. The only way they do is if they somehow turn things around in a dramatic fashion. BTW, the Chargers have used the money saved by not signing Brees to extend the contracts of or resign many of their starters (Jammer and Dielman being two prime examples). You could also say that they made those deals on the new cap money they had to work with. Fact is they are just avg in spending their money. The big deal some have made here on the big savings of letting Brees leave just doesn't add up. Some make different excuses like he was hurt so why would they weant him? And yet they made an insulting low ball offer that came off contradictory. Doesn't add up either. As far as not wanting to fire Norv because they don't want to pay 2 ex coaches, that is pure speculation by writers who have column space to fill. I am sure that the Chargers don't want to pay 2 ex coaches, but I don't think that would stop them if they felt they really needed to make a change. So you're saying Acee isn't a viable source? Maurlie would disagree with you. Either that or all the other arguments made based on his reports are bogus I guess. As far as this Chargers fan is concerned, I don't blame anybody for their inability to match expectations this year. I think the expectations for this team were set too high. This is a team that has gone 11-5, 9-7, 14-2 the last three years, and will end up somewhere between 9-7 and 11-5 this year. It would appear to me that this is nominally a 10-6 or 11-5 team that either overachieved or benefited from a soft schedule last year, and is playing about to their talent level this year. I agree that expectations were too high. But for different reasons. I noticed to avoid the issue created by AJ's changes. I can only assume by your responses so far and failure to address my main point, that you think these moves by AJ were good ones. So you think the following to be true:1. Letting Brees go was the best thing to help this team win now. 2. Playing hardball with star players like Gates sends a positive message to the rest of the team that we want you to help us win. So long as we can lowball you. 3. If you get injired I'm not going to want any longer. See Brees. 4. If I don't you I will argue with you, take away your authority and not support you in your efforts to build a winning team. See Marty. So these types of decisions have led to numerous changes that have stopped their progress. Their performance so far this year proves that to be true. Unless you want to suggest the LT was lying in his SI interview that things are an issue. You only need to step back from the AJ is god perspective and see and hear what's happening. They're still good but they could be doing so much better if AJ hadn't made some of these decisions. Pretty simple really.
  14. Quick, give me the name of one NFL franchise that is hoping to pay for ex-coaches.FM = Not smart but I consider the source. Typical well thought posts. Once again you have demonstarted your superior intellect.Funny how when I refer to articles or national media pundits about the Chargers I hear comments like they don't what they're talking about. I also here from some of you that Acee is the local expert and is "in the know" so to speak. In fact it was Maurile that has stated Acee is the Charger expert. I know some have hold him in high regard. Now you want to dismiss his reports about the Chargers not wanting to fire Norv to avoid paying ex-coaches. Sounds about right.
  15. There wasn't a setback. 14-2 down? Brees isn't exactly lighting it up for the Saints this year. I really don't see how anyone can point to this season as absolute proof that Brees is better than Rivers. Why would any general manger's best interest not be to win games? Common sense would dictate that the more games a team wins the more secure his job would be.You asked a great question about the GM. It would be interesting to see your answer to this question and then explain the moves AJ made the last 2 years. How in the world does getting rid of Marty and Brees help this team win? How does putting a first year QB in help win now? I can't wait to hear your response.As to your comment about Brees, does he have the talent around him that SD has? No he doesn't. If he did I'm confident he would be performing much better.