• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About 49ernut

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

2,725 profile views
  1. Agree with this theory 100%. The value you perceive a player to have doesn't always line up with your fellow league mates point of view. DT has more value than a 2017 1st but at the same time, the longer you hold, the less value he'll bring in return. I would wait for the contenders to shake out and then offer him up, you might be able to snag a good young rookie and a couple of 2017 picks in return.
  2. Uh, brown is 27 and born in July, dez is 27, born in November. Big Ben or romo?
  3. Give me Brown, guy brings it day in, day out. 1.8 is a token add in IMO
  4. I would keep Eifert unless an offer blew me away
  5. Very cool the way keepers are determined. However, I would change your keepers. Bortles probably scored top 5 in your league and I don't see him slowing. You can only start 3 WR's but yet are keeping 5. I would find a way to keep Bortles IMO, get rid of Hurns, probably Ingram and someone else. The math is going to be tough but my keepers are: Julio, Charles, Watkins, Thomas, Kelce, Parker. The rest are coin flips. Martin, who knows if he was just playing for a contract and goes back to his old self. AP is aging, how long can he keep it going. That would be my thought process.
  6. See if you could throw in 2.5 and 2.9 to keep 1.6 and use 1.9 as part of the trade. If not, then yeah, I would do that. Doing a rookie draft now and after 2.3, there is nothing but question marks. This draft looks to be Elliot and then everyone else.
  7. Um, I'll take the 2 players and pick thank you.
  8. This is not a good offer IMO, you're getting a bunch of question marks (how quickly does NE change RB's?) and moving back 3 spots to no mans land in this draft. I'd pass and hold out for a better offer. You need a top tier WR and you can get that with Treadwell.
  9. Give me Calvin as well, he's a stud who can take over a game.
  10. Beckham and Evans for me
  11. Give me the guy who gives me a huge advantage at TE. Lacy, being a top 5 RB is replaceable, Gronk is not, it's Gronk, then everyone else.
  12. Tre Mason
  13. Agree with this, no way would I give a 1st for someone in a time share. No one knows how the RB situation in Dallas will shake out, to much unknown at this point. If he takes control of the position, then it's time to shop. A third is not enough but a first would/should get rejected.
  14. Give me the guy who's proven it for several years and he's young enough to build a great team around.
  15. I am not a fan of this offer. Christine Michael has not shown that he can get on the field, even in garbage time. I'm not sure he will even be the heir to Lynch. Witten is close to done and is not an upgrade to Thomas, I would say he's a downgrade. Thomas, while a major downgrade being in Jax is still Bortles safety net. I pass on this offer