OldMilwaukee
IBL Representative
captain....your box is full
you must be sending to the wrong person - plenty of room in mine and no one else has said that....careful there is an impostor using a version of my name (no space)captain....your box is full
Really like your WRs. You'll need to hit on something late because there isn't much punch at QB or RB.'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me matesQB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)TE - Witten (5)
SSL1:11.06 EvilGrin 72 - Benjarvus Green-Ellis, NEP, RB52 Wow, what a difference...'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me matesQB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)TE - Witten (5)
So SSL1 forgot about Law Firm until I drafted him?or nobody thinks he is back with the Patriots?Sure the TD number was somewhat lucky but I think he still gets the goal line carries and many of the short yardage attempts (which on that offense can go the distance at times)SSL1:11.06 EvilGrin 72 - Benjarvus Green-Ellis, NEP, RB52 Wow, what a difference...'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me matesQB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)TE - Witten (5)
So SSL1 forgot about Law Firm until I drafted him?or nobody thinks he is back with the Patriots?Sure the TD number was somewhat lucky but I think he still gets the goal line carries and many of the short yardage attempts (which on that offense can go the distance at times)SSL1:11.06 EvilGrin 72 - Benjarvus Green-Ellis, NEP, RB52 Wow, what a difference...'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me matesQB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)TE - Witten (5)
He actually drafted him before you. I think everyone knows he's back with the Pats but, in what role and how many other backs in the NFL have similar roles?But, I wasn't really debating - just pointing out the difference....'Captain Hook said:So SSL1 forgot about Law Firm until I drafted him?or nobody thinks he is back with the Patriots?Sure the TD number was somewhat lucky but I think he still gets the goal line carries and many of the short yardage attempts (which on that offense can go the distance at times)'Reaper said:SSL1:11.06 EvilGrin 72 - Benjarvus Green-Ellis, NEP, RB52 Wow, what a difference...'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me matesQB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)TE - Witten (5)
What kind of clock are you working with?????He actually drafted him before you.'Captain Hook said:So SSL1 forgot about Law Firm until I drafted him?or nobody thinks he is back with the Patriots?'Reaper said:SSL1:'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me mates
QB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)
RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)
WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)
TE - Witten (5)
11.06 EvilGrin 72 - Benjarvus Green-Ellis, NEP, RB52
Wow, what a difference...
Sure the TD number was somewhat lucky but I think he still gets the goal line carries and many of the short yardage attempts (which on that offense can go the distance at times)
I think everyone knows he's back with the Pats but, in what role and how many other backs in the NFL have similar roles?
But, I wasn't really debating - just pointing out the difference....
At least you didn't take him in the early 2nd like Toads.What kind of clock are you working with?????He actually drafted him before you.'Captain Hook said:So SSL1 forgot about Law Firm until I drafted him?or nobody thinks he is back with the Patriots?'Reaper said:SSL1:'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me mates
QB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)
RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)
WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)
TE - Witten (5)
11.06 EvilGrin 72 - Benjarvus Green-Ellis, NEP, RB52
Wow, what a difference...
Sure the TD number was somewhat lucky but I think he still gets the goal line carries and many of the short yardage attempts (which on that offense can go the distance at times)
I think everyone knows he's back with the Pats but, in what role and how many other backs in the NFL have similar roles?
But, I wasn't really debating - just pointing out the difference....
Posted Yesterday, 08:46 AM
7.14 BenJarvus Green-Ellis, RB, New England
Posted Yesterday, 12:00 PM
11.6 Benjarvus Green-Eliis, RB, NE
What kind of clock are you working with?????He actually drafted him before you.'Captain Hook said:So SSL1 forgot about Law Firm until I drafted him?or nobody thinks he is back with the Patriots?'Reaper said:SSL1:'Captain Hook said:almost halfway home.....here are me mates
QB - Cassel (6) & Fitzpatrick (7)
RB - Stewart (9) & BJGE (7)
WR - White (8), Bryant (5), & Nelson (8)
TE - Witten (5)
11.06 EvilGrin 72 - Benjarvus Green-Ellis, NEP, RB52
Wow, what a difference...
Sure the TD number was somewhat lucky but I think he still gets the goal line carries and many of the short yardage attempts (which on that offense can go the distance at times)
I think everyone knows he's back with the Pats but, in what role and how many other backs in the NFL have similar roles?
