Same here, although I missed and really want to see the basketball one about Petrovic/Divac and the Yugoslavian team.My favorite one so far is "unguarded" about Chris Herren. I thought it was really well done.
Planning on watching live and DVRing it"You Don't Know Bo" is on tonight at 9. Can't wait... favorite athlete of my lifetime.
Don't think his baseball career was that impressive either. I'll be dammed if he wasn't bigger than life though. Was so pumped when he came to play for the white sox after his injury.Never hit 1000 yards in a season. Still one of the best runners ever. How I wish he hadn't got hurt.
Games played might have something to do with that: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/J/JackBo00.htmNever hit 1000 yards in a season.
Agree, particularly about the first hour or so, but I felt it picked up later.MEH. It is basically airtime for ESPN talking heads wrapped around a Nike commercialSo much potential, but missed the mark for me
The highlights for me were when Bo was talking about getting recruited, when he was talking about his hatred of Tampa Bay for misleading him and his bit at the end. So pretty much when Bo was telling his side of the story. That was maybe 10 minutes of the episode, max.and at the "updates" at the endAgree, particularly about the first hour or so, but I felt it picked up later.MEH. It is basically airtime for ESPN talking heads wrapped around a Nike commercialSo much potential, but missed the mark for me
Those lovely tidbits had absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the story arc they had just told. If they wanted that to be the dramatic ending of their tale, they could have set it up so much better.Bo Jackson was 28 years old when he sustained his hip injury. He is still the only player ever selected for both the MLB All-Star Game and the NFL Pro Bowl. He is not in the Hall of Fame for either sport.
I didn't get why Mark Gubicza got so much camera time.Moar coaches and old guys, less Chuck Klosterman and Jeremy Schaap
Not gonna lie, he had bee completely wiped from my mind And I kept hoping that George Brett would retell his story about ####ting his pantsI didn't get why Mark Gubicza got so much camera time.Moar coaches and old guys, less Chuck Klosterman and Jeremy Schaap
Bret Saberhagen wasn't available.I didn't get why Mark Gubicza got so much camera time.Moar coaches and old guys, less Chuck Klosterman and Jeremy Schaap
They said if he played 10 years later he wouldn't have been such a phenomenon because people would assume he was on steroids.Did they discuss his steroid use?
Look at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyon status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
'Eviloutsider said:OMG HE RAN UP A WALL!!!!!! BO IS THE BEST!And Russell's rebounding stats were crazy good.Guys, I'm only going by the stats here but Bill Russell seems to be overrated.
A couple notes about Bo after watching a good chunk of this...-Bo Jackson loves himself. He let everyone's opinion of him really inflate his ego. -I was too young for the Jackson craze but looking at his stats in baseball, meh.-Football wise, he seemed like he could have been great in the NFL, but he was never elite.-The Bozworth play was not that big of a deal. Bo had a head of steam and hits Bozworth at the two. Bozworth tackled him at the goaline, it's not that he was blown up and never got him.-The stuff that they are pimping out (HR in an all-star game, jumping over a pile against Auburn, etc.) just wasn't that impressive. I suppose it gets more impressive when you consider it was happening is multiple sports.To me, so far, Bo Jackson seems very too full of himself to really like him. I am sure I am in the minority with this, but again, I am only judging based on an hour and a half worth of video.
Me too...great show this week."You Don't Know Bo" is on tonight at 9. Can't wait... favorite athlete of my lifetime.
Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyon status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just wasn't great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
This is odd.Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just wasn't great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
You are announcing to the world that your opinions are irrelevant going forward. You know that, right?Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just wasn't great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
Yeah, you should probably just check out of this thread. If numbers told the whole story, sports wouldn't have the impact they do. To argue otherwise... it won't end wellYeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just wasn't great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
Heaven forbid that I have a different opinion. I repeat, "He wasn't that great." It's not that I said he was awful, or mediocre, just that he wasn't great. The only thing you can go by in sports is numbers, they don't lie. His numbers were not great. Then again you are type that says Jeter is the greatest because he has the "it" factor.You are announcing to the world that your opinions are irrelevant going forward. You know that, right?Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
The problem isn't that the opinion is different. The problem lies in the fact that its an awful one.Heaven forbid that I have a different opinion. I repeat, "He wasn't that great." It's not that I said he was awful, or mediocre, just that he wasn't great. The only thing you can go by in sports is numbers, they don't lie. His numbers were not great. Then again you are type that says Jeter is the greatest because he has the "it" factor.You are announcing to the world that your opinions are irrelevant going forward. You know that, right?Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
Because ADP is hitting baseballs, off of MLB pitching, 450 feet.I agree...I think you guys are romanticising him because he was injured so early. He was just Adrian Peterson plus a ton of hype.
