Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jene Bramel

IDP 2007 NFL Draft Thread

188 posts in this topic

The fun begins soon. There aren't as many obvious stud talents in this group as in 2006. But plenty of these guys will be upgrades at favorable roles for IDP production.

For those of you who want to make this a one-stop-shopping thread of sorts, here are some links for today's FBG/NFLDraftGuys discussion and a couple of tandem threads for dynasty leaguers.

NFLDraftGuys live blog from the draft

950 AM feed (Cecil Lammey with frequent spots with Bloom, etal) -- click on sidebar to listen live

Tick's IDP Opportunity in the Draft thread

NFLDraftGuys rankings pages

We were onto late round specials like Mark Anderson, Omar Gaither and Freddy Keiaho in this thread last year. Hopefully, we'll be onto a few other gems this weekend.

I'm planning to just sort of blog through this thread like last year, listing each pick quickly then coming back and adding a short blurb of speculation. Sounds like there's more interest than last year when there were just a couple of us so hopefully there'll be plenty of talk.

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't have asked for more:

1.) Well Placed,

2.) Well Planned,

3.) Well Manned.

Well Done.

:banned:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! I´ll follow it the whole day. Best regards from Munich, Germany.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:ph34r:

Unfortunately, unless there's a shocker and Gaines Adams busts the rumor mill, we'll be waiting a bit to open our presents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaines Adams to Tampa????

Maybe they work out something with Detroit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.04 -- GAINES ADAMS -- Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Undersized edge rusher with questionable run support ability. Really not an elite player but the scarcity of 4-3 edge rushers continues to drive the value of players like Adams through the roof. Tampa-2 defense is a good fit for Adams. Long term IDP value in standard leagues dependent on how well he supports the run. Likely steps right into the starting lineup at RDE with Simeon Rice's health still in question. And probably means Kevin Carter stays at tackle unless Greg Spires is released.

Or he gets traded to Detroit later today in a blockbuster swap for Calvin Johnson. Same scheme, same outlook there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like its gonna be Levi Brown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like its gonna be Levi Brown

Who? :lmao: If Mayock, Gosselin and a few others are right, a mini corner run might be coming...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With Peterson sliding, I think its less likely Denver trades with Houston to move up for Willis.

Houston will prolly jump on Peterson ... Atlanta may take Peterson if Landry is gone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.04 -- GAINES ADAMS -- Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Undersized edge rusher with questionable run support ability. Really not an elite player but the scarcity of 4-3 edge rushers continues to drive the value of players like Adams through the roof. Tampa-2 defense is a good fit for Adams. Long term IDP value in standard leagues dependent on how well he supports the run. Likely steps right into the starting lineup at RDE with Simeon Rice's health still in question. And probably means Kevin Carter stays at tackle unless Greg Spires is released.

Or he gets traded to Detroit later today in a blockbuster swap for Calvin Johnson. Same scheme, same outlook there.

It is a good fit, the Bucs have been producing solid ff starters for a long time now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.06 -- LARON LANDRY -- Washington Redskins

Interesting.

Landry and Sean Taylor are pretty similar players. Both stellar two-way players and extremely physical over the middle. The value of both will depend on which spends more time in the box. This is a good fit for Landry, though, as the FS spot in Atlanta would have had questionable IDP value. Both safety spots have had good value in Washington. Landry will be a real nice player in big play IDP leagues.

I imagine both will spend time in the box in the Skins scheme. Interested in Redman's take and will post comments from Gregg Williams when we get them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! Landry and Taylor, what a combo!!!!! :eek:

NFC East receivers better button up the chin strap crossing the middle vs the Skins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pity the 950am feed is 5 minutes behind. I wanted to mute my TV and listen to it instead :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who's the SS in WAS ?

My early opinion would be Landry, but the safeties could be and have been used interchangeably in this scheme and Landry is so solid in coverage, that there may not be a true SS/FS alignment here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mayock screaming corner for Vikes, no way they take a corner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who's the SS in WAS ?

