Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
They are all smarter than you though. Dont have to be a genius to spot a tax and control scheme.
Awesome. You guys had nothing but the science says so card anyway. Science has been wrong on this since the 70s and you cant prove other wise
If you have some free time in the next 3 months, check out the autumn king tides in Florida (especially Oct 17), in places like Miami Beach, Ft. Lauderdale, Satellite Beach. Check out Norfolk & Charleston, SC. Days with so-called nuisance flooding have increased dramatically along the US east coast. In Miami, it appears that the rise in sea-level is accelerating.
I live in Florida man. Click on the second link and watch the 15 minute video in my hoax thread. Its by a real scientist not a politician.
May I present the scientist, Don Easterbrook:
I think Soylent Green had the right idea, just the wrong product.cstu said:
It doesn't matter.
Does it matter to a place like Miami if the sea levels only rise 6 feet instead of 10?
Actually that does matter. The cost of mitigation changes drastically depending on how severe the change is. We're all on the hook to pay for it. Until we figure out how to un-externalize the cost of ecological damage caused by the products and services we buy, the whole population pays (either through taxes spent on mitigation, or just plain suffering a deteriorating environment if nothing is done).
It may be too late to prevent any warming, but that doesn't follow that we cannot do anything about the catastrophic scenarios currently projected
What a stupid article. They're comparing different maps showing different measurements based on different data sets. What kind of idiots get taken in by the junk this site puts out? Go look at the data sets involved in these analyses and see how those results are generated. Here's the methodology of the Land & Ocean Temperature Percentiles maps. Then they compare surface land/water temperature measurements against upper air temperature measurements (that TLT map) to try and make a point. What a joke.
You have it backwards.
And what about the 99% of climate scientists worldwide who believe climate change is real?
I know it's tempting because it's soooo idiotic, but you're wasting air and probably doing harm. Been a strategy a long time to do more than counter liberal positions & establish the eminence of their own and go directly after the most obviously incontrovertible issues (environment, tolerance) on which the left are the no-doubt good guys, with their truthiness. The laughable part is that these boardsters are shilling for people who couldnt care less about them in order to be part of the same club as the superrich to feel better about themselves. The wasteful part is that they got you leaning in with the outrageousness of their claims. The harmful part is that the talky right have so many people distracted by countering nonsense on these issues and grouping everyone who disagrees with them with the ugly Old Left (educators, unions) that many centrists and liberals spend so much time on the defensive they haven't the energy to coordinate with each other on strengths. Explaining anything to them is the equivalent to reciting the rulebook of a sport to a child who wants no more than to whifflebat your nuts.Skoo said:
It's not 99%.Skoo said:
What's is your point?Remember, Sand swears up and down that Jeff B Sessions isn't a racist because he had wonderful conversations with him. He's like bueno, jr. You aren't changing minds here, but if you want to play debate club, I'll get out of your way.
