Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
How much $$ are they? And how much is paid out?
Z-Land is "Where Dynasties Are Born"
Recruiting is under way for '08 leagues: 53 man roster, 12 team format, full IDP.
Compete with, and against, the best FFB players on The Planet
Send a PM, or post in this thread, and I'll forward your application package.
So it's a free league that costs money
It costs money to run a league at MyFantasyLeague.com. It costs money to host a message board for 60+ leagues. Not sure where you'd expect that to come from.So it's a free league that costs money
I got that part, I just assumed that with all the effort that goes into managing a team in a league like this that people would be actually playing for money.It costs money to run a league at MyFantasyLeague.com. It costs money to host a message board for 60+ leagues. Not sure where you'd expect that to come from.So it's a free league that costs money
Nope. Not these. There are plenty of $$-payout dynasties out there (I am in some as well) but ZF was established on the basis of simply playing for fun, pride and the challenge of top-notch competition. If that's something you'd be up for, we'd be glad to have you. If not, that's cool too.I got that part, I just assumed that with all the effort that goes into managing a team in a league like this that people would be actually playing for money.It costs money to run a league at MyFantasyLeague.com. It costs money to host a message board for 60+ leagues. Not sure where you'd expect that to come from.So it's a free league that costs money
There are both options right now. We are in the process of filling 12 new 12-team leagues that will have startup drafts this spring and we also have some orphaned teams available. If there are multiple vacancies in a league, there will either be a mini-draft but if there is only one opening, the new owner would just take the team as-is.Please go here:
Purplehaze, thanks for the fill in information. The link gives you the application. Forwarding it to the "applications" address is the generic route.
Or Z51, that is a good one to join as well. My plug to fill my new one as well.
This is true if you are looking to obtain a brand new team. But, we also have some openings in existing leagues that need to be filled. Mark is specifically filling the Hutson Syndicate and would have nothing to do with filling vacancies in other leagues. For those that would consider taking over an orphaned squad, sending to the applications@zealotsfield.com addy is the way to go.
Get 'um while there hot!Fortunately, recruiting is ongoing and there's time left to fill these spots....we've got untill August to get 'er done...just checking on 'My People'
FWIW, Z is not Full IDP.It is 2 DL, 2LB, 2DB and a flex.
Z-Land is "Where Dynasties Are Born"
Recruiting is under way for '08 leagues: 53 man roster, 12 team format, full IDP.
Compete with, and against, the best FFB players on The Planet
Send a PM, or post in this thread, and I'll forward your application package.
what does Full IDP mean?7 IDP positions is certainly an IDP league to 99% of fantasy owners, IMO.
Actually, its 2 flex - not the same position.And if you want ALL IDP - there is a specialty league available after you join one of the classic leagues that is only/all IDP.
IMHO, Full IDP has always meant starting a full team on defense - 11 players in some configuration.
agree to disagree then.as long as # of starters on offense and defense are roughly similar, it's full IDP as far as I'm concerned.if you start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, and 1 FLEX that's 8 offensive starters. starting 8 IDPs balances out the lineup perfectly.
Just a counterpoint as I think we're getting off topic of the OP, but it does depend on scoring.If we have FBG-style scoring I'm inclined to agree with you on the balance aspect, but IIRC "Z" is a little light on IDP scoring as well.I think 8 vs. 11 IDPs is a bit semantical, but in principle I agree with you that you should have at least 7 or 8 IDPs or a close match to # of offensive players to be balanced. I just tend to think of 11 IDPs with the words "full IDP".
I'll amend that to read: full-service IDP and we'll just coin a new FFB term....that should work out.The point about "being light on the IDP scoring" is well taken. Furthur more, the IDP is slanted towards a tackle heavy system, where guys like Ed Reed don't bring home a lot of bacon.
If this was in the FFA, I'd be quite
I'll send you a PM and we'll get knee deep in this Gator....and drain the swamp.
lol...okay, thanks.
Gotta Love It.