But, I wasn't really debating - just pointing out the difference....
Posted Yesterday, 08:46 AM
7.14 BenJarvus Green-Ellis, RB, New England
Posted Yesterday, 12:00 PM
11.6 Benjarvus Green-Eliis, RB, NE
8.13 - FUBAR - Tony Moeaki - TE - KC- I'm going all in on young players at this point. Some will probably bust, some will pan out and I'm relying on luck to pull me through. I like this kid's game, but would have preferred Olsen among others.Round by round...1.06 - FUBAR - LeSean "Shady" McCoy - RB6 - PHI
Not loving this team, just more risk than I would usually like. But there weren't "safe" players available at my picks that I like.
Freeman (8), McCoy (5)
McCoy (7), Mathews (6)
Jennings (8), Harvin (9)
Gresham (7), Moeaki (6)
I'll comment more later on, but I'm hesitant to like this team. "Potentially" great, but far from a safe bet to make it past the first few weeks.
- 2nd draft I've taken McCoy in. PPR stud and improving on a great offense. Thought for a second about AJ, Vick or Rodgers just to change it up but nobody else was more than a passing consideration.
2.11 - FUBAR - Greg Jennings - WR6 - GB
- just missed on Brady who would have been my pick. I wanted a relatively safe pick here and Jennings is a surefire top 10 WR. Maybe not quite worth the WR6, but he's certainly in the running. Plus, as a native Michigander I just like the guy. Also considered Dallas Clark who I might have taken if we were here today, also Rivers and Wayne. Sort of a crossroads here.
3.06 - FUBAR - Ryan Mathews - RB15 - SD
- If I hadn't taken McCoy earlier I would have taken Maclin here. Otherwise, didn't really care for other options and I see Mathews as a potential top 5 RB (I admit that's probably way too high). Two top RBs makes it a position I can sit back on for awhile.
4.11 - FUBAR - Josh Freeman - QB12 - TB
- I like Freeman. Moreso as a dynasty #1 than redraft but seems good value here. Could easily have gone in different directions, Graham has a nice ceiling, Eli is safer, and if Lloyd repeats he'll be the SOD.
5.06 - FUBAR - Percy Harvin - WR23 - MIN
- This pick was easy. Although he lacks a good QB and Rice is a very good WR across from him, I see whoever their QB is relying heavily on Harvin's short game with YAC. IMO he'll end the year closer to WR12 than WR24.
6.11 - FUBAR - Jermaine Gresham - TE14 - CIN
- I wanted a TE here and most targets were taken in the previous series of TE picks. I really don't know what to think about this group (Gresham, Gronk, Keller) so I just took one I thought could succeed.
7.06 - FUBAR - Colt McCoy - QB - Clev
- Pretty much a "get a QB with a workable bye week" pick. I actually like his potential a lot but don't see him having a great 2nd season. He actually played well in games against other teams than the Steelers and Ravens, but those account for 25% of his games. I need him to have a good week 8 at San Fran, and he certainly can. In hindsight I should have gone with my first choice, who I had typed in before getting nervous about not having a good 2nd QB, which would have been Jared Cook. Frankly, this is the pick I regret right now (which probably means it's my best pick)
9.06 FUBAR - Michael Bush - RB - Oak- I had LT typed in here first, but opted for Bush. If McFadden got injured, Bush could hit it big. Even if he doesn't, Bush will play. Could also have gone Pierre Thomas or Reggie Bush here.Freeman (8), McCoy (5)
McCoy (7), Mathews (6), MBush (8)
Jennings (8), Harvin (9), RMoss (?)
