Is that a complaint? I think that is probably how most leagues are. There is a pretty big luck component involved in all of this of course.I also think this is a pretty sweet feature. I especially like the rec for adding a DEF by committee and it even lists out the schedules for each def if you were to add them.Just checked post-draft, 10 of the 12 teams in the league are more than 50% likely to make the playoffs with Average management.
how many make the playoffs of the 12? I agree the percentages seem way overly optimistic for this ap. Having said that it IS a pretty sweet application.Just checked post-draft, 10 of the 12 teams in the league are more than 50% likely to make the playoffs with Average management.
just checked .. still there for meis it still up there on MFL? couldn't find it today.
Yeah, optimistic is one way to put it. 8 of the 12 are 70% or better to make the playoffs, and we don't send that many. I know I'm not entering data about the other teams against each other, just one at a time, but something isn't jiving inside.how many make the playoffs of the 12? I agree the percentages seem way overly optimistic for this ap. Having said that it IS a pretty sweet application.Just checked post-draft, 10 of the 12 teams in the league are more than 50% likely to make the playoffs with Average management.
Finding the right balance on this was tough. We knew one of the first things people would do would be to enter a terrible team and see if we blew sunshine at them. So we knew we had to be honest. On the other hand, we want to be careful and not act like we're the final word on anything and tell a guy his team is terrible when he thinks it's good. We settled on the format we came up with and I feel pretty good about it. Clearly, it's slanted toward our rankings as the report is how WE think you drafted. There really isn't any other way to do that. But the thing that pleases me the most was how readable it is. I too was worried about it sounding like a "mad libs" thing and Doug and David and the guys did a fantastic job with that. Really very pleased with it.Thanks to you guys that are helping spread the word. If you don't mind sharing the app with your friends, that is hugely appreciated as it helps us in a big way. Thanks.JI'm going through the rest of my league now.Worst one I have found so far is an upside of 40%...it gives ranges so this range is 40/25/4...worst so far.Starts out "Let us say this as nicely as we can. This team is brutal. It is below average and/or too thin at all three core positions (quarterback, running back and receiver)."What's the lowest % chance anyone is seeing for their team to make the playoffs? Just curious.
I did our complete draft in DD and emailed a couple of the non Footballguys users the ratings of their teams. They were quite impressed.Finding the right balance on this was tough. We knew one of the first things people would do would be to enter a terrible team and see if we blew sunshine at them. So we knew we had to be honest. On the other hand, we want to be careful and not act like we're the final word on anything and tell a guy his team is terrible when he thinks it's good. We settled on the format we came up with and I feel pretty good about it. Clearly, it's slanted toward our rankings as the report is how WE think you drafted. There really isn't any other way to do that. But the thing that pleases me the most was how readable it is. I too was worried about it sounding like a "mad libs" thing and Doug and David and the guys did a fantastic job with that. Really very pleased with it.Thanks to you guys that are helping spread the word. If you don't mind sharing the app with your friends, that is hugely appreciated as it helps us in a big way. Thanks.JI'm going through the rest of my league now.Worst one I have found so far is an upside of 40%...it gives ranges so this range is 40/25/4...worst so far.Starts out "Let us say this as nicely as we can. This team is brutal. It is below average and/or too thin at all three core positions (quarterback, running back and receiver)."What's the lowest % chance anyone is seeing for their team to make the playoffs? Just curious.
Where is it on MFL? I know I just saw i the other day, but I'm having trouble finding it today.TIAjust checked .. still there for meis it still up there on MFL? couldn't find it today.
In my defense I was going with the "Kicker early and often" strategy. We shall see who has the last laugh!I'm going through the rest of my league now.Worst one I have found so far is an upside of 40%...it gives ranges so this range is 40/25/4...worst so far.Starts out "Let us say this as nicely as we can. This team is brutal. It is below average and/or too thin at all three core positions (quarterback, running back and receiver)."What's the lowest % chance anyone is seeing for their team to make the playoffs? Just curious.
click on an owners name.... its listed last in big blue letters just above the owners nameWhere is it on MFL? I know I just saw i the other day, but I'm having trouble finding it today.TIAjust checked .. still there for meis it still up there on MFL? couldn't find it today.
and if you did your draft with DD you can do it directly from there without putting in all the players. It is located at the bottom of the team data window.I tried this out after my draft this weekend and in a word it was....AWESOME. Not so much for the evaluation of the team because I have a good idea of how good my team is and where the strengths and weaknesses are but the links to all the additional infomation, news, projected hot/cold starts, etc.. If you haven't tried it out yet I'd HIGHLY recommend you spend 10 minutes and do it.
Thank you so much. I know some people want to never share the site but it's a gigantic help to us when folks do this like you did. Thanks a lot.JI did our complete draft in DD and emailed a couple of the non Footballguys users the ratings of their teams. They were quite impressed.Finding the right balance on this was tough. We knew one of the first things people would do would be to enter a terrible team and see if we blew sunshine at them. So we knew we had to be honest. On the other hand, we want to be careful and not act like we're the final word on anything and tell a guy his team is terrible when he thinks it's good. We settled on the format we came up with and I feel pretty good about it. Clearly, it's slanted toward our rankings as the report is how WE think you drafted. There really isn't any other way to do that. But the thing that pleases me the most was how readable it is. I too was worried about it sounding like a "mad libs" thing and Doug and David and the guys did a fantastic job with that. Really very pleased with it.Thanks to you guys that are helping spread the word. If you don't mind sharing the app with your friends, that is hugely appreciated as it helps us in a big way. Thanks.JI'm going through the rest of my league now.Worst one I have found so far is an upside of 40%...it gives ranges so this range is 40/25/4...worst so far.Starts out "Let us say this as nicely as we can. This team is brutal. It is below average and/or too thin at all three core positions (quarterback, running back and receiver)."What's the lowest % chance anyone is seeing for their team to make the playoffs? Just curious.
I am pretty sure most of our owners come here but I am thinking of sending it out to all of them anyway. If I encourage groupthink it should be easier to take advantage of them!Thank you so much. I know some people want to never share the site but it's a gigantic help to us when folks do this like you did. Thanks a lot.J
Thanks a lot.JI just sent out the results to 4 of my draft teams. They liked it allot. Very cool feature. (proably like it the best because it gives me a 99% chance to make the playoffs and the other teams i checked were only 85% at best)
The commissioner has to enable 3rd party links. It's under the setup options.Is there some option you have to do in MFL to make this work? I have one league that shows a link, but one that doesn't.
Sweet! If you ever come to Dallas we can make out.The commissioner has to enable 3rd party links. It's under the setup options.Is there some option you have to do in MFL to make this work? I have one league that shows a link, but one that doesn't.
Thank you.JI did this for every team in my league and posted it. A lot of good feedback so far, pretty cool feature.It should also cut down on the "Please se mine!" posts. Double win =
I also did this but I cut and pasted a lot to keep my league mates from finding where I get my info. I also added a few of my own quotes--:languagefilter: that got some pretty good laughs. They thought I spent a lot of time doing it. If they only knew.I did this for every team in my league and posted it. A lot of good feedback so far, pretty cool feature.It should also cut down on the "Please se mine!" posts. Double win =
Cincy and Cleveland showing up as "red" matchups for defenses like Pittsburgh and Green Bay?In seriousness, I do like the defense committee suggestions, and the red/green matchup charts.
Did anyone get better than "ok" on the defense?The Steelers are probably not a difference-maker at defense, but they should be OK.
If you import from the draft dominator, make sure that the max allowed at each position adds up to the roster limit at the end.In other words, if you have a 20 round draft, but have QB Mx = 4, RB Max = 8, WR Max = 9, TE Max =3, Def Max =2, PK Max =2 then you will get this error because Rate My Team is 28 players. Just tweak the set up at the end in DD, before clicking the Rate My Team and you will be goodThink it's real cool too!But often I get the "come on enter a real team..."... .even when I do....
exactly. every team is 50/50. they either make it or they dont.Is that a complaint? I think that is probably how most leagues are. There is a pretty big luck component involved in all of this of course.I also think this is a pretty sweet feature. I especially like the rec for adding a DEF by committee and it even lists out the schedules for each def if you were to add them.Just checked post-draft, 10 of the 12 teams in the league are more than 50% likely to make the playoffs with Average management.
Packers ranked #4, "you're in good shape here"Love the feature but this one had me stumped
Did anyone get better than "ok" on the defense?The Steelers are probably not a difference-maker at defense, but they should be OK.
ah got it (and thank you).If you import from the draft dominator, make sure that the max allowed at each position adds up to the roster limit at the end.In other words, if you have a 20 round draft, but have QB Mx = 4, RB Max = 8, WR Max = 9, TE Max =3, Def Max =2, PK Max =2 then you will get this error because Rate My Team is 28 players. Just tweak the set up at the end in DD, before clicking the Rate My Team and you will be goodThink it's real cool too!But often I get the "come on enter a real team..."... .even when I do....
If you have keepers, RMT doesnt seem to take those into account. When coming up with the max players.If you import from the draft dominator, make sure that the max allowed at each position adds up to the roster limit at the end.In other words, if you have a 20 round draft, but have QB Mx = 4, RB Max = 8, WR Max = 9, TE Max =3, Def Max =2, PK Max =2 then you will get this error because Rate My Team is 28 players. Just tweak the set up at the end in DD, before clicking the Rate My Team and you will be goodThink it's real cool too!But often I get the "come on enter a real team..."... .even when I do....
A bit odd to name your team after the Steelers and then not take any of them. But we're sure you have your reasons. On to the analysis...