Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

doubletrouble

Members
  • Content Count

    3,175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

12 Good

About doubletrouble

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Charlotte NC
  • Interests
    Why Ask?

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Miami Dolphins
  1. Went against Perry Riley for much of the day. Not every team will be dumb enough to cover him with LBs... It's a pick your poison. If you go nickel, the Eagles just run it down your throat. If you go with a base, they send Ertz or Matthews against a LB. Once Kelly gets a personnel grouping he can exploit, he does. The other teams defense determines who has the big game, the Eagles just take what they're given. Agreed. I'm just saying it would be wise to temper expectations. It's not like he was outside roasting Hall or Amerson. He has a lot of potential for sure, but there are many stinker weeks coming. Don't get cute and start him if you aren't having bye week blues... hater
  2. What's his trade value now? Guy in my league paid in the offseason Harvin, J. Thomas (DEN) and DMAC which looking back isn't bad. I threw out there Matthews and a 1st 2015 and thought that was more than fair.
  3. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000384185/article/josh-gordon-suspended-one-season-by-nfl
  4. He did good last night but all the RBs did...after all they played the Cowgirls
  5. Dallas Cowboys rookie wide receiver Cole Beasley is poised to make a massive impact on the fantasy football world now that Miles Austin is once again injured. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1419038-cole-beasley-updated-fantasy-outlook-after-miles-austins-injury
  6. It's not about expectations. No one is saying he's not living up to expectations. I think we're just saying we're not ready to crown his ### like many seem to be. What he's doing for the Ravens, another 20 QBs in the league could be doing. That's all. It's still really impressive for a rookie, but not impressive for starting NFL QB. Were you impressed with what Dilfer did with Baltimore? Did that make him a star in your eyes?Whoa there, hoss, all I said was he did what he was expected to do, I'm not trying to crown him as anything except one of the best rookie QBs we've ever seen. I disagree with a comparison to Dilfer as much as I disagree with a comparison to Manning, tho. Personally, I think he has more potential than you seem to, but all I'm trying to say is that he doesn't suck. I agree that today's performance was great, for a rookie, would've been mediocre for a 3-4 year vet. hes not even the best rookie qb this season.You don't have to sell me on that, just check my avatar, but to say he's not one of the best ever is selling him short, IMO. Not sure where the confusion is coming from, I said outright it would've been mediocre if it weren't for the fact that he was a rookie. I don't know if you can quantify it with stats, but the kid's won two playoff games with 0 turnovers. He, Peyton and Ben are the only QBs in the playoffs this year without a turnover, that in itself is pretty good stuff.
  7. http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...howtopic=451907 someone here thinks he'll be as good as Tom Brady
  8. The Ravens may win with D but the D hasn't really changed since last season when they couldn't manage to win more than 4 games.The principle differences between this and last season are on offense. Harbaugh, Cameron & Flacco. The kid deserves some credit. I agree w/ this but people are trying to insinuate he will be the next Peyton Manning.....
  9. Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report back your talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back... If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a game I second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!For one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck. The whole "team" performance thing is crazy, point out anywhere in the first post or my post that states anything about how the team ended up. ummm I was pretending to be Jim Mora Manning team sucked when he was a rookie, Joe's does not. Faulk was Manning's leading receiver! Manning had 26 tds and was always playing from behind. Joe sucks and you know it! Another Trent Edwards all over again.... This allegedly awesome Baltimore team Flacco is leading won 4 games last season. Cue the 2007 excuse mongers in 3...2...1... were not talking about last year....for that look what Chad P did with the dolphins then..LMAOyou like apples? how you like them apples! actually, the opposite of that.What are you talking about? Peyton took over a team with 2 Hall of Famers at RB and WR. None of Baltimore's RBs or WRs will sniff the hall (most likely, I guess we can't tell about Rice yet) Peyton made no difference in the W/L column his rookie year. Gotta love these threads What part of M Faulk was his leading receiver in his rookie year didnt you understand? Joe had a 1k wr where peyton didn't. peyton in his first year threw 575 attempts (2nd most in his career), to Joe's 428. Peyton did have a great rb, as did Joe w/ mcclain and willis. who def was better balt or indy?HOF, where do you come up w/ this stuff? Rookie season and that's all....look and the numbers and get back w/ me...
  10. Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report back your talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back... If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameI second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!For one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck. The whole "team" performance thing is crazy, point out anywhere in the first post or my post that states anything about how the team ended up. ummm I was pretending to be Jim Mora Manning team sucked when he was a rookie, Joe's does not. Faulk was Manning's leading receiver! Manning had 26 tds and was always playing from behind. Joe sucks and you know it! Another Trent Edwards all over again.... This allegedly awesome Baltimore team Flacco is leading won 4 games last season. Cue the 2007 excuse mongers in 3...2...1... were not talking about last year....for that look what Chad P did with the dolphins then..LMAOyou like apples? how you like them apples!
  11. Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report back your talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back... If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gameI second that, not only that, did somebody actually tell us to go compare him to Peyton? Flacco is a rookie on a team that is winning strictly bcuz of the D and cuz they pound the ball with McClain. Personally if they had a better QB they might be using Rice or McGahee a little more! But with teams knowing they are gonna run a ton, they need to use the durable big back! Flacco hurts this team more then helps if you ask me, and here is why I think Tennessee wins this week. A Rookie QB against a Tennessee D that is at home in the Playoffs! Lets see if people praise this kid after his 3 TO performance!!!For one, when did the PLAYOFFS get brought into the conversation? The original post said only Flacco sucks because he has almost as many INT as TD's and poor passer rating. That's all it said. So, why wouldn't you compare him to Manning's rookie year? Manning had almost as many INT as TD's, too, and he doesn't suck. The whole "team" performance thing is crazy, point out anywhere in the first post or my post that states anything about how the team ended up. ummm I was pretending to be Jim Mora Manning team sucked when he was a rookie, Joe's does not. Faulk was Manning's leading receiver! Manning had 26 tds and was always playing from behind. Joe sucks and you know it! Another Trent Edwards all over again....
  12. Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report back your talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back... If Peyton had the Ravens D, I dont think he'd lose a gametalking about their rookie seasons...which team was better Peyton Ind or Joe's Balt???
  13. Might want to take a look at Peyton Manning's rookie year's INT to TD ratio.Report back your talking bout PLAYOFFS? which team was better Ind or Balt?report back...