Gresham (7), Moeaki (6)
Packers D (8)
You're weak RB and TE IMHO.QB - Cutler,Stafford RB - CJ2k,J.Starks, Vereen WR - B.Marshall, DeSean, Deion Branch, Johnny Knox TE - Heap, Carlson my TEs blow, but i like the make-up of the rest of my team
Im weak at Rb with Chris Johnson?? Most people only even draft 4, RB2 is a the spot to be weak IMOYou're weak RB and TE IMHO.QB - Cutler,Stafford RB - CJ2k,J.Starks, Vereen WR - B.Marshall, DeSean, Deion Branch, Johnny Knox TE - Heap, Carlson my TEs blow, but i like the make-up of the rest of my team
I would argue that you should be strong at every position. I just don't like your RB depth.Im weak at Rb with Chris Johnson?? Most people only even draft 4, RB2 is a the spot to be weak IMOYou're weak RB and TE IMHO.QB - Cutler,Stafford RB - CJ2k,J.Starks, Vereen WR - B.Marshall, DeSean, Deion Branch, Johnny Knox TE - Heap, Carlson my TEs blow, but i like the make-up of the rest of my team
Starks and Vereen have a great chance to produce this year, Let me guess you think grant and BJGE are value? whens the last time you did something in these leagues anyway????I would argue that you should be strong at every position. I just don't like your RB depth.Im weak at Rb with Chris Johnson?? Most people only even draft 4, RB2 is a the spot to be weak IMOYou're weak RB and TE IMHO.QB - Cutler,Stafford RB - CJ2k,J.Starks, Vereen WR - B.Marshall, DeSean, Deion Branch, Johnny Knox TE - Heap, Carlson my TEs blow, but i like the make-up of the rest of my team
So Grant is a collosal reach here?> But I get the guy who performed in the playoffs and is in line to get a good chunk of the carries somehow my depth is weak????At this point in the game your behind on QB...I have Schaub/Bradford for example.Rice was a good pick, but the Pack want to split carries so Grant was a collossal reach'Football Critic said:QB - Matt Ryan
RB - Rice, Grant
WR - SJohnson, SRice, AJ Green
TE - Witten
Johnson, Rice, Green...meh, okay. You reached on Green.
Witten - The TE I drafted in the 8th round may exceed his production(Winslow). You embarrassingly took Witten in the second. Again, I drafted Winslow in the 8th. Do you see the problem here?
What the guppies don't understand is that TE is very deep this year...anybody who drafted a TE early wasted a pick barring Gates who is in his own tier. But don't feel bad pretty much everybody in SSL1, SSL2 and SSL3 made the same mistake. I've always been the one to inform this forum when they draft incorrectly, nothing has changed.
I give this team a solid C+
It's obvious that "Footbal Critic" still has some learning to do.
The question is how much will they produce. My RB#2 is Jonathan Stewart for example...IMHO he has nearly twice the upside of either of your backs.Starks and Vereen have a great chance to produce this year, Let me guess you think grant and BJGE are value?
right and what round did you invest in him??? How is your top two WR compared to mine?The question is how much will they produce. My RB#2 is Jonathan Stewart for example...IMHO he has nearly twice the upside of either of your backs.Starks and Vereen have a great chance to produce this year, Let me guess you think grant and BJGE are value?
I believe the committee situation kills the GB RB value. I wouldn't want either of them as my RB#2.So Grant is a collosal reach here?> But I get the guy who performed in the playoffs and is in line to get a good chunk of the carries somehow my depth is weak???? Which is it???or do you not believe the rB1 in GB will have any value?
It doesn't really matter, my point is that optimally you should have a stronger RB#2. If you think you do, that's great...I'm just providing some commentary for you to chew on.right and what round did you invest in him???The question is how much will they produce. My RB#2 is Jonathan Stewart for example...IMHO he has nearly twice the upside of either of your backs.Starks and Vereen have a great chance to produce this year, Let me guess you think grant and BJGE are value?
And got BMW as your WR#2??? Yikes. I got 4 guys who will out perform him. GLI doubt grant comes back unless its at a massive discount #1, and BJGE is a UFA and you think they took Vereen in the 2nd round to hold a clipboard for Danny Woodhead?I believe the committee situation kills the GB RB value. I wouldn't want either of them as my RB#2.So Grant is a collosal reach here?> But I get the guy who performed in the playoffs and is in line to get a good chunk of the carries somehow my depth is weak???? Which is it???or do you not believe the rB1 in GB will have any value?
I love the debate dont get me wrong. If you look back at ALL of my SSL championship teams RB2 is where I choose to be weak almost every single time. TE is an issue here as well and will need a break there, but my WR depth and top2 qbs plus CJ2k give me alot of firepower week in and week outIt doesn't really matter, my point is that optimally you should have a stronger RB#2. If you think you do, that's great...I'm just providing some commentary for you to chew on.right and what round did you invest in him???The question is how much will they produce. My RB#2 is Jonathan Stewart for example...IMHO he has nearly twice the upside of either of your backs.Starks and Vereen have a great chance to produce this year, Let me guess you think grant and BJGE are value?
