Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

jon_mx

Members
  • Content Count

    50,884
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

jon_mx last won the day on December 12 2014

jon_mx had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

6,511 Excellent

About jon_mx

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

27,732 profile views
  1. Isn't a loose cannon just a nice way of saying she says stupid things all the time?
  2. Back in the day, Clint Eastwood ruled a whole genre of movies. Well Clint and John Wayne. I think anyone alive when those movies were big picture Clint in Westerns. Dirty Harry did not even cross my mind until after I opened the thread.
  3. A lot were at Andrews (113), but not most. 220 were not.
  4. 333 deserves criticism. Trump will blow by that in maybe 4 years or less, but so what? Both are very significant. A non-biased source would track and raise questions on both. If you focus on one and not the other, you are exposing yourself as a hypocrit.
  5. She is not going away even if the left tries to drop her like Nancy Pelosi wishes they would. The GOP will use her regardless, much in the same way the Dems used David Duke. If you don't denounce David Duke strong enough, you will be cast with agreeing with his racist views. If you do not denounce AOC plans, you will be cast as a Communist. She will be a tool for the GOP and it will work even better since there are still lots of people on the left who prop her up.
  6. No one is questioning Fox being biased and hypocritical.
  7. Too easy. Take NBC News tracking Trump's vacations and golf outings. NBC News were not really critical of Obama and his activities, and certainly did not have a page where they tracked it.
  8. Do you want me to put numbers to how much effort is required to meet her plan? I believe the $93 Trillion figure is on the low end of what she is proposing. One little girl shown working in her video does not produce $93 Trillion work of economic output. The entire GDP of the US is about $19 Trillion a year. She is proposing taking about half of the entire US economic production and putting it on her plan. In other words, half of the stuff our economy is currently doing must stop and focus on what she wants. That is flat out loony toons land.
  9. Much of the coverage is by news organizations that are in favor of her wacky ideas, that is what makes it so interesting. She is an absolute hero according to the massive amount of positive coverage Newsweek gives her. Washington Post and CNN cover her extensively and are largely positive towards her. She is one of the most influencial people according to Time. Every tweet and statement gets covered by organizations on both sides of the isle. She has a substaintial amount of support from the far-left wing, and critics love her because her whacky ideas are so easy to mock. What is not to love about her? She beautifully articulates how crazy the extremists are.
  10. It seems her view on the issue is that you all you have to do is pass a law and we magically reduce our emissions by 50% in 12 years, everyone gets healthcare, all children are feed, we have high speed trains which take you everywhere in the country, and everyone has a job unless of course you don't feel like working. But no sweat, we will take care you you regardless of work. The city of Miami still gets wiped out by a Hurricane and associated flooding, but who needs them anyway? Her so-called views are that goods and services simply fall out of the sky. At least Trump understood that someone had to pay for his wall, so there was some kind of plan albeit utterly ridiculous. AOC makes Trump's ideas seem comparably well-thought out.
  11. You are welcome. I have seen those style of infomericials a few times before, and in each case they were pitching snakeoil products with simpleton logic and no real proof that the product would do what it claims. This seemed no different.
  12. It was already illegal in the state of New York. A bit surprised an event which causes an injury is only a misdemeanor though. Unfortunately, Laws do not completely prevent bad things from happening. New York State Penal Law, Chapter 716, Section 1 (effective November 1, 1988) 120.16: Hazing in the first degree A person is guilty of hazing in the first degree when, in the course of another person's initiation into or affiliation with any organization, he intentionally or recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of physical injury to such other person or a third person and thereby causes such injury. Hazing in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor. 120.17: Hazing in the second degree A person is guilty of hazing in the second degree when, in the course of another person's initiation or affiliation with any organization, he intentionally or recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of physical injury to such other person or a third person. Hazing in the second degree is a violation.