He had 2 catches for 65 yards when I posted that. Even in a non-PPR, I'm trying to figure out how he only had 4 points in your league.I am not trying to be critical of you RN, you are a rock (love ya man), but I never understood why people post scoring relative to their leagues instead of simply putting in a stat line. For example he has 4 points in my league, it's a nice start to his day but nothing spectacular and it is completely irrelevant to anyone else's league.Dude is a monster. Halfway through the 1st Q, he's got 8.5 points without scoring a TD.
That's a full game of production for some other good WRs.
5 for 110 & a TD now. My goodness this guy is unstoppable.He had 2 catches for 65 yards when I posted that. Even in a non-PPR, I'm trying to figure out how he only had 4 points in your league.I am not trying to be critical of you RN, you are a rock (love ya man), but I never understood why people post scoring relative to their leagues instead of simply putting in a stat line. For example he has 4 points in my league, it's a nice start to his day but nothing spectacular and it is completely irrelevant to anyone else's league.Dude is a monster. Halfway through the 1st Q, he's got 8.5 points without scoring a TD.
That's a full game of production for some other good WRs.
Update: early 2nd Q. 4 catches, 90 yards.
Non-PPR and 1 pt for every 15 yards receiving.He had 2 catches for 65 yards when I posted that. Even in a non-PPR, I'm trying to figure out how he only had 4 points in your league.I am not trying to be critical of you RN, you are a rock (love ya man), but I never understood why people post scoring relative to their leagues instead of simply putting in a stat line. For example he has 4 points in my league, it's a nice start to his day but nothing spectacular and it is completely irrelevant to anyone else's league.Dude is a monster. Halfway through the 1st Q, he's got 8.5 points without scoring a TD.
That's a full game of production for some other good WRs.
Update: early 2nd Q. 4 catches, 90 yards.
I know, RIGHT?!?!If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.
And would probably say no.
To each their own. I find PPR too easy to get points. I think standard is more challenging.P.S. Tell your leaguemates to climb into this century. Non-PPR is dumb.
i traded this guy away weeks ago WITH stacy for aj green. Shoot meIf someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
Agreed, a 1 yard reception shouldn't generate points. Maybe 1 point per first down catch/run, then I could see some value in that 1 yard reception.To each their own. I find PPR too easy to get points. I think standard is more challenging.P.S. Tell your leaguemates to climb into this century. Non-PPR is dumb.
1 catch, 45 yards, TD = 10.5 points in a non-PPRTo each their own. I find PPR too easy to get points. I think standard is more challenging.P.S. Tell your leaguemates to climb into this century. Non-PPR is dumb.
What about next year? Where would he rank among WRs in a redraft next year?If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
I tend to agree, although I play in both formats. There's also a reason why it's called standard.To each their own. I find PPR too easy to get points. I think standard is more challenging.P.S. Tell your leaguemates to climb into this century. Non-PPR is dumb.
Top-3, I would think. As long as he doesn't sabotage his career.What about next year? Where would he rank among WRs in a redraft next year?If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
It should be called archaic.I tend to agree, although I play in both formats. There's also a reason why it's called standard.To each their own. I find PPR too easy to get points. I think standard is more challenging.P.S. Tell your leaguemates to climb into this century. Non-PPR is dumb.
Well, that's just like you're opinion...man.It should be called archaic.I tend to agree, although I play in both formats. There's also a reason why it's called standard.To each their own. I find PPR too easy to get points. I think standard is more challenging.P.S. Tell your leaguemates to climb into this century. Non-PPR is dumb.
It's 10.5 points in your non-PPR, which illustrates my point that posting points relative to any individual league is meaningless. Stat lines are much more appropriate.1 catch, 45 yards, TD = 10.5 points in a non-PPRTo each their own. I find PPR too easy to get points. I think standard is more challenging.P.S. Tell your leaguemates to climb into this century. Non-PPR is dumb.
6 catches, 45 yards, 0 TD = 10.5 points in a PPR
PPR rewards receivers who are more integral to the game plan, as opposed to a WR who perhaps got lucky for one play.
Third after Calvin and Dez? Ahead of Julio, AJ, Marshall, and others?Top-3, I would think. As long as he doesn't sabotage his career.What about next year? Where would he rank among WRs in a redraft next year?If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
Impossible to give a definitive answer to this on December 1. We need to see how the offseason/personnel stuff goes.Third after Calvin and Dez? Ahead of Julio, AJ, Marshall, and others?Top-3, I would think. As long as he doesn't sabotage his career.What about next year? Where would he rank among WRs in a redraft next year?If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
Agreed but he is absolutely in the conversation with those guys.Impossible to give a definitive answer to this on December 1. We need to see how the offseason/personnel stuff goes.Third after Calvin and Dez? Ahead of Julio, AJ, Marshall, and others?Top-3, I would think. As long as he doesn't sabotage his career.What about next year? Where would he rank among WRs in a redraft next year?If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
Talent-wise, sure. Just WAY too early to slot him for next season.Agreed but he is absolutely in the conversation with those guys.Impossible to give a definitive answer to this on December 1. We need to see how the offseason/personnel stuff goes.Third after Calvin and Dez? Ahead of Julio, AJ, Marshall, and others?Top-3, I would think. As long as he doesn't sabotage his career.What about next year? Where would he rank among WRs in a redraft next year?If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
I go:Third after Calvin and Dez? Ahead of Julio, AJ, Marshall, and others?Top-3, I would think. As long as he doesn't sabotage his career.What about next year? Where would he rank among WRs in a redraft next year?If someone offered me Calvin in exchange for Gordon for ROS, I would have to think hard about it.And would probably say no.
Hey watch out, you're gonna give that little yellow guy a concussion.When I hear concussion the week before the fantasy playoffs begin, it resonates just like "ACL tear."
Ya...good luck with thatCool. I need him....going up against A.Jeffery.He's back!
ThanksYa...good luck with thatCool. I need him....going up against A.Jeffery.He's back!
DUDE...u may just pull it off...wow...im rooting for youThanksYa...good luck with thatCool. I need him....going up against A.Jeffery.He's back!