Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

HULLOBUDMAN

Members
  • Content Count

    1,382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

40 Excellent

About HULLOBUDMAN

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Kansas City Chiefs

Recent Profile Visitors

2,946 profile views
  1. I suffered through the Jets/Washington game this week on my second screen. Haskins is awful but McLaurin did have a lengthy catch called back on a penalty (IIRC about 60 yards). Based on what is on our waiver wire, he is better than most players available in terms of upside and WAS has the 8th best PPR schedule left ROS including good matchups in weeks 12, 15 and 16 (DET, PHI, NYG). JuJu is hurt, also has awful QB play, has a below average schedule left and only one favorable matchup left in week 16 against NYJ.
  2. I read the rule as if it is in the last 2 minutes AND it meets one of these criteria: an interception by an opponent; a fumble or backward pass recovered by an opponent or that goes out of bounds through the opponent’s end zone; a scrimmage kick touched by the receiving team and recovered by the kicking team; or a disqualification of a player. Such plays may be reviewed regardless of whether a foul is committed on the play that, if accepted, would negate the on-field ruling. The Replay Official may only challenge a play until the next legal snap or kick. The Replay Official may consult with a designated member of the Officiating department at the league office regarding whether to challenge a play. Maybe I am unable to decipher the rule. Are you saying that ANY play can be reviewed at the officials discretion within the last 2 minutes?
  3. Late in the game, Rivers tried to hang on to a ball which hit the ground and was ruled a fumble on the field. The Chargers recovered it and the call was reviewed and reversed and called an incomplete pass. My question is why was that reviewed by the booth? I thought a fumble ruling was only reviewed when there was a change of possession. Here is the rule on NFL.com that explains when an official review can happen. ARTICLE 2. REPLAY OFFICIAL REQUEST FOR REVIEW Only the Replay Official or the Senior Vice President of Officiating or his or her designee may initiate a review of a play: that begins after the two-minute warning of each half; throughout any overtime period; when points are scored by either team; that is a Try attempt (successful or unsuccessful); and when on-field officials rule: an interception by an opponent; a fumble or backward pass recovered by an opponent or that goes out of bounds through the opponent’s end zone; a scrimmage kick touched by the receiving team and recovered by the kicking team; or a disqualification of a player. Such plays may be reviewed regardless of whether a foul is committed on the play that, if accepted, would negate the on-field ruling. The Replay Official may only challenge a play until the next legal snap or kick. The Replay Official may consult with a designated member of the Officiating department at the league office regarding whether to challenge a play.
  4. Tempted to but think I am starting Golden Tate instead. If Finley isn't awful, CIN has a great string of games from week 11-14. Hoping he comes out healthy and Finley is only slightly below average instead of horrible so I can roll him out against Oakland week 11.
  5. Assuming Case Keenam comes back and is healthy the rest of the year, what would you do with him? Contemplating dropping this week to pick up a TE to cover the bye but his upcoming schedule looks so inviting after the bye. Looks like only one "bad" matchup against GB according to FBG but they have been exposed lately (allowing over 300 yards average over the last 5) . At this point he is a luxury for me and likely won't ever start him but not sure I want him on an opponents lineup. Jets Lions @CAR @GB Eagles Giants
  6. https://twitter.com/adamteicher/status/1176901618454990848
  7. Not sure how reliable this guy is guy but Bloom retweeted this today: https://twitter.com/ChrisAllenFFWX/status/1175817859563511809 Chris Allen @ChrisAllenFFWX Noted: Announcer in CIN/BUF game mentioning a Week 6 or Week 7 return for A.J. Green.
  8. I'll add: I am somewhat disappointed with the scheme to date. I imagined more of a Jim Johnson, constant pressure from all angles type plan from the D (not just in this game but overall). If they give up some long TD early in the games, it would be ok. The O has enough fire power to overcome. It may just be that the defensive backfield is just too over-matched to allow this. That being said, the D looks to be closer middle third instead of bottom to me which would represent some improvement. I dont think Ingram's dominance in the run game in the second half is that worrisome. Why not let the team down 3 scores run the ball? Shady definitely has something left in the tank. Could be a huge addition and I think eventually when healthy he ends up with greater than 50% of the workload. I posted this in another thread but I think the loss of Hill will help the team ROS and in the long run. These reps for Robinson and Hardman are huge. Watkins is going to get cut next year to free up money for Chris Jones and PM. Hopefully they can re-sign Robinson to fill that role at a fraction of the cost that they would have for Watkins ($21m).
  9. Slight Hijack: Robinson seemingly stepped into Hill's role while Hardman's snap % has stayed about the same (little decrease this week). I think for ROS and long term that these weeks without Hill are actually helpful for KC. I will not be shocked at all when Sammy gets cut next year and Robinson gets an extension and moves into Watkins outside role opposite Tyreek.
  10. Didnt practice today. This is the first I have heard of him not practicing this week. Anyone know more? https://twitter.com/BaltimoreLuke/status/1175076215918649344 NEvermind. Just read a follow up tweet and I guess this has been the case the last 3 Fridays too.