Your incredibly shallow analysis implied that you are uninformed... Your ENTIRE analysis was "look at his performance the last two years - his stats aren't good and he's inconsistent." You failed to take into account changes in offensive line, change in QB, changes at WR/TE, and most importantly the change at offensive coordinator. When personnel or coaching changes were brought up, you said I was "making excuses" for Doug. You need to broaden your research beyond looking at game logs. That's some JV level research and analysis. When you constantly troll a player thread with the same weak sauce analysis, you're going to get laughed out of here. This time, however, I'm not going to drop a not-even-mildly offensive rhetorical question to give you an excuse to cry to the mods. You aren't presenting a counterpoint. You've just been trolling with the same shtick the entire time. It's not helpful or productive. As we've already said, he was drafted around RB24-RB26 to provide RB2 value in our RB2 spot if we drafted the position late or possibly at the flex if we secured our third RB early. We all expect a dud here or there out of an RB2 drafted that late. He's already surpassed his ADP value, proving us correct and your game log analysis wrong. I'm open to detailed, well thought out counterpoint analysis, maybe you should've been, too. My analysis has been more complete than anybody here this season. I am the only one that has taken into acount his prevous performnaces. Yes--he has a new coordinator, and some new teammates--but that doesn't mean that his entire history should be expunged. You choose to disregard it completely-I choose to give it some weight---that's not me or you being wrong--it's the differences between how you and I analyze things. I analyzed the very nature of this team--a rookie qb that is unproven, an offense that is like Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde, a team that will no doubt be behind in some games that they will abandon the running game, a running back in Simms that before 3-4 pre-season games the fantasy community was drafting well ahead of Martin..etc. Yes--there are factors that also made Martin look good--and supporters choose to put more emphasis on those. However--to insult or criticize anybody for analyzing a player differently from you is 10000% wrong--period. By the way--I contacted the mods because you and others went to the point of making jokes and insulting family members of mine for a fantasy opinion. I will make clear--that if you or anybody posts anything insulting or negative about anybody in my family--you will get reported. There is no room for that and the fact that you riducule me for taking offense to it--as opposed to apologizing for being out of line--says a lot about your moral character. How has your analysis been the most complete? You focused on his past performance, and said discussion of new offense/OC/new teammates, etc were excuses. You did EXACTLY what you are claiming others did. You also claim that you don't care if you are wrong, but your posts are the exact opposite. He has his 1st 100 yard game, and you say "Today he had that big game the fantasy world was waiting for.......I think that I've made clear why I would probably shop him after his big game". Meanwhile, you used that entire post to make excuses for that big game (he faced a soft defense for 3/4 quarters, etc). Meanwhile, he had 1/2 his yards, AND his TD when the Bucs were within 10 points; that isn't "garbage time." You make a few other posts before his 2nd big game, then you disappear until today. You want to cry about people calling you names, then don't give them a reason to. Don't troll, don't get your panties all in a wad when someone points out a flaw in your logic, don't come in this thread only when you think your point is supported, don't ignore it when it's pointed out that you're wrong, etc. Bayhawks dropping truth bombs.