My early opinion would be Landry, but the safeties could be and have been used interchangeably in this scheme and Landry is so solid in coverage, that there may not be a true SS/FS alignment here.
I agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be Okeye here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be Okeye here

Or a strongside end like Carriker or Anderson. But I agree that the defensive line gets addressed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should be Okeye here

Or a strongside end like Carriker or Anderson. But I agree that the defensive line gets addressed.
Figuring Petrino ties with Okoye will be the difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.08 -- JAMAAL ANDERSON -- Atlanta Falcons

Need pick here. Chauncey Davis is a poor fit on the strongside and the rotation behind him aren't much better. The Falcons had to get an end at some point. Anderson is a former WR turned athletic 280 pound end. Although he's not an explosive edge guy, he's got a good array of pass rush moves and will continue to improve in run defense. Could be a stud LDE like a Michael Strahan or Charles Grant if he continues to develop his all-around skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good call Jean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.08 -- JAMAAL ANDERSON -- Atlanta Falcons

Need pick here. Chauncey Davis is a poor fit on the strongside and the rotation behind him aren't much better. The Falcons had to get an end at some point. Anderson is a former WR turned athletic 280 pound end. Although he's not an explosive edge guy, he's got a good array of pass rush moves and will continue to improve in run defense. Could be a stud LDE like a Michael Strahan or Charles Grant if he continues to develop his all-around skills.

Should have a positive impact on Abraham wouldnt you say ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who's the SS in WAS ?

My early opinion would be Landry, but the safeties could be and have been used interchangeably in this scheme and Landry is so solid in coverage, that there may not be a true SS/FS alignment here.
Well, I'm not very enthusiastic about this pick, but I'll guarantee you that Landry will play the traditional SS role far more than Taylor. Landry's weakness is his hands - he drops a lot of picks (not to be confused with being generally weak in coverage, which he's not). Taylor's hands are superb. Taylor figures to play the deep centerfield role more often, and I'd figure that Landry will far more often play shallower or be blitzing or at least up in run support. I would figure, if I had to guess now, that Landry will outproduce Taylor in most systems because he'll end up with more tackles and sacks. One thing's for sure though: with that defensive line both of those guys had better be ready to play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.08 -- JAMAAL ANDERSON -- Atlanta Falcons

Need pick here. Chauncey Davis is a poor fit on the strongside and the rotation behind him aren't much better. The Falcons had to get an end at some point. Anderson is a former WR turned athletic 280 pound end. Although he's not an explosive edge guy, he's got a good array of pass rush moves and will continue to improve in run defense. Could be a stud LDE like a Michael Strahan or Charles Grant if he continues to develop his all-around skills.

Should have a positive impact on Abraham wouldnt you say ?
Meh. Won't hurt, but I think the only positive impact on Abraham at this point would be a Steve Austin like lower body transplant complete with a lifetime warranty on all tendons and muscles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.08 -- JAMAAL ANDERSON -- Atlanta Falcons

Need pick here. Chauncey Davis is a poor fit on the strongside and the rotation behind him aren't much better. The Falcons had to get an end at some point. Anderson is a former WR turned athletic 280 pound end. Although he's not an explosive edge guy, he's got a good array of pass rush moves and will continue to improve in run defense. Could be a stud LDE like a Michael Strahan or Charles Grant if he continues to develop his all-around skills.

Should have a positive impact on Abraham wouldnt you say ?
Meh. Won't hurt, but I think the only positive impact on Abraham at this point would be a Steve Austin like lower body transplant complete with a lifetime warranty on all tendons and muscles.
Thought you liked to project everyone as being healthy all year :goodposting:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.08 -- JAMAAL ANDERSON -- Atlanta Falcons

Need pick here. Chauncey Davis is a poor fit on the strongside and the rotation behind him aren't much better. The Falcons had to get an end at some point. Anderson is a former WR turned athletic 280 pound end. Although he's not an explosive edge guy, he's got a good array of pass rush moves and will continue to improve in run defense. Could be a stud LDE like a Michael Strahan or Charles Grant if he continues to develop his all-around skills.

Should have a positive impact on Abraham wouldnt you say ?
Meh. Won't hurt, but I think the only positive impact on Abraham at this point would be a Steve Austin like lower body transplant complete with a lifetime warranty on all tendons and muscles.
Thought you liked to project everyone as being healthy all year :excited:
:excited: Only in April, my friend, only in April.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who's the SS in WAS ?

