Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Philo Beddoe

Members
  • Content Count

    395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

54 Excellent

About Philo Beddoe

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Recent Profile Visitors

6,694 profile views
  1. I cancelled mine after 15 years plus time with chestsheets.net for this very reason.
  2. If the justification for impeachment is because a few people died then we should impeach every president and congressman that ever held office.
  3. “ A violation of this section may be prosecuted in the jurisdiction in which the communication was made or received or in the City of Richmond if the person subjected to the act is one of the following officials or employees of the Commonwealth: the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.“ It is absolutely what it says.
  4. So now they are pushing legislation that would make criticism of a government official a criminal offense? 18.2 § 18.2-152.7:1. Harassment by computer; penalty. If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he shall be is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. A violation of this section may be prosecuted in the jurisdiction in which the communication was made or received or in the City of Richmond if the person subjected to the act is one of the following officials or employees of the Commonwealth: the Governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor-elect, Attorney General, or Attorney General-elect, a member or employee of the General Assembly, a justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
  5. It’s my biggest issue with this place. It’s like we are not real people. Like any of us are not friends and family with teachers, doctors, local politicians etc. We don’t have friends and family who are African Americans, Hispanics, Muslim etc. We haven’t had positions in both private/public sector. We haven’t worked for both large corporations and small businesses. We haven’t started a business. We don’t have kids currently enrolled in school etc. How could we possibly have an opinion on these things? Sorry for my off topic rant. Carry on. Matt does excellent work here.
  6. The New York Times editorial board reported last March, “The Obama administration estimated that over its two terms drone strikes had killed between 64 and 116 civilians in 542 airstrikes outside the major war zones.” Other experts calculated the civilian death toll closer to 324.
  7. All those visa overstays risked their lives coming here via airline.
  8. Everytime something bad happens, folks cry out for safety. The Government answers by taking rights away from good people.
  9. Point to my post where I made that claim? I am just curious as to what he could possibly do in this situation. Governors are elected by the laws and Constitution of their states. They can only be removed by the laws and Constitution of their states. Even if a Governor commits and is convicted of a federal crime, he'll go to federal prison, but it will still be the laws and Constitution of their state that, in an entirely separate process, determine when, how, and even if he is removed from office as Governor. They can recall, Impeach or Pelosi and the House can Impeach. Also, I am not a Trump supporter but he did approved a disaster declaration for Puerto Rico last week $8 billion in disaster aid relief
  10. I don’t think the President has the power to remove a duly elected Governor. Pelosi can impeach though.
  11. She’s spent her life accumulating wealth and power.
  12. Come on Ivan those darn right wingers are at it again using public funds to send their children to Yeshivas and Islamic Schools.
  13. which headline is more accurate? “Supreme Court appears likely to allow public funding for religious schools“ or, “Families Ask the Supreme Court to Stop Discrimination Against Religious Schools“ Also in the article - “The Supreme Court has never drawn a bright line between acceptable and prohibited public aid for religious programs.“ They left this out - “Back in 2002, the Court ruled that the U.S. Constitution allowed religious schools to participate in state scholarship programs. Today, Espinoza and her lawyers from the Institute for Justice are asking that the Supreme Court go one step further and prohibit state-backed scholarship programs from discriminating against those same schools in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.”
  14. @jon_mx here’s a good one for your false narrative thread.
  15. You forgot Bush but he received a pass because Pelosi was complicit. Politico