My understanding is that Grant is a lock to come back. Regarding Vereen, this history of NE is one of committees...Vereen could surprise and get a significant amount of work, but history would argue you're looking at a committee in NE.I doubt grant comes back unless its at a massive discount #1, and BJGE is a UFA and you think they took Vereen in the 2nd round to hold a clipboard for Danny Woodhead?
Yeah the corey Dillon committee.In NE, I think BJGE and Faulk and Morris are gone. grant will have to take a discount to come back and i think he lost his jobMy understanding is that Grant is a lock to come back. Regarding Vereen, this history of NE is one of committees...Vereen could surprise and get a significant amount of work, but history would argue you're looking at a committee in NE.I doubt grant comes back unless its at a massive discount #1, and BJGE is a UFA and you think they took Vereen in the 2nd round to hold a clipboard for Danny Woodhead?
we'll agree to disagree...my stance is vereen will have limited opportunity.Yeah the corey Dillon committee.In NE, I think BJGE and Faulk and Morris are gone. grant will have to take a discount to come back and i think he lost his jobMy understanding is that Grant is a lock to come back. Regarding Vereen, this history of NE is one of committees...Vereen could surprise and get a significant amount of work, but history would argue you're looking at a committee in NE.I doubt grant comes back unless its at a massive discount #1, and BJGE is a UFA and you think they took Vereen in the 2nd round to hold a clipboard for Danny Woodhead?
you maybe right, but I think his path to getting carries isnt one he cant overcome. Come on man Pac-10 or 12 or mountain west love!!!!we'll agree to disagree...my stance is vereen will have limited opportunity.Yeah the corey Dillon committee.In NE, I think BJGE and Faulk and Morris are gone. grant will have to take a discount to come back and i think he lost his jobMy understanding is that Grant is a lock to come back. Regarding Vereen, this history of NE is one of committees...Vereen could surprise and get a significant amount of work, but history would argue you're looking at a committee in NE.I doubt grant comes back unless its at a massive discount #1, and BJGE is a UFA and you think they took Vereen in the 2nd round to hold a clipboard for Danny Woodhead?
the kid is a third down back for now...those types usually don't have huge impacts their rookie season...see CJ Spiller.you maybe right, but I think his path to getting carries isnt one he cant overcome. Come on man Pac-10 or 12 or mountain west love!!!!we'll agree to disagree...my stance is vereen will have limited opportunity.Yeah the corey Dillon committee.In NE, I think BJGE and Faulk and Morris are gone. grant will have to take a discount to come back and i think he lost his jobMy understanding is that Grant is a lock to come back. Regarding Vereen, this history of NE is one of committees...Vereen could surprise and get a significant amount of work, but history would argue you're looking at a committee in NE.I doubt grant comes back unless its at a massive discount #1, and BJGE is a UFA and you think they took Vereen in the 2nd round to hold a clipboard for Danny Woodhead?
I count one starting RB and two starting WRs.QB Tony Romo QB Jason CampbellRB "All Day" Adrian Peterson RB Daniel Thomas RB Mike Tolbert WR Reggie WayneWR Brandon Lloyd WR Chad OchocincoWR Steve Breaston TE Dustin Keller DST Philadelphia Eagles Loving my team, so far.
I always knew you were bad at mathI count one starting RB and two starting WRs.QB Tony Romo QB Jason CampbellRB "All Day" Adrian Peterson RB Daniel Thomas RB Mike Tolbert WR Reggie WayneWR Brandon Lloyd WR Chad OchocincoWR Steve Breaston TE Dustin Keller DST Philadelphia Eagles Loving my team, so far.
LOL, this LHucks kid is classic, all talk and zero knowledge.Hucks are there any good players in the league but the ones you draft? LMAO...also, do you ever provide anything other than rhetoric? Stats, fact based analysis? ever?I always knew you were bad at mathI count one starting RB and two starting WRs.QB Tony Romo QB Jason CampbellRB "All Day" Adrian Peterson RB Daniel Thomas RB Mike Tolbert WR Reggie WayneWR Brandon Lloyd WR Chad OchocincoWR Steve Breaston TE Dustin Keller DST Philadelphia Eagles Loving my team, so far.
You are pretty new here, aren't youLOL, this LHucks kid is classic, all talk and zero knowledge.Hucks are there any good players in the league but the ones you draft? LMAO...also, do you ever provide anything other than rhetoric? Stats, fact based analysis? ever?I always knew you were bad at mathI count one starting RB and two starting WRs.QB Tony Romo QB Jason CampbellRB "All Day" Adrian Peterson RB Daniel Thomas RB Mike Tolbert WR Reggie WayneWR Brandon Lloyd WR Chad OchocincoWR Steve Breaston TE Dustin Keller DST Philadelphia Eagles Loving my team, so far.
Fairly, but not new to fantasy by any means.Am I off base, or on point? lolYou are pretty new here, aren't youLOL, this LHucks kid is classic, all talk and zero knowledge.Hucks are there any good players in the league but the ones you draft? LMAO...also, do you ever provide anything other than rhetoric? Stats, fact based analysis? ever?I always knew you were bad at mathI count one starting RB and two starting WRs.QB Tony Romo QB Jason CampbellRB "All Day" Adrian Peterson RB Daniel Thomas RB Mike Tolbert WR Reggie WayneWR Brandon Lloyd WR Chad OchocincoWR Steve Breaston TE Dustin Keller DST Philadelphia Eagles Loving my team, so far.
Come on dude, everyone knows Lhucks provides alot of good information. For example, if he picks a team to win, you instantly fade the pick and are in the money. If he calls a fantasy player a bust you instantly draft him. When he drafts a player in one of these leagues you know to add him to your do not draft list. Lhucks is pure gold.LOL, this LHucks kid is classic, all talk and zero knowledge.Hucks are there any good players in the league but the ones you draft? LMAO...also, do you ever provide anything other than rhetoric? Stats, fact based analysis? ever?I always knew you were bad at mathI count one starting RB and two starting WRs.QB Tony Romo QB Jason CampbellRB "All Day" Adrian Peterson RB Daniel Thomas RB Mike Tolbert WR Reggie WayneWR Brandon Lloyd WR Chad OchocincoWR Steve Breaston TE Dustin Keller DST Philadelphia Eagles Loving my team, so far.
Your right, thats beautiful information.Guess it makes what I've been saying about Schaub and Gore going into this year true...BUST!'BassNBrew said:Come on dude, everyone knows Lhucks provides alot of good information. For example, if he picks a team to win, you instantly fade the pick and are in the money. If he calls a fantasy player a bust you instantly draft him. When he drafts a player in one of these leagues you know to add him to your do not draft list. Lhucks is pure gold.'Football Critic said:LOL, this LHucks kid is classic, all talk and zero knowledge.Hucks are there any good players in the league but the ones you draft? LMAO...also, do you ever provide anything other than rhetoric? Stats, fact based analysis? ever?'Jason Wood said:I always knew you were bad at math'LHUCKS said:I count one starting RB and two starting WRs.'Jason Wood said:QB Tony Romo QB Jason CampbellRB "All Day" Adrian Peterson RB Daniel Thomas RB Mike Tolbert WR Reggie WayneWR Brandon Lloyd WR Chad OchocincoWR Steve Breaston TE Dustin Keller DST Philadelphia Eagles Loving my team, so far.
Gore will be a straight up BUST, he WILL get hurt AGAIN, I'm sure of it. I dont care of his ADP really, but yes my bust staement is based off his ADP.Schaub, has been a virtual bust for his ADP every year has he not? As he always under performs, and to under perform with the best WR in the league is unacceptable. He however can present a good season, and I hope he does. But now that LHucks owns him, he is sure to suck.Will Gore and Schaub be a bust at their lowest drafted positions in the SSL? What are you offering?
he was a steal two years ago.last year he slightly underperformed...due in part to injuries and to the emergence of FosterWhat else do you need educated on?Schaub, has been a virtual bust for his ADP every year has he not?
List the players that will get injured. 20 should do to revisit the Football Critic Injury Predictinator.I got Gore at RB11.Gore will be a straight up BUST, he WILL get hurt AGAIN, I'm sure of it. I dont care of his ADP really, but yes my bust staement is based off his ADP.Schaub, has been a virtual bust for his ADP every year has he not? As he always under performs, and to under perform with the best WR in the league is unacceptable. He however can present a good season, and I hope he does. But now that LHucks owns him, he is sure to suck.Will Gore and Schaub be a bust at their lowest drafted positions in the SSL? What are you offering?