Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Appreciate the feedback and input. But if you were shopping Sanders, what would you take for him if he was on your Bench? While I agree Sanders > Lockett when you consider his position of RB surplus and fact he is shopping RB's, it was not a horrible offer (IMO as I made it). He would be giving up a Bench player RB for a Starting WR1. The trade value of each is only an early-2nd apart, most rankings have them about Sanders #27 and Locket #39 and D Adams as Top 8 Overall.
I agree Adams should be able to get it done (and then some) but I wouldn't bother countering if you had sent me an offer with Lockett. I like him but I would not move him for Sanders.Birdie048 said:
I own Sanders in a few leagues as well. Lockett would be enough if you're adding mid 1st value on top. He's a depreciating asset. Good for highlights, super efficient, good WR2, but gets pushed down boards rather easily because they have a young stud WR looking like he's about to take over #1 duty and Lockett himself is soon to be 28 (at seasons start). Not that it's a bad thing, but I can see an owner shying away from trading for Lockett pretty easily due to the age difference between Sanders and Lockett. You keep your team younger and more valuable with a RB rather than an aged vet WR. In a year's time Lockett will be WR40 in startups at best, and Sanders at worst will be RB20.Birdie048 said:
I agree that sanders is not > adams. However I’m not a big Lockett guy so thats not close for me regardless of his perceived value. I also think that even when trading for need u should try to get full value. Having said that, going into this yr I think Cook is his only clear starter over sanders. So While I completely understand not wanting to give Adams for him, as a sanders owners there aren’t many wrs I would trade him for. I agree w u that Adams>Sanders but prbly think it is closer than u do. It’s all good I understand ur side n as a sanders owner was just trying to give the other side.Birdie048 said:
That's the worst trade you have ever been offered? OBJ is still generally viewed as a top 10 WR.
I can understand hoping for a return like this on someone like Beckham, but it’s not going to happen. He could easily have a randy moss type revival though.hunter1 said:
That’s not even close to horrible. I may even accept it - and I’m some one that just traded OBJ away. Those picks are far from sure things.hunter1 said:
Hooper finished 46th overall in average points in the league. He slotted between Chris Carson and Cooper Kupp, for perspective.
You know the scoring rules in your league better than me, but when I hear TE premium I would do trade 1.6 for Hooper in most TE premium leagues.
Yes well superflex te premium is different than “te premium” and would change value of the pick involved a lot, and I’d agree a little more with you, especially since he just went to Cleveland. So in that context, sure, it’s a light offer.
I see that essentially Godwin for J. Cook. Which is very bad.Boy I got a dandy just now. 12 team PPR dynasty.
Give: Godwin and 1.12
Get: Cook and 2021 1st
By the way, that's TE old fart Jared Cook, not the RB.
Exactly. I didn't write anything back, but like, seriously, even in a TE premium scoring where TEs get 20 points per catch, that ain't flying
Looks like we've got a Brady believer on our handsBoy I got a dandy just now. 12 team PPR dynasty.
Give: Godwin and 1.12
Get: Cook and 2021 1st
By the way, that's TE old fart Jared Cook, not the RB.
The Bucs could have signed Marsha Brady as their QB and Godwin is STILL worth more than Cook
It was a jokeThe Bucs could have signed Marsha Brady as their QB and Godwin is STILL worth more than Cook
That is offensiveBoy I got a dandy just now. 12 team PPR dynasty.
Give: Godwin and 1.12
Get: Cook and 2021 1st
By the way, that's TE old fart Jared Cook, not the RB.
I first read it as a 2020 3rd and thought the giver was getting screwed. But 2021? That's just a classic Roman soldier helmet with the old #### n balls.
That guy should lay off the Knob Creek when formulating offers.I just turned down Edelman and the 2.8 for 1.2.
What a missed opportunity you had thereI just turned down Edelman and the 2.8 for 1.2.
A better offer would have been 1.05 and 1.11 for Henry and the 3.03. Yes, that was a bad offer, but certainly not in the ball park of tar and feathering.
Agreed, far from the worst but imho pretty silly to want Henry and the 1.11 for the 1.5 and the thread needed bump anyway.
Yes it's terrible. A top 5 dynasty RB is worth way more than a 6 pick upgrade. Especially with the WR depth in this upcoming draft I don't see a ton of difference between 1.05 and 1.11.
Told them Henry was worth more than the 1.5 and it wasn't close enuf to offer a counter
What did you counter? Was it rejected?VolBoy said:
