Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Crash and Walk Away

Members
  • Content Count

    103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

25 Excellent

About Crash and Walk Away

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Indiana

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Indianapolis Colts

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I, too, use Classic. You can convince me to move over by gaining my trust in the non-classic version, and making it more readable. The main reason is the inaccuracy of the non-classic version. And before you tell me to report each and every problem so you can fix them, I'll tell you that is not practical when not a single one of my 10 teams is accurate, each one is numerous ways. For example, in one of my leagues for week 1, the non-classic 10-second primer suggested I start Seth Roberts and T.J. Jones (getting them off of waivers) instead of Adam Thielen and Julio Jones (who are on my team). Julio was not even selected as a Flex Option. In addition, the projections are different. In a different league, the classic projected Stafford scoring 15.4 and Goff 14.4, while the non-classic version list them at 56.85 and 51.1, respectively. Shouldn't both versions be using the same projections? Also, I like looking at the rankings of each projection contributor separately. Late in the week, Sig is more up to date with late-breaking news than David is. So I set my lineups early in the week with David and Maurile, then check for changes which Sig might suggest if i have time later in the week. Your icons with the team names in them, and various shading patterns (which I can't figure out what they mean) are unnecessary and distracting. Really, does anyone who subscribes to your site need to know that Todd Gurley plays for the Rams?
  2. Anybody want to speculate on why all the Jets games have leaked so early?
  3. I'm looking for the listing *within" each position group. For example, here a list of (motley) RBs for one of my team: J. Stewart C. Ivory J. Howard M. Gillislee M. Mack C. Thompson G. Bernard How is this sorted? Can I change how it's sorted?? etc ... Note: I would have attached an actual image from the tool if I knew how. - Joe
  4. First, sending my appreciation to Simon for rolling this out ... and rolling it out this early in the off season. Question: What determines your listing order within positions? I would expect alphabetic, since that is the way MFL sorts them, but that is not completely true. Almost, but there are a few outliers. - Joe
  5. I experimented on a smaller scale during the middle weeks of this past season. Based on my own selection process, I determined my preferred: 3 QBs 6 RBs 9 WRs 3 TEs 3 Def 3 PK and used Excel to generate all possible lineups on Fanduel, and their corresponding fbg projections. I then cherry picked 9 that I liked the most and played each lineup in both a 50-50 and 1/4K Sun NFL Mini Tourney at only $1 entry levels. One of my criteria, for example, was trying to spread out my exposure to any one player. I didn't want each lineup to have David Johnson, no matter how much of a roll he was on. I did this for 4 or 5 weeks, and came out ahead. So not a big $ investment or return, but an interesting exercise, and I did not experience the wild swings of the original author. Some of my steps took too much time to repeat each week, so I could only do it certain weeks. I plan to hone the process in the off-season, so I can try it in earnest in 2017 on a more consistent/regular basis.
  6. If the offensive line can protect Luck without extra help on normal downs, they'll play three wide. 11 personnel was the predominate set in training camp when the 1s played vs. the 1s. They might even get away with 11 personnel since Allen is an excellent blocker. Alas, that will destroy his value as we saw in the 3rd preseason game when the TEs were rarely looked at, much less targeted. Even in the 3rd preseason game debacle, some of their more successive plays were the few 5-wides they through at the Eagles. Due to trust, and past successes, I expect TY and Donte to be targetted heavily. If that proves fruitful, I anticipate Dorsett will be an occasional complimentary piece. No matter how much the offensive line improves, there'll rarely have time for 9 routes or going to the 3rd read. As for Allen, it all depends on how much he's needed for blocking. At this point in time, it seems like a lot.
  7. Double check to ensure you have the correct DD. I see the 2013 schedule. BAL open up at DEN. GB at SF. ATL @ NO. All check correct. It is fixed today, in g. It was not correct in f.
  8. The Draft Dominator application has the 2012 schedule in the SOS section, not the 2013 schedule.
  9. I tried to do something similar this year, only with a 3rd WR and also selected a stud K & DEF: [*]Brees & Flacco [*]Rice & Lynch [*]Julio, Victor, & Antonio [*]Gates [*]Hanson [*]Chicago FWIW, not only am I the only one left, but the only one period who selected these five studs: [*]Brees [*]Rice [*]Julio [*]Victor [*]Gates So if am can make it to the finals, I'll have high hopes.
  10. God bless Antonio Gates. The Turk will have to wait another week for me.