Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

TheWinz

Members
  • Content Count

    3,856
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2,720 Excellent

About TheWinz

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Mystic, CT

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    San Diego Chargers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Lowest post week 4 cut over the last 10 years: 2019 - 125.85 (week 7) 2018 - 142.80 (week 7) 2017 - 116.05 (week 9) 2016 - 134.25 (week 9) 2015 - 128.35 (week 5) 2014 - 131.10 (week 7) 2013 - 127.40 (week 8 ) 2012 - 116.45 (week 7) 2011 - 104.90 (week 5) 2010 - 123.50 (week 7)
  2. I couldn't agree more. This contest is my single favorite FF obsession. I was thinking about buying a 2nd subscription next year, and inviting like 20 regulars to help devise a winning team.
  3. Week 7 final results for Joe's extras Join me in congratulating these 17 103477 - @stuckinthemuck - 205.50 - how in the heck do you score this high with $77 wrapped up with the Giants? 103413 - @Go DC Yourself - 190.10 - nice showing at RB, and always great when kicker scores 17 103729 - @bcnfinance - 182.10 - must be nice to be 40 above with only 16 from Mahomes 102453 - @Titans_fan - 181.00 - how do you score 181 while taking .8 from your WR2? It's called Russell Lockett. 104031 - @cstruk - 178.45 - great score, considering this is an 18-man roster with Zeke & Jacobs on the bench (10.2 combined) 100246 - @gobrowns33 - 178.05 - one of a few teams with 2 decent TE scores this week 102020 - @neal cassady - 176.20 - survived CeeDee Lamb's first dud game with a good overall score 103154 - @Synthesizer - 173.10 - Burrow to Boyd wasn't like Russell to Lockett, but it gets you through 103292 - @ConstruxBoy - 170.30 - I thought this team was toast, congrats on hanging in there 103368 - @Kujjie - 169.00 - who needs more than 1 active RB when you are getting almost 100 from 3 of your WR's? 103462 - @Raging weasel - 165.50 - 25% of scoring coming from K & D, and 2 TE's in double digits 104127 - @Galileo - 164.20 - did well without Aaron Jones, strong trio of WR's carried this team to week 8 103205 - @4th&inches - 164.20 - this guy managed to leave 7.50 points on his bench... at the TE position! 104539 - @BroadwayG - 162.00 - no monster scores by anyone, but decent all around; even left Kittle's 13 pts on the bench 104511 - @Deamon - 159.05 - third straight week with Watson scoring 30+ - I know, cuz I got booted week 4 103281 - @mphtrilogy - 157.95 - one of many taking a goose egg at TE; woulda been nice to have the Darnold/Haskins dough elsewhere 103146 - @themeanmachine - 151.60 - didn't leave alot on the bench; 4 RB's & 5 WR's combined to score 10 points We lost 5 more this week 103807 - @Sweet Love - 138.50 - hard to compete with Ben's 22 points and no TE scoring 103072 - @scoobus - 137.80 - Jacobs & Jonnu underperformed, and I will say it again - 25 pts by QB's is not as much as you think 104534 - @da_budman - 134.80 - Russell couldn't save him; $47 spent on 4 TE's with zero points 103400 - @Grid71 - 133.10 - no QB in the 30's, no RB or WR in the 20's, no TE, K, or D in double digits 103985 - @coltsuperfan - 100.80 - it was only a matter of time once Dak went down; strong TE duo though
  4. Cut sitting at 136.75 going into the Bears/Rams game. Here are the only players left: QB - Goff (117), Trubisky (79), Foles (22) Looks like Goff will be the line mover here, as Trubisky is playing second fiddle to Foles right now RB - Akers (170), Brown (140), Cohen (108), Montgomery (23), Henderson (23) Looks like the lead ball carriers for both teams are the least common WR - Woods (186), Kupp (159), Robinson (105), Miller (79), Reynolds (21) Could see some nice scores from this group TE - Higbee (106), Graham (74), Everett (42), Kmet (25) Alot of TE duds this week, so I bet these guy count if they do almost anything K - Sloman (234), Pineiro (37) Sloman still looking like the Rams kicker, but not Pineiro D - LAR (226), CHI (126) Started the contest as the 7th & 18th most common; 1418 remaining teams rostered only 1 or 2 D's, so these 2 can move the line quite easily with good scores
  5. Will try to answer that when I get home in the morning. I'm a night worker with limited access right now.
  6. Not out of the woods? You are up by 12 with Wilson, Carson, Lockett, and the ARI D still going. You ain't in the woods - you ain't even in tall grass!
  7. Say what? Looks like you are 12 above the line right now. Am I missing something?
  8. You are such a nice coach, letting Zeke and Jacobs have the week off. Congrats, and keep on trucking!
  9. Dude, you are a shoe-in for this week, thanx to Burrow, Diontae, and Beasley. Who needs TE's?
  10. I am in danger of missing the cut... for the 2nd time in 3 weeks
