Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

StrikeS2k

Members
  • Content Count

    13,317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

234 Excellent

About StrikeS2k

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Denver Broncos

Recent Profile Visitors

16,638 profile views
  1. I think I'd rather see a one-on-one game between Strike and Tim than Wisconsin-Duke on Monday night. Only problem is both players would probably foul out. I am from Cali. I'll bet that I could beat Tim one on one if the bet was the loser leaves this board forever. Of course, I've offered him ban bets before and EVERY time he's declined. Because he NEEDS this board. I could easily leave and never worry about it again. Tim needs an anonymous place to vent his idiocy because I can guarantee you he never expresses his idiocy to people who know who he is. So Tim, if you want, the next time I come to Cali we can arrange a one on one game and settle this. Let me know. Go away little man. just put him on ignore. I told him to do that years ago.
  2. Dude stalks me. What can I say? I don't post in his thread but he follows me around. I've just made him an offer that should take care of this though. I'm sure he'll accept it and the board will be good going forward. You have tim confused with yourself. I think you'd have zero posts at FBG if it weren't for you stalking Tim, and frankly that would be great for everyone who posts here. This is just as brilliant as Tim. And you and I have a history as well. You can easily tell that I have a history with LOTS of people in this forum, and the majority of them have nothing to do with Tim. It's because I'm a D*ck. FYP Funny you'd do this since you've yelled at me for post manipulation in the past. Are you denying that? Of course, I wouldn't expect you to live up the morals you expect of others. Your posts have made it clear that you have different standards on any given day. So how about that one on one and the loser leaves this board forever? Yeah, you're not a stalker. Terrible, please de-register tomorrow toolbag. Still waiting for you to show that I ONLY post to "stalk' Tim. Weird that you'd find me replying to a post of his replying to me to be "stalking". I guess that shows your bias.
  3. Dude stalks me. What can I say? I don't post in his thread but he follows me around. I've just made him an offer that should take care of this though. I'm sure he'll accept it and the board will be good going forward. You have tim confused with yourself. I think you'd have zero posts at FBG if it weren't for you stalking Tim, and frankly that would be great for everyone who posts here. This is just as brilliant as Tim. And you and I have a history as well. You can easily tell that I have a history with LOTS of people in this forum, and the majority of them have nothing to do with Tim. It's because I'm a D*ck. FYP Funny you'd do this since you've yelled at me for post manipulation in the past. Are you denying that? Of course, I wouldn't expect you to live up the morals you expect of others. Your posts have made it clear that you have different standards on any given day. So how about that one on one and the loser leaves this board forever?
  4. Dude stalks me. What can I say? I don't post in his thread but he follows me around. I've just made him an offer that should take care of this though. I'm sure he'll accept it and the board will be good going forward. Didn't YOU engage him in this latest battle of "wits"?? Not sure what you're referring to. Again I'll have to ask you to expand with specifics.
  5. Dude stalks me. What can I say? I don't post in his thread but he follows me around. I've just made him an offer that should take care of this though. I'm sure he'll accept it and the board will be good going forward. You have tim confused with yourself. I think you'd have zero posts at FBG if it weren't for you stalking Tim, and frankly that would be great for everyone who posts here. This is just as idiotic as Tim. And you and I have a history as well. You can easily tell where my posts are, and the majority of them have nothing to do with Tim. D*ck. I don't think anyone at FBG likes you, not even sure your pals at FFToday like you. It's because you suck. I think you know this about yourself, so just quit the internet please. Thanks. You didn't address my counter to your post. Figures.
  6. I think I'd rather see a one-on-one game between Strike and Tim than Wisconsin-Duke on Monday night. Only problem is both players would probably foul out. I am from Cali. I'll bet that I could beat Tim one on one if the bet was the loser leaves this board forever. Of course, I've offered him ban bets before and EVERY time he's declined. Because he NEEDS this board. I could easily leave and never worry about it again. Tim needs an anonymous place to vent his idiocy because I can guarantee you he never expresses his idiocy to people who know who he is. So Tim, if you want, the next time I come to Cali we can arrange a one on one game and settle this. Let me know.
  7. Dude stalks me. What can I say? I don't post in his thread but he follows me around. I've just made him an offer that should take care of this though. I'm sure he'll accept it and the board will be good going forward. You have tim confused with yourself. I think you'd have zero posts at FBG if it weren't for you stalking Tim, and frankly that would be great for everyone who posts here. This is just as idiotic as Tim. And you and I have a history as well. You can easily tell where my posts are, and the majority of them have nothing to do with Tim. D*ck.
  8. Dude stalks me. What can I say? I don't post in his thread but he follows me around. I've just made him an offer that should take care of this though. I'm sure he'll accept it and the board will be good going forward.
