Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Olaf

Members
  • Content Count

    648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Olaf

  1. So did The Coz. Add Lou Ferrigno's wife to the list of women coming forward. Lou wants to Hulk Smash! The Coz. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/20/lou-ferrignos-wife-carla-bill-cosby-tried-to-sexua/#!
  2. So that's worse than raping Asian, Black or Native chicks? How much worse, please show your work in graph form. Worse? No, Cosby seems to think it's better. (allegedly)
  3. Not that I'm aware of. I know he remained silent when asked abou the allegations during an NPR interview. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/11/17/nprs-scott-simon-further-explains-bill-cosbys-silence-in-detailed-tweets-cnn-appearance/
  4. And another And another And another Hard not to notice that The Coz had a thing for allegedly raping young white chicks.
  5. Link to anyone saying this? Here you go... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WxMHMcFh-s
  6. Maybe he wasn't such a great guy.He probably was a good guy, but he lashed out on occasion because he had issues and insecurities. Even though he calls the married guys miserable in his rant above, he was probably the miserable one deep down. He was trying to convince others and, more importantly, himself that his life was actually great. Deep down he probably didn't want all the women he claimed he got in that rant, he wanted just one woman that would love him unconditionally. He probably felt that void in his life, and coupled with his other issues he concluded his life wasn't worth continuing. Very sad. RIP, Guy I don't know. I'll pray for you. He died because he never found the right chick? From just reading the above rant and doing a little psychoanalysis, not having the right chick probably was a contributing factor to him being depressed and trying to medicate himself with drugs. He might have felt that he had nobody, other than his family members, who truly loved him.
  7. Maybe he wasn't such a great guy.He probably was a good guy, but he lashed out on occasion because he had issues and insecurities. Even though he calls the married guys miserable in his rant above, he was probably the miserable one deep down. He was trying to convince others and, more importantly, himself that his life was actually great. Deep down he probably didn't want all the women he claimed he got in that rant, he wanted just one woman that would love him unconditionally. He probably felt that void in his life, and coupled with his other issues he concluded his life wasn't worth continuing. Very sad. RIP, Guy I don't know. I'll pray for you.
  8. You can never get enough pumpkin flavor
  9. Or Dillard's reacted normally, most likely because Randle shoplifted. Reacted normally when a black man does it Honest question: Stinky bait or bad case of white guilt?
  10. Or Dillard's reacted normally, most likely because Randle shoplifted.
  11. Can Liberalism Be Saved From Itself?
  12. Oddly enough, I don't agree with that hypothetical either even though I'm Olaf. That's probably because I was arguing the opposite. Jihadis, whether they be ISIL or the Taliban, come to power and maintain power through violence and the threat of violence. Sure there will be less violence once Jihadis eradicate or quiet all of their internal opponents, but that drop in violence doesn't mean the Jihadis have adopted a new set of more moderate ethics. It means that there all less internal opponents for the Jihadis to enact violence against because the Jihadis eliminated open internal opposition through violence or the threat of violence. If open internal opposition returned, so would the violence. I doubt the Jihadis would try to reach some middle ground with their opponents through touchy-feeling team building sessions.
  13. Why would ISIL's ethics change, though? If their ethics are based entirely on their interpretation of scripture and that scripture is not going to change, and there no longer is any internal resistance against their interpretation and ethics, then why would their interpretation and ethics change? Especially considering that any change from what they currently hold would likely be considered blasphemous. History shows that most change is external. Let's say that we didn't have a nuclear society, or that ISIL developed in the 14th century, etc: In that case as the society grew larger it would eventually adopt outside thought which would modify it's strict behavior- IF prosperity went along with it. It doesn't have to be centuries, either, though most human societal changes have been. But a more recent example- China. The average Chinese today is much more prosperous than he was 50 or 60 years ago. And there is much less rigid belief in Marxist ideology than there was 50-60 years ago. And this is despite the fact that during Mao's time, his interpretation of Marx was NOT subject to change. I don't think that's a coincidence. But you suggested above that change comes as a result of killing and/or conquering your empire's internal opponents.
  14. Why would ISIL's ethics change, though? If their ethics are based entirely on their interpretation of scripture and that scripture is not going to change, and there no longer is any internal resistance against their interpretation and ethics, then why would their interpretation and ethics change? Especially considering that any change from what they currently hold would likely be considered blasphemous.
