Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Fantasyfollow1

Offered Adrian Peterson for A.J. Green

8 posts in this topic

I have been offered Adrian Peterson (Minnesota) for A.J. Green. My league type, starting req's as well as my team and his are below. He is in a rebuild and so he only wants young players or picks. I only have picks 4.8, 4.10 and 5.10 left in this years draft. One thought is maybe I don't need Peterson with the backs I have. The other part of me wants to go after Peterson if I have the chance. I would be willing to offer possibly Ingram/S. Rice as a shot, but not much more. Thoughts?

10 team PPR dynasty. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 RB/WR, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB/WR/TE, 1 DEF, 1K

My team:

QB: Rodgers, Flacco

RB: CJ2K, Lynch, J. Stew, M. Ingram, C.J. Spiller, K. Hunter, B. Powell,

WR: A.J. Green, J. Jones, W. Welker, M. Austin, S. Rice, E. Decker, R. Cobb, D. Nelson, R. Moss, A. Roberts, B. Lafell

TE: A. Hernandez, K. Rudolph, M. Bennett,

DEF: Pittsburgh

K: A. Henery

His Team:

QB: S. Bradford, M. Flynn, K. Kolb, T. Jackson

RB: AP, F. Jones, D. Thomas, K. Moreno, J. Starks, B. Scott,

WR: G. jennings, D. Bryant, D. Thomas, Tampa Mike, M. Crabtree, E. Sanders, V. Brown, D. Hester, J. Gaffney

TE: D. Keller, J. Cook, H. Miller

DEF: Patriots, Redskins

K: D. Carpenter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a 10 team start one RB PPR, I like AJ Green better. For Ingram/Rice though sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

No I am not even considering that. so you think it makes my team better. I am giving up a young talent in Ingram if I were to make this offer to add an older talent who may have 1-2 good years left. Could be buying very low on him as well though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

No I am not even considering that. so you think it makes my team better. I am giving up a young talent in Ingram if I were to make this offer to add an older talent who may have 1-2 good years left. Could be buying very low on him as well though.
You can afford it. I might try Ingram even up first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

No I am not even considering that. so you think it makes my team better. I am giving up a young talent in Ingram if I were to make this offer to add an older talent who may have 1-2 good years left. Could be buying very low on him as well though.
You can afford it. I might try Ingram even up first.
O.K. offered Ingram/Rice. Ingram alone I think is too low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good lord, it is hard to gauge value with such short starting requirements. I'd do Ingram for Peterson if I was you in a heartbeat, with those starting requirements Ingram may never be startable.

Personally, I think you should be packaging up to go after Calvin, Rice, McCoy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good lord, it is hard to gauge value with such short starting requirements. I'd do Ingram for Peterson if I was you in a heartbeat, with those starting requirements Ingram may never be startable.Personally, I think you should be packaging up to go after Calvin, Rice, McCoy.

I am confused. We can start as many few as 1 RB or as many as 3. We can start as few as 2 Wr's or as many as 4, and as few as 1 TE or as many as 2. Quite a bit of flexibility depending on how your team is composed. I don't get how the requirements are "short". Can someone explain to me, maybe I am not getting it. I think if Ingram improves he could start as a RB 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.