• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


HellToupee last won the day on February 26

HellToupee had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

6,718 Excellent

About HellToupee

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Pittsburgh Steelers

Recent Profile Visitors

24,857 profile views
  1. sorry never saw it . I'll check it out. You should've PMd me
  2. I'm all for even across the board moderation . The rules apply to all or none at all.
  3. Totally different taste. I like CZ but this definitely reminds me of coca cola
  4. Care to flesh this out a bit
  5. It definitely tastes different , I liked it
  6. Must have been hacked or something
  7. "No good deed goes unpunished "
  8. “White Cis Male” can be seen as a label derived from Cisgender (often shortened as Cis), a sociological neologism coined by German sexologist Volkmar Sigusch in his 1991 article “Transsexuals and Our Nosomorphic View” to describe an individual whose gender and personal identity matches the sex he or she was assigned at birth (in contrast to someone who identifies as transgender). During the 1990s and 2000s, the term Cisgender continued to appear in academic papers on gender relations and transphobia, including Peggy McIntosh’s 1998 article “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack.” Online, the term rose to prominence through its widespread usage by social justice bloggers and LGBTQ activists to combat transphobia on Tumblr in the early 2010s. Let me check the ever popular urban dictionary Cis Male A term used (in a non-ironic fashion) by radical feminists and other odd characters as a way to marginalize normal people. nah
  9. Delicious. I was a fan of Coke Zero but I think this is a really nice upgrade. Coca-Cola is killing Coke Zero as we know it — and people are freaking out Coke Zero is about to be replaced by Coke Zero Sugar.vox efx/flickr KO Coca-Cola Co 45.74 0.50 (+1.10 %) Disclaimer Get real-time KO charts here » Coca-Cola just killed Coke Zero as we know it. On Wednesday, Coca-Cola announced plans to stop selling Coke Zero in the US in August, replacing it with a beverage with a different recipe, design, and name: Coke Zero Sugar. "It is a reinvention of Coke Zero," CEO James Quincey said in a call with investors. According to Coca-Cola, Coke Zero Sugar is closer to the taste of the standard Coca-Cola and has been hugely popular in certain markets. With zero sugar and zero calories, the drink is designed for customers seeking lower-sugar options. According to Quincey, many people don't understand that Diet Coke and Coke Zero do not contain any sugar. With Coke Zero Sugar, that's front and center. But people are already freaking out online about the loss of the Coke Zero they know and love. "Obviously, any change has some degree of risk," he said, whether it's a tweak of a recipe or design. According to Quincey, the reaction has been overwhelmingly positive in areas with the new formula and design. The new Coke Zero Sugar bottles.Coca-Cola Confusion about the new name and design has been minimal, Quincey said. Coke Zero Sugar bottles and cans have plenty of visual cues to link it to the Coke Zero brand as well as the larger Coca-Cola brand — part of the company's "One Brand" strategy to more strongly connect its colas under a single umbrella. "Consumers get it immediately," Quincey said. Ultimately, Coca-Cola is trusting that the taste of Coke Zero Sugar will win over Coke Zero fanatics as well as potential new customers. Coke Zero Sugar is already a major hit outside the US, with growth figures reaching the teens. In the US, Coke Zero sales increased by 3.5% in 2016, compared with Diet Coke's drop of 1.9% in the same period.
  10. If I post like a naughty boy all I ask is to be treated like a progressive poster
  11. Why yes , Republicans bad Democrats , good if only we had 1 party rule , democrats of course, everything would be hunky dory
  12. But is it like the Carrier deal? Asking for another poster
  13. It's an older article but Comparing Trump to Hitler says a lot more about the accuser than the accused July 17, 2016 - 07:56 AM EDT Getty By Bill Ozanick After my article entitled, “Likening Trump to Hitler: a dangerous comparison” was published two weeks ago, I was astounded by the amount of readers who felt I’d failed to demonstrate exactly why Donald Trump is not Adolf Hitler. I believe this alleged failure to prove a negative was the corollary of a limited word count and imagination; I never imagined so many people would need to be convinced that Trump is not Hitler. For starters, Hitler announced his 25-point Program in 1920 which promulgated that only those with German blood could be citizens, not Jews. Nearly three years later, and a decade before he even became Chancellor of Germany, Hitler began dictating Mein Kampf from his prison cell. He was in prison for staging a failed takeover of the government in Bavaria – known as the Beer Hall Putsch – where four police officers and sixteen Nazis were killed. Murder and armed revolution do not appear to be Trump’s modus operandi. But back to Mein Kampf, where Hitler outlined his racial theories and rambled on ad nauseam about the Jews being categorically evil and the need for them to be exterminated. So much for the claim that “no one knew Hitler was Hitler until he became Hitler!” As historian Eberhard Jäckl rightly stated, “Perhaps never in history did a ruler write down before he came to power what he was to do afterwards as precisely as Adolf Hitler.” Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’ (1941-1945) was not unpredictable. Some may agree that Trump isn’t Hitler, but still whine that the resemblances are frightening; this is nonsense. While Trump’s proposal to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the U.S. is absolutely un-American and deserving of censure, trying to prevent ISIS operatives from entering the U.S. (who are trying to pose as refugees) cannot be compared to Hitler’s ideas and decrees. There is not a modicum of evidence to suggest Trump would immediately call for a boycott of all Muslim businesses and bar Muslims from holding civil service, university, and state positions (like Hitler did with the Jews) if he were to be elected. The mere existence of the “Jewish race” was what acutely troubled Hitler, while Trump has never even hinted at having a problem with those of a “Muslim race”. While I disagree with the rhetoric Trump uses when discussing immigration, he is plainly distressed with the large numbers of Hispanics and Latinos who have entered the U.S. illegally (as was President Clinton); he has never implied that he has a problem with the mere existence of their race. If he did, one in four Hispanic registered voters would probably not support Trump. However, I do realize that facts often don’t matter to the social justice warriors who desperately want to feel that they are just as valiant as those who stood up to the real Hitler. It’s axiomatic that the ultimate goal of those who compare Trump to Hitler (even if they know it to be untrue) is to frighten and cajole others into not voting for Trump, yet this tactic almost always has the opposite effect. I’ve personally witnessed a friend who was doing rather well in attempting to persuade another to not vote for Trump, hitting on all the right points (his capriciousness, ignorance of geopolitics, etc.), but the moment she made the Hitler comparison, the discussion was abruptly derailed. This charge reliably destroys any meaningful discussions that may have otherwise occurred. Considering there is plenty to criticize when it comes to Trump, as there is with Clinton (both scored historic unfavorable ratings earlier this year), it is baffling why so many still feel the need to make the Hitler comparison. Trump is unquestionably unpresidential (this is the man who mocked a disabled reporter), but he’s nothing like Hitler. I encourage everyone to challenge and condemn the immoral and unfeasible ideas that Trump has, such as the proposal to deport 11 million undocumented migrants, but comparing Trump to Hitler is not only inaccurate, ineffective, dishonest, and dangerous, it also trivializes the tragedy of the Holocaust in the name of scoring political points. Indeed, comparing Trump to Hitler says a lot more about the accuser than the accused. If you truly want to convince someone else to not vote for Trump, while maintaining your intellectual honesty and ostensible acumen, you really need to stop comparing Trump to Hitler. Bill Ozanick is currently a graduate student at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C. He can be followed on Twitter @BillOzanick.
  14. Correct , great uncle . Seems crazy