  15. Wat???? Did I stutter? Let me simplify things for you: it's easier for the winners to have ethics. Why did't Muslim ethics change then when the Ottoman Empire became the preeminent empire in the world? They did. For a long while they were the freest, most civilized place on Earth. Human advancement was foremost in science, mathematics, building, culture. There was freedom of religion. Believe me, if I had a choose a place to live around the year 1000, it would be Istanbul or Damascus. Nothing in the Christian world comes close. But then the Crusades happened, and after that the Mongols came and completely devastated most of the Middle East, making it the desert wasteland it is today. The Muslim world has never recovered from this. OK, so say, hypothetically, that ISIL prevails throughout the Middle East and like minded Islamists prevail throughout northern Africa. They conquer their moderate opponents and form a caliphate across that huge swath of land. Would you expect the caliphate to form a new form of ethics that the rest of the world would approve of? If not, why if vanquishing your opponents allegedly is what causes ethics to change? "Muslims who were never able to kill all of their opponents, and thus did not have the opportunity to come up with a new system of ethics." So maybe sacrifice the Isrealis for the sake of a new system of Muslim ethics to fluorish in that area?
  16. Wat???? Did I stutter? Let me simplify things for you: it's easier for the winners to have ethics. Why did't Muslim ethics change then when the Ottoman Empire became the preeminent empire in the world?
  17. He gets on my to site stats and get quotes from liberals stating they don't want to live near minorities or school their children with them then tosses some ridiculous statement out there like that. THAT IS THE PROBLEM. They don't practice what they preach. They think there is a special island or plot of land or place where all these people should be taken care of. That the money should come from the pockets of the wealthy, white, blue haired businessmen...the evil capitalists.They want to take make everyone else take care of everyone as long as it's not them that has to deal with the hard work and fallout. Keep going, this is good stuff.I agree with you that Finless' truths are good stuff.Arctic Edge, still so clever after all these years. Wanna ####?
  18. He gets on my to site stats and get quotes from liberals stating they don't want to live near minorities or school their children with them then tosses some ridiculous statement out there like that. THAT IS THE PROBLEM. They don't practice what they preach. They think there is a special island or plot of land or place where all these people should be taken care of. That the money should come from the pockets of the wealthy, white, blue haired businessmen...the evil capitalists.They want to take make everyone else take care of everyone as long as it's not them that has to deal with the hard work and fallout. Keep going, this is good stuff.I agree with you that Finless' truths are good stuff.
  19. No offense, but almost everything you wrote here is completely wrong and based on utter ignorance. No it's based on what I have witnessed. I grew up in Massachusetts. I grew up around liberals. After living there I lived in Vermont. Another bastion of liberalism. At one point I was a liberal I guess then I got tired of being surrounded by ignorant hypocrites. Why do we hear liberals constantly bashing Christians (I'm not Christian)? Because they oppose abortion and a homosexual lifestyle? It is okay to be outspoken and have strong anti-Christian views within liberal circles but its racist and bigoted to have a negative opinion of Islam. Why is that? I don't care how many liberals you grew up around, you're wrong. I challenge you to produce a single liberal who will state that they are uncomfortable living with minorities in their neighborhood. I challenge you to produce a single liberal who will state that they don't want minorities going to school with their kids. And I don't want to hear about your personal anecdotes. Show some statistics on this, or produce a liberal writer or talk show host or politician or whatever. I don't believe you can. Judge people by their actions, not their words. Judge by them by where they choose to live and where they choose to send their kids to school, not by what they profess. Yes, liberals like to live in nice safe areas like anyone else. But that's not what he wrote. You really think a liberal living in a nice safe neighborhood cares when an affluent black couple moves next store to them and puts their kid in the same school? That's really dumb, IMO. Conservatives don't care whether an affluent black couple moves in next door either. If a Conservative said that they'd prefer not to live in a majority black neighborhood, however, most Liberals, including you, would call them a racist. Most Liberals, however, including you, have the choice to live in a majority black neighborhood and they choose not to. That, I think, is what Finless is alluding to.
  20. No offense, but almost everything you wrote here is completely wrong and based on utter ignorance. No it's based on what I have witnessed. I grew up in Massachusetts. I grew up around liberals. After living there I lived in Vermont. Another bastion of liberalism. At one point I was a liberal I guess then I got tired of being surrounded by ignorant hypocrites. Why do we hear liberals constantly bashing Christians (I'm not Christian)? Because they oppose abortion and a homosexual lifestyle? It is okay to be outspoken and have strong anti-Christian views within liberal circles but its racist and bigoted to have a negative opinion of Islam. Why is that? I don't care how many liberals you grew up around, you're wrong. I challenge you to produce a single liberal who will state that they are uncomfortable living with minorities in their neighborhood. I challenge you to produce a single liberal who will state that they don't want minorities going to school with their kids. And I don't want to hear about your personal anecdotes. Show some statistics on this, or produce a liberal writer or talk show host or politician or whatever. I don't believe you can. Judge people by their actions, not their words. Judge by them by where they choose to live and where they choose to send their kids to school, not by what they profess.
  21. Bull####. This is really stupid. You're really stupid. You don't even have an avatar....
  22. ... but would react like Affleck if a Conservative raised Harris' points.
  23. Why is Maher right? Show me anything factual to back up his claims. Here are the poll figures that Maher and Harris referenced regarding apostasy... 64 percent of Muslims in Egypt and Pakistan support the death penalty for leaving Islam