My early opinion would be Landry, but the safeties could be and have been used interchangeably in this scheme and Landry is so solid in coverage, that there may not be a true SS/FS alignment here.
Well, I'm not very enthusiastic about this pick, but I'll guarantee you that Landry will play the traditional SS role far more than Taylor. Landry's weakness is his hands - he drops a lot of picks (not to be confused with being generally weak in coverage, which he's not). Taylor's hands are superb. Taylor figures to play the deep centerfield role more often, and I'd figure that Landry will far more often play shallower or be blitzing or at least up in run support.

I would figure, if I had to guess now, that Landry will outproduce Taylor in most systems because he'll end up with more tackles and sacks. One thing's for sure though: with that defensive line both of those guys had better be ready to play.

These would be my thoughts as well, although I'm continually underprojecting the production of Taylor.

First insider thoughts from the Washington beat writer Jason LaCanfora -- nothing surprising here.

The Redskins believe he could play either safety position and be deployed deep in coverage, or close to the line of scrimmage to aid the pass rush.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who's the SS in WAS ?

My early opinion would be Landry, but the safeties could be and have been used interchangeably in this scheme and Landry is so solid in coverage, that there may not be a true SS/FS alignment here.
Well, I'm not very enthusiastic about this pick, but I'll guarantee you that Landry will play the traditional SS role far more than Taylor. Landry's weakness is his hands - he drops a lot of picks (not to be confused with being generally weak in coverage, which he's not). Taylor's hands are superb. Taylor figures to play the deep centerfield role more often, and I'd figure that Landry will far more often play shallower or be blitzing or at least up in run support.

I would figure, if I had to guess now, that Landry will outproduce Taylor in most systems because he'll end up with more tackles and sacks. One thing's for sure though: with that defensive line both of those guys had better be ready to play.

These would be my thoughts as well, although I'm continually underprojecting the production of Taylor.

First insider thoughts from the Washington beat writer Jason LaCanfora -- nothing surprising here.

The Redskins believe he could play either safety position and be deployed deep in coverage, or close to the line of scrimmage to aid the pass rush.

Well, the lemonade I'm mixing right now as a 'Skins fan is that there are going to be a hell of a lot of alligator arms and crushing hits between the hash marks with Taylor and Landry back there. Todd Pinkston just filed his formal retirement papers. :mellow:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.10 -- AMOBI OKOYE -- Houston Texans

Houston slowly filling holes on defense. Williams and Ryans last year. Okoye this year. If Okoye continues to fill out, there's no reason he can't become the next big IDP value at DT. Very explosive off the ball and can be a playmaker in both run defense and pass rush. But he's still young. Scouts get on him for getting too high at times and not handling double teams consistently. Still, there's all kinds of potential in DT specific leagues as he grows into the position.

No major impact on the Texan back seven.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SF should get Willis???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SF should get Willis???

I say Carriker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SF should get Willis???

I've got him queued up and ready to post but Adam Carriker would be a very, very good 3-4 end and the Niners still need a NT to make the 3-4 effective. Sounds like Branch's value is dropping like a rock but...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tough choice for the Niners, but its appears to be a win win situation

As a Crowell owner don't want to see Willis go to Buffalo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.11 -- PATRICK WILLIS -- San Francisco 49ers

Lot of ramifications here. Don't believe the scuttle on Willis' coverage skills. He's more than capable of holding his own in coverage and is athletic enough to improve. But this isn't the best case scenario for Willis from an IDP standpoint. The 3-4 scheme is a bit of a concern -- there's not a stud NT in San Francisco -- but if he lines up at the playmaking, tackle friendly LILB spot there's still plenty of value to be had. It won't be as much as the MLB spot in Denver or Buffalo, though, at least not right away. And more bad news for Brandon Moore if Willis gets the LILB gig. He could hold some value if he stays inside (assuming he plays RILB and not LILB), but might get stuck back in that hybrid inside sometimes, outside sometimes, third down pass rusher role.

Depending on where he aligns and how soon the Niners address the NT position, there's room for somebody to jump ahead of Willis in the early rookie rankings.

ETA: This also should preserve the increased value Angelo Crowell looks to have in Buffalo at MLB. There are a couple ILB prospects left (i.e. Durant, Davis) who fit in a Tampa-2, but far more OLBs. Crowell should be safe. Thanks to lord_helmet for the reminder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:goodposting::confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.