TobiasFunke

Members
  • Content count

    27,596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3,909 Excellent

About TobiasFunke

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

14,361 profile views
  1. You're 100% right. I shouldn't have assumed youd find it funny just because I might have. I don't know you and should not have made that assumption, which is why I deleted it. My bad.
  2. If you are offended, please accept my sincere apologies. Based on your tendency to regularly dish out personal insults (including at me) I thought it would be funny to hit you with some Friday afternoon return fire, but then I thought better of it. Feel free to report me if you think it's appropriate or warranted.
  3. If the target of the joke was offended by it I would happily do so. If he has thick skin and shares my sense of humor then there is no need. And I suspect he might, given the fact that he liked a post where you said F U to me like 20 minutes ago.
  4. Man, thought I deleted that one in time Anyway, lighten up Francis. It was a joke. And no, nothing has changed with me. Why would it? If you need a safe space the ignore function works just fine.
  5. While we're on the subject of basketball, another interesting thing to note is that the 73 win Warriors blew a 3-1 lead in the NBA Finals.
  6. C'mon man. People here may not think much of you, but they at least give you enough credit to know that you didn't just completely miss the "insult" part of the post/link. Which means they know you're intentionally ignoring it so you can embark on a Friday afternoon fishing expedition. Next time maybe a little less obvious?
  7. In that case I sure hope nobody votes for either of them for president!
  8. She didn't use the phrase in reference only to African-Americans, and it's actually pretty racist to assume she was (she used it in reference to "gangs of kids," no further physical description given). But regardless, she has apologized. Anyone who knows how to use google could have figured that out in 5 seconds.
  9. If you guys really want to hate on Hillary, this is how you do it. That's art right there.
  10. Not sure why, I didn't mean to be confrontational. It genuinely did seem like a win-win If you really want to piss me off, here's a tip- there's nothing I hate more than a string of posts in the yoga pants thread on a Friday afternoon. So annoying.
  11. How about if you don't actually vote for him but just say that you did? Seems like a win-win
  12. Consider decisions like the one Obama made to take out Bin Laden- all the intelligence that had to be absorbed and considered, all the pros and cons and variables to be weighed, etc. And I assume that presidents make similar decisions that we don't know about or don't think about somewhat frequently. If you prefer to keep it bipartisan, consider Bush's (correct) decision to sign TARP. And then I imagine Donald Trump being the one asked to consider all that information and make the right decisions. How anyone is OK with that is mind-boggling.
  13. You said you wanted to "hang your hat on what Comey said." You also said "in other words" what she did would have been illegal with more knowledge. Both of those statements imply that no further analysis of the dialogue is needed to reach your conclusion. Yet here you are doing further analysis- and still not linking anything in the dialogue to a specific criminal charge. Stop digging, GB.
  14. I don't really get the voter ID part of this- seems like a stretch trying to catch this guy being a hypocrite. The fact that he's a huge dooshbag who runs a bigoted, obnoxious, irresponsible news website should be enough. No need to find voter ID-related hypocrisy too. Anyway I feel like the real lede should be that the guy abused his wife. That seems not so great.
  15. You summarized the dialogue as concluding that she would have been committing an illegal act if she'd been more knowledgeable. The words "illegal" and "crime" and "criminal" don't even appear in the dialogue as far as I can tell. There's no discussion of legality.