Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

PatrickT

Members
  • Content Count

    2,856
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About PatrickT

  • Rank
    Footballguy
  • Birthday 12/12/1966

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Atlanta, GA

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Atlanta Falcons
  1. PPR, thinking that if Tyrell is out, Inman is the play at flex. If he's in, then Ware. Other flex options are Allen Robinson and Kenny Britt, both with crappy matchups. What do you think?
  2. You seem to be bucking the trend with your projection of Brate over Fiedorowicz in a good matchup vs OAK this week. Can you provide your reasoning there, please?
  3. Do you think Gronk being out lifts Hogan at all? I'm wary of Beasley continued declined with Dez back and Britt in Goff's first start. PPR EDIT: Skip this one, Hogan is out.
  4. Doesn't using Hogan to beat Rex seem like the most Belichikian thing ever? Currently playing him over Alshon vs MIN. Whaddaya think?
  5. PPR redraft, I give Gurley/Alshon and get McCoy/Hopkins. Good for me? Seems like a fair offer to me.
  6. I am currently planning on sitting Charles and Ware this week to wait and see in favor of McCoy and Freeman. Thoughts on that, please?
  7. Who do you like more for the rest of the season, Rainey or Deandre Washington? Do you update your projections for the 10 second weekly primer based on breaking news, i.e. Jamaal Charles being active on Sunday?
  8. I reported the same thing. Was Romo grayed out? If so, that means he is a free agent that is projected higher than your current choice (clearly projections haven't been updated, lol). I think this is VERY unclear and gave my suggestions to Doug on that. ETA, just ignore everything I've said, since I can't read basic instructions that I was supposed to be looking classic myfbg.
  9. I sent an email with a lot of suggestions/usability items, but the big error was players showing up in lineup coach that weren't on my roster. This happened in all 3 of my leagues, ESPN, MFL and Yahoo. The other was pretty minor, Daily Updates was two days behind.
  10. I think this answered my earlier post about missing features. I guess it's lineup dominator that I'm remembering, odd to not have it out prior to week 1. Thanks.
  11. It's not about expectations. No one is saying he's not living up to expectations. I think we're just saying we're not ready to crown his ### like many seem to be. What he's doing for the Ravens, another 20 QBs in the league could be doing. That's all. It's still really impressive for a rookie, but not impressive for starting NFL QB. Were you impressed with what Dilfer did with Baltimore? Did that make him a star in your eyes?Whoa there, hoss, all I said was he did what he was expected to do, I'm not trying to crown him as anything except one of the best rookie QBs we've ever seen. I disagree with a comparison to Dilfer as much as I disagree with a comparison to Manning, tho. Personally, I think he has more potential than you seem to, but all I'm trying to say is that he doesn't suck. I agree that today's performance was great, for a rookie, would've been mediocre for a 3-4 year vet. hes not even the best rookie qb this season.You don't have to sell me on that, just check my avatar, but to say he's not one of the best ever is selling him short, IMO. Not sure where the confusion is coming from, I said outright it would've been mediocre if it weren't for the fact that he was a rookie. I don't know if you can quantify it with stats, but the kid's won two playoff games with 0 turnovers. He, Peyton and Ben are the only QBs in the playoffs this year without a turnover, that in itself is pretty good stuff. Can't remember now who stands on which side of this debate, so I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not, but in either case, Joe certainly made up for the turnovers in that game. Still a great rookie season, we'll see how he progresses in the next couple of years.
  12. It's not about expectations. No one is saying he's not living up to expectations. I think we're just saying we're not ready to crown his ### like many seem to be. What he's doing for the Ravens, another 20 QBs in the league could be doing. That's all. It's still really impressive for a rookie, but not impressive for starting NFL QB. Were you impressed with what Dilfer did with Baltimore? Did that make him a star in your eyes?Whoa there, hoss, all I said was he did what he was expected to do, I'm not trying to crown him as anything except one of the best rookie QBs we've ever seen. I disagree with a comparison to Dilfer as much as I disagree with a comparison to Manning, tho. Personally, I think he has more potential than you seem to, but all I'm trying to say is that he doesn't suck. I agree that today's performance was great, for a rookie, would've been mediocre for a 3-4 year vet. hes not even the best rookie qb this season.You don't have to sell me on that, just check my avatar, but to say he's not one of the best ever is selling him short, IMO. Not sure where the confusion is coming from, I said outright it would've been mediocre if it weren't for the fact that he was a rookie. I don't know if you can quantify it with stats, but the kid's won two playoff games with 0 turnovers. He, Peyton and Ben are the only QBs in the playoffs this year without a turnover, that in itself is pretty good stuff.
  13. It's not about expectations. No one is saying he's not living up to expectations. I think we're just saying we're not ready to crown his ### like many seem to be. What he's doing for the Ravens, another 20 QBs in the league could be doing. That's all. It's still really impressive for a rookie, but not impressive for starting NFL QB. Were you impressed with what Dilfer did with Baltimore? Did that make him a star in your eyes?Whoa there, hoss, all I said was he did what he was expected to do, I'm not trying to crown him as anything except one of the best rookie QBs we've ever seen. I disagree with a comparison to Dilfer as much as I disagree with a comparison to Manning, tho. Personally, I think he has more potential than you seem to, but all I'm trying to say is that he doesn't suck. I agree that today's performance was great, for a rookie, would've been mediocre for a 3-4 year vet.
  14. Titans absolutely gift wrapped this game, but doesn't take away what Flacco did. He did what he had to do, when he had to do it. He also got some good help from his receivers, but he still delivered a catchable ball when it counted under pressure. Not sure what more people expect from him. He done good.
  15. The Ravens may win with D but the D hasn't really changed since last season when they couldn't manage to win more than 4 games.What?My bad, they won 5 games in 2007.The defensive cornerstones Lewis, Reed, Suggs & Ngata played 62 combined games in 2007 and 64 combined games in 2008. Did the loss of Adalius Thomas have that much of an impact on the 2007 team? Trevor Pryce? They lost 8 more games in 2007 then in 2006 was it all because of those two? If those losses were so big what accounts for the 6 game improvement this year? Marques Douglass? Brandon McKinney? Brendon Ayanbadejo? Jameel McClain? Jim Leonhard has had a nice season. Samari Rolle played four more games in 2008 than 2007. Isn't there an argument for improved play from the QB position being a significant factor in that? I think Flacco deserves some credit for this turnaround. I am not saying he is the next Manning but he has had a very nice season. Which is what I think 95% of the people here are saying, and now we're starting to split hairs on how nice of a season it was. The OP was obviously , but it turned into a decent discussion despite that.