  11. Strange and fun facts thus far... QB - Josh Allen has a higher completion %, more passing yards, more passing TD's, and less rushing yards than Patrick Mahomes - 38 year old Ryan Fitzpatrick has as many rushing TD's as 23 year old Lamar Jackson - The only player who has topped 30 points every week is Kyler Murray, yet his high week of 38.00 is tied for QB11 with Justin Herbert RB - Currently, this year's RB6 and RB7 in PPR scoring weren't even offered in the contest - If not for Jordan Howard's 3 TD's, he would have a grand point total of 1.6 (which is twice that of his YPC) - Saquon Barkley and LeVeon Bell, 2 of this year's contest fails, have a 33.33% survival rate if you rostered both WR - Adam Thielen & Justin Jefferson are WR3 and WR8, while Kirk Cousins is QB19 (things that make you go hmm) - Only 3 WR's have reached double digits all 6 weeks (Stefon Diggs, Robby Anderson, CeeDee Lamb) (DK Metcalf may have qualified if not for his bye) - Of the 101 contest WR's, 46 cost under $10. Of those 46, only 11 were in the top half of the most common WR's. Mike Williams ($10) was the only double digit WR in the bottom 20 most common. TE - By week 2, Travis Kelce was atop the TE leader board, and is on pace to become the TE1 for the 5th year in a row - Who needs a TE anyways? One live team basically punted the position, taking only $4 Vance McDonald (he is averaging a whopping 2 pts) - At the other end of the spectrum, a team of Travis Kelce, George Kittle, Darren Waller, and Jimmy Graham is averaging over 60 per week at the position
  12. Week 6 - 1.55 above the cut Week 5 - 5.85 above the cut Week 4 - 9.80 above the cut Week 3 - 22.00 above the cut Week 2 - 94.30 above the cut Week 1 - no cut line Just an FYI - 2018's winner took home the top prize without Alex Smith, Alex Collins, and OJ Howard ($44) for the last 5 weeks. Hang in there!
  13. With only 22 left in Joe's extra contest, here are my thoughts for this week. I am listing them by team number, in case anyone else cares to follow along... 100246 - @gobrowns33 - only bye is Thielen, overall pretty healthy, will easily make it to week 8... JINX! 102020 - @neal cassady - Mixon out/Taylor on bye, but Boston Scott helped; Herndon only active TE 102453 - @Titans_fan - another Mixon/Scott owner; will be running thin at WR this week 103072 - @scoobus - Mixon again? CEH & Jacobs will have to bring it; a tad worried about week 8 byes 103146 - @themeanmachine - WR corps isn't very healthy, but should survive week 7; week 8 looking tight 103154 - @Synthesizer - there is no way this team does not advance to week 8; now that I said that.. 103205 - @4th&inches - should have a near-full roster; nice bye week distribution going forward 103281 - @mphtrilogy - deep roster of RB's & WR's should carry this team to week 8; go Minshew! 103292 - @ConstruxBoy - only RB's over $9 are Barkley & Sanders; only possible TE is Akins 103368 - @Kujjie - will need decent scores from all active players; playing with a skeleton crew 103400 - @Grid71 - strong RB corps will carry him through week 7; low ROI on 4 TE's thus far 103413 - @Go DC Yourself - secretly happy Mixon is out; could use a few decent scores from cheap WR's 103462 - @Raging weasel - usable scores by Scott & Tate; would be nice to see Stafford's first game over 30 pts 103477 - @stuckinthemuck - a Saquon owner with a decent shot of advancing? Heck yeah! 103729 - @bcnfinance - barring a Mahomes meltdown, this team skates easily into week 8 103807 - @Sweet Love - how long can he last with Chubb & Ekeler out? Austin Hooper also missing week 7 103985 - @coltsuperfan - needs monster scores from RB/TE corps, no active QB and only Metcalf/Cobb at WR (maybe Edwards?) 104031 - @cstruk - 18-man rosters especially risky this year; but he chose wisely and should make it to week 8 104127 - @Galileo - I like the chances of this roster for week 7; hoping Aaron Jones is good to go 104511 - @Deamon - thin at WR this week, but strong elsewhere; week 8 here we come 104534 - @da_budman - guaranteed goose egg at TE even with 4 rostered; need CEH & Jacobs to score well 104539 - @BroadwayG - 29-man roster with no week 7 byes; how can he not advance? Good luck folks!
  14. Calcomatic still showing last week's scores, so I figured I would post the player scores here. I think I got the scores right?
  15. Week 7 kicks off with the Eagles hosting the Giants. Cutting down from 2200 to 1500. QB - Jones (95), Wentz (30), Hurts (21) All 3 have a lower than average survival rate, with Hurts comically leading the way at 18.75% RB - Scott (108), Sanders (61), Barkley (58), Lewis (12), Freeman (8) All 5 have a lower than average survival rate; send best wishes to @ConstruxBoy because he is going into battle without Barkley & Sanders WR - Jackson (229), Shepard (113), Slayton (76), Arcega-Whiteside (61), Jeffery (57), Reagor (54), Tate (39) All 7 have a lower than average survival rate; stuff like this happens when the 2nd best guy ranks as WR85 TE - Goedert (121), Ertz (102), Engram (68), Smith (11) All 4 have a lower than average survival rate K - Elliott (112) Yup, he's below average too, and Gano isn't even part of the contest D - PHI (76), NYG (70) Sticking to the theme, both D's are below average as well 22 contest options above, and all below the average survival rate. Cut line is guaranteed to remain at zero after the game, because ownership numbers for active players will be well below 1500.