  9. So if Wisconsin wins on Monday you think people will remember this game OVER that game? What a f'ing idiot you are. Go back to your thread where you said you'd stay. Quit polluting other threads you dolt. 1. Yes. 2, GFY 3. GFY. So why did you say you'd stay in your own thread but keep moving out of it? You know you f up every thread you enter EXCEPT yours, but you keep doing it? Why? Cause you're a doosh. No one else has EVER been relegated to one thread, but you did it voluntarily because you recognized you're a doosh. You're like Cliff Clavin in Cheers when he hired a guy to shock him when he was being a d*ck. You know it but you can't help yourself. #######. I decided to stay in my own thread mostly because I was hoping you wouldn't follow me. That didn't work. I should let you know that I have received numerous PMs from all sorts of people telling me how much they detest you. You are widely regarded as the most despicable person on this board, and you haven't done anything to help yourself here. I'd be astonished if you had any friends here at all. I will continue to post in sports threads and whereever else the hell I like. If I were you I'd stronglyu consider changing my name and personality and trying to start over. But I'm not sure you're capable of it. Congrats on winning money tonight. Be sure to buy yourself a drink, and if you can afford it, a prostitute. She (or he) can pretend that you're likeable. I have THREE total posts in your thread. If that was your goal I'll make you a deal. You stay in your thread and you will NEVER have to see my post again. I will NEVER post in your thread if you NEVER post in any other. I guess we'll see if you are being truthful. Except I remember the thread where you said you'd stay in your own thread. it had nothing to do with me. It was other people telling you how pathetic you were. You're an f-ing liar on top of being a doosh and an idiot.
  10. So if Wisconsin wins on Monday you think people will remember this game OVER that game? What a f'ing idiot you are. Go back to your thread where you said you'd stay. Quit polluting other threads you dolt. 1. Yes. 2, GFY 3. GFY. So why did you say you'd stay in your own thread but keep moving out of it? You know you f up every thread you enter EXCEPT yours, but you keep doing it? Why? Cause you're a doosh. No one else has EVER been relegated to one thread, but you did it voluntarily because you recognized you're a doosh. You're like Cliff Clavin in Cheers when he hired a guy to shock him when he was being a d*ck. You know it but you can't help yourself. #######. Why feed this guy bro...just let him wither on the vine. I call him out for 1) being a doosh, 2) being an idiot, and 3) saying he would stay in his own thread after he acknowledged publicly that he was both (1) and (2). I wish more people would do the same. Why? Because the board moderators and Tim seem to think that there's only a couple of us that find him and his pedophilia objectionable. We all know the numbers are significantly higher. If more people called him out consistently he might actually stay within his own thread or the moderators might reign him in in some way. Hope that answers your question.
  11. Can't believe lines are already out. Also would be surprised if Duke is the dog. They already beat Wisconsin once this year, in Wisconsin. I'm not sure how much this matters...neither team looks now like they did then. Can you expand on this a bit, especially re: Duke? Minus losing what's his name who they dismissed is Duke that different? Wisconsin is better, and I think Duke is better and less reliant on Okafor, but I don't think they're THAT different. You'd think Duke would be favored just based upon the (limited) information available, which says Duke beat Wisconsin fairly recently. Sulamon (spelling?)...They are heavily reliant on Okafor. Even with Winslow okaying unreal and an improved Tyus Jones, Okafor still requires a ####load of attention. They beat Wisconsin in a regular season game months ago, I think you can throw that one out the window here (which it looks like Vegas did). His statement was that neither team looks like they did the last time they played. Nothing you stated explains how Duke is different. If anything, you're suggesting that they're basically the same since Okafor is still the guy who everyone has to game plan for. They're better, as is Wisconsin... I don't know what you're looking for here? Just because two teams played earlier doesn't mean the result will be the same. Wisconsin is the favorite here bc of their body of work in the last two weeks IMO. I'm looking for the specifics on how Duke is "not the same team" they were the last time these two teams met.
  12. So if Wisconsin wins on Monday you think people will remember this game OVER that game? What a f'ing idiot you are. Go back to your thread where you said you'd stay. Quit polluting other threads you dolt. 1991 is an excellent comp. The famous game was Duke beating UNLV in the semifinals. There's a lot of people who remember a lot of details from that game but can't even tell you who Duke played the following Monday, much less how the game flowed. Tim said this is the game that will be remembered. Are you suggesting that noone knows who Duke beat in the championship game? Come on. Not to mention that minus those few years UNLV has never been a national powerhouse while Duke is the best team in college basketball since Wooden's UCLA teams. A little different.
  13. Can't believe lines are already out. Also would be surprised if Duke is the dog. They already beat Wisconsin once this year, in Wisconsin. I'm not sure how much this matters...neither team looks now like they did then. Can you expand on this a bit, especially re: Duke? Minus losing what's his name who they dismissed is Duke that different? Wisconsin is better, and I think Duke is better and less reliant on Okafor, but I don't think they're THAT different. You'd think Duke would be favored just based upon the (limited) information available, which says Duke beat Wisconsin fairly recently. Sulamon (spelling?)... They are heavily reliant on Okafor. Even with Winslow okaying unreal and an improved Tyus Jones, Okafor still requires a ####load of attention. They beat Wisconsin in a regular season game months ago, I think you can throw that one out the window here (which it looks like Vegas did). His statement was that neither team looks like they did the last time they played. Nothing you stated explains how Duke is different. If anything, you're suggesting that they're basically the same since Okafor is still the guy who everyone has to game plan for.
  14. So if Wisconsin wins on Monday you think people will remember this game OVER that game? What a f'ing idiot you are. Go back to your thread where you said you'd stay. Quit polluting other threads you dolt. 1. Yes. 2, GFY 3. GFY. So why did you say you'd stay in your own thread but keep moving out of it? You know you f up every thread you enter EXCEPT yours, but you keep doing it? Why? Cause you're a doosh. No one else has EVER been relegated to one thread, but you did it voluntarily because you recognized you're a doosh. You're like Cliff Clavin in Cheers when he hired a guy to shock him when he was being a d*ck. You know it but you can't help yourself. #######.
  15. So if Wisconsin wins on Monday you think people will remember this game OVER that game? What a f'ing idiot you are. Go back to your thread where you said you'd stay. Quit polluting other threads you dolt.