The thing is, he was that great. Perhaps one of the greatest ever as far as peak performance. The only knock against him is longevity and that was due to a horrible injury. To this day he ranks as one of the toolsiest baseball players ever by many scouts. Off the charts goodHeaven forbid that I have a different opinion. I repeat, "He wasn't that great." It's not that I said he was awful, or mediocre, just that he wasn't great. The only thing you can go by in sports is numbers, they don't lie. His numbers were not great. Then again you are type that says Jeter is the greatest because he has the "it" factor.You are announcing to the world that your opinions are irrelevant going forward. You know that, right?Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
For who, me? I will live with people not agreeing with me. It's happened before and it will happen again. I am sure I am in the minority (like I said in the first post) when it comes to this opinion. There are many reasons people watch sports. You have yours and I have mine. I do love the human element of sports as well. I also love the various feel good stories they bring but when I am going to judge a player and how great he was, I will not factor in his backstory and what could have been, into how great I think he actually was. Again, I know I am in the minority when it comes to this and I am ok with this. You guys can all continue to remissness about the greatest player to never hit 1,000 yards rushing nor have an OPS over .866.Yeah, you should probably just check out of this thread. If numbers told the whole story, sports wouldn't have the impact they do. To argue otherwise... it won't end wellYeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just wasn't great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
His walk to strikeout ratio was awful and his OPS was .784 career. Tools is something older scouts say when numbers don't back up what they are seeing.The thing is, he was that great. Perhaps one of the greatest ever as far as peak performance. The only knock against him is longevity and that was due to a horrible injury. To this day he ranks as one of the toolsiest baseball players ever by many scouts. Off the charts goodHeaven forbid that I have a different opinion. I repeat, "He wasn't that great." It's not that I said he was awful, or mediocre, just that he wasn't great. The only thing you can go by in sports is numbers, they don't lie. His numbers were not great. Then again you are type that says Jeter is the greatest because he has the "it" factor.You are announcing to the world that your opinions are irrelevant going forward. You know that, right?Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
Gale Sayers sucked balls also.-Football wise, he seemed like he could have been great in the NFL, but he was never elite.
This simply isn't true. I would gather you have no idea what 'tools' refers to in baseball.His walk to strikeout ratio was awful and his OPS was .784 career. Tools is something older scouts say when numbers don't back up what they are seeing.The thing is, he was that great. Perhaps one of the greatest ever as far as peak performance. The only knock against him is longevity and that was due to a horrible injury. To this day he ranks as one of the toolsiest baseball players ever by many scouts. Off the charts goodHeaven forbid that I have a different opinion. I repeat, "He wasn't that great." It's not that I said he was awful, or mediocre, just that he wasn't great. The only thing you can go by in sports is numbers, they don't lie. His numbers were not great. Then again you are type that says Jeter is the greatest because he has the "it" factor.You are announcing to the world that your opinions are irrelevant going forward. You know that, right?Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowessLook at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
He was nothing short of amazing with a football in his prime.'Eviloutsider said:A couple notes about Bo after watching a good chunk of this...-Bo Jackson loves himself. He let everyone's opinion of him really inflate his ego. -I was too young for the Jackson craze but looking at his stats in baseball, meh.-Football wise, he seemed like he could have been great in the NFL, but he was never elite.-The Bozworth play was not that big of a deal. Bo had a head of steam and hits Bozworth at the two. Bozworth tackled him at the goaline, it's not that he was blown up and never got him.-The stuff that they are pimping out (HR in an all-star game, jumping over a pile against Auburn, etc.) just wasn't that impressive. I suppose it gets more impressive when you consider it was happening is multiple sports.To me, so far, Bo Jackson seems very too full of himself to really like him. I am sure I am in the minority with this, but again, I am only judging based on an hour and a half worth of video.
you didn't get that idea from Moneyball or anything'Eviloutsider said:His walk to strikeout ratio was awful and his OPS was .784 career. Tools is something older scouts say when numbers don't back up what they are seeing.'Guster said:The thing is, he was that great. Perhaps one of the greatest ever as far as peak performance. The only knock against him is longevity and that was due to a horrible injury. To this day he ranks as one of the toolsiest baseball players ever by many scouts. Off the charts good'Eviloutsider said:Heaven forbid that I have a different opinion. I repeat, "He wasn't that great." It's not that I said he was awful, or mediocre, just that he wasn't great. The only thing you can go by in sports is numbers, they don't lie. His numbers were not great. Then again you are type that says Jeter is the greatest because he has the "it" factor.'Raider Nation said:You are announcing to the world that your opinions are irrelevant going forward. You know that, right?'Eviloutsider said:Yeah I guess if you didn't grow up in that era (I did but I just didn't watch sports) that maybe you can't understand how good he could have been. I would argue with sports, how great you are is all about the numbers, and he just great.Sports to me are numbers. I don't care about how far your HRs are, I care about your strikeouts. I don't care about how fast your 40 times are, I care about your YPC (which Bo's were good). I love sports because of the ever changing numbers not the raw talent you possess.'Guster said:Paul Bunyan is actually a great comparison He was so good he was mythicalHe was bigger than life They even made the point in the movie that his stats don't reflect his impact and prowess'Eviloutsider said:Look at the post, I did see him play, in what they showed, which highlighted the best of what he did.Compare that to the Barry Sanders NFL documentary and I can see a huge difference, obviously. Take off the homer glasses and realize that as the years go by he is going to inch closer and closer to Paul Bunyan status.'Raider Nation said:Please save any absurd/misguided criticisms you may have of Bo if you never saw him play.Thx.
He was basically a part-time running back. His skills were not only elite, they were super elite. He had some astonishing games, like the one against Seattle in '87. He never played long enough to establish awesome career stats.You want overrated? How about Marcus Allen, who was essentially ahead of Jackson on the depth chart. Nice longevity, but pedestrian stats.'Eviloutsider said:-Football wise, he seemed like he could have been great in the NFL, but he was never elite.