Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
It decreases our roll over into 2020. We are already spending above the cap in 2019. Which is fine because we have been rolling over unused cap for years. We are now in treading lightly territory though. Bringing in another (meaningful) contract will essentially mean not retaining an expiring contract.
So if the talk of Trading Schobert and/or Duke is involved this offseason, what does that do to your books? By drafting multiple LBs, I can see where Kirksey and/or Schobert may be gone this year.
Their 2019 cap hits pale in comparison to McCoy. And I dont think Duke is here in 2020. I hope he doesnt leave prior, but (may) understand why he would.
It's weird right? This whole idea of actually needing to worry about the salary cap?
The CJ Mosely and Kwon Alexander contracts were insane.
That would be great since S was a dire need. Greedy selection was value and we will have a role for him as a boundary CB even if he isn't listed as a starter he has premium skills/value. Safety has historically been a position that can be found with mid to late draft selections but if Berry gets a clean bill of health then he would be surgical veteran addition to what could be an emerging secondary.
More likely, but it depends on his contract demands because the cap situation remains. Dollars now means less later. The Browns should probably pass if what you cited is his market value.
The contract is why maybe it's less likely.
If a team wanted him for $13 mil then they would have swapped 7's or something with them. They aren't going to pay more now.
This is where I'm not aligned in the thinking with the vast majority that want McCoy. It isn't about being cap savvy; it's about ensuring you have the necessary cap space to retain your core, which should be priority #1. And maintaining the ability to maximize your ability to build a strong team in future years as you are now - sustained success. Any move that negatively impacts that should not go through. I'm not saying acquiring McCoy does that, but as of right now it's in the range of potential outcomes.Bracie Smathers said:
I don't think it is the price so-much as the structure of the contract where their would be no dead cap hit basically making it a performance based contract.
It isn't bull ####, this is the price of admission. Don't remember how you felt about him 2 months ago, but if you were good with it then you kinda can't not be good with this. Yeah, double negatives!
Anyone know what recreational thing he’s doing that would take precedent over showing up for the occupation that earns him millions?
prima donna's don't attend voluntary OTAs see Antonio Brown, LeVeon Bell.... Odell.....etc.....
i wasn’t banging the drum to bring in a prima donna.
I am glad your not the GM I like to win championships. OBJ helps that chance. I can't believe people are crying about OBJ not being there for voluntary workouts. Would it be nice if he was ? Sure. It isn't mandatory so not sure why all the complaining.
if leaguewide, accepted unspoken rules about vets/stars and voluntaries didnt exist, then ya.
Here's the deal... As fans, we want to jump up & down and shout from the rooftops that OBJ is a Brown. We want to celebrate, to brag. We got a QB that is a winner and doesn't leave you wondering about his attitude -- he's ALL IN! We want OBJ to be that so we can jump on his bandwagon without any worries. Too bad he's not that kind of guy. We would love him!
If we let him be him then we will probably love him. If we force him to be what we want him to be then we may not.
