Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

cacksman

Members
  • Content Count

    1,514
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

23 Excellent

About cacksman

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Seattle Seahawks
  1. I'd guess he's still a little bitter about XLVIII.
  2. Is there a reason DeVante Parker's ADP is around 20 spots higher than Fitzgerald's? Moncrief is also going about 10 spots higher than Fitz. I'm just trying to see if there's something I'm missing here.
  3. I might have to get back with you guys next year, I'm in too many leagues as it is. Sorry dudes.
  4. I vote slow draft (provided there's a reasonable time limit per pick), but I'm fine either way.
  5. Leaguesafe. Everyone can see everyone that has paid/hasn't paid. Easy.
  6. Your timeliness is always appreciated. I am a little concerned with your ability to snipe me on waiver wire. Please PM as to how the hell that works on yahoo. It seems like you were able to get 3-4 guys before I got one. I need help. Hmm interesting. I wouldn't call it timely, my team was pretty bad so I was constantly filtering through guys. I think the way we had it set up last year, was reverse waiver order based on standings (which I'd like to change this year), so whoever was last in the standings got #1 that week. Maybe that's why I got more players.
  7. I can do any of the remaining Saturdays (22, 29, 5) , Friday 21st, Sunday 30th, Friday 4th. No: Evening of Sunday 23rd Friday 28th (could only do if we were done by 10pm) Sunday 6th (could only do if done by 8pm)
  8. Link to the league? I thought I entered, but I didn't get an email/see anything on my dashboard.
  9. Seems like you may have over invested at RB. Top 4 picks all RBs? Going to be tough to compete with that WR corps. This is a perfectly fine group of WRs for best ball, a nice mix of floor and ceiling guys. Saying it's going to be tough to compete with this roster is just ignorance of the format. This team is pretty close to optimal. I would just like to see a slightly better TE situation. I would rather spend a 6th or 8th on Olsen or Bennett/Ertz and then pair him with Walker or Witten in the 11th, and stick with 2 guys who should finish in the top 8 to add another WR later in the draft.I'm very familiar with the format. Where exactly is the floor in this WR group? Fitz/Floyd? Fitz I'd buy but not seeing it otherwise. Too much weekly boom/bust for my liking here at WR. Also I said difficult to compete with the WR corps not the "roster". You're making it sound like I #### over every aspect of the team. Thanks for putting words in my mouth though.The floor? This is a best ball league. What's the likelihood that there aren't going to be 3 startable WRs in a given week out of 7? Not to start a silly argument, but also, what's the point of saying "going to be tough to compete with that WR corps", if you didn't mean "tough to compete"? Is there an aspect of MFL10s where your WR corps are pitted against each other that I'm just finding out about? I would actually tend to agree that this is a fairly weak group of WRs and it will hold you back. And while you might be OK since it's best ball, there is a lot of weekly downside, as I would expect there to be several weeks where you struggle to start 3WRs who can break into double digit scores. The upside is certainly there, but the floor is low. It would be a more competitive roster if either Ingram or Freeman had been a WR selection, with one of the late WR selections being swapped for a cheap upside play (A Helu, Dunbar, J. White type). My two cents... To me, at least, it appears to have more floor WRs than upside.
  10. Seems like you may have over invested at RB. Top 4 picks all RBs? Going to be tough to compete with that WR corps. This is a perfectly fine group of WRs for best ball, a nice mix of floor and ceiling guys. Saying it's going to be tough to compete with this roster is just ignorance of the format. This team is pretty close to optimal. I would just like to see a slightly better TE situation. I would rather spend a 6th or 8th on Olsen or Bennett/Ertz and then pair him with Walker or Witten in the 11th, and stick with 2 guys who should finish in the top 8 to add another WR later in the draft.I'm very familiar with the format. Where exactly is the floor in this WR group? Fitz/Floyd? Fitz I'd buy but not seeing it otherwise. Too much weekly boom/bust for my liking here at WR. Also I said difficult to compete with the WR corps not the "roster". You're making it sound like I #### over every aspect of the team. Thanks for putting words in my mouth though.The floor? This is a best ball league. What's the likelihood that there aren't going to be 3 startable WRs in a given week out of 7? Not to start a silly argument, but also, what's the point of saying "going to be tough to compete with that WR corps", if you didn't mean "tough to compete"? Is there an aspect of MFL10s where your WR corps are pitted against each other that I'm just finding out about?