What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Breaking Bad on AMC (5 Viewers)

http://m.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2013/09/breaking-bad-finale-reviewed.html

This is the original theory. Thought it was interesting but implausible.
Agree with the writer, the finale felt different then a lot of the other episodes. Gilligan swears it is not a dream sequence but I see how many think it could be. Him leaving for Vermont/NH felt pretty final.
Even if it's not what Gilligan intended the fact that we can discuss it makes the show even better.

 
Friend of mine started watching on. Netflix. He knows im a big fan. He tells me "im two episodes in. Its ok but does it get better? Its kind of slow. It doesnt make me wanna watch the next episode right away like homeland or 24". I basically told him hes a moron and to watch a few more episodes and then get back to me.

 
Friend of mine started watching on. Netflix. He knows im a big fan. He tells me "im two episodes in. Its ok but does it get better? Its kind of slow. It doesnt make me wanna watch the next episode right away like homeland or 24". I basically told him hes a moron and to watch a few more episodes and then get back to me.
That's fair - it's not like this was a compelling show from the get go - the fever pitch began in season 4

 
Friend of mine started watching on. Netflix. He knows im a big fan. He tells me "im two episodes in. Its ok but does it get better? Its kind of slow. It doesnt make me wanna watch the next episode right away like homeland or 24". I basically told him hes a moron and to watch a few more episodes and then get back to me.
That's fair - it's not like this was a compelling show from the get go - the fever pitch began in season 4
Huh? I think the fever pitch, as you called it, kicked in way earlier than that.

As for the start of the show, I thought the pilot was awesome, and by the time I got to the end of the 3rd episode, when Walt killed Krazy-8 and then told Skyler he had something to tell her, I was on board for the duration.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was hooked when the body fell through the ceiling.

If you can't get hooked when that happens, then #### you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started watching again from the start. I forgot exactly how crazy Tuco was.

It's easily just as good the second time through.

Better than anything else on tv

 
I don't understand people who say this moves slow. The first three seasons are pretty much non-stop action. Especially when compared to other critically acclaimed shows.

 
I don't understand people who say this moves slow. The first three seasons are pretty much non-stop action. Especially when compared to other critically acclaimed shows.
Agreed. If somebody told me that The Wire was too slow, okay I guess I could see where they're coming from. But BB? I don't get it.

 
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?

 
Friend of mine started watching on. Netflix. He knows im a big fan. He tells me "im two episodes in. Its ok but does it get better? Its kind of slow. It doesnt make me wanna watch the next episode right away like homeland or 24". I basically told him hes a moron and to watch a few more episodes and then get back to me.
That's fair - it's not like this was a compelling show from the get go - the fever pitch began in season 4
The opening scene of the pilot is two guys in gas masks, one passed out in the front seat and the other sweating profusely while speeding through the desert in an RV while two "dead" guys slide around the back of the vehicle. It certainly got my attention right away!

:shrug:

 
Friend of mine started watching on. Netflix. He knows im a big fan. He tells me "im two episodes in. Its ok but does it get better? Its kind of slow. It doesnt make me wanna watch the next episode right away like homeland or 24". I basically told him hes a moron and to watch a few more episodes and then get back to me.
That's fair - it's not like this was a compelling show from the get go - the fever pitch began in season 4
I was in from episode one when a high school teacher got cancer and started making meth.

 
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####

 
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####
:shrug:

He didn't exactly beg for his life. He tried to use the only card he had left up his sleeve.
Agreed. Jack tried out a logical argument based on the assumption that Walt wanted his money back. That wasn't unreasonable at all, but unfortunately for Jack, Walt didn't give a #### about his money at that point.

Also, that part is nearly an exact mirror of Jack killing Hank. Remember that Walt tries to buy Hank's life, but Jack kills him anyway. In the scene in the finale, Jack tries to buy his own life and, well, you know.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####
:shrug:

He didn't exactly beg for his life. He tried to use the only card he had left up his sleeve.
And he was too dumb to see that Walt had made up his mind 10 minutes ago.
 
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####
:shrug:

He didn't exactly beg for his life. He tried to use the only card he had left up his sleeve.
And he was too dumb to see that Walt had made up his mind 10 minutes ago.
Way more than 10 minutes.

 
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####
:shrug:

He didn't exactly beg for his life. He tried to use the only card he had left up his sleeve.
And he was too dumb to see that Walt had made up his mind 10 minutes ago.
Way more than 10 minutes.
It was a reference to Hank's line right before Jack killed him.
 
I watched the first episode and liked it, but not enough to get hooked. I didn't watch another full episode until a couple months ago, and only because I wanted to catch up on it before the finale.

The first great episode - the one where I was legitimately hooked - was the one in the basement with Crazy 8 and the plate. When he makes the pros and cons list, and they sit down and talk over a beer, and they talk about him buying the crib from the kid's father's store - that was near perfect storytelling. After that, the plate - which was a cool scene in and of itself - almost felt too hollywoody because of the humanity of the scene before it. And then when Walt realizes he has to do it, and the kid reaches for the shard of plate anyways, and he's stabbing blindly backwards while Walt is all at once raging because the kid was lying the whole time, and protective of himself and his family, but also crushed that the kid lied to him, but proud of himself for figuring it out but also horrified at what he's got to do, then stabbed - and you actually see all those emotions washing over him - that might have been the best scene of the entire series.

If someone can get that far into the show and not love it, then it's just not the right show for them. But the fact that you could have a conversation with someone else about their top ten or twenty scenes in the show and that wouldn't even register - that's the sign that Breaking Bad was on that next level. There really were so many great moments.

 
I watched the first episode and liked it, but not enough to get hooked. I didn't watch another full episode until a couple months ago, and only because I wanted to catch up on it before the finale.The first great episode - the one where I was legitimately hooked - was the one in the basement with Crazy 8 and the plate. When he makes the pros and cons list, and they sit down and talk over a beer, and they talk about him buying the crib from the kid's father's store - that was near perfect storytelling. After that, the plate - which was a cool scene in and of itself - almost felt too hollywoody because of the humanity of the scene before it. And then when Walt realizes he has to do it, and the kid reaches for the shard of plate anyways, and he's stabbing blindly backwards while Walt is all at once raging because the kid was lying the whole time, and protective of himself and his family, but also crushed that the kid lied to him, but proud of himself for figuring it out but also horrified at what he's got to do, then stabbed - and you actually see all those emotions washing over him - that might have been the best scene of the entire series.If someone can get that far into the show and not love it, then it's just not the right show for them. But the fact that you could have a conversation with someone else about their top ten or twenty scenes in the show and that wouldn't even register - that's the sign that Breaking Bad was on that next level. There really were so many great moments.
:goodposting:

 
The first great episode - the one where I was legitimately hooked - was the one in the basement with Crazy 8 and the plate. When he makes the pros and cons list, and they sit down and talk over a beer, and they talk about him buying the crib from the kid's father's store - that was near perfect storytelling.
Con: It's not a humane thing to do.

Pro: He will kill you and your entire family.

 
Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning.

I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.

 
I don't understand people who say this moves slow. The first three seasons are pretty much non-stop action. Especially when compared to other critically acclaimed shows.
My guess is some go in thinking non-stop action means fast-paced in an action movie kind of way, as opposed to the story always moving fast, while still progressing naturally instead of it ever feeling like it went too fast. So, if you go in with that line of thinking, I guess I can see how some might think it moves slow, but when you consider that this was a crime drama, not a crime action show, the pace was still like having the gas pedal constantly pressed to 80. Except for Fly (which was mostly self-contained), I never came away from an episode thinking the story didn't progress a lot in those 47+ minutes.

 
Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning.

I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.
Android, iPhone, or Bud Light?

 
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####
:shrug:

He didn't exactly beg for his life. He tried to use the only card he had left up his sleeve.
Agreed. Jack tried out a logical argument based on the assumption that Walt wanted his money back. That wasn't unreasonable at all, but unfortunately for Jack, Walt didn't give a #### about his money at that point.

Also, that part is nearly an exact mirror of Jack killing Hank. Remember that Walt tries to buy Hank's life, but Jack kills him anyway. In the scene in the finale, Jack tries to buy his own life and, well, you know.
Both were shot mid-sentence too. Big difference is Jack thought he had a bargaining chip but Hank knew he was a goner.
 
Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning. I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.
I was talking about this with a friend yesterday. She somehow got through the whole week without catching any spoilers while watching an episode or two of 5b every night. You don't have time for fluff with 10 episodes. It stays focused and the show runner is much more involved with every aspect. That's how you get details like Walt's pants in the desert. Seems minor, but there's a hundred of them every season it seems. Gillgan was able to oversee the writing much more effectively and concentrate the story arc directly. I think that's a huge reason why many of the shows vying for best ever are short season shows like BB, Sopranos, Deadwood, Wire, BSG (though their tragically bad foray into fluff episodes in season 2-2.5 proved that they don't belong in short season shows), etc...I think we'll start seeing that in books as well. Hugh Howey's Wool books are novellas that hearten back to serial days. With no publishing costs and all electronic delivery (talking about first run here, not omnibus editions), a new form (or a return to an old form that produced classics like Dickens and Dumas) of storytelling is emerging and though there'll be a lot of crap produced like this, I think the good stuff is going to be very comparable to the great TV series we've been seeing in the last 10 years.

Eta: Plus the practically zero chance if being cancelled mud season, largely because they're almost surely done shooting all the episodes. And finite seasons, around 4-6 is ideal IMO, focuses the storyline to a conclusion instead of having to jump the shark to keep a 22episide per season show going into its 6th or 7th season.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####
:shrug:

He didn't exactly beg for his life. He tried to use the only card he had left up his sleeve.
Agreed. Jack tried out a logical argument based on the assumption that Walt wanted his money back. That wasn't unreasonable at all, but unfortunately for Jack, Walt didn't give a #### about his money at that point.

Also, that part is nearly an exact mirror of Jack killing Hank. Remember that Walt tries to buy Hank's life, but Jack kills him anyway. In the scene in the finale, Jack tries to buy his own life and, well, you know.
Both were shot mid-sentence too. Big difference is Jack thought he had a bargaining chip but Hank knew he was a goner.
You just spoiled my 85th birthday.

 
I didn't have any problem with Uncle Jack stopping. I think that being respected was important to him. Didn't he mething to Todd about it when they were watching the confession video?
After mocking Jesse, Uncle Jack died like a #####
:shrug:

He didn't exactly beg for his life. He tried to use the only card he had left up his sleeve.
Agreed. Jack tried out a logical argument based on the assumption that Walt wanted his money back. That wasn't unreasonable at all, but unfortunately for Jack, Walt didn't give a #### about his money at that point.

Also, that part is nearly an exact mirror of Jack killing Hank. Remember that Walt tries to buy Hank's life, but Jack kills him anyway. In the scene in the finale, Jack tries to buy his own life and, well, you know.
Both were shot mid-sentence too. Big difference is Jack thought he had a bargaining chip but Hank knew he was a goner.
You just spoiled my 85th birthday.
Uh, wat?
 
Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning.

I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.
Android, iPhone, or Bud Light?
:lmao: iPhone..

Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning.I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.
I was talking about this with a friend yesterday. She somehow got through the whole week without catching any spoilers while watching an episode or two of 5b every night. You don't have time for fluff with 10 episodes. It stays focused and the show runner is much more involved with every aspect. That's how you get details like Walt's pants in the desert. Seems minor, but there's a hundred of them every season it seems. Gillgan was able to oversee the writing much more effectively and concentrate the story arc directly. I think that's a huge reason why many of the shows vying for best ever are short season shows like BB, Sopranos, Deadwood, Wire, BSG (though their tragically bad foray into fluff episodes in season 2-2.5 proved that they don't belong in short season shows), etc...I think we'll start seeing that in books as well. Hugh Howey's Wool books are novellas that hearten back to serial days. With no publishing costs and all electronic delivery (talking about first run here, not omnibus editions), a new form (or a return to an old form that produced classics like Dickens and Dumas) of storytelling is emerging and though there'll be a lot of crap produced like this, I think the good stuff is going to be very comparable to the great TV series we've been seeing in the last 10 years.

Eta: Plus the practically zero chance if being cancelled mud season, largely because they're almost surely done shooting all the episodes. And finite seasons, around 4-6 is ideal IMO, focuses the storyline to a conclusion instead of having to jump the shark to keep a 22episide per season show going into its 6th or 7th season.
:goodposting: Absolutely. And I think BB struck just the right combination to make the short season more and more prevalent. Critical acclaim was off the charts (probably due to the laser focus required when you only get 8,10,13 episodes). Perhaps more importantly, the short season made the entire series incredibly accessible to new fans who finally relented after the positive word of mouth from others. I caught up between S4 and S5. Normally 4 seasons in I would think I was too far gone to get catch up, but 45 episodes is manageable, especially with the show's consistent quality. Breaking Bad jumped from ~2 million viewers for the S4 finale to >10 million viewers for the series finale. Absolutely unheard of and definitely has network execs re-examining the old way of doing things.

 
Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning.I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.
I was talking about this with a friend yesterday. She somehow got through the whole week without catching any spoilers while watching an episode or two of 5b every night. You don't have time for fluff with 10 episodes. It stays focused and the show runner is much more involved with every aspect. That's how you get details like Walt's pants in the desert. Seems minor, but there's a hundred of them every season it seems. Gillgan was able to oversee the writing much more effectively and concentrate the story arc directly. I think that's a huge reason why many of the shows vying for best ever are short season shows like BB, Sopranos, Deadwood, Wire, BSG (though their tragically bad foray into fluff episodes in season 2-2.5 proved that they don't belong in short season shows), etc...I think we'll start seeing that in books as well. Hugh Howey's Wool books are novellas that hearten back to serial days. With no publishing costs and all electronic delivery (talking about first run here, not omnibus editions), a new form (or a return to an old form that produced classics like Dickens and Dumas) of storytelling is emerging and though there'll be a lot of crap produced like this, I think the good stuff is going to be very comparable to the great TV series we've been seeing in the last 10 years.

Eta: Plus the practically zero chance if being cancelled mud season, largely because they're almost surely done shooting all the episodes. And finite seasons, around 4-6 is ideal IMO, focuses the storyline to a conclusion instead of having to jump the shark to keep a 22episide per season show going into its 6th or 7th season.
FOX tried to launch a 'short-season' series last year with "The Following", which will make no more than 15 episodes a year. This year they've partnered it with "Sleepy Hollow", which will make no more than 13 this year and 13-15 next year. However, I don't think the quality of the writing that short season allows for has taken hold on these series. I don't know if the writers "get it."

 
Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning.

I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.
I was talking about this with a friend yesterday. She somehow got through the whole week without catching any spoilers while watching an episode or two of 5b every night. You don't have time for fluff with 10 episodes. It stays focused and the show runner is much more involved with every aspect. That's how you get details like Walt's pants in the desert. Seems minor, but there's a hundred of them every season it seems. Gillgan was able to oversee the writing much more effectively and concentrate the story arc directly. I think that's a huge reason why many of the shows vying for best ever are short season shows like BB, Sopranos, Deadwood, Wire, BSG (though their tragically bad foray into fluff episodes in season 2-2.5 proved that they don't belong in short season shows), etc...

I think we'll start seeing that in books as well. Hugh Howey's Wool books are novellas that hearten back to serial days. With no publishing costs and all electronic delivery (talking about first run here, not omnibus editions), a new form (or a return to an old form that produced classics like Dickens and Dumas) of storytelling is emerging and though there'll be a lot of crap produced like this, I think the good stuff is going to be very comparable to the great TV series we've been seeing in the last 10 years.

Eta: Plus the practically zero chance if being cancelled mud season, largely because they're almost surely done shooting all the episodes. And finite seasons, around 4-6 is ideal IMO, focuses the storyline to a conclusion instead of having to jump the shark to keep a 22episide per season show going into its 6th or 7th season.
FOX tried to launch a 'short-season' series last year with "The Following", which will make no more than 15 episodes a year. This year they've partnered it with "Sleepy Hollow", which will make no more than 13 this year and 13-15 next year. However, I don't think the quality of the writing that short season allows for has taken hold on these series. I don't know if the writers "get it."
Anyone who likes 24 should not be taken seriously
I've got 24 and BB in my top 5 of all time.. Does that make me a bad person?
No. Your taste is a little suspect though.
I think they are wildly different shows. And while 24 wasn't as tight as BB (due to the significantly longer seasons and the real time structure) they produced a few really superb (like Emmy worthy) seasons (1,5) while the remainder were still wildly entertaining if not award winning.

I think it really speaks to the fact that dramas are ready made for the compact 10-13 episode batch delivery. If Breaking Bad was forced to produce 22-24 episodes on a big 4 network timeline, I imagine we would have lost our way a little bit. It necessities further delving in B,C story lines which are often weaker and centered around unloveable characters.
I was talking about this with a friend yesterday. She somehow got through the whole week without catching any spoilers while watching an episode or two of 5b every night. You don't have time for fluff with 10 episodes. It stays focused and the show runner is much more involved with every aspect. That's how you get details like Walt's pants in the desert. Seems minor, but there's a hundred of them every season it seems. Gillgan was able to oversee the writing much more effectively and concentrate the story arc directly. I think that's a huge reason why many of the shows vying for best ever are short season shows like BB, Sopranos, Deadwood, Wire, BSG (though their tragically bad foray into fluff episodes in season 2-2.5 proved that they don't belong in short season shows), etc...

I think we'll start seeing that in books as well. Hugh Howey's Wool books are novellas that hearten back to serial days. With no publishing costs and all electronic delivery (talking about first run here, not omnibus editions), a new form (or a return to an old form that produced classics like Dickens and Dumas) of storytelling is emerging and though there'll be a lot of crap produced like this, I think the good stuff is going to be very comparable to the great TV series we've been seeing in the last 10 years.

Eta: Plus the practically zero chance if being cancelled mud season, largely because they're almost surely done shooting all the episodes. And finite seasons, around 4-6 is ideal IMO, focuses the storyline to a conclusion instead of having to jump the shark to keep a 22episide per season show going into its 6th or 7th season.
FOX tried to launch a 'short-season' series last year with "The Following", which will make no more than 15 episodes a year. This year they've partnered it with "Sleepy Hollow", which will make no more than 13 this year and 13-15 next year. However, I don't think the quality of the writing that short season allows for has taken hold on these series. I don't know if the writers "get it."
Well, the major networks are going to have an extra dozen or more studio execs to run everything through and dilute the content. The advantage of short seasons only works if you also are not trying to dumb it down enough for the lowest common denominator. The ratings needed for a cable show are way different for the big 4, plus you get to be more "edgy" (to use an overused term). You might get enjoyable shows, and so far SH is IMO, but you're not gonna get great on a regular basis. I didn't watch Lost, but even among people that liked it, it seems that the show was lost several times along its run.

 
So this is the week between Breaking Bad and Walking Dead?

Which is like going to a 3 star Michelin to a decent Chinese Buffet

 
The ricin is certainly believable. It first appeared when, the beginning of season 2? Do people really think that the full run of a TV show is all written at the very beginning?

I would say that the gun is surprising, though.


I also agree with Rude (or whoever) that the ratings for LWS are a little unfair when it is airing at 11:30. It's not terrible for cable at 11:30 on a Sunday. I think that it speaks the show's overall poorness rather than losing the Breaking Bad audience specifically that night.

(MaMn: did I really see this above?)
Joe Adalian ?@TVMoJoe 17m

Sans Breaking Bad, AMC’s LOW WINTER SUN falls to a series low Sunday: 628,000 viewers and a .15 A18-49 (159K viewers under 50)

ooof

 
The ricin is certainly believable. It first appeared when, the beginning of season 2? Do people really think that the full run of a TV show is all written at the very beginning?

I would say that the gun is surprising, though.


I also agree with Rude (or whoever) that the ratings for LWS are a little unfair when it is airing at 11:30. It's not terrible for cable at 11:30 on a Sunday. I think that it speaks the show's overall poorness rather than losing the Breaking Bad audience specifically that night.

(MaMn: did I really see this above?)
Joe Adalian ?@TVMoJoe 17m

Sans Breaking Bad, AMC’s LOW WINTER SUN falls to a series low Sunday: 628,000 viewers and a .15 A18-49 (159K viewers under 50)

ooof
Note to AMC: When you're debuting a series next to arguably the hottest cable TV show perhaps ever, make sure it doesn't suck.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top