I think betting on Kirksey bouncing back is reasonable. Expecting Avery to become more than a subpackage player wouldn't be fair to him, but it's in the range of potential outcomes. If he doesn't? No big deal, nickel's the new base defense in this game anyway. I think it's fair to say that as of right now our run D is a little light. But I also think it's fair to say that if you're going to have a weakness in today's game then that's the area to be weak.Hmnn. Not sure how LB isn't deemed a pressing need.
Our entire linebacking corps looked much better with Danny Shelton at NT anchoring the LOS and containing blockers allowing the LBers to flow to the action. When Shelton was at NT all three of our LBers ranked in the top-11. This is from January of last year before we dealt Shelton and left a gap on our D-Line.
NFL1000: Ranking the Top Inside Linebackers of 2017 Season NFL1000 SCOUTS JANUARY 10, 2018
Good right? Well at the end of last year this is how PFF had our LBers ranked.
Pro Football Focus grades and rankings of our currently listed starting linebackers
Joe Schobert
Gerard Avery -
- Grade 78.2
- Overall Rank #11
Christian Kirksey -
- Grade 54.9
- Overall Rank #94
We addressed DT with the Sheldon Richardson signing but he is more of 3 tech where Shelton was a 0 tech. Shelton is currently an unsigned FA but I don't know if Dorsey wants to re-sign him. I don't know how CBS shows us with a good or even average grade at LB when we've got Kirksey coming off a bad and injury year and Avery more as a situational pass rusher rather than three down starter on the outside.
- Grade 46.1
- Overall Rank #85
Its reasonable to peg Kirksey into the D because their currently aren't any options. LB isn't a cap priority so it is reasonable/hopeful that he bounces back.MAC_32 said:I think betting on Kirksey bouncing back is reasonable. Expecting Avery to become more than a subpackage player wouldn't be fair to him, but it's in the range of potential outcomes. If he doesn't? No big deal, nickel's the new base defense in this game anyway. I think it's fair to say that as of right now our run D is a little light. But I also think it's fair to say that if you're going to have a weakness in today's game then that's the area to be weak.
It'd be nice to beef up that unit later this month, but I also think we don't have to. If there are better players on the DL, secondary, WR/TE, or OL available day two then pick them and start identifying LB's on day 3. If the LB talent's optimal day 2 then pick one then and circle back around to those other positions day 3. Because ultimately that's what day 3's about for us right now, competition for those last spots on the roster. And it couldn't be more awesome writing that.
But was he better than when Gregggggg had Shelton dropping back into coverage?PFF has Genard Avery as above average rushing the passer and against the run, but a disaster in coverage. He had the worst PFF coverage grade in the NFL at any position, and he dropped back into coverage 130 times (26% of his passing snaps).
Watching that thing drop back probably just made it seem like he dropped back more often. Kind of an attention grabber when it happened. And always resulted in a good belly laugh.PFF has Danny Shelton dropping into coverage 13 times in 2017 (vs. 130 for Avery in 2018), and has Shelton with a slightly below average coverage grade (vs. an abysmal grade for Avery). So the usage of Avery seems much worse. On the other hand, it is much funnier to have a 340 pounder dropping into coverage.
Reports saying the 'leaked schedule' is not legit.that schedule is brutal. all of the “easy” games are away.
16-0The entirety of the Browns 2019 schedule is as follows:
Sep. 9 vs. Tennessee Titans (1 p.m. ET) CBS
Sep. 16 at New York Jets (8:15 p.m. ET) ESPN
Sep. 22 vs. Los Angeles Rams (8:20 p.m. ET) NBC
Sep. 29 at Baltimore Ravens (1 p.m. ET) CBS
Oct. 7 at San Francisco 49ers (8:15 p.m. ET) ESPN
Oct. 13 vs. Seattle Seahawks (1 p.m. ET) FOX
BYE
Oct. 27 at New England Patriots (4:25 p.m. ET) CBS
Nov. 3 at Denver Broncos (4:25 p.m. ET) CBS
Nov. 10 vs. Buffalo Bills (1 p.m. ET) CBS
Nov. 14 vs. Pittsburgh Steelers (8:20 p.m. ET) FOX/NFL Network/Amazon
Nov. 24 vs. Miami Dolphins (1 p.m. ET) CBS
Dec. 1 at Pittsburgh Steelers (4:25 p.m. ET) CBS
Dec. 8 vs. Cincinnati Bengals (1 p.m. ET) CBS
Dec. 15 at Arizona Cardinals (4:05 p.m. ET) CBS
Dec. 22 vs. Baltimore Ravens (1 p.m. ET) CBS
Dec 29 at Cincinnati Bengals (1 p.m. ET) CBS
The fact that the meat of the schedule hits after Week 8 when Hunt is able to start playing is a real treat!
Fair points. I think the Titans are 0-3 on Week 1 the last few years, so I'm inclined to think we'll get an early jump. NYJ aren't that solid of a team yet, so I think we may catch them off guard as well. Plus Baker and OBJ on MNF should be must-see TV - win or lose! Rams will be a tough one, no doubt and the Ravens I'd liken to a "warm up" game for the division. I think this team can come out of the first 6 weeks at worst 3-3, then the rest of the schedule opens up for them. It's definitely a windy road in the offset, but I don't think it would cause CLE to go 1-5 or 0-6.
I think the first 6 games is a substantially windier road. Week 1 may look good on paper, but isn't much more unpredictable than NFL results in early September. Then we go on the road for a Monday nighter against a team with aspirations for contending with the Pats. Only to return home on a short week for another primetime contest, only this time it's against the Super Bowl runner-up. To be followed up by a road trip against arguably our stiffest division foe. Then we go cross country to play another Monday nighter. Then return home and draw Russell Wilson on a short week.
Fun? Hell yeah! But all that's gonna be a real challenge. And the more structured second half will be welcomed relief.
Well yeah, that'd be a disaster. I expect 3-3 and would be thrilled with 4-2. Looking at those 6 games I cannot identify any penciled in W's though. No one's going to be sleeping on us.Peak said:I think this team can come out of the first 6 weeks at worst 3-3, then the rest of the schedule opens up for them. It's definitely a windy road in the offset, but I don't think it would cause CLE to go 1-5 or 0-6.
Saw that and that is good but two weeks before playing us they have a Thursday Night game and then Belichick gets 11 days to prepare for the Jets which would be good except it is a divisional game so he's got lots of tape on them AND the Patriots will have already played the Jets in week 3 so Belichick will have extra time to game plan for the Browns.The Man With No Name said:BYE week then at New England
I love rooting for the Browns, but dosen't a team actually have to be good to play in a trap game?Week 15 at ARI is a classic "trap" game.
I'm not worried one bit about Baker losing focus against Kingsbury's team.Week 15 at ARI is a classic "trap" game.
Just watched Eps 1 and 2 last night. Def some fun nuggets in there. Next one looks like alot of Odell.2019 Building the Browns: Episode 1 | Cleveland Browns
I've been really impressed the past few off-seasons with the Browns social media team. They've produced their own version of 'Hard Knocks' the past few years.
Primetime doesn't get all the good matchups. I'm not sure exactly how the networks/NFL select/divvy these games, but that CBS late slot (and the same for FOX) is no joke. Only SNF rivals it.FOUR primetime games!!!!
And the one v NE isnt one of then
I have high expectations for this team, though I am not one of the ones who think we are super bowl bound. We should win our division and get some playoff experience. It will be good for our young team, and I think next year and after the expectations go up. I am however a Browns fan, so there is that little kernel of doubt in my brain wondering how things could implode. A little playoff experience will be good for us fans too.To long suffering Browns fans,I'm curious,are you going into this season with a great deal of HOPE? Or a lot of EXPECTATIONS?
I believe there's a difference and am wondering what true Brown's fans are feeling.
I expect playoffs. I hope for the division and at least one January win.To long suffering Browns fans,I'm curious,are you going into this season with a great deal of HOPE? Or a lot of EXPECTATIONS?
I believe there's a difference and am wondering what true Brown's fans are feeling.
Why you gotta deflate the good vibes in this thread?i am not expecting anything.
a lot of things have to break your way to make the playoffs.
i am hoping for a winning record. that is the next step.
I don't care about the past, either, but there are 9-10 playoff teams in the AFC right now. Let's win the division!why beat around the bush? this team is more than good enough to make playoffs.
not making it would be a total disappointment. end of story. i dont care about the past
I'll bite.....who's on your list? I can get to 4 perennial playoff teams with talent, 2 with young talent that are ready to take the next step, and 4 with chances if things go their way (2 of which in the same division).there are 9-10 playoff teams in the AFC right now
Agreed. I didn't mean to imply that all have equally good chances. There are flaws on every team.I'll bite.....who's on your list? I can get to 4 perennial playoff teams with talent, 2 with young talent that are ready to take the next step, and 4 with chances if things go their way (2 of which in the same division).
IMO...for sure playoffs: NE, SD, IND, HOU,
Young teams ready to make the playoffs: CLE (best in division on paper), NYJ (talented, but needs symmetry)
Potential playoffs (things need to go right way): Balt (many player changes, new QB, DEF not as it was), PIT (lost RB/WR); JAX (new QB), KC (no RB, no DEF),
Too many changes, low chance: CIN, TEN (not with IND having a healthy Luck), MIA (dumpster fire), DEN (Offense issues), Oakland (would be a big surprise), BUFF
I'm not sure KC makes the playoffs again and are in a decline. Losing Hunt and some key Defensive pieces will hurt. If Hill gets suspended, that will be a major hit as well. I just don't see this young team making it again this year.
Ep 3 is must see tv.Just watched Eps 1 and 2 last night. Def some fun nuggets in there. Next one looks like alot of Odell.
What's new floating out there today?I hope this noise about moving up from 49 is just that - noise.
Pick 80? That's the one I hope we're looking to move up from.
It certainly could be absolutely nothing. Heard it both last night and this morning on 92.3. Sounded like both segments were after interviews, but I don't know who with as I'm rarely in the car for more than 10 minutes at a time. Came up in conversation in the office this morning (co-workers come in later, so Carmen and Lima were probably still talking about it) and that's when the thought entered my head. The pool of talent gets real muddy once tier 2 in round 1 has dried up and it seems to stay that way well into day 2. So instead of packaging 49 with a meaningful piece in 2020 and/or a player along with day 3 piecemeal this year to move into the end of tier 2...just get two players from tier 3.What's new floating out there today?
I'd like to think the noise simply comes with the territory (having Dorsey as GM). People know he dots all his i's and crosses all his t's. He's also open to anything. So it's easy to float this stuff from a media perspective.