Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
He was a guest on RBS today?LOL at the dude roasting Grossi from the MMQB about his opinion on Baker Mayfield. Dude called him lazy about 100 times with his Manzell comparisons. GB him!
And he hung up on themBeautiful
Robert Klemco, hat's off to you https://twitter.com/RobertKlemko/status/970700257012035584
Not really. The RBS crew, mainly Grossi, started kinda ripping on him. One of his followers heard it and sent this guy a tweet so he called in out of the blue. It was kinda funny and then caller dude hung up on them
If we don't get COusins, I would think we would be LESS likely to trade one of the picks.
Ok, I always thought the chances of him coming here were super remote, near 0%. I think Denver needing a QB on draft day is going to create a trade market we can exploit. Him going to Minny is best scenario for this.
Oh I see what you mean. If Minny gets him then Denver and the Jets would make a lot of sense for us. Thing is, if we take a QB at 1, they know we obviously arent going to take one at 4, so who knows how much those other teams want to get into a bidding war to move up in front of each other for a QB.
I posted a link earlier that stated Cousins wasn't interested in the Browns, So I think you can sub "if" with "when."
It was cute watching all the if then scenarios being dreamt up all winter.
Yeah, there was a link a month ago also. Never know till they flash the money (if they flash the money)
I'll take him at his word. Not because I think he's trustworthy, but rather because I want to believe him. I don't think he's worth anywhere near what it would take to get him. So I am hoping he goes elsewhere.
His worth would be good QB play and allowing us to use pick 1 to trade down and add several good players with that pick rather than use it on a QB.
Sort of depends who our QB is, what we do with 110 million, and what we do with the most draft capital in the history of drafts.amnesiac said:
If Sam's degenerative knee is a non-issue, then Sam and Darnold/Mayfield.
I think 99% of what we have heard is speculation/conjecture.
They had picks 4 and 5 in the mock. It didn't matter which order they went. RB/QB or QB/RB, it would be the same two players.
How about the Browns send a 2nd rounder to the Eagles for Foles, trade the first overall pick for a ton of selections, and then spend the #4 on a QB prospect. Foles can mentor the new guy instead of .... Kizer.
Foles is 29 years old...he is not looking to be a mentor if he gets another chance at a starting gig...
If they land Foles or Cousins, they *have* to take Barkley 1, in my opinion. You would think the Browns could use that to help entice a vet QB to want to come there. Side note I'm a Bears fan no dog in this fight. I also think the Vikings are crazy to not keep Keenum. I think they found their guy and are gonna feck it up by snagging Cousins. Is there any way Keenum comes to Cleveland? I think with the capital you guys have there is no excuse to come out of this with anything less than Barkley and a vet QB to start, along with your favorite rookie QB that's still available at 4. I'd be uber aggressive about getting either Foles or Keenum. Not to tutor who you draft at 4, but to be your franchise. My ten cents. Probably worth less.
ewww, no. Drafting a QB at 4 is grounds for termination of the entire front office IMO.
I don't think that would be wise either, but it's better than drafting a RB at 1 and then drafting QB at 4
I read something somewhere that Philly was listening to offers but "it would take more than the #1 + #4 that was traded for Bradford".
It’s not silly at all. None of the QBs are flawless and many have them all ranked about equal. Meanwhile, many have Barkley slated as a once a